This document provides an overview of WebTrends Ad Director, an automated system for optimizing pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns. It discusses the problems with traditional rule-based bid management tools and outlines how WebTrends Ad Director uses statistical modeling and machine learning to optimize bids across many campaign elements. Case studies show the system increased revenues and conversions for customers while reducing costs compared to manual optimization. The document argues SEM managers should focus on strategic functions while letting automated systems optimize routine tasks.
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
An Introduction to Webtrends Ad Director
1. PPC Optimization – An Introduction to
WebTrends Ad Director
Barry Parshall
Vice President, Product Strategy
+1 (503) 553-2741
Barry.parshall@webtrends.com
2. Agenda
• Automated systems – a brief history lesson
• Demystify algorithmic solutions
– The problems with bid management
– The mathematics of WebTrends Ad Director
• The WebTrends Ad Director solution
• Case studies
• Digital marketing maturity
– Multi-touch attribution
– Leveraging web analytics data
• Questions and discussion
3. Historical Examples of Automation
• Credit card fraud costs the credit industry
billions of dollars every year
– Since the introduction of automated fraud detection
in 1992, fraud has been reduced by 70%
• Human-powered switchboards
replaced by automated routing
systems
– Today, billions of communication
connections are made possible by
mathematically-based systems
4. Historical Examples of Automation
• In 1997, an IBM chess program and computer beat the reigning
chess master in a 6-game match
– Today, no one can beat a properly
designed chess program running on
modern computing technology
• In 2008, $4.5B in paid search advertising was lost to manual
processes and bid management tools
– Over $5B will be wasted in 2009
5. Barriers to PPC Optimization
Failure to leverage data and statistical models
•
Failure to leverage computing power
•
Failure to apply human insight towards strategic functions
•
Failure to optimize SEM holistically
•
• Bid management tools contribute to all of these problems
6. Problems with Bid Management
1. Bid rules do not optimize all campaign elements
Is the right ad being used?
–
Is the right landing page being used?
–
Is the right match type being used?
–
Are the right geo-targets being used?
–
7. Testing and Optimizing Campaign Elements
20 ad creatives
x 5 landing pages
x 3 match types
x 5 positions
x 24 hours in a day
x 3 search engines
x 10,000+ geo-targets
= 1,000,000,000+ combinations
… for just 1 keyword
Billions of attribute combinations in
large-scale PPC campaigns
8. Testing and Optimization Techniques
• A/B/n split testing
– Ideal for a small number of values for a single variable
– Many trials can be executed for each value
• Multi-variable testing
– Operates the same as split testing, but for multiple
variables
• Multivariate optimization
– Required when number of variations is large
– Uses statistical analysis techniques to determine optimal
combination of elements with minimal trial data
Genichi Taguchi
– Taguchi methods are used in digital marketing
applications
9. Problems with Bid Management
1. Bid rules do not optimize all campaign elements
Is the right ad being used?
–
Is the right landing page being used?
–
Is the right match type being used?
–
Are the right geo-targets being used?
–
2. Bid rules do not properly optimize keyword portfolios
– NOTE: “portfolio-based bid management“ ≠ portfolio-based optimization
10. Modern Portfolio Theory
• When applied to investment portfolios, uses asset diversification to
achieve optimal returns within a risk tolerance
Harry Markowitz
• When applied to keyword portfolios, uses keyword diversification to
achieve optimal results with a minimal and predictable ad spend
– Depends on accurately inferring returns for each keyword
11. Problems with Bid Management
1. Bid rules do not optimize all campaign elements
Is the right ad being used?
–
Is the right landing page being used?
–
Is the right match type being used?
–
Are the right geo-targets being used?
–
2. Bid rules do not optimize keyword portfolios
– NOTE: “portfolio bid management“ ≠ portfolio-based optimization
3. Rules-based approaches do not properly estimate expected
results for a given keyword
12. Inferring Results
• Example of bid rule approach (David Rodnitzky):
– Bid = RPC (1-MG), where
• RPC is revenue per click calculated from rolling 7, 14 or 28 day average
• MG is margin goal
• WebTrends Ad Director approach:
– Uses a hierarchical Bayesian inference model to
statistically infer results from existing data
– Ideal for sparse data (tail terms)
– WebTrends has pending patents of the application
of statistical inference in PPC campaigns
– Designed by Ph.D mathematicians
Thomas Bayes
• Leo Chang, Ph.D Mathematics, MIT
• Peter Kassakian, Ph.D Statistical Mathematics, U of C Berkeley
• John Rodkin, Ph.D Mathematics and Computer Sciences, MIT
13. Inferring Results – Tail Term Example
• Bid rule vs. statistical inference approaches
– Bid rule: simplistic math and heavy reliance on recent data cause bids to
fluctuate dramatically
– WebTrends Ad Director: statistical modeling quickly finds the optimal bid rates
and does not “react” to short-term statistical anomalies
100
80
60
40
20
0
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 101
BID RULE - ROAS = $3,735 WEBTRENDS AD DIRECTOR - ROAS = $7,745
16. Bottom Line
A properly designed program will always out-perform humans at
•
optimizing large-scale PPC campaigns, while reducing human costs
Best Possible ROI
Result gap increases
Automated Optimization
Result
with campaign size
ROI
Gap
and complexity
Manual / Bid Management
Human Effort
SEM manager efforts better spent on strategic functions
•
Some vendors are intentionally misrepresenting their solutions
•
17. WebTrends Ad Director
Self-Learning, Algorithmic Optimization
• Better performance, less wasted spend, lower total costs
• Works around the clock to drive profitable search programs
– Determine and execute optimal combinations and bids
– Maximize results on a portfolio-basis
• Complete transparency
• Complete control to override the machine
18. Getting Started with Ad Director
• Dedicated account manager
– Establish your goals
– Set up your account
• Watch the machine learn
• Supplement machine learning with human insight
Apply bid overrides
–
Test new ad creatives
–
Expand keywords
–
Identify negative keywords
–
• Review your goals with your account manager
23. CUSTOMER SUCCESS
Lead Generation: Safelite Auto Glass
Weekly Conversions
Business Objective:
• Maximize conversions while
maintaining CPA and budget targets
Results:
• 21% decrease in CPO
• 42% increase in daily sales within the
first two months
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
• 80% increase in daily average click
volume to site
Before WebTrends
24. CUSTOMER SUCCESS
eCommerce: Orion Telescopes & Binoculars
Search Engine Revenues
Business Objective:
150%
• Maximize revenue while maintaining
140%
ROAS and budget goals
130%
Results:
120%
110%
• 35% increase in search advertising
100%
revenues Y/Y
90%
• 25% increase in CTR
80%
• Reduced number of hours spent on
Before WebTrends
campaign management
25. “But what about my job?”
SEM managers should focus on functions machines can’t do:
• Keyword expansion
– Uncover hidden ROAS gems
– Add to portfolio diversity
Negative keyword identification
•
Randomized testing of new ad creatives, offers and landing pages
•
Manual overrides of optimization engine, as needed
•
Cross-channel campaign and organic search impact analysis
•
– Multi-touch attribution
Best results derived from combining the insights of a human
with the computational power of a machine
26. Digital Marketing Maturity
Automated campaign optimization
and statistical attribution modeling
Visitor-centric business intelligence
Affinity scoring and targeted cross-
CUSTOMER-LEVEL INSIGHT
channel communications
Bid management and last-click attribution
Aggregate online marketing reporting
Triggered e-mails
Acquire
Convert
Manual campaign management
Retain
Site activity reporting
E-mail blasts
MA RK E TI NG O P TI MI ZATI O N
27. Maturity Model
Centralization
Cross Media Optimization
Channel Optimization
Channel Specific Process
Fragmentation
29. Campaign Attribution Models
• Last click-through
– Same visit Traditional approaches that provide
– Across visits little insight into performance of
multi-channel campaign strategies
– Configurable timeout
• First click-through
• Equal distribution Emerging models positioned
as providing greater campaign
• Configurable attribution rules
mix insight
– E.g. 50% to last (N), 30% to N-1, 20% to N-2
True insight requires
• Statistical variance modeling
statistical modeling to
– E.g. Cov(x,y;w) = ∑i wi(xi - m(x;w))(yi - m(y;w)) / ∑i wi measure causality
33. 3rd Generation Solutions
business
analysts
data warehouses
and business
intelligence
Visitor-level
Detail Data
merchandising
acquisition
marketing
customer
marketing
34. 3rd Generation Solutions
Best Possible ROAS
Automated Optimization
ROAS
Visitor-level
Manual / Bid Management
Detail Data
Human Effort
attribution
acquisition
modeling
marketing
35. To receive a copy of this presentation, text i1 and your email address to 88769.
Leave a space between the keyword and your email address.
EX: i1 sally@webtrends.com
To rate this presentation, text PPC and your rating on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being
fair and 5 being excellent, to 88769. Leave a space between the keyword and
your rating.
EX: PPC 5
Barry Parshall
Engage Text powered by