A Smarter Way to Research: Using Emerging Technologies such as Mendeley, Google Scholar Profile, and Publish or Perish to Improve our Scholarship
•Als KEY, PDF herunterladen•
5 gefällt mir•1,030 views
Web 2.0 technologies have grown increasingly popular and useful for many aspects of personal and professional life. Following this trend, new Internet technologies are emerging that provide many benefits to academic researchers, including assistance in finding research articles around particular topics; identifying colleagues for potential collaboration; disseminating and promoting one's own research; and developing a clearer understanding of which studies, journals, and scholars have had the most impact in a particular field. In this workshop, presented at AECT 2012 in Louisville, KY, I introduced three Internet technologies that can assist scholars and readers of scholarship: Mendeley, Google Scholar Profile, and, to a lesser degree, Publish or Perish. Mendeley. Mendeley, a free open-source tool, seeks to meet basic citation management needs in a similar way as Endnote, Refworks, and Zotero, while at the same time building a robust scholarly social network using a model based on Last.fm (Henning & Reichelt, 2008; Hoyt, Reichelt & Henning, 2009). Mendeley consists of two main programs: a desktop citation and PDF manager and an online companion that can also manage citations while sharing user-defined pieces of information about one's research with others (Zaugg, West, Tateishi, & Randall, 2011). Mendeley focuses on researchers' libraries instead of on the researchers themselves so networks can be formed around strands of research and specific articles. This may help researchers begin conversations and collaboration with others interested in the same research. Google Scholar Profile. Google Scholar has a new “my citations” feature that allows researchers to set up their own profile and identify which citations in the Google Scholar system are their own. This profile and list of citations combines to create an attractive online presence and portfolio. Perhaps most importantly, Google Scholar provides the citation counts for specific articles listed on the author’s profile, as well as overall impact statistics, allowing others to quickly see which of the author’s articles have been viewed as potentially most important. Finally, Google Scholar enables authors to list co-authors, creating a network of collaboration that can be useful in studying a specific research topic. References Henning, V. & Reichelt J. (2008) Mendeley – A last.fm for research? 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, 1-2. Hoyt, J. J., Reichelt, J., & Henning, V. (2009) Building successful online research networks with the last.fm model, Proceedings of the 5th Open Knowledge Conference, 1-2. Zaugg, H.; West, R. E.; Randall, D.; Tateishi, I. (2011). Creating communities of scholarly inquiry through participation in an online social network. TechTrends. 55(1): 32-36.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Mehr von Rick West
Mehr von Rick West (7)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
A Smarter Way to Research: Using Emerging Technologies such as Mendeley, Google Scholar Profile, and Publish or Perish to Improve our Scholarship
- 1. Technologies & Research Richard West • 2012
- 2. A little like this ... rickwest@byu.edu
- 3. Orientation This workshop will focus on: • Over-arching principles related to finding, sharing/disseminating, and evaluating scholarship • Comparison of citation management tools • Hands-on with Mendeley, Google Scholar, and Publish or Perish rickwest@byu.edu
- 4. Proposed Outline • Discussion: Scholarship Finding • Workshop: EBSCO Thesaurus, Tic Tocs • Discussion: Scholarship Sharing • Workshop: Mendeley • Discussion: Scholarship Evaluation • Workshop: Google Scholar/P or P rickwest@byu.edu
- 6. How is the literature search going?
- 7. A Knowledge Management Shift Or Some rights reserved (Att) by Mykl Roventine Some rights reserved (Att/NP) by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center Puzzles Mysteries? rickwest@byu.edu
- 10. How did we search for Scholarship in a “puzzle” paradigm? rickwest@byu.edu
- 17. Recommendation Systems rickwest@byu.edu
- 19. Why Share? • PhD scooped comic rickwest@byu.edu
- 20. Why Share? • PhD scooped comic rickwest@byu.edu
- 21. Why Share? • To increase your personal publicity and impact • To contribute to a collective creativity that you can then draw on yourself • Because we are scholars & teachers ... that’s what we do! • Because the public has funded our research rickwest@byu.edu
- 22. Scholar’s Repository • You have the right, typically, to share the “pre-pubs” or your research • You have the right, typically, to share your data excerpts online in a blog/website rickwest@byu.edu
- 23. Your Online Reputation Academics need to be intentional about how, when, and what shows up when someone uses a search engine. • If Google cannot find a faculty scholar's work, then it is essentially irrelevant — even nonexistent. • Building a web presence is more than simply having a website and can make the difference in an academic's visibility. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/intentional-web-presence-10-seo- strategies-every-academic-needs-know rickwest@byu.edu
- 24. Key Principles • Make it easy for people to find you, cite you, and read you • Make it easy to keep updated! rickwest@byu.edu
- 25. Abstracts & Keywords We can do better!
- 26. We may have to be OK with “open”
- 27. We may have to be OK with “open”
- 29. First, a word about Citation Management Tools rickwest@byu.edu
- 30. Questions To Consider • Do you mostly work with your references online or offline? • Do you work on multiple computers or one? • Do you need to share references with collaborators? (what platforms? • Are your sources usually online or offline? (library stacks, databases, Google Scholar, websites)? • Do you use or need advanced features? • Do you use Word or something else (Open Office, Google Docs?) • What is your budget? • Will you need to retain your references after graduation? rickwest@byu.edu
- 31. Comparison Learning Curve Functionality Endnote/Mendeley bes rd t to t o ha Endnote wo easy rst Refworks/Mendeley Refworks Zotero Zotero Large Library Management Collaboration Mendeley bes best t to Endnote to w orst wo rst Refworks Zotero Mendeley Refworks Zotero Endnote rickwest@byu.edu
- 32. Comparison Database Integration Website Scraping bes b es t to Zotero t to wo Refworks/Endnote wo rst rst Mendeley Zotero Refworks Mendeley Endnote Multiple Computers Document Bibliographies Refworks best Word (E, M, R, Z) to w orst Mendeley Open Office (E, M, Z) Zotero Google Docs (?) Endnote Pages (E, Sente) rickwest@byu.edu
- 35. + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 36. + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 37. + + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 38. + + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 39. + + + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 40. + + + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 41. + + + = rickwest@byu.edu
- 42. Mendeley: Step 1 Download the desktop client rickwest@byu.edu
- 43. Organize into Collections Tip: consider making collections around topics, and then also collections for specific research projects rickwest@byu.edu
- 44. Step 2 Create your Online Account Tip: Fill out your profile to increase networking possibilities. Upload your articles to the “my publications” collection for an online vita. rickwest@byu.edu
- 45. Step 3 Install the Web Importer - http://www.mendeley.com/import/ Tip: works in all major browsers, including Chrome! rickwest@byu.edu
- 46. Step 4 Find Articles 1. Import when on the web 2. Export if needed to Refworks/Zotero (Refworks XML format), then import 3. Drag PDFs into the desktop program or 4. Download PDFs to a “watched” folder 5. Search among the 45 million+ citations contributed by Mendeley users. rickwest@byu.edu
- 47. Tip: tag your articles here to save time later. rickwest@byu.edu
- 48. Step 5 Organize your PDFs Tip: Don’t organize by titles, as they’re too long. Choose authors or journals or years. rickwest@byu.edu
- 49. Step 6: Start Annotating Tip: If you can’t highlight, OCR the document in Acrobat Pro and then open in Mendeley. Use tagging liberally to organize citations into piles that can become sections in your literature review. rickwest@byu.edu
- 51. Step 7 Insert into papers (Word, Google, OpenOffice, etc.) Copy a citation in Mendeley, paste into word processor, or install the Mendeley plugin for Word or Open Office. Tip: Use the plug-in if you like stopping your work flow to fix problems. I think copy and paste works better, pretty much for all citation managers. rickwest@byu.edu
- 52. Step 8: Create Groups Private = pdfs + notes Public = citations Tip: become contacts first, groupies second rickwest@byu.edu
- 53. Mendeley as a Journal rickwest@byu.edu
- 55. Mendeley as an Online DIscussion Image from class this year rickwest@byu.edu
- 56. Mendeley as a class “Back Channel” rickwest@byu.edu
- 57. Step 9: Sync Tip: Don’t rely on synching as a backup mechanism. Backup regularly under the help menu. rickwest@byu.edu
- 58. Step 10: iPad/iPhone “You can’t edit any of the metadata for your papers, but don’t worry, we will be releasing a full version of Mendeley for iPhone in the near future” - Mendeley’s blog rickwest@byu.edu
- 59. For More Info Zaugg, B. H., West, R. E., Tateishi, I., & Randall, D. L. (2011). Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration. TechTrends, 55(1), 32-36. doi: 10.1007/ s11528-011-0467-y. rickwest@byu.edu
- 63. The Old(?) Paradigm • Over-reliance on quantity over quality • Over-reliance on one statistic (AR or IF) • What challenges does this raise? rickwest@byu.edu
- 64. Be Wary!
- 65. The Problem with Impact Factors • 75% of education journals are missing from ISI • Doesn’t consider books, presentations, and other scholarship • Considers journal impact as a substitute for article/ scholar impact rickwest@byu.edu
- 66. It feels a bit like this ... rickwest@byu.edu
- 68. Challenges with Acceptance Rates • Difficult to find updated information • Does the journal count resubmissions as new submissions? • What level of quality articles does the journal receive? • International influx • Desk rejects can be quite high, and contribute to the AR • Quality of peer reviewers • Reviewers often disagree rickwest@byu.edu
- 69. ETR&D (2008) Submit to editor (inform them it’s unpublished, and not Blind Review (3-6 Minor Resubmit Accept Reject Seek New Journal 7/11 32/7 0/3 119/5 Agreement In Press (Edit proofs; fix All - 29% grammar/APA errors; sign 2 = 39% none=32%
- 70. Possible Solution • Multi-faceted, wholistic evaluation of scholarship based on multiple pieces of evidence tied to core scholarship goals rickwest@byu.edu
- 72. R.I.P. • Rigor rickwest@byu.edu
- 73. R.I.P. • Rigor • Critical review based on stringent standards rickwest@byu.edu
- 74. R.I.P. • Rigor • Critical review based on stringent standards • Impact rickwest@byu.edu
- 75. R.I.P. • Rigor • Critical review based on stringent standards • Impact • How valid/useful is the research for others? Does it effect change? rickwest@byu.edu
- 76. R.I.P. • Rigor • Critical review based on stringent standards • Impact • How valid/useful is the research for others? Does it effect change? • Prestige rickwest@byu.edu
- 77. R.I.P. • Rigor • Critical review based on stringent standards • Impact • How valid/useful is the research for others? Does it effect change? • Prestige • Trust judgment, a qualitative judgment about the importance in a field, the “gut check” rickwest@byu.edu
- 79. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) rickwest@byu.edu
- 80. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) • AR, blind review, judgment of quality, good editor rickwest@byu.edu
- 81. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) • AR, blind review, judgment of quality, good editor • Impact (ISI/Publish or Perish/Google Scholar) rickwest@byu.edu
- 82. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) • AR, blind review, judgment of quality, good editor • Impact (ISI/Publish or Perish/Google Scholar) • Impact factors, circulation, publisher, sponsoring agency, readership/download numbers, book sales, impact on practitioners? rickwest@byu.edu
- 83. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) • AR, blind review, judgment of quality, good editor • Impact (ISI/Publish or Perish/Google Scholar) • Impact factors, circulation, publisher, sponsoring agency, readership/download numbers, book sales, impact on practitioners? • Prestige (Studies, respected peers) rickwest@byu.edu
- 84. R.I.P. • Rigor (Cabell’s, journal website) • AR, blind review, judgment of quality, good editor • Impact (ISI/Publish or Perish/Google Scholar) • Impact factors, circulation, publisher, sponsoring agency, readership/download numbers, book sales, impact on practitioners? • Prestige (Studies, respected peers) • Editor, sponsoring agency, survey research, “you just know” rickwest@byu.edu
- 86. R.I.P. Technologies • What technologies could provide useful data for evaluating: rickwest@byu.edu
- 87. R.I.P. Technologies • What technologies could provide useful data for evaluating: • Rigor rickwest@byu.edu
- 88. R.I.P. Technologies • What technologies could provide useful data for evaluating: • Rigor • Impact rickwest@byu.edu
- 89. R.I.P. Technologies • What technologies could provide useful data for evaluating: • Rigor • Impact • Prestige? rickwest@byu.edu
- 91. R.I.P. Technologies Rigor rickwest@byu.edu
- 92. R.I.P. Technologies Rigor • Open, public review rickwest@byu.edu
- 93. R.I.P. Technologies Rigor • Open, public review • PaperCritic (using Mendeley’s API) allows users to comment and rate articles based on criteria rickwest@byu.edu
- 94. R.I.P. Technologies Rigor • Open, public review • PaperCritic (using Mendeley’s API) allows users to comment and rate articles based on criteria • Open research journals and data sets, saved in the cloud to avoid relying on “fragments of transcript that evidence the author’s analytic claims” rickwest@byu.edu
- 95. R.I.P. Technologies Rigor • Open, public review • PaperCritic (using Mendeley’s API) allows users to comment and rate articles based on criteria • Open research journals and data sets, saved in the cloud to avoid relying on “fragments of transcript that evidence the author’s analytic claims” • Additional data sources for “thick description” rickwest@byu.edu
- 98. R.I.P. Technologies Impact rickwest@byu.edu
- 99. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) rickwest@byu.edu
- 100. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) rickwest@byu.edu
- 101. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) • “Saved” citation statistics (Mendeley) rickwest@byu.edu
- 102. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) • “Saved” citation statistics (Mendeley) • Ping-backs rickwest@byu.edu
- 103. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) • “Saved” citation statistics (Mendeley) • Ping-backs • Personal citation metrics (Google Scholar) rickwest@byu.edu
- 104. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) • “Saved” citation statistics (Mendeley) • Ping-backs • Personal citation metrics (Google Scholar) • Publish or Perish by Harzing rickwest@byu.edu
- 105. R.I.P. Technologies Impact • Search statistics (Academia.edu) • Downloaded statistics (web analytics) • “Saved” citation statistics (Mendeley) • Ping-backs • Personal citation metrics (Google Scholar) • Publish or Perish by Harzing • What about impact on practitioners? rickwest@byu.edu
- 107. R.I.P. Technologies Prestige rickwest@byu.edu
- 108. R.I.P. Technologies Prestige • “Liking” and “following” rickwest@byu.edu
- 109. R.I.P. Technologies Prestige • “Liking” and “following” • “Authority” measuring within networks rickwest@byu.edu
- 110. R.I.P. Technologies Prestige • “Liking” and “following” • “Authority” measuring within networks • Transparency can increase confidence rickwest@byu.edu
- 111. R.I.P. Technologies Prestige • “Liking” and “following” • “Authority” measuring within networks • Transparency can increase confidence • Surveys to “measure the pulse” rickwest@byu.edu
- 114. FWIW West, R. E. & Rich, P. J. (2013). Rigor, impact, and prestige: A proposed framework for evaluating scholarly publications. Innovative Higher Education, 38(1). rickwest@byu.edu
- 115. FWIW West, R. E. & Rich, P. J. (2013). Rigor, impact, and prestige: A proposed framework for evaluating scholarly publications. Innovative Higher Education, 38(1). rickwest@byu.edu
- 116. FWIW West, R. E. & Rich, P. J. (2013). Rigor, impact, and prestige: A proposed framework for evaluating scholarly publications. Innovative Higher Education, 38(1). Rich, P. J. & West, R. E. (2012). New technologies, new approaches to evaluating academic productivity. To be published in Educational Technology. rickwest@byu.edu
- 117. Maybe ...
- 118. Google Scholar “often the spark of discovery comes from making a new connection or looking in a direction that you hadn’t yet considered.” rickwest@byu.edu
- 128. Google Scholar Log in, find pdfs rickwest@byu.edu
- 131. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? rickwest@byu.edu
- 132. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? • Are citations fairly even? (e.g. BJET) rickwest@byu.edu
- 133. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? • Are citations fairly even? (e.g. BJET) • Can things be cited well in this journal? (e.g. IRRODL) rickwest@byu.edu
- 134. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? • Are citations fairly even? (e.g. BJET) • Can things be cited well in this journal? (e.g. IRRODL) • What kinds of papers does this community seem to appreciate? (i.e. IHE: Rovai/Garrison) rickwest@byu.edu
- 135. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? • Are citations fairly even? (e.g. BJET) • Can things be cited well in this journal? (e.g. IRRODL) • What kinds of papers does this community seem to appreciate? (i.e. IHE: Rovai/Garrison) • What key articles should I (or my students) be aware of? rickwest@byu.edu
- 136. Journal Citations • Why could it be useful to know citation patterns for a journal? • Are citations fairly even? (e.g. BJET) • Can things be cited well in this journal? (e.g. IRRODL) • What kinds of papers does this community seem to appreciate? (i.e. IHE: Rovai/Garrison) • What key articles should I (or my students) be aware of? • How well cited are my articles (e.g. TechTrends article) rickwest@byu.edu
- 137. Targeting Journals: Know your Audience
- 138. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 139. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 140. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 142. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 143. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 144. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 145. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 146. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 147. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 148. Google Scholar • image of Google Scholar rickwest@byu.edu
- 149. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 150. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 151. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 152. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 153. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 154. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 155. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 156. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 157. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 158. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 159. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 160. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 161. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 162. Google Profile http://scholar.google.com/intl/ en/scholar/citations.html rickwest@byu.edu
- 166. P. or P. Process • Search for journal titles • Clean up duplicates and spurious articles • Sort to see top-cited • New information: Cites/paper & additional indices rickwest@byu.edu
- 167. Are we on the tip of something big? rickwest@byu.edu
- 168. Thank You! http://richardewest.com Twitter: @richardewest mendeley.com/profiles/richard-west1 Google Profile: http://goo.gl/jJqOn rickwest@byu.edu
Hinweis der Redaktion
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- Show Mendeley’s public collections feature, where you can follow some else’s collection of articles. Also show the recommender features in Mendeley. Briefly show the GS alerts feature.\n
- Show Mendeley’s public collections feature, where you can follow some else’s collection of articles. Also show the recommender features in Mendeley. Briefly show the GS alerts feature.\n
- Show Mendeley’s public collections feature, where you can follow some else’s collection of articles. Also show the recommender features in Mendeley. Briefly show the GS alerts feature.\n
- Show Mendeley’s public collections feature, where you can follow some else’s collection of articles. Also show the recommender features in Mendeley. Briefly show the GS alerts feature.\n
- Show Mendeley’s public collections feature, where you can follow some else’s collection of articles. Also show the recommender features in Mendeley. Briefly show the GS alerts feature.\n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- i.How can you use this to promote your own scholarship? (do you have a paper that is particularly well cited for its journal?). My example: I published in TechTrends. BUT it’s the 6th top-cited article since 2006 with 42 citations. Can I make a case that this particular article is high quality, but published where it was for good reason (the audience)? \n\n
- \nAsk: Why do you think that journal is good? What evidence do you have? Suggest as they read journals, that they start keeping a spreadsheet of different journals they may consider publishing in some day.\n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- New ways of having computers help us find, share, disseminate, and evaluate the quality of research. This can only lead to good things.\n
- \n