141028 open access to agricultural knowledge for inclusive growth
130321 agrarian crisis and way forward
1. Agrarian Crisis and Way Forward
Ramanjaneyulu
@ infosys campus on 21st March, 2013
The evolution of agricultural technology was from labour intensive to capital
intensive and should move on to knowledge and thought intensive
Richard Lewontin and Richard Levins in 'Biology under Influence'
2. Input Intensive Agriculture
• Economic Crisis
– Increasing costs of cultivation and decreasing returns
– Reducing public support and increasing indebtedness
• Ecological Crisis
– is highly LINEAR, whereas traditionally agriculture was highly CYCLICAL.
– is based on maximizing the output of a narrow range of species leading to
monoculture of crops and varieties
– is based on capital depletion and massive additions of external inputs (e.g.
energy, water, chemicals)
– views the farm as a factory with “inputs” (such as pesticides, feed, fertilizer,
and fuel) and “outputs” (grain, cotton, chicken, and so forth)
– never cared about the externalities
• Socio-political crisis
– Increasing tenancy, land use shift
– Increasing farmers suicides, 270,940 in 17 years
– Huge migration
4. State Farmer Suicides Difference (2nd Avg-1st Avg)
1995-2002 2003-2010
Andhra Pradesh 1590 2301 +711
Assam 155 291 +135
MP+Chhattisgarh 2304 2829 +525
Maharashtra 2508 3802 +1294
The table only includes States whose annual averages have risen by over 100 farmer suicides
between the two periods. It also treats Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh as one unit for
data purposes.
Source: NCRB Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India Reports 1995-2010
5. Smaller holdings
• Between 1960-61 and 2003, the total number of
operational holdings increased from 50.77 million
to 101.27 million.
• During the same period, the total operated area
declined from 133.46 million hectares to 107.65
million hectares.
• Thus average operated area declined from 2.63
hectares to 1.06 hectares.
(NSSO 59th Round, Some Aspects of Operational
Land Holdings in India, various issues)
6. Income and Expenditure of farmers
Land Category Total Expenditure Percent of
holding Income (Rs/month) farmers
(Rs/month)
<0.01 Landless 1380 2297 36 %
0.01-0.4 Sub marginal 1633 2390
0.4-1.0 Marginal 1809 2672 31 %
1.0-2.0 Small 2493 3148 17 %
2.0-4.0 Semi-medium 3589 3685 10 %
4.0-10.0 Medium 5681 4626 6%
>10.0 Large 9667 6418
Total 2115 2770 All
farmers
Source: Report “On Conditions Of Work And Promotion Of Livelihoods In The Unorganised Sector” Arjun Sen
Gupta Committee, 2007
7. Farm Incomes: Continuing problem
• Incomes of farmers have stagnated or declined; while living
costs have increased enormously
• Disparity between agricultural incomes and other sectors has
widened
• Recent studies also show farm incomes have fallen
e.g. From the decade of 1981-82 to the decade of 2001-02.
• Income per ha in Karnataka from Rs.8809 to Rs.5671
• Income per ha in Maharashtra from Rs.4194 to Rs.3047
Where do the farmers go? To other sectors?
10. Where are the jobs?
• From 2004-05 to 2009-10, only 2 million additional employment
was generated but 55 million were added to working age
population!
• 25.1 million people lost their self-employment
• Increase in the number of casual workers by 21.9 million, while
growth in the number of regular workers nearly halved between
2004-05 and 2009-10, compared with the previous 5 year period.
Sector-wise unemployment (millions)
Sector 2004-05 2009-10 Difference
Agriculture 258.93 243.21 -15.71
Manufacturing 55.77 48.54 -7.23
Services 112.81 112.33 -0.48
Non-Manufacturing 29.96 56.10 26.14
(construction)
TOTAL 457.46 460.18 2.72
11. 66th NSSO survey: deep urban-rural divide
• Per capita expenditure of urban India was 88% higher than rural India
• Average MPCE in 2009-10 to be Rs. 1054 and Rs. 1984 in rural India and
urban India respectively
• Top 10% of India’s rural population having an average MPCE (Rs. 2517)
5.6 times that of the poorest 10% (Rs. 453)
• Top 10% of urban population having a 9.8 times higher average MPCE
(Rs. 5863) compared that of the bottom 10% (Rs. 599)
• Considering the average rural MPCE value of Rs. 1054 in isolation
would be partially misleading. The rural MPCE median of Rs. 895 (about
Rs. 30 per day) implies that half the rural population had MPCE below
this level.
• 40% of the rural population had MPCE below Rs. 800 while 60% had
MPCE below Rs. 1000
• Compared to the rural median MPCE (Rs. 895), the urban median MPCE
level was 1.68 times higher at Rs. 1502 with 30% of the urban
population having MPCE above Rs. 2100 and 20% having MPCE above
Rs. 2600.
16. Reducing institutional credit
• The share of agricultural credit in total bank lending nearly doubled
from around 10% in the mid-1970s to about 18% in the late 1980s.
• The share of agricultural credit in total bank lending declined from
the peak of 18% in the late 1980s to about 11% in 2005, the decline
has continued since then.
• Rural branches of commercial banks has declined from 51.2% in
March 1996 to 45.7% in March 2005.
• Data also shows that the share of agricultural credit cornered by
farm sizes of more than 5 acres has increased
• Tenancy is informal and tenant farmers do not get access to credit
(GOI, 2007).
17. Indirect finance
• Till 1993 only direct finance was considered as
part of (18%) priority sector lending
• Indirect finance growing at an astonishing rate
of 32.9% compared to 17% of direct finance
from 2000 onwards
• Indirect finance definition changed after 1993
18. Share of agriculture credit from different bank branches
1990-2008 (in %)
Year Rural + semi- Only rural Urban+ Only All branches
urban branches metropolitan metropolitan
• Not adequate
branches branches branches
All India
•1990 accessible-
Not 85.1 55.5 14.9 4.0 100.0
crops, region,
1994 83.4 54.6 16.6 5.6 100.0
tenant farmers
1995 83.7 52.7 16.3 7.3 100.0
2005 69.3 43.0 30.7 19.0 100.0
•2006
Interest 62.4 37.1 37.6 23.8 100.0
subvention who
2008 66.0 38.4 34.0 20.0 100.0
benefits?
Maharashtra
1990 82.4 59.7 17.6 - 100.0
•1994
How to increase
76.8 52.9 23.2 - 100.0
coverage?
1995 70.5 46.5 29.5 - 100.0
2005 41.8 26.1 58.2 48.5 100.0
2006 31.6 18.4 68.4 61.3 100.0
2008 42.4 25.7 57.6 48.3 100.0
21. Fertilizer issues
• NPK use is 14.78:1.56:1 where as ideally it is 4:2:1
• The higher and imbalance use of chemical fertilizers threatened the
soil health
• Fertilizer use efficiency less than 50%
• Factor productivity of fertilizer coming down
• Fertilizer production largely dependent on Petroleum products and
prices fluctuate with them
• Phosphotic and Potash reserves coming down
•
Nutrient response drastically declined
Period Response (kg/kg NPK)
V FYP 15.0
Now 6.5
•
During 1961-2006 globally 8 fold increase in use of
agrochemicals, but increase in grain yield only 1.5 times
24. Soil Organic matter
The soil organic matter has declined from about 1.43 and 1.21 % in
red and black soils in the 1950’s to about 0.80 to 0.86 percent
respectively at present.
Soil organic matter performs Hydrological, Biological and Nutrient
related functions, which are both interrelated and distinct.
The OM helps tide over dry spells and in reducing runoff. Soil
moisture and organic matter is essential even for improving the
efficiency of biofertilisers and chemical nutrients.
25. Pesticides poisoning past, present and future
• Acute poisoning effects
• Agriculture workers killed
• Chronic poisoning effects
• Children growth effected
• Effect on reproductive health
• Pesticides increased costs of cultivations
• Rs. 1000 to 15000/acre
• Ecological Disturbances
• Beneficials killed, pest shifts
• Pest resistances, pest resurgences
• Poisoning of resources
• Soils
• Water
• Milk
• Food (NIN study found18 pesticides
found in Vegetables in Hyderabad, 2012)
26. Loosing Seed Sovereignty
• Increasing dependency on seeds over industry
• Increasing costs of seed (>500% in the last 5 yrs)
• Vegetable seeds costs upto 70,000/kg
• No regulation..seed bill pending from 2004
• Increased monoculture-few crops, few varieties and
now few genes
27. Before Bt Cotton
70% increase
Data for % area under BT for 2010-11 and 2011-12 are estimates and for 2005-06 is interpolated
28. GM crops and foods
• Key issues
• Relevance of GM crops
• Biosafety issues
• IPRs and Market monopoly
• Conflicts of interests and scandals
• Documentary evidences on Violations of regulations
in field trials,
• Newer pests and diseases like Bronze wilt, Tobacco
Streak Virus, Mealybug
• Studies on Environmental Risk Assessment and Socio
Economic Impacts
• Contamination organic cotton and Bt Bikeneri Narma
• What does reports say
– Public Consultation during Bt Brinjal Approval
– Parliamentary Standing Committee
– Technical Expert Committee
• Liability and Redress Mechanism
33. Water Foot Prints
Each ha of paddy yields @ 30 bags/acre and 75 5625 kg/ha grain
kg/bag
In terms of rice 70 % milling 3938 kg/ha
Water requirement 2000 mm (2 m) crop water 20000 cu m water
requirement x10000 sq m. Which is equal to 5.078
cu.m/kg rice (5078 litres/kg
rice)
Each family consuming monthly 30 152340 Litres of water per
kg rice month per family
This is equivalent to
Each family consumes water @ 300 litres/day and for 30 9000 litres
directly at around days
Water consumption by way of 16.93 times higher than the
rice is water we consume directly
34. Depleting natural resources
• Increasing dark zones due
to groundwater depletion
• 30 % of soils are reported
to be saline by the recent
study by ministry of
environment
35.
36. Lift Irrigation Schemes in AP
• 31 projects under lift irrigation
• It needs about 206 million units electricity/day needs
12,682 Megawatt power/annum (currently we use
160.80 million units a day or 10,000 mega watt/yr)
• 47 lakh ha would be brought under irrigation
• Seven and half horse power motor will be used for every
10 acres and five lakh such motors have to be installed
• Needs 37.5 lakh HP electricity (2775 mega watt)
• Major lift irrigation schemes needs 6407 mega watt
• Minor lift irrigation schemes needs 500 mega watt
• to produce and supply one mega watt power
• Rs. 4 cr to create infrastructure to produce
• Rs. 4.5 cr for transmission and distribution
Today 3,000 mega watts power is supplied freely to agriculture for 29 lakh pump sets
37. Farmer
•Shifting to better and sustainable practices
•Getting organised to deal with the markets and policies
Policy Support Market Support
•Supporting sustainable •Farmers moving up the
models value chain
•Regulating unsustainable •Direct marketing
practices •Forward and backward
•Invest more in agriculture linkages
•Income security to farmers •Better prices
38. Ecological farming practices
• Holistic understanding of the ecological and
biological processes (Gestalt approach)
• Harnessing the synergy of biodiversity,
ecological balance, high energy efficiency,
• Need a new science to under stand
technologies and not a new technology with old
science
39. Crop productivity vs land productivity
• Productivity is narrowly understood as crop
productivity in a monoculture situation, and
• Often compared with western developed
countries which have
– advantage of long day light,
– higher diurnal variation of temperature
– monoculture to suit mechanisation due to labor
shortage
– limited by only one crop season
• cannot be compared with tropical climate which
is rich in diversity and three crop seasons.
40. What is needed….
• Integrated farming systems integrating
livestock, trees etc
• Building soil organic matter
• Conserving moisture
• Rainwater harvesting
• Locally adopted crops and varieties
• Contingence planning
• Moving away from agro-chemical use
41. Community Managed Sustainable
Agriculture in Andhra Pradesh
Basic Principles
Regenerative, ecologically sound practices
Organized communities planning,
implementing and managing the program
Govt/ngos playing facilitating agency role
2004-05 started with 225 acres in one dist and
reached 7 lakh acres in 2007-08 in 18 dist. World
Bank says this is a good tool for poverty
eradication and now promoted as part of NRLM
With 50 % development expenditure one can
double the incomes of the farmers
A national program called Mahila Krishi
Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP) is launched
based on this experiencce
2009
42. Farmers and area covered under CMSA
4000
3800
3500 3500
3000
2800
2500 2500
2000 2135 1997 2000 2000
1500 1394 1541 1381 1500
1300
1000 1000
700 600 1015
500 200
0.225 25 300
0 80
0.1 15
Acerage ('000 acres) Farmers ('000) Pesticide use (MT Active Ingradient)
44. Average Reduction in costs and net
additional income for different crops
Crops Reduction in cost Reduction in costs due to use Net additional
due to NPM (Rs) of organic fertilisers/manures income (Rs)
(Rs)
Paddy 940 1450 5590
Maize 1319 2357 5676
Cotton 1733 1968 5676
Chillies 1733 1968 7701
Groundnut 1021 3462 10483
Vegetables 1400 390 3790
3rd Party Evaluation of Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY) : Community Managed
Organic Farming implemented by SERP
Evaluation Team
Prof. R. Ratnakar, Director, Dr. M. Surya Mani, Professor, EXTENSION EDUCATION
INSTITUTE, (Southern Region), Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India
45. Who benefits from your purchase
• Farmer gets Rs 15 for each kg of rice you
purchase at Rs 35
• Farmer gets Rs 30 for each Kg of Toor Dal you
purchase at Rs 80
• In case of other foods the farmer’s share is
similar or lesser.
• In processed foods farmers share is less than
10% and the rest goes to the Industry,
advertising and sales.
• Your purchases in retail chains go towards
energy-hogging facilities like air-conditioned
stores, cold storages and transportation all of
which have a huge ecological cost.
46. Sahaja Aharam
Organic Store
Processing units
Farmer Group A Seed market
Producer Co-op-1
Farmer Group B Producer Co-op-2
Farmer Group C
Other farmers and
farmers groups
Sahaja Aharam
Market place
Marketing Agency
Direct to
•Capacity building
resellers
•Institutional building Direct to Home
Whole sale to •Value Chain Fund Consumer Co-op
traders •Brand building
•Healthy food Mobile Store
•Qualtiy Management
Bulk buyers •Affordable Price
•Fair Trade
•Max share to farmers Organic Store
Yet to estiblish
47. Way forward
• Moving from high external input agriculture to high internal input agriculture
• Information based to knowledge based extension
• Reducing the risks with uncertain weather conditions and degraded and
limited natural resources, by adopting agroecologically suitable cropping
patterns and production practices
• Diversifying the assets and income sources to sustain the livelihoods by
integrating livestock and horticulture into agriculture and promoting on-farm
and off-farm employment opportunities,
• Conserving and efficiently use the available natural resources like soil and
water, and promote biomass generation,
• Organizing farmers into institutions which can help them to have better
planning, greater control over their production, help to access resources and
support, improve food security and move up in the value chain,
• Recasting subsidies to support farmers own resources and labor
• Building livelihood security systems to withstand the natural disasters like
drought, floods and other climate uncertainties.
Today, India, with a successful green revolution has over 300 million living below the poverty line, mainly in rural areas. With 86 percent of India’s operational holdings being marginal and small (less than 2 hectares), largely unviable due to increasing input costs – of fertilizers, chemicals, water, seeds, agro-machinery and implements, (Acharya and Jogi, 2007), technology fatigue with increasing input prices and declining factor productivity (Swaminathan, 2005), increasing soil and water problems –both quantity (declining arable land and water tables) and quality (soil and water systems degradation) (ICAR, 1998; Government of India, 2005; 2008), limited rural employment opportunities (NCEUS, 2006), increasing capital intensity of agriculture (doubling the ICOR (Golait and Lokare, 2008), increasing deployment of labour saving technologies in agriculture and the low and declining employment elasticity (Palanivel, 2006), and the rate of growth of income per worker in the agriculture sector falling from 1.15% per annum (1980-81 to 1990-91) to 0.48% per annum (1990-91 to 2000-2001) (Sen and Bhatia, 2004; Bhalla and Hazell, 2003), the picture of agriculture in India is no longer green.