Presentation given by Marco Hogewoning at CITC IPv6 Forum in Jeddah

1. Obstacles in IPv6
Deployment
Marco Hogewoning
RIPE NCC

2. Agenda
• Current state of affairs
• Observations
• What are the RIPE NCC and MENOG doing?
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 2

3. Statistics

4. IPv6 RIPEness
• Rating system designed to monitor progress in
the deployment of IPv6
• Four “stars” to earn, based on the level of
deployment:
– First star for getting an IPv6 allocation
– Subsequent stars awarded for visibility, route objects
and reverse DNS
• Only lists RIPE NCC members
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 4

5. Total Membership (7711 LIRs)
1 star
13%
2 stars
5%
3 stars
No IPv6 10%
55%
4 stars
16%
(1 September 2011)
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 5

6. Middle East Region (September 2010)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
AE BH IQ IR JO KW LB OM PS QA SA SY TR YE
(13) (23) (14) (84) (33) (31) (27) (4) (10) (6) (60) (11) (110) (2)
No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 6

7. Middle East Region (September 2011)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
AE BH IQ IR JO KW LB OM PS QA SA SY TR YE
(19) (24) (22) (104) (35) (32) (29) (5) (17) (6) (61) (13) (126) (2)
No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 7

8. At Least 1 Star
100
80
60
40
20
0
All AE BH IQ IR JO KW LB OM PS QA SA SY TR YE
LIRs (19) (24) (22) (104) (35) (32) (29) (5) (17) (6) (61) (13) (126) (2)
Percentage of LIRs with at least 1 star
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 8

9. Changes Between 2010 and 2011
30
24
18
12
6
0
AE BH IQ IR JO KW LB OM PS QA SA SY TR YE
(19) (24) (22) (104) (35) (32) (29) (5) (17) (6) (61) (13) (126) (2)
LIRs that changed to at least 1 star RIPEness
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 9

10. Relative Changes (2010 - 2011)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Average AE BH IQ IR JO KW LB OM PS QA SA SY TR YE
on all LIRs (19) (24) (22) (104) (35) (32) (29) (5) (17) (6) (61) (13) (126) (2)
Percentage of LIRs that changed from 0 stars since September 2010
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 10

11. Conclusions
• Keep in mind sample size is relatively small
• 32.5% of the LIRs from this region have at least
an IPv6 Allocation
• 16% is beyond that point and has at least 2 stars
• For the full membership these numbers are 45
and 31.3 percent
• Growth is roughly the same
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 11

12. Observations

13. Feedback From Training Courses
• The RIPE NCC IPv6 course contains an exercise
about “IPv6 deployment challenges”
• Often heard arguments are:
– Lack of general knowledge about IPv6
– Legacy hardware and software
– Support by transit or upstream carrier
– Content vs eyeballs
– Accounting and billing
– Security concerns
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 13

14. RIPE Working Groups
• Policy restrictions have been raised
– Multihoming in IPv6
– Allocation size and additional allocations
• Addressing plan troubles
– How much do you assign to an End User?
– Static or dynamic assignments to residential user?
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 14

15. Other Sources
• Specific needs regarding security, such as user
separation in FTTx environments
• Performance issues and bugs
• Customer experience during transitioning
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 15

16. Obstacles

17. The biggest challenge in
transitioning to IPv6 is
non-technical

18. Lack Of Experience and Knowledge
• For many people, IPv6 is a theoretical solution to
a theoretical problem
• You can explain the most likely scenarios, but
everyone's situation and business case is
different
• Expertise can only come from hands-on
experience
• To be successful with IPv6, you need to work
with IPv6
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 18

19. What Are We Doing

20. Promotion of IPv6
• Publications, presentations and press releases
regarding the depletion of the IPv4 free pool
• Dedicated platforms like IPv6actnow.org
• Social media such as twitter
• World IPv6 Day
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 20

21. Guidance On Purchasing
• Publications on IPv6 capable customer premises
equipments (CPE)
• Ripe-501 document on IPv6 requirements in
tenders
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 21

22. Training and Education
• “IPv6 for LIRs” training course
• IPv6 Roadshow together with MENOG
• E-learning
• Publications
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 22

23. Training Locations in 2010/2011
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 23

24. Effects of training
IPv6 deployment indicators (2008-now) in country: PS
25 %
%ASes
%LIRs
20 %
15 %
10 %
5%
0%
IP
M -CO
W OG RS
EN U
O -R E
V6
R
LD OA
-IP DS
v6 H
-D OW
AY
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 24

25. Effects of training
IPv6 deployment indicators (2008-now) in country: GE
16 %
%ASes
%LIRs
14 %
12 %
10 %
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
IP
W
O
V6
R
-
LD
C
O
-IP
U
R
v6
SE
-D
AY
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 25

26. Providing a Platform
• The RIPE NCC and MENOG provide a platform
to exchange experiences and ideas
• Although every network is different, the building
blocks are usually the same
• You are not the only one facing the challenges of
deploying IPv6
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 26

27. Future Developments
• Dedicated staff focusing on Middle East and
Central Asia, working from Dubai
• Full rewrite of the IPv6 Roadshow training
material
• RIPE NCC training courses continue to develop,
with more focus on practical tasks
• And much more...
Marco Hogewoning, October 2011 27

28. How can we
help you?