SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 28
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL - NON-EXEMPT

 DATE:


 DEPT:


 PAY #:                                                                                    REVIEW PERIOD (Month/Year):
                                                                                          From:               To:
 EMPLOYEE:                                                                                              ###


 JOB TITLE:                                                                                           OVERALL RATING:
                                                                                                                0.0
                        ANNUAL                            ORIENTATION                                 SPECIAL
 INSTRUCTIONS:
 1. Complete all sections (A, B and C).

 2. Carefully evaluate each of the factors separately, based on recurring day-to-day performance since the last review and
 not on recent or isolated exceptional events. Use examples, whenever possible, to support each performance rating.
 3. There are seven core performance categories. All non-exempt employees must be rated in each of these areas and
 given specific feedback on performance. There are also four optional performance categories that may be relevant,
 depending on the non-exem
 4. For each factor, evaluate the employee using the definitions provided below.
 5. The overall rating will be automatically calculated on Page 6.

 EXCELLENT (EXCEEDS STANDARDS) (4)
 Performance frequently exceeds the established requirements for the job. The employee fully understands the position,
 takes the appropriate initiative, and requires only occasional direct supervision.
 GOOD (FULLY MEETS STANDARDS) (3)
 Performance fully meets all the established requirements for the job. The employee is familiar with all aspects of the
 position and performs these in a competent and satisfactory manner.
 ACCEPTABLE (USUALLY MEETS STANDARDS) (2)
 Performance usually meets all the minimal established requirements for the job. The employee’s performance
 occasionally may require improvement.
 UNSATISFACTORY (SUBSTANTIALLY SHORT OF STANDARDS) (1)
 Performance is considered below established requirements for the job. The employee needs to improve performance
 significantly to reach satisfactory performance and requires daily close supervision and/or additional training to bring
 performance within ac

                       The care and accuracy with which this appraisal is completed will
                      determine its value to you, to the employee, and to the organization.




Page 1
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)

 OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS                    (Consider written, verbal, and listening skills)
 Demonstrates proficiency at expressing ideas and listening, asking for and providing productive feedback, and has a
 positive, effective communication style.

 Excellent (4)           Good (3)                Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)        RATING:     0.00




     COMMENTS:




 DEPENDABILITY
 Fulfills responsibilities, instills full confidence, works well without continual supervision.

 Excellent (4)           Good (3)                Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)        RATING:     0.00




     COMMENTS:




 RELIABILITY
 Consistent attendance, punctually arrives and leaves work, meetings and appointments.

 Excellent (4)           Good (3)                Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)        RATING:     0.00




     COMMENTS:




 ATTITUDE/COOPERATION/ADAPTABILITY

 Commitment, team spirit, amount of interest and enthusiasm shown in the performance of responsibilities and attitude
 toward coworkers, students and the University. Works effectively and willingly with others (individuals and departments)
 in positive, sup

 Excellent (4)           Good (3)                Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)        RATING:     0.00




     COMMENTS:




Page 2
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)


 JUDGMENT
 Demonstrates ability to make sensible and appropriate decisions. Demonstrates discretion/professionalism in unusual
 situations. Ability to make solid decisions.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)              Acceptable (2)        Unsatisfactory (1)            RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




 KNOWLEDGE
 Demonstrates skills and an understanding of the position, policies, and procedures required in present job.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)              Acceptable (2)        Unsatisfactory (1)            RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




 QUALITY
 Works with attention to detail and absence of error.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)              Acceptable (2)        Unsatisfactory (1)            RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




 QUANTITY/APPLICATION
 The amount of work an individual accomplishes. Consistently applies ability and completes work in given timeframe.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)              Acceptable (2)        Unsatisfactory (1)            RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




Page 3
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION B: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (OPTIONAL PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)


 PROBLEM SOLVING
 Identifies problems and determines their causes, assesses alternatives, makes recommendations/decisions.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)             Acceptable (2)         Unsatisfactory (1)           RATING:    0.00




     COMMENTS:




 INITIATIVE
 A self-starter who contributes and/or carries out new ideas or methods.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)             Acceptable (2)         Unsatisfactory (1)           RATING:    0.00




     COMMENTS:




 PLANNING
 Develops and utilizes methods and work organization to efficiently complete overall workload.

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)             Acceptable (2)         Unsatisfactory (1)           RATING:    0.00




     COMMENTS:




 OTHER (IDENTIFY)

 Excellent (4)          Good (3)             Acceptable (2)         Unsatisfactory (1)           RATING:    0.00




     COMMENTS:




Page 4
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION C: CONCLUSION


 THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH THE EMPLOYEE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE APPRAISAL.

 COMPLETED MANDATORY TRAINING

 Has employee completed mandatory training? (E.G. Sexual Harassment Awareness & Prevention Training, Code of
 Conduct & Ethics Training, Compliance Training, Safety-Sensitive training, Other (please specify).
 Yes                     No
 Note: Failure to comply with Mandatory training requirements will be noted on this performance appraisal, and tentative
 fiscal merit salary increases will be withheld until all required training has been completed.
 COMMENTS




 PLANS, GOALS, AND OTHER COMMENTS


 Include any plans to further develop the employee's strengths, or any areas to develop requiring improvement.




 Describe any specific goals or special projects this employee is assigned during the next four quarters. Specify
 details and milestones. (Set cooperatively by supervisor and employee.)




 EMPLOYEE COMMENTS
 After you have reviewed this appraisal and discussed it with your supervisor/manager, please state briefly your
 comments regarding this evaluation. If you have no comments, please indicate “none.”




         Employee’s Signature:                                                               Date:

           Evaluated By: Alex Khoo
                                       Print Name                              Signature

            Reviewed By: Uwe Gundlach

Page 5
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
(Next Level Supervisor)            Print Name                              Signature



                                             PERFORMANCE RATING CALCULATION

                                Gray-shaded areas contain formulas and are protected against entry.

 CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES:                                 PERFORMANCE RATING


 OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS                                           0.00
 DEPENDABILITY                                                          0.00
 RELIABILITY                                                            0.00
 ATTITUDE/COOPERATION/ADAPTABILITY                                      0.00
 JUDGMENT                                                               0.00
 KNOWLEDGE                                                              0.00
 QUALITY                                                                0.00
 QUANTITY/APPLICATION                                                   0.00


 OPTIONAL CATEGORIES:

 PROBLEM SOLVING                                                        0.00
 INITIATIVE                                                             0.00
 PLANNING                                                               0.00
 OTHER                                                                  0.00

                                                                                            NUMBER OF CATEGORIES:
                                                     TOTAL:             0.00                                 0
                                                                                            (Field automatically counts categories entered)




                          OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:               0.00



                                                       EXTENSION INFORMATION
                                                              Reason:
                      30 days    60 days     90 days




Page 6
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 7
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 8
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 9
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 10
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 11
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 12
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL -
   EXEMPT MANAGERIAL (Supervisory Level and Above)

DATE:


CENTER/DEPT:


PAY #:                                                                                               REVIEW PERIOD (Month/Year):
                                                                                                    From:                 To:
EMPLOYEE:                                                                                                           ###


JOB TITLE:                                                                                                      OVERALL RATING:



                         ANNUAL                                 ORIENTATION                                      SPECIAL

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Complete all sections (A and B).


2. Carefully evaluate each of the factors separately, based on recurring day-to-day performance since the last review and not on
recent or isolated exceptional events. Use examples, whenever possible, to support each performance rating.

3. There are nine core performance categories. All exempt employees must be rated in each of these areas and given specific
feedback on performance. There are also two optional performance categories that may be relevant, depending on the exempt
positio
4. For each factor, evaluate the employee using the definitions provided below.
5. The overall rating will be automatically calculated on Page 6.

EXCELLENT (EXCEEDS STANDARDS) (4)
Performance frequently exceeds the established requirements for the job. The employee fully understands the position, takes the
appropriate initiative, and requires only occasional direct supervision.

GOOD (FULLY MEETS STANDARDS) (3)
Performance fully meets all the established requirements for the job. The employee is familiar with all aspects of the position and
performs these in a competent and satisfactory manner.

ACCEPTABLE (USUALLY MEETS STANDARDS) (2)
Performance usually meets all the minimal established requirements for the job. The employee’s performance occasionally may
require improvement.

UNSATISFACTORY (SUBSTANTIALLY SHORT OF STANDARDS) (1)


Performance is considered below established requirements for the job. The employee needs to improve performance significantly to
reach satisfactory performance and requires daily close supervision and/or additional training to bring performance within ac

                                The care and accuracy with which this appraisal is completed will
                               determine its value to you, to the employee, and to the organization.




         Page 13
         (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)


OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider written, verbal, and listening skills)
Demonstrates proficiency at expressing ideas and listening, asking for and providing productive feedback, and has a positive,
effective communication style.

Excellent (4)             Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)                 RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




POSITION PERFORMANCE
Works individually and with others to effectively carry out responsibilities and assignments of the position. Accepts and
accomplishes special projects in a timely manner. Professionally knowledgeable and competent.

Excellent (4)             Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)                 RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




ECONOMIC OUTCOME AND/OR OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Generates ideas, selects strategies/alternatives, effectively uses controllable resources. Makes timely decisions. Influences
quality/quantity results or makes other contributions to the economic or operative effectiveness of the Unit.

Excellent (4)             Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)           Unsatisfactory (1)                 RATING:      0.00




     COMMENTS:




        Page 14
        (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)

SUPERVISION/ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE
Structures and monitors unit or individual activities. Plans, set goals, organizes, reviews, controls, communicates, and coordinates
the performance of others using resources productively. Delegates tasks appropriately.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                RATING:        0.00




     COMMENTS:




LEADERSHIP


Creates and communicates a clear vision. Uses personal/professional insight and competencies to communicate with and inspire
others, guiding effective performance. Builds a high performing work environment as evidenced by successful operations.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                RATING:        0.00




     COMMENTS:




ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Understands organizational processes; how work groups/individuals function to achieve results. Sensitive to how decisions and
change influence performance. Encourages problem-solving/teamwork in interdependent settings.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                RATING:        0.00




     COMMENTS:




ADAPTABILITY
Anticipates and recognizes problems/opportunities early. Creative and resourceful. Handles ambiguous circumstances and changes
to University's advantage. Profits from experience. Applies learning to the future.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                RATING:        0.00




     COMMENTS:




        Page 15
        (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES)

CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Resolves conflicts directly and completely. Discusses issues with appropriate party's) with courtesy and tact.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                   RATING:   0.00




     COMMENTS:




DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
Includes appropriate personnel on decisions or changes. Informs appropriate personnel on a timely basis. Accurate judge of who
needs to know what.

Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                   RATING:   0.00




     COMMENTS:




  OTHER (IDENTIFY)



Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                   RATING:   0.00




     COMMENTS:




  OTHER (IDENTIFY)


Excellent (4)            Good (3)                 Acceptable (2)            Unsatisfactory (1)                   RATING:   0.00




     COMMENTS:




        Page 16
        (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
SECTION B: CONCLUSION

       THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH THE EMPLOYEE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE APPRAISAL.

COMPLETED MANDATORY TRAINING

Has employee completed mandatory training? (E.G. Sexual Harassment Awareness & Prevention Training, Code of
Conduct & Ethics Training, Compliance Training, Safety-Sensitive training, Other (please specify).
Yes                     No
Note: Failure to comply with Mandatory training requirements will be noted on this performance appraisal, and
tentative fiscal merit salary increases will be withheld until all required training has been completed.
COMMENTS




What plans have you and the employee developed to build on present strengths?




What plans have you and the employee established to work on areas requiring improvement?




Describe any specific goals or special projects this employee is assigned during the next four quarters. Specify details and
milestones.




After you have reviewed this appraisal and discussed it with your supervisor/manager, please state briefly your comments regarding
this evaluation. If you have no comments, please indicate “none.”




       Page 17
       (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 18
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
EMPLOYEE COMMENTS




     Employee's Signature:                                                       Date:

        Evaluated By: Uwe Gundlach
                                Print Name                                     Signature

          Reviewed By: Uwe Ackremann
(Next Level Supervisor)          Print Name                                    Signature


                                       PERFORMANCE RATING CALCULATION

                          Gray-shaded areas contain formulas and are protected against entry.


CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES:                               PERFORMANCE RATING

OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS                                         0.00
POSITION PERFORMANCE                                                 0.00
ECONOMIC/OPERATING PERFORMANCE                                       0.00
SUPERVISION/ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE                               0.00
LEADERSHIP                                                           0.00
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE                                           0.00
ADAPTABILITY                                                         0.00
CONFLICT RESOLUTION                                                  0.00
DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION                                         0.00

OPTIONAL CATEGORIES:


OTHER                                                                0.00
OTHER                                                                0.00



                                                                                           NUMBER OF CATEGORIES:
                                                  TOTAL:             0.00                               0.00
                                                                                               (Field automatically counts
                                                                                           categories entered)

                                                                     0.00
                      OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:




                                                    EXTENSION INFORMATION

                                                           Reason:
                30 days      60 days    90 days




      Page 19
      (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 20
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 21
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 22
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 23
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 24
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 25
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
Page 26
(c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
BALI HOSPITALITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2009 ANNUAL SALARY REVIEW - FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

DEPARTMENT:              ROOM DIVISION
SALARY STRUCTURE :       HOUSE KEEPING
CURRENCY :               US Dollars
EFFECTIVE DATE :         1-Jan-09
CUT-OFF DATE :           1-Jan-09                   DATE SCHEDULE PRINTED 19-Mar-09
                                                                          :

                                                                2008       Rating   Prior Salary                   2009 Salary Range            Range    Merit     Merit      Merit      Prom    Other    Pro      Total      Salary      2009            New Range
            Name                      Position          Gr      Salary     Score Rev Date (d-mm-yr)        Min           Mid             Max    Pen. %   PR        CC       Total Incr    Incr    Incr   Rat'n     Incr      Incr Amt     Salary           Pen. %

                         Assistant Housekeeper          2        3000                      1-Jan-07       1,920           3,437         4,956
                         Floor Supervisor               4        1920                      1-Jan-07       1,056           1,364         3,534
                         Laundry Manager                2        1800                      1-Jan-07       1,920           3,437         4,956
                         Housekeeping Secretary         6        1584                      1-Jan-07        960            1,356         1,752
                         Floor Suppervior               4        1440                      1-Jan-07       1,056           1,364         3,534




SUMMARY :                                                    2007 Salaries Total : 9,744                  Overall % - Increase :     0.00%                                                                       Increase : $-          1997 Total :   0
Exch rate to US$ :       VND 16,000                                US$ :           0.61                                                                                                                            US$ : 0.00             US$ :        0.00


APPROVALS :




Human Resources, Hotel                              Finance, Hotel                                    General Manager         Date                               President Director
BALI HOSPITALITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
                                 2009 SALARY ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET

NAME :                       Hồ Tấn Dũng                            DEPARTMENT :            ROOM DIVISION

TITLE :                      Mason                                  STRUCTURE :             HOUSE KEEPING

GRADE :                      8                                      EFFECTIVE DATE :        1-Jan-09

CURR RANGE PENETRN : 161%                                           PRIOR REV. DATE :       30-Dec-99

PERFORMANCE RATING :         PR         CC
                             X          X



MERIT INCREASE :
                        0.00% X                12.0 /12 X                 1200 =                       0
                                        Mths since                  2009 Salary           Merit Increase
                                        last increase


PROMOTIONAL INCREASE :                       0.00% X                      1,200 =                       0
                                                                    2009 Salary          Promotional Incr

OTHER INCREASE : *** SEE BELOW               0.00% X                      1,200 =                      0
                                                                    2009 Salary           Other Increase

NEW BASE SALARY :
                             2008 Salary                    1,200
                             + Merit Incr                       0
                             + Promotional Incr                 0
                             + Other Incr                       0
                             2008 Base Salary               1,200     Total % Incr                 0.00%
                             Range Penetration              161%      Monthly Salary                  100


NEXT MERIT REVIEW DUE :                                1-Jan-09

PRORATA INCREASE DUE AT THAT TIME :                          0.00 /12           Months

APPROVALS:




Executive Housekeeper        Date                                    Human Resources        Date


 Finance                     Date                                   General Manager         Date


***Reason for OTHER INCREASE :


             3rd Level Approval     :
                                                                                            Date

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Employee Performance Appraisal

Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)rajeevgupta
 
Employee+review+template
Employee+review+templateEmployee+review+template
Employee+review+templateConfidential
 
Performance mgt chapt 5
Performance mgt chapt 5Performance mgt chapt 5
Performance mgt chapt 5Aamera Khan
 
The Performance Appraisal System.
The Performance Appraisal System.The Performance Appraisal System.
The Performance Appraisal System.Binit Das
 
Situation Reaction Test (srt) (3).pptx
Situation Reaction Test  (srt)  (3).pptxSituation Reaction Test  (srt)  (3).pptx
Situation Reaction Test (srt) (3).pptxpurohitmac66
 
Quantitative tools for HR managers
Quantitative tools for HR managersQuantitative tools for HR managers
Quantitative tools for HR managersraza kamal
 
Performance management dr. s hira
Performance management   dr. s hiraPerformance management   dr. s hira
Performance management dr. s hiraPrabir Chatterjee
 
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docx
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docxIDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docx
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docxsheronlewthwaite
 
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxPJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxinfantsuk
 
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxPJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxstilliegeorgiana
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisalVishy Vincent
 
Employee performance evaluation form
Employee performance evaluation formEmployee performance evaluation form
Employee performance evaluation formKamran Arshad
 
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdfjimmynelson21
 
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Jonathan Fuller
 
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptx
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptxppt-on-job-evaluation.pptx
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptxssuser112f91
 

Ähnlich wie Employee Performance Appraisal (20)

Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
 
Case study analysis - Muffler magic
Case study analysis - Muffler magicCase study analysis - Muffler magic
Case study analysis - Muffler magic
 
Employee+review+template
Employee+review+templateEmployee+review+template
Employee+review+template
 
Performance mgt chapt 5
Performance mgt chapt 5Performance mgt chapt 5
Performance mgt chapt 5
 
The Performance Appraisal System.
The Performance Appraisal System.The Performance Appraisal System.
The Performance Appraisal System.
 
Situation Reaction Test (srt) (3).pptx
Situation Reaction Test  (srt)  (3).pptxSituation Reaction Test  (srt)  (3).pptx
Situation Reaction Test (srt) (3).pptx
 
Vincent doc 2
Vincent doc 2Vincent doc 2
Vincent doc 2
 
360 performance appraisal
360 performance appraisal360 performance appraisal
360 performance appraisal
 
Quantitative tools for HR managers
Quantitative tools for HR managersQuantitative tools for HR managers
Quantitative tools for HR managers
 
6
66
6
 
6
66
6
 
Performance management dr. s hira
Performance management   dr. s hiraPerformance management   dr. s hira
Performance management dr. s hira
 
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docx
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docxIDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docx
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docx
 
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxPJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
 
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docxPJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Employee performance evaluation form
Employee performance evaluation formEmployee performance evaluation form
Employee performance evaluation form
 
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf
6_how_to_write_an_ier_0.pdf
 
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
 
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptx
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptxppt-on-job-evaluation.pptx
ppt-on-job-evaluation.pptx
 

Mehr von Rasel Khondaker

2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0
2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 02011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0
2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0Rasel Khondaker
 
Stewarding Department (1)
Stewarding Department  (1)Stewarding Department  (1)
Stewarding Department (1)Rasel Khondaker
 
8070520 Human Energy Requirements
8070520 Human Energy Requirements8070520 Human Energy Requirements
8070520 Human Energy RequirementsRasel Khondaker
 
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt50119604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501Rasel Khondaker
 
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel IndustryRasel Khondaker
 
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft DrinksRasel Khondaker
 
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting SystemRasel Khondaker
 
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification TemplateRasel Khondaker
 
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting SystemRasel Khondaker
 

Mehr von Rasel Khondaker (20)

5e Chapter 05
5e Chapter 055e Chapter 05
5e Chapter 05
 
Chapter06
Chapter06Chapter06
Chapter06
 
2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0
2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 02011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0
2011%20 Steward%20 Pledge 0
 
Datastewards
DatastewardsDatastewards
Datastewards
 
Good Hygiene Practices
Good Hygiene PracticesGood Hygiene Practices
Good Hygiene Practices
 
Ship Organization
Ship OrganizationShip Organization
Ship Organization
 
Stewarding Department (1)
Stewarding Department  (1)Stewarding Department  (1)
Stewarding Department (1)
 
Cv Cv
Cv  CvCv  Cv
Cv Cv
 
Cv Cv
Cv  CvCv  Cv
Cv Cv
 
075e Cribb
075e Cribb075e Cribb
075e Cribb
 
8070520 Human Energy Requirements
8070520 Human Energy Requirements8070520 Human Energy Requirements
8070520 Human Energy Requirements
 
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt50119604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501
19604900 Human Resouce Management Mgt501
 
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry
22945926 Hr Practices In Hotel Industry
 
13758611 Hotel Intro
13758611 Hotel Intro13758611 Hotel Intro
13758611 Hotel Intro
 
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks
13103855 Research On Consumer Preference For Soft Drinks
 
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
 
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template
13573194 Fb Kitchen Utilities Job Specification Template
 
6456686 Restaurant
6456686 Restaurant6456686 Restaurant
6456686 Restaurant
 
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
13990389 Hotel Engineering Training Lighting System
 
13758611 Hotel Intro
13758611 Hotel Intro13758611 Hotel Intro
13758611 Hotel Intro
 

Employee Performance Appraisal

  • 1. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL - NON-EXEMPT DATE: DEPT: PAY #: REVIEW PERIOD (Month/Year): From: To: EMPLOYEE: ### JOB TITLE: OVERALL RATING: 0.0 ANNUAL ORIENTATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Complete all sections (A, B and C). 2. Carefully evaluate each of the factors separately, based on recurring day-to-day performance since the last review and not on recent or isolated exceptional events. Use examples, whenever possible, to support each performance rating. 3. There are seven core performance categories. All non-exempt employees must be rated in each of these areas and given specific feedback on performance. There are also four optional performance categories that may be relevant, depending on the non-exem 4. For each factor, evaluate the employee using the definitions provided below. 5. The overall rating will be automatically calculated on Page 6. EXCELLENT (EXCEEDS STANDARDS) (4) Performance frequently exceeds the established requirements for the job. The employee fully understands the position, takes the appropriate initiative, and requires only occasional direct supervision. GOOD (FULLY MEETS STANDARDS) (3) Performance fully meets all the established requirements for the job. The employee is familiar with all aspects of the position and performs these in a competent and satisfactory manner. ACCEPTABLE (USUALLY MEETS STANDARDS) (2) Performance usually meets all the minimal established requirements for the job. The employee’s performance occasionally may require improvement. UNSATISFACTORY (SUBSTANTIALLY SHORT OF STANDARDS) (1) Performance is considered below established requirements for the job. The employee needs to improve performance significantly to reach satisfactory performance and requires daily close supervision and/or additional training to bring performance within ac The care and accuracy with which this appraisal is completed will determine its value to you, to the employee, and to the organization. Page 1 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 2. SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider written, verbal, and listening skills) Demonstrates proficiency at expressing ideas and listening, asking for and providing productive feedback, and has a positive, effective communication style. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: DEPENDABILITY Fulfills responsibilities, instills full confidence, works well without continual supervision. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: RELIABILITY Consistent attendance, punctually arrives and leaves work, meetings and appointments. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: ATTITUDE/COOPERATION/ADAPTABILITY Commitment, team spirit, amount of interest and enthusiasm shown in the performance of responsibilities and attitude toward coworkers, students and the University. Works effectively and willingly with others (individuals and departments) in positive, sup Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 2 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 3. SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) JUDGMENT Demonstrates ability to make sensible and appropriate decisions. Demonstrates discretion/professionalism in unusual situations. Ability to make solid decisions. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: KNOWLEDGE Demonstrates skills and an understanding of the position, policies, and procedures required in present job. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: QUALITY Works with attention to detail and absence of error. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: QUANTITY/APPLICATION The amount of work an individual accomplishes. Consistently applies ability and completes work in given timeframe. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 3 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 4. SECTION B: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (OPTIONAL PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) PROBLEM SOLVING Identifies problems and determines their causes, assesses alternatives, makes recommendations/decisions. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: INITIATIVE A self-starter who contributes and/or carries out new ideas or methods. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: PLANNING Develops and utilizes methods and work organization to efficiently complete overall workload. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: OTHER (IDENTIFY) Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 4 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 5. SECTION C: CONCLUSION THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH THE EMPLOYEE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE APPRAISAL. COMPLETED MANDATORY TRAINING Has employee completed mandatory training? (E.G. Sexual Harassment Awareness & Prevention Training, Code of Conduct & Ethics Training, Compliance Training, Safety-Sensitive training, Other (please specify). Yes No Note: Failure to comply with Mandatory training requirements will be noted on this performance appraisal, and tentative fiscal merit salary increases will be withheld until all required training has been completed. COMMENTS PLANS, GOALS, AND OTHER COMMENTS Include any plans to further develop the employee's strengths, or any areas to develop requiring improvement. Describe any specific goals or special projects this employee is assigned during the next four quarters. Specify details and milestones. (Set cooperatively by supervisor and employee.) EMPLOYEE COMMENTS After you have reviewed this appraisal and discussed it with your supervisor/manager, please state briefly your comments regarding this evaluation. If you have no comments, please indicate “none.” Employee’s Signature: Date: Evaluated By: Alex Khoo Print Name Signature Reviewed By: Uwe Gundlach Page 5 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 6. (Next Level Supervisor) Print Name Signature PERFORMANCE RATING CALCULATION Gray-shaded areas contain formulas and are protected against entry. CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES: PERFORMANCE RATING OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS 0.00 DEPENDABILITY 0.00 RELIABILITY 0.00 ATTITUDE/COOPERATION/ADAPTABILITY 0.00 JUDGMENT 0.00 KNOWLEDGE 0.00 QUALITY 0.00 QUANTITY/APPLICATION 0.00 OPTIONAL CATEGORIES: PROBLEM SOLVING 0.00 INITIATIVE 0.00 PLANNING 0.00 OTHER 0.00 NUMBER OF CATEGORIES: TOTAL: 0.00 0 (Field automatically counts categories entered) OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: 0.00 EXTENSION INFORMATION Reason: 30 days 60 days 90 days Page 6 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 7. Page 7 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 8. Page 8 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 9. Page 9 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 10. Page 10 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 11. Page 11 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 12. Page 12 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 13. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL - EXEMPT MANAGERIAL (Supervisory Level and Above) DATE: CENTER/DEPT: PAY #: REVIEW PERIOD (Month/Year): From: To: EMPLOYEE: ### JOB TITLE: OVERALL RATING: ANNUAL ORIENTATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Complete all sections (A and B). 2. Carefully evaluate each of the factors separately, based on recurring day-to-day performance since the last review and not on recent or isolated exceptional events. Use examples, whenever possible, to support each performance rating. 3. There are nine core performance categories. All exempt employees must be rated in each of these areas and given specific feedback on performance. There are also two optional performance categories that may be relevant, depending on the exempt positio 4. For each factor, evaluate the employee using the definitions provided below. 5. The overall rating will be automatically calculated on Page 6. EXCELLENT (EXCEEDS STANDARDS) (4) Performance frequently exceeds the established requirements for the job. The employee fully understands the position, takes the appropriate initiative, and requires only occasional direct supervision. GOOD (FULLY MEETS STANDARDS) (3) Performance fully meets all the established requirements for the job. The employee is familiar with all aspects of the position and performs these in a competent and satisfactory manner. ACCEPTABLE (USUALLY MEETS STANDARDS) (2) Performance usually meets all the minimal established requirements for the job. The employee’s performance occasionally may require improvement. UNSATISFACTORY (SUBSTANTIALLY SHORT OF STANDARDS) (1) Performance is considered below established requirements for the job. The employee needs to improve performance significantly to reach satisfactory performance and requires daily close supervision and/or additional training to bring performance within ac The care and accuracy with which this appraisal is completed will determine its value to you, to the employee, and to the organization. Page 13 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 14. SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider written, verbal, and listening skills) Demonstrates proficiency at expressing ideas and listening, asking for and providing productive feedback, and has a positive, effective communication style. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: POSITION PERFORMANCE Works individually and with others to effectively carry out responsibilities and assignments of the position. Accepts and accomplishes special projects in a timely manner. Professionally knowledgeable and competent. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: ECONOMIC OUTCOME AND/OR OPERATING PERFORMANCE Generates ideas, selects strategies/alternatives, effectively uses controllable resources. Makes timely decisions. Influences quality/quantity results or makes other contributions to the economic or operative effectiveness of the Unit. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 14 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 15. SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) SUPERVISION/ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE Structures and monitors unit or individual activities. Plans, set goals, organizes, reviews, controls, communicates, and coordinates the performance of others using resources productively. Delegates tasks appropriately. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: LEADERSHIP Creates and communicates a clear vision. Uses personal/professional insight and competencies to communicate with and inspire others, guiding effective performance. Builds a high performing work environment as evidenced by successful operations. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE Understands organizational processes; how work groups/individuals function to achieve results. Sensitive to how decisions and change influence performance. Encourages problem-solving/teamwork in interdependent settings. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: ADAPTABILITY Anticipates and recognizes problems/opportunities early. Creative and resourceful. Handles ambiguous circumstances and changes to University's advantage. Profits from experience. Applies learning to the future. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 15 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 16. SECTION A: FACTORS AFFECTING JOB PERFORMANCE (CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES) CONFLICT RESOLUTION Resolves conflicts directly and completely. Discusses issues with appropriate party's) with courtesy and tact. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION Includes appropriate personnel on decisions or changes. Informs appropriate personnel on a timely basis. Accurate judge of who needs to know what. Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: OTHER (IDENTIFY) Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: OTHER (IDENTIFY) Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1) RATING: 0.00 COMMENTS: Page 16 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 17. SECTION B: CONCLUSION THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH THE EMPLOYEE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE APPRAISAL. COMPLETED MANDATORY TRAINING Has employee completed mandatory training? (E.G. Sexual Harassment Awareness & Prevention Training, Code of Conduct & Ethics Training, Compliance Training, Safety-Sensitive training, Other (please specify). Yes No Note: Failure to comply with Mandatory training requirements will be noted on this performance appraisal, and tentative fiscal merit salary increases will be withheld until all required training has been completed. COMMENTS What plans have you and the employee developed to build on present strengths? What plans have you and the employee established to work on areas requiring improvement? Describe any specific goals or special projects this employee is assigned during the next four quarters. Specify details and milestones. After you have reviewed this appraisal and discussed it with your supervisor/manager, please state briefly your comments regarding this evaluation. If you have no comments, please indicate “none.” Page 17 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 18. Page 18 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 19. EMPLOYEE COMMENTS Employee's Signature: Date: Evaluated By: Uwe Gundlach Print Name Signature Reviewed By: Uwe Ackremann (Next Level Supervisor) Print Name Signature PERFORMANCE RATING CALCULATION Gray-shaded areas contain formulas and are protected against entry. CORE PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES: PERFORMANCE RATING OVERALL COMMUNICATION SKILLS 0.00 POSITION PERFORMANCE 0.00 ECONOMIC/OPERATING PERFORMANCE 0.00 SUPERVISION/ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE 0.00 LEADERSHIP 0.00 ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE 0.00 ADAPTABILITY 0.00 CONFLICT RESOLUTION 0.00 DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION 0.00 OPTIONAL CATEGORIES: OTHER 0.00 OTHER 0.00 NUMBER OF CATEGORIES: TOTAL: 0.00 0.00 (Field automatically counts categories entered) 0.00 OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: EXTENSION INFORMATION Reason: 30 days 60 days 90 days Page 19 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 20. Page 20 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 21. Page 21 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 22. Page 22 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 23. Page 23 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 24. Page 24 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 25. Page 25 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 26. Page 26 (c) Drs. Agustinus Agus Purwanto, MM
  • 27. BALI HOSPITALITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2009 ANNUAL SALARY REVIEW - FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT: ROOM DIVISION SALARY STRUCTURE : HOUSE KEEPING CURRENCY : US Dollars EFFECTIVE DATE : 1-Jan-09 CUT-OFF DATE : 1-Jan-09 DATE SCHEDULE PRINTED 19-Mar-09 : 2008 Rating Prior Salary 2009 Salary Range Range Merit Merit Merit Prom Other Pro Total Salary 2009 New Range Name Position Gr Salary Score Rev Date (d-mm-yr) Min Mid Max Pen. % PR CC Total Incr Incr Incr Rat'n Incr Incr Amt Salary Pen. % Assistant Housekeeper 2 3000 1-Jan-07 1,920 3,437 4,956 Floor Supervisor 4 1920 1-Jan-07 1,056 1,364 3,534 Laundry Manager 2 1800 1-Jan-07 1,920 3,437 4,956 Housekeeping Secretary 6 1584 1-Jan-07 960 1,356 1,752 Floor Suppervior 4 1440 1-Jan-07 1,056 1,364 3,534 SUMMARY : 2007 Salaries Total : 9,744 Overall % - Increase : 0.00% Increase : $- 1997 Total : 0 Exch rate to US$ : VND 16,000 US$ : 0.61 US$ : 0.00 US$ : 0.00 APPROVALS : Human Resources, Hotel Finance, Hotel General Manager Date President Director
  • 28. BALI HOSPITALITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2009 SALARY ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET NAME : Hồ Tấn Dũng DEPARTMENT : ROOM DIVISION TITLE : Mason STRUCTURE : HOUSE KEEPING GRADE : 8 EFFECTIVE DATE : 1-Jan-09 CURR RANGE PENETRN : 161% PRIOR REV. DATE : 30-Dec-99 PERFORMANCE RATING : PR CC X X MERIT INCREASE : 0.00% X 12.0 /12 X 1200 = 0 Mths since 2009 Salary Merit Increase last increase PROMOTIONAL INCREASE : 0.00% X 1,200 = 0 2009 Salary Promotional Incr OTHER INCREASE : *** SEE BELOW 0.00% X 1,200 = 0 2009 Salary Other Increase NEW BASE SALARY : 2008 Salary 1,200 + Merit Incr 0 + Promotional Incr 0 + Other Incr 0 2008 Base Salary 1,200 Total % Incr 0.00% Range Penetration 161% Monthly Salary 100 NEXT MERIT REVIEW DUE : 1-Jan-09 PRORATA INCREASE DUE AT THAT TIME : 0.00 /12 Months APPROVALS: Executive Housekeeper Date Human Resources Date Finance Date General Manager Date ***Reason for OTHER INCREASE : 3rd Level Approval : Date