1. Summary of comments received on 4/11 at open house.
Comment cards were typed for clarity however no attempt was made to correct spelling or otherwise
alter the comment. Original scans of the comments are attached.
What are your thoughts about the short listed sites?
Please put the sewer plant at the Crescent harbor site because I do not want the sewer plant on the
waterfront. The waterfront is a big part of the beauty of the area. Boating, fishing, beaches etc. for
employment tourists and Oak Harbor res. Employment
What are your thoughts about the added sixth site (the Crescent Harbor North site)?
Yes, please at Oak Harbor North.
What considerations are important to you in choosing a new treatment facility site?
Not on the water please.
What are your thoughts about the short listed sites?
The only one I am concerned with is the Fleet Reserve Assn. Why would the City of Oak Harbor try to
interrupt a service organization that does tons of charitable work? I + numerous other people find it
appalling.
What are your thoughts about the added sixth site (the Crescent Harbor North site)?
This is the best idea so far, far away from everything.
What considerations are important to you in choosing a new treatment facility site?
Far away from Downtown, we need more traffic problems like we need another hole in the head!
What are your thoughts about the short listed sites?
I think the 3 sites originally proposed were the best and I think windjammer park is the best site.
What are your thoughts about the added sixth site (the Crescent Harbor North site)?
A waste of money and time
What considerations are important to you in choosing a new treatment facility site?
We’ve already spent $10’s of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of community, government
and professional time to come up with the 3 sites on the short list. The best site is Windjammer. Quick
jerking us around and get on with it. Built the best system and building at Windjammer.
Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.

2. What are your thoughts about the short listed sites?
1) You did not advertise this meeting
2) The cost to drain the Bridgeford property would eat up your 30% override‐
3) The 6th
site has been short notice‐ how could you have done the same due diligent as the other
sites in that time?
What are your thoughts about the added sixth site (the Crescent Harbor North site)?
What considerations are important to you in choosing a new treatment facility site?
If windjammer is the lowest cost and can be made the safest + cleanest + incorporated to the park
pleasing environment‐ at the lowest cost why is not it the best‐ most cost efficient way to go?
Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.

3. Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.

4. Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.