A case study completed as part of the coursework for Principles of Accounting II (ACCT&202), a comparative analysis' having been submitted rather than the assigned analysis of a single company.
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Comprehensive Financial Analysis: Columbia Sportswear vs. The Timberland Company
1. Comprehensive Financial Analysis
Columbia Sportswear Company vs. The Timberland Company
Prepared by Rachel Wilcox-Miano
NSCC Accounting 202: Principles of Accounting II
2. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Table of Contents
Financial Analysis – Part I
R1: Vertical and Horizontal Analysis ...........................................................................................................................2-5
Income Statement – Columbia Sportswear Company (Required)............................... 2
Income Statement – The Timberland Company (Supplemental) ................................ 2
Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 3
Columbia Sportswear Company (Required) – Balance Sheet, Analysis ....................... 4
The Timberland Company (Supplemental) – Balance Sheet, Analysis ........................ 5
R2: Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS)................................................................................................................................. 6
Columbia Sportswear Company (Required) – Data ..................................................... 6
The Timberland Company (Supplemental) – Data ...................................................... 6
Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 6
R3: Liquidity and Profitability Analysis – Working Capital, Ratios ................................................................................. 7
Columbia Sportswear Company (Required) – Data ..................................................... 7
The Timberland Company (Supplemental) – Data ...................................................... 7
Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 7
R4: Market Analysis – Columbia Sportswear Company vs. Industry Averages .............................................................. 8
P/E, Dividends Per Share Data ..................................................................................... 8
Analysis/Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 8
Financial Analysis – Part II
R1: Trend Analysis – Columbia vs. Timberland .........................................................................................................9-11
Discussion .................................................................................................................... 9
Common-size Income Statement ................................................................................ 9
Columbia Sportswear Company – Data, Analysis ...................................................... 10
The Timberland Company – Data, Analysis ............................................................... 11
R2: Analyst’s Recommendation ................................................................................................................................... 12
Appendices
Appendix A: Financial Reports, Columbia Sportswear Company ...........................................................................13-25
FY 2008 Annual Report – Financial Reports ................................................... 13, 15-19
FY 2007 Annual Report – Balance Sheet (FY 2006 Data) ........................................... 14
Appendix B: Financial Reports, The Timberland Company .....................................................................................20-26
FY 2008 Annual Report – Financial Reports ................................................... 20, 22-26
FY 2007 10K – Balance Sheet (FY 2006 Data) ............................................................ 21
• 1 •
3. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 1
R1: Vertical Analysis - Consolidated Income Statement
Columbia Sportswear Company
The Timberland Company (Supplemental)
• 2 •
4. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 1 (continued)
Analysis
A vertical analysis of Columbia Sportswear’s Income Statement reveals that Cost of Sales was 56.9% of Net Sales
compared with 57.2% in 2007, and 58.0% in 2006. Despite a decrease in Net Sales and Gross Profit from 2007 to
2008, due to the reduction in Cost of Sales, Gross Profit was 43.1% of Net Sales in 2008, compared with only 42.8%
in 2007 (and 42.0% in 2006).
The increase in SG&A expense in 2008 over 2007, (the causes of which are explained in great detail in the Notes to
the Financial Statements in the FY 2008 Annual Report), as well as the impairment of goodwill and an acquired
patent resulted in significantly reduced Income from Operations in 2008, which fell from 14.7% of Net Sales in
2007 to a mere 9.0% in 2008.
While on the surface these trends would tend to be cause for concern, a rapid comparison with one of Columbia
Sportswear’s biggest rivals for the outdoor apparel market, The Timberland Company, reveals that Columbia’s
situation, while somewhat in decline, is still significantly better than its competitor.
Although vertical analysis of a company can be a useful tool to gauge its trends over time, it is an insufficient tool
with which to make an informed decision unless used in tandem with other evaluation methods.
• 3 •
5. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 1 (continued)
R1: Horizontal Analysis – Consolidated Balance Sheet
Columbia Sportswear Company
Analysis
Columbia Sportswear’s 20.1% increase of Cash and Cash Equivalents in 2008 is offset by the significant liquidation
of its short-term investments (a 72.5% reduction). Prepaid expenses and other current assets more than doubled,
resulting in a reduced, but relatively stable, 1.5% reduction to Total Current Assets. The increased PPE was offset
by the impairment to both Goodwill and the patent, resulting in a 1.6% decline in Total Assets.
Although the collective fluctuations to Columbia Sportswear’s liabilities could be considered volatile, after all
changes had been factored in, Total Liabilities increased just 4.0% over the course of the year.
Despite Columbia Sportswear and Timberland’s having both implemented a significant stock repurchase, unlike its
competitor, in 2008 Columbia Sportswear elected to record its substantial repurchase as a reduction to total
retained earnings rather than include a line item for Treasury Stock on its Balance Sheet, otherwise, as stated in its
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the aggregate purchase price would have resulted in a negative stock
carrying amount.
• 4 •
6. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 1 (continued)
The Timberland Company (Supplemental)
Analysis
A horizontal analysis of The Timberline Company’s Balance Sheet yields a somewhat somber result. Although the
company appears stable with 1.6% growth overall, the decline in Inventory, Accounts Receivable, PPE and Other
Assets combined with a 51% growth in Cash and Cash Equivalents gives one the impression that the Timberland’s
management is striving to increase its liquidity. Although in and of itself not a red flag, the company merits further
investigation in order to determine the reasons behind this trend.
• 5 •
7. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 2
R2: Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Columbia Sportswear Company
The Timberland Company (Supplemental)
Analysis
Columbia Sportswear’s EPS remained relatively stable from 2004-06 (with an average value of $3.41), experienced
an 18.0% increase in 2007 only to decline by an astounding 31.3% from 2007 to 2008. Because EPS is calculated
using both Net Income as well as the number of shares of common stock outstanding, its decline can be attributed
to the cumulative effects of reduced Net Income in 2008 coupled with Columbia Sportswear’s corporate stock
repurchasing plan.
Again, a tacit examination of The Timberland Company’s historic EPS values puts Columbia’s situation in a better
light. Not only is Timberland’s EPS consistently lower than that of Columbia Sportswear, it has been in steady
decline since 2006, which corresponds notably with the implementation of Columbia Sportswear’s aggressive
corporate marketing and expansion strategy, and raises the question of whether Timberland’s market share has
suffered because of it, or whether other factors influenced its decline.
• 6 •
8. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 3
R3: Liquidity and Profitability Analysis
Columbia Sportswear Company
The Timberland Company (Supplemental)
Analysis
Due to a 1.5% decrease in Current Assets and a 4.0% increase in Current Liabilities in 2008, the current ratio for
Columbia Sportswear fell 5.3% indicating a reduction in its liquidity; however, at 5.04, it remains strong. In most
cases, a 7.5% drop in the quick ratio would be cause for concern, but Columbia Sportswear’s stands a robust 3.19.
The drop in both ROS and ROE can be attributed to the 34.2% reduction in Net Income combined with an 11.6%
increase in SG&A expense, and indicate impaired profitability, but do not yet constitute a trend.
In contrast, Timberland’s ratios, while acceptable, pale in comparison with Columbia’s performance overall. Since
hitting a 3-year low in 206, Timberland has been steadily increasing its working capital; ROE has been significantly
affected by Timberland’s own stock repurchasing plan as well as its restructuring policies.
• 7 •
9. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part I: Requirement 4
R4: Market Analysis
Columbia Sportswear Company
Analysis
Columbia Sportswear’s P/E ratio and dividend yield outperform the industry average, which indicates that
investors are willing to pay more for its shares than for its competitors’.
Evaluation
At 12.86, the 2008 P/E ratio for Columbia Sportswear is 7.17% higher than the industry average, indicating above-
average investor interest. At 1.8%, the dividend yield is slightly higher than the industry average of 1.7%, indicating
that the rate of return on an investment in Columbia Sportswear, while somewhat in line with its competitors, is
still the more favorable option.
• 8 •
10. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part II: Requirement 1
R1: Trend Analysis – Columbia Sportswear vs. Timberland
Discussion
Although the generation of a common-size Income Statement was not a requirement, a comparative analysis of
Columbia Sportswear vs. Timberland would be incomplete without it. Through consolidation of certain elements
and a slight rearrangement of Timberland’s Consolidated Statement of Income, the results are as shown below.
Despite higher Cost of Sales and Gross Profit percentages, Columbia Sportswear’s Income from Operations
outperforms Timberland’s by a margin of 4.1%, in part due to higher SG&A expenses. Columbia Sportswear enjoys
greater interest income and benefitted from its treatment of the 2008 Income Tax expense to arrive at a Net
Income that was of a significantly greater percentage of Net Sales than that of Timberland.
• 9 •
11. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part II: Requirement 1 (continued)
Columbia Sportswear Company
Analysis
Columbia Sportswear’s Net Sales remain strong and exhibit continued growth despite a difficult
economy; although Net Income has fallen drastically from 2007 to 2008, it is due in large part to
impaired goodwill and the impairment of an acquired patent that was determined to have no use
beyond 2009. The fall in Net Income has significantly affected both ROS and ROE, although both the
current and quick ratios remain relatively stable, and at very strong levels. EPS has also been affected by
the drop in Net Income, but the corporate stock repurchase plan also played a role in its decline.
• 10 •
12. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part II: Requirement 1 (continued)
The Timberland Company
Analysis
By comparison, The Timberline Company appears to be in an overall decline despite strong current and
quick ratios and a steady increase in working capital since hitting its 3-year low of $363M in 2006. EPS,
ROS and ROE have all fallen significantly over the periods for which data is available. The strong current
and quick ratios offer hope to investors that the short-term effects of management decisions might
translate into an upward trend overall.
• 11 •
13. Comprehensive Financial Analysis Case Columbia vs. Timberland
Financial Analysis – Part II: Requirement 2
Analyst’s Recommendation
• 12 •
19. Appendix A: Financial Reports– Columbia Sportswear Company (FY08 FY07 )
Source: http://investor.columbia.com/annuals.cfm
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below for, and as of the end of, each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2008 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Accompanying Notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Item 7.
Year Ended December 31,
2008 2007 2006 (1) 2005 2004
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,317,835 $1,356,039 $1,287,672 $1,155,791 $1,095,307
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,047 144,452 123,018 130,736 138,624
Per Share of Common Stock Data:
Earnings per share:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.75 $ 4.00 $ 3.39 $ 3.39 $ 3.44
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.74 3.96 3.36 3.36 3.40
Cash dividends per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.64 0.58 0.14 — —
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,610 36,106 36,245 38,549 40,266
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,711 36,434 36,644 38,943 40,812
December 31,
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,148,236 $1,166,481 $1,027,289 $ 967,640 $ 947,625
Long-term obligations, net of current
maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 61 136 7,414 12,636
(1) Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, under which compensation expense is
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fair value of employee stock-based
compensation. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we accounted for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Accordingly, under APB Opinion No. 25, no
compensation expense was recognized because the exercise price of our employee stock options was equal
to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. We applied the disclosure provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, as if the fair value method had been applied in
measuring compensation expense. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
23
• 18 •
20. Appendix A: Financial Reports– Columbia Sportswear Company (FY08 FY07 )
Source: http://investor.columbia.com/annuals.cfm
Performance Graph
The line graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of our Common Stock with the
cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 400 Mid-Cap Index and the Russell 3000 Textiles
Apparel Manufacturers for the period beginning December 31, 2003 and ending December 31, 2008. The graph
assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2003, and that any dividends were reinvested.
Historical stock price performance should not be relied on as indicative of future stock price performance.
Columbia Sportswear Company
Stock Price Performance
December 31, 2003—December 31, 2008
Total Return to Stockholders
(Assumes $100 investment on 12/31/03)
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
12/31/2003 12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008
Columbia Sportswear Co. S&P 400 MidCap Index Russell 3000 Textiles Apparel Mfrs.
Total Return Analysis
12/31/2003 12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008
Columbia Sportswear Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 $109.36 $ 87.58 $102.45 $ 81.91 $66.77
S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 $116.47 $131.09 $144.61 $156.14 $99.55
Russell 3000 Textiles Apparel Mfrs. . . . . . . $100.00 $128.84 $135.78 $174.78 $134.12 $78.91
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Part III, Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding our securities authorized for
issuance under equity compensation plans.
21
• 19 •
26. Appendix B: Financial Reports – The Timberland Company (FY08- FY07 )
Source: http://www.timberland.com/category/index.jsp?categoryId=4304478
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company made no repurchases of its common shares during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements, entitled “Stockholders’ Equity”, in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding activity under our repurchase programs and
shares available under such programs as of December 31, 2008.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Statement of Income Data
Years Ended December 31, 2008 2007 2006(1) 2005 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,364,550 $1,436,451 $1,567,619 $1,565,681 $1,500,580
Net income . . . . . . . . ............. 42,906 39,999 101,205 180,216 145,114
Earnings per share
Basic . . . . . . . . . . ............. $ 0.73 $ 0.65 $ 1.62 $ 2.72 $ 2.08
Diluted . . . . . . . . . ............. $ 0.73 $ 0.65 $ 1.59 $ 2.66 $ 2.03
(1) Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $217,189 $143,274 $181,698 $213,163 $309,116
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417,829 399,122 363,143 369,176 417,176
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849,399 836,345 860,377 790,699 751,642
Total long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — —
Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 576,538 577,160 561,685 527,921 507,414
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations
of The Timberland Company and its subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, “us”, “its”, “Timberland” or the “Company”),
as well as our liquidity and capital resources. The discussion, including known trends and uncertainties
identified by management, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Included herein with respect to 2008 versus 2007 and
2007 versus 2006 comparisons are discussions and reconciliations of (i) total Company, Europe and Asia
revenue changes to constant dollar revenue changes; and (ii) net income and diluted earnings per share
(“EPS”) to net income excluding restructuring and related costs and diluted EPS excluding restructuring and
related costs, respectively.
Constant dollar revenue changes, which exclude the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates, and net
income and diluted EPS, each excluding restructuring and related costs are not performance measures
recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The difference
between changes in reported revenue (the most comparable GAAP measure) and constant dollar revenue
changes is the impact of movement in foreign currencies. We provide constant dollar revenue changes for total
Company, Europe and Asia results because we use the measure to understand the underlying changes in our
25
• 25 •
27. Appendix B: Financial Reports – The Timberland Company (FY08- FY07 )
Source: http://www.timberland.com/category/index.jsp?categoryId=4304478
Performance Graph
The following graph shows the five year cumulative total return of Class A Common Stock as compared
with the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index and the weighted average of the S&P 500 Footwear Index
and the S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories and Luxury Goods Index. The total return for the Footwear and
Apparel, Accessories and Luxury Goods indices is weighted in proportion to the percent of the Company’s
revenue derived from sales of footwear and from apparel and accessories (excluding royalties on products sold
by licensees), respectively, for each year.
200
150
100
50
0
20031 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Timberland S&P 500 Index Weighted Average of
S&P 500 Footwear Index and
S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories
& Luxury Goods Index
2003(1) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Timberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 120.36 125.02 121.30 69.44 44.36
S&P 500 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 110.88 116.33 134.70 142.10 89.53
Weighted Average of S&P 500 Footwear Index
and S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury
Goods Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 130.81 132.35 159.86 179.68 141.35
(1) Indexed to December 31, 2003.
24
• 26 •