SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Business
Statistics
Level 3




Model Answers
Series 3 2007 (Code 3009)
Business Statistics Level 3
Series 3 2007



                                      How to use this booklet

Model Answers have been developed by Education Development International plc (EDI) to offer
additional information and guidance to Centres, teachers and candidates as they prepare for LCCI
International Qualifications. The contents of this booklet are divided into 3 elements:

(1)   Questions                  – reproduced from the printed examination paper

(2)   Model Answers              – summary of the main points that the Chief Examiner expected to
                                   see in the answers to each question in the examination paper,
                                   plus a fully worked example or sample answer (where applicable)

(3)   Helpful Hints              – where appropriate, additional guidance relating to individual
                                   questions or to examination technique

Teachers and candidates should find this booklet an invaluable teaching tool and an aid to success.

EDI provides Model Answers to help candidates gain a general understanding of the standard
required. The general standard of model answers is one that would achieve a Distinction grade. EDI
accepts that candidates may offer other answers that could be equally valid.




                          © Education Development International plc 2007

All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise
without prior written permission of the Publisher. The book may not be lent, resold, hired out or
otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover, other than that in which it is
published, without the prior consent of the Publisher.


                                                  1
QUESTION 1

Over the past 9 years a company has achieved the following market share

                 Year     Market Share %
                 1998          22.3
                 1999          21.6
                 2000          22.0
                 2001          21.1
                 2002          20.8
                 2003          19.9
                 2004          19.5
                 2005          18.4
                 2006          17.6

(a) Plot the data on a graph and comment on the pattern shown.
                                                                                              (4 marks)

(b) Calculate and state the least squares regression line for Market Share dependent on Year.
                                                                                        (10 marks)

(c) Use the regression line found in (b) to estimate the year in which market share is likely to fall to
    15% and comment upon the accuracy of your estimate.
                                                                                              (6 marks)

                                                                                      (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                   2
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 1

(a)

                                                Market Share % v Time

                       23

                       22

                       21
      Market Share %




                       20

                       19

                       18

                       17

                       16

                       15
                        1998     1999    2000      2001      2002       2003   2004   2005   2006
                                                             Year



Comment: ‘The market share is decreasing over time.’


(b)

      Year                      Market
                               Share %
                x                 y        x2               xy
               1                 22.3      1               22.3
               2                 21.6      4               43.2
               3                 22.0      9               66.0
               4                 21.1      16              84.4
               5                 20.8      25             104.0
               6                 19.9      36             119.4
               7                 19.5      49             136.5
               8                 18.4      64             147.2
               9                 17.6      81             158.4
               45               183.2     285             881.4
               Σx                Σy       Σx2              Σxy




3009/3/07/MA                                                        3                 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 1 CONTINUED

      n∑ xy − (∑ x )(∑ y )
b=
        n∑ x 2 − (∑ x )
                       2




      (9 x881.4) − (45 x183.2)
b=
            9 x 285 − 45 2

b = -311.4 = -0.577 (-0.58)
     540



a=
      ∑ y −b∑x
     n       n                        If x goes from 1998 to 2006 the
   183.2            45                equation is y = 1174.84-0.577x
a=       − −0.577 x
     9              9
a = 20.36 +2.89 = 23.25


Y = 23.25 – 0.577x


(c)

         Y = 23.25-0.557x

         15 = 23.25 –0.577x

         x = 23.25 – 15
               0.577
         x = 14.29 Round up to 15

         Therefore year is 2012


The answer is an extrapolation and therefore subject to uncertainty. In real life the business might
change strategy to protect its market share. A better estimate would have been obtained from using
the regression line for year on market share.




3009/3/07/MA                                  4
QUESTION 2

(a) Explain what is meant by a 90% confidence interval for a sample proportion.
                                                                                             (4 marks)


A company is concerned about the level of customer satisfaction with the service provided by its
domestic and overseas call centre operations. A random sample of customers calling its domestic call
centre showed that 267 out of 400 were satisfied or very satisfied with the service. A random sample
of customers calling its overseas call centre showed that 350 out of 500 were satisfied or very satisfied
with the service.

(b) Test whether there is a difference in the proportion of customers satisfied or very satisfied with
    the service provided at the two call centres.
                                                                                             (12 marks)

(c) Explain what is meant by a type 2 error. Might such an error have been committed in part (b)
    above?
                                                                                         (4 marks)

                                                                                     (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                   5
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 2

(a) The 90% confidence interval means that if samples of the same size are taken the sample
    proportion will lie within the stated range 90 times out of 100.


(b) Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the
    customer service from its domestic and overseas call centres.
    Alternative hypothesis: there is a difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the
    customer service from its domestic and overseas call centres.

Critical z value = 1.96/2.58

p1 = 267/400 = 0.6675,     p2 = 350/500 = 0.7

                          267 + 350   617
   Pooled value of p =              =     = 0.6856
                          400 + 500   900


                 0.6675 − 0.7                          − 0.0325
 z=                                          =                        = - 1.04
                         ⎛ 1    1 ⎞                  0.2156(0.0045)
       0.6856(1 − 0.6856)⎜    +    ⎟
                         ⎝ 400 500 ⎠

Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.
There is no difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the customer service from its
domestic and overseas call centres.


(c) A type 2 error is to accept the null hypothesis when it is false. A type 2 error may have been
    committed.




3009/3/07/MA                                     6
QUESTION 3

The consumer price index and the index of average earnings are as follows:

                             Year         Consumer      Index of Average
                                          Price Index       Earnings
                             1996            100.0            83.3
                             1997            101.8            86.8
                             1998            103.4            91.3
                             1999            104.8            95.7
                             2000            105.7           100.0
                             2001            106.9           104.4
                             2002            108.3           108.1
                             2003            109.8           111.7
                             2004            111.2           116.7
                             2005            113.5           121.4
                             2006
                                            116.7             127.0
                            estimate

(a) Rebase the index of average earnings to 1996 as the base year = 100
                                                                                            (4 marks)

(b) Using the information in the table and your answer to part (a), calculate an index of average real
    earnings with 1996 as the base year.
                                                                                             (4 marks)

A worker’s wage has risen, between the years 1996 to 2006, from £350.64 to £420.78.

(c) What further increase would be necessary to enable the worker’s wage to keep pace with the
    Real Earnings Index?
                                                                                       (4 marks)

(d)
      (i)    Explain how you would carry out a Quota Sample and give one advantage and one
             disadvantage of the method.

      (ii)   Explain how you would carry out a Systematic Sample and give one advantage and one
             disadvantage of the method.
                                                                                         (8 marks)

                                                                                    (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                   7
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 3

(a) Conversion of Index of Average Earnings to base year 1996 = 100

       Divide by 83.3 multiply by 100 throughout

                                     Index of
                                     Average
                            Index of
                                     Earnings
                Year        Average
                                     Rebased
                            Earnings
                                       1996
                                       =100
                1996         83.3     100.0
                1997         86.8     104.2
                1998         91.3     109.6
                1999         95.7     114.9
                2000         100.0    120.0
                2001         104.4    125.3
                2002         108.1    129.8
                2003         111.7    134.1
                2004         116.7    140.1
                2005         121.4    145.7
                2006
                             127.0    152.5
               estimate

(b) Index of average real earnings

       Divide Rebased Index of Earnings by Consumer Price Index

                                   Index of
                                   Average
                          Consumer          Index of
                                   Earnings
               Year         Price             Real
                                   Rebased
                            Index           Earnings
                                     1996
                                     =100
             1996           100      100.0      100.0
             1997          101.8     104.2      102.4
             1998          103.4     109.6      106.0
             1999          104.8     114.9      109.6
             2000          105.7     120.0      113.5
             2001          106.9     125.3      117.2
             2002          108.3     129.8      119.9
             2003          109.8     134.1      122.1
             2004          111.2     140.1      126.0
             2005          113.5     145.7      128.4
             2006
                           116.7     152.5      130.7
            estimate


(c) £350.64 x 130.7/100 = £458.29
                         -£420.78 = £37.51




3009/3/07/MA                                    8            CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 3 CONTINUED

(d)
      (i)    Quota sampling involves taking a sample with a given number of people. Often this is done
             by stopping people in the street. Interviewers are given quota controls i.e. the characteristics
             that the respondents should have. These often relate to age, gender and income. The
             advantages are the sample is relatively cheap; there is no need for a sampling frame and no
             need for call-backs. The disadvantages are there may be bias in the choice of respondents,
             theoretically the standard error cannot be calculated so significance tests are not valid.

      (ii)   Systematic sampling involves taking a sample at a given interval. The interval is determined
             by the sampling proportion e.g. a 10% sampling proportion would mean items are chosen
             every 10 items. The first item to be chosen would be selected randomly between 1 and 10
             e.g. 4 and the 4th, 14th, 24th etc item sampled. The advantages are the method is relatively
             cheap. The disadvantages are there may be a natural period in the subjects and the method
             excludes or includes particular subjects and theoretically the standard error cannot be
             calculated so significance tests are not valid.




3009/3/07/MA                                       9
QUESTION 4

(a) Explain the difference between a paired t test and a two independent sample means test.
                                                                                        (4 marks)

Two random samples of twelve car hire companies were taken in countries X and Y. The car rental
costs in £ per 10 day hire for a standard four door 2000 cc saloon are given in the table below.

                Car Rental Costs in       Car Rental Costs in
                    Country X                 Country Y

                        350                        525
                        525                        340
                        550                        430
                        525                        520
                        390                        670
                        540                        470
                        525                        520
                        570                        540
                        530                        650
                        650                        650
                        540                        680
                        590                        450

(b) Test whether the car rentals paid in country X differ from those paid in Country Y.
                                                                                          (12 marks)

(c) Explain what is meant by the sampling distribution of the mean.
                                                                                           (4 marks)

                                                                                    (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                  10
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 4

(a) A paired t test is used when a single sample is subject to two treatments, for example, before and
    after: a two independent sample means test is used when the results from two separate samples
    are compared in respect of a stated parameter, the mean.

(b) Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the car rentals paid in country X and country Y.
    Alternative hypothesis: There is a difference in the car rentals paid in country X and country Y

Degrees of freedom n + m –2 = 12+12 –2 = 22
Critical t values 2.07/2.82


      x               y               x2          y2           (x − x ) (y − y )
                                                                      2           2


     350             525            122500      275625        30189.06       1.5625
     525             340            275625      115600         1.5625       33764.06
     550             430            302500      184900        689.0625 8789.063
     525             520            275625      270400         1.5625       14.0625
   390               670         152100         448900        17889.06      21389.06
   540               470         291600         220900        264.0625      2889.063
   525               520         275625         270400         1.5625        14.0625
   570               540         324900         291600        2139.063      264.0625
   530               650         280900         422500        39.0625       15939.06
   650               650         422500         422500        15939.06      15939.06
   540               680         291600         462400        264.0625      24414.06
   590               450         348100         202500        4389.063      5439.063
  6285              6445         3363575       3588225        71806.25      128856.3

     Σx               Σy             Σx2          Σy2          (
                                                              Σ x−x   ) Σ (y − y )
                                                                        2             2




         6285                                                 6445
x=            = 523.75                                  y =        = 537.083
          12                                                   12

               −             −
         ( x − x ) 2 + ( y − y) 2            71806.25 + 128856.3   s = 95.5 (95.0)
s=                                     s=
               n+m−2                             12 + 12 − 2




          x− y               523.75 − 537.083 = -0.34
t=                      t=
           1 1                       1 1
     s      +                 95.5     +
           n m                      12 12


Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. There is no difference in the
car rentals paid in country X and country Y.

(c) When a large number of samples of a given size are taken from a population the mean values will
    vary from sample to sample. If the sample size is large (30 and greater) the sample means will be
    normally distributed. If the sample size is small (less than 30) the means will be distributed in
    accordance with the t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom.




3009/3/07/MA                                              11
QUESTION 5

(a) Explain what the difference is between a one tail and a two tail test.
                                                                                              (4 marks)

The records of a company for two manufacturing plants X and Y, contain the following data on order
value for the past year:

                                                      Plant X                Plant Y
  Mean order value £                                    760                   698
  Median order value £                                  720                   665
  Standard deviation £                                  145                   135
  Sample size                                            35                    40



(b) Calculate the coefficient of skewness for both plants and comment on your answers.
                                                                                              (4 marks)

(c) Test whether the mean order value is significantly higher in plant X than in plant Y.
                                                                                              (8 marks)

When the order values of the two plants are combined the mean order value for the company as a
whole is found to be £726.93 and the standard deviation is £139.76.

(d) Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the overall mean order value.
                                                                                              (4 marks)

                                                                                       (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                  12
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 5

(a) A one tail test tests if the difference between two samples varies in a single direction either
    greater or smaller; a two tail test tests if the difference between two samples varies in either
    direction (greater or smaller).

(b)
      Coefficient of Skew =    3(Mean – Median)
                               Standard Deviation

                   Plant X =   3(760 -720) = 120/145 = 0.828
                                  145
                   Plant Y =   3(698 – 665) = 99/135 = 0.733
                                   135

Both distribution are positively skewed, Plant X is more skewed than plant Y.



(c) Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the mean order value between plant X and plant Y.

      Alternative hypothesis: The mean order value in plant X is greater than in plant Y.


Critical z value = 1.64/2.33


        x1 − x 2         760 − 698                  62
z=                  =                     =                    = 1.908
        s12 s 2
              2
                        1452       1352       600.71 + 455.625
           +                   +
        n1 n2            35         40


Conclusions: There is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level; the mean order
value at plant X is greater than the mean order value at plant Y. At the 0.01 level there is insufficient
evidence to support the alternative hypothesis; the mean order value does not differ between the two
plants.


                                              σ                        139.76
(e) 95% confidence interval = x ± 1.96            =    726.93 ± 1.96
                                              n                          75


                               = 726.93 ± 31.63 = £695.30 to £758.56




3009/3/07/MA                                      13
QUESTION 6

A random sample is taken of workers in different sectors of the economy and the number of days they
are absent on sick leave in 2006 are recorded in the table below.

                                                         Sector of the Economy
                                    Public Sector          Domestic Owned             Foreign Owned
     Sick Leave Taken                                         Private                     Private

  Less than 5 days sick                   35                        45                        20
  leave
  5 days and less than 10                 95                       102                        35
  days sick leave

  10 or more days sick                    70                        53                        45
  leave

(a) Test whether there is any association between the sector of the economy and the amount of sick
    leave taken.
                                                                                      (12 marks)

In a similar survey carried out 5 years earlier the proportions of people taking sick leave were as
follows.

                  Less than 5         and less than 10    10 or more days
                  days sick leave      days sick leave    sick leave
                    17%                  54%                29%

(b) Test whether the pattern of sick leave taken has changed over the period.
                                                                                              (8 marks)

                                                                                      (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                   14
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 6

(a) Null hypothesis: there is no association between the sector of the economy and the number of
    days sick leave taken.
    Alternative hypothesis: there is association between the sector of the economy and the number
    of days sick leave taken.

Degrees of freedom (R-1)(C-1) = (3-1)(3-1) = 4
Critical Χ2 = 9.49/13.28

Observed
                 35         45           20
                 95        102           35
                 70         53           45

Expected

                 40         40          20
                92.8       92.8         46.4
                67.2       67.2         33.6


Contributions to X2

                0.625    0.625        0
             0.052155 0.912069 2.800862
             0.116667 3.000595 3.867857
                                 X2 =   12.00021


Conclusions: The calculated value of X2, 12.00 is more than the critical value of X2 at the
0.05 level: reject the null hypothesis there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. There is
association between the work sector and the number of days sick leave taken.
The calculated value of X2, 12.00 is less than the critical value of X2 at the 0.01 level, there is
insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis: there is no association between the work sector and
the number of day’s sick leave taken.

(b) Null hypothesis: the pattern of sick leave has not changed.
    Alternative hypothesis: the pattern of sick leave has changed.

Degrees of freedom = n-1 = 3-1 = 2
Critical X2 = 5.99/9.21

Observed                         100           232     168
Expected                          85           270     145

Contributions to X2              2.65         5.35    3.65
                                                      X2 =       11.65


Conclusions: The calculated value of X2 is greater than the critical value of X2 at both the 0.05 and
0.01 levels: reject the null hypothesis accept the alternative hypothesis. There is strong evidence to
support the alternative hypothesis, the pattern of sick leave has changed.




3009/3/07/MA                                     15
QUESTION 7

A company’s largest selling product has average weekly sales of 2500 units with standard deviation
250 units. Assume that weekly sales are normally distributed.

(a) Find the probability that weekly sales:

    (i)    exceed 3050 units
    (ii)   lie between 3100 units and 2200 units
                                                                                           (8 marks)

(b) Find the level of sales which will be exceeded on 90% of occasions.
                                                                                           (3 marks)

The same company is planning the launch of a new product. It estimates that the probability of good
economic conditions is 70%. If economic conditions are good the probability of the workforce
accepting a new wage offer is 30%; if economic conditions are poor the probability of the workforce
accepting a new wage offer is 50%.

(c) Find the probability that the wage offer is accepted.
                                                                                           (5 marks)

(d) If the wage offer is accepted what is the probability that the economic conditions were poor.
                                                                                            (4 marks)

                                                                                   (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                  16
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 7

(a)
      (i)     probability that sales exceed 3050 units
                    x−x           3050 − 2500 550
               z=             =              =     = 2.2
                     σ               250       250
               Probability = 1 – 0.986 = 0.014


      (ii)    probability that sales lie between 3100 units and 2200 units.

Probability of sales between 2500 and 3100
      x−x          3100 − 2500 600
z=             =              =     = 2.4
      σ               250       250
Probability = 0.992 –0.5 = 0.492

Probability of sales between 2500 and 2200

      x−x           2200 − 2500 300
z=             =               =     = 1.2
      σ                250       250
Probability = 0.885 –0.5 = 0.385

Probability of sales 2200 to 3100 = 0.492 +0.385 = 0.877


(b)
      Nearest table value for 90%/0.90 is z = 1.3

                   x−x
              z=          ,
                    σ

             x − 2500
− 1.3 =
               250
x = (-1.3 x 250) + 2500 - 325 +2500 = 2175 units

(c)

Probability that the wage offer is accepted.

Good economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.7 x 0.3 = 0.21
+
Poor economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15
                                                             = 0.36


(d)

Probability poor economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.15 = 0.4167 (0.42)
                Probability wage offer accepted                0.36




3009/3/07/MA                                     17
QUESTION 8

(a) Explain how the mean and range chart are used in quality control.
                                                                                                 (4 marks)

Quality control procedures are used which set the warning limits at the 0.025 probability point and
action limits at the 0.001 probability point. This means, for example, that the upper action limit is set so
that the probability of the means exceeding the limit is 0.001. The weight of a packet of biscuits is set
at 150 grams with a standard deviation of 8 grams. Samples of 8 items at a time are taken from the
production line to check the accuracy of the manufacturing process.

(b)
      (i)    Calculate the values of the action and warning limits and construct a quality control chart to
             monitor the manufacturing process.
                                                                                                 (8 marks)

      (ii)   The results for 7 samples are given below. Plot these on your quality control chart and
             comment on the results.
                                                                                               (4 marks)

sample number                1     2         3           4       5      6      7
sample mean (grams)         150.5 156.4     143.9      152.9   148.13 159.5   157.6

(c) Find the probability that a single item taken from the production line lies outside the action limits.
    You may assume that the control chart was correctly set up with mean 150 grams and standard
    deviation 8 grams.
                                                                                               (4 marks)

                                                                                         (Total 20 marks)




3009/3/07/MA                                      18
MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 8

(a) When a product is made to a standard the aim is that average dimension of a sample is close to
    the specified value. It is also intended that the variability of the item should remain constant.

          The mean chart checks that the average stays within acceptable limits and the range chart
          checks that the variability of the product stays within acceptable limits.

                                               σ                     8
(b) Warning Limits = x ± 1.96                       =   150 ± 1.96      = 144.5 to 155.5
                                                n                     8


                                           σ
          Action Limits = x ± 3.09                 = 141.3 to 158.7
                                            n


                                           Quality Control Chart

                  165.0


                  160.0
                                                                                                      UAL

                  155.0                                                                               UWL
   Weight grams




                                                                                                      Mean
                  150.0


                  145.0
                                                                                                      LWL

                                                                                                      LAL
                  140.0


                  135.0
                            1          2            3         4          5        6          7
                                                        Sample Number



The process is outside the action limits at sample 6. It needs to be stopped and adjusted.


(c) Probability an item lies above the upper action limit

             x−μ                 158.7 − 150
z=                        = z=               = 8.7/8 = 1.09
                  σ                   8
Probability for table value for z = 1.09 (1.1) = 0.864

Required probability = 1- 0.864 = 0.136


Probability an item lies below the lower action limit = 0.136

Total Probability = 0.272




3009/3/07/MA                                                  19                © Education Development International plc 2007

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017
96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code301796130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017
96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017priya5594
 
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code301796390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017priya5594
 
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-301684427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016priya5594
 
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s355184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3priya5594
 
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_schemeclaire meadows-smith
 
Upsr mat trial_19_1
Upsr mat trial_19_1Upsr mat trial_19_1
Upsr mat trial_19_1Ragulan Dev
 
reliance steel & aluminum 2006_AnnualReport
reliance steel & aluminum  2006_AnnualReportreliance steel & aluminum  2006_AnnualReport
reliance steel & aluminum 2006_AnnualReportfinance32
 
0580 s12 ms_42
0580 s12 ms_420580 s12 ms_42
0580 s12 ms_42salma2020
 
0580 w13 ms_42
0580 w13 ms_420580 w13 ms_42
0580 w13 ms_42King Ali
 
Van koten economics experiments_ 2013.02.27
Van koten  economics experiments_ 2013.02.27Van koten  economics experiments_ 2013.02.27
Van koten economics experiments_ 2013.02.27Silvester Van Koten
 
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machineryguestd436758
 
0580 w13 ms_41
0580 w13 ms_410580 w13 ms_41
0580 w13 ms_41King Ali
 
Sweco Annual Review 2010
Sweco Annual Review 2010Sweco Annual Review 2010
Sweco Annual Review 2010Sweco
 
Chapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciònChapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciònfedericoblanco
 
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1Predrag Pesic
 
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...YorkConsultingLLP
 
Lesson 1.1 multiplication
Lesson 1.1 multiplicationLesson 1.1 multiplication
Lesson 1.1 multiplicationA V Prakasam
 
0580 w13 qp_41
0580 w13 qp_410580 w13 qp_41
0580 w13 qp_41King Ali
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017
96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code301796130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017
96130014 cost-accounting-series-3-2010-code3017
 
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code301796390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017
96390194 cost-accounting-series-4-2011-code3017
 
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-301684427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
 
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s355184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
 
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme
04a 5 mb2f_unit_2_november_2011_mark_scheme
 
AnswersCWA-FR-2012
AnswersCWA-FR-2012AnswersCWA-FR-2012
AnswersCWA-FR-2012
 
Upsr mat trial_19_1
Upsr mat trial_19_1Upsr mat trial_19_1
Upsr mat trial_19_1
 
reliance steel & aluminum 2006_AnnualReport
reliance steel & aluminum  2006_AnnualReportreliance steel & aluminum  2006_AnnualReport
reliance steel & aluminum 2006_AnnualReport
 
0580 s12 ms_42
0580 s12 ms_420580 s12 ms_42
0580 s12 ms_42
 
0580 w13 ms_42
0580 w13 ms_420580 w13 ms_42
0580 w13 ms_42
 
Van koten economics experiments_ 2013.02.27
Van koten  economics experiments_ 2013.02.27Van koten  economics experiments_ 2013.02.27
Van koten economics experiments_ 2013.02.27
 
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machinery
 
0580 w13 ms_41
0580 w13 ms_410580 w13 ms_41
0580 w13 ms_41
 
Sweco Annual Review 2010
Sweco Annual Review 2010Sweco Annual Review 2010
Sweco Annual Review 2010
 
Chapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciònChapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciòn
 
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1
Team maverick bond portfolio managment projekt 1
 
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
 
jacobs_ar00
jacobs_ar00jacobs_ar00
jacobs_ar00
 
Lesson 1.1 multiplication
Lesson 1.1 multiplicationLesson 1.1 multiplication
Lesson 1.1 multiplication
 
0580 w13 qp_41
0580 w13 qp_410580 w13 qp_41
0580 w13 qp_41
 

Ähnlich wie 97901279 business-statstics-series-3-2007-code3009

Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docx
Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docxQuestion 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docx
Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docxIRESH3
 
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 Results
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 ResultsVIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 Results
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 ResultsVIVO - Investor Relations
 
Embraer 4 q10 results_final
Embraer 4 q10 results_finalEmbraer 4 q10 results_final
Embraer 4 q10 results_finalEmbraer RI
 
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 Eng
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 EngTim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 Eng
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 EngTIM RI
 
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallSix Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallNehal Dixit
 
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berenson
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by BerensonSolutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berenson
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berensonriven063
 
2020 technologies annual report 2009
2020 technologies annual report 20092020 technologies annual report 2009
2020 technologies annual report 200920-20 Technologies
 
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)Omer Perchik
 
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013Inst Presentation IR - February 2013
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013Embraer RI
 
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013Inst Presentation IR - January 2013
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013Embraer RI
 
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012Embraer RI
 
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graph
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graphDatainterpretation tabulation and bar graph
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graphTamal Kumar Das
 
Campus Crest Communities Investor Presentation
Campus Crest Communities Investor PresentationCampus Crest Communities Investor Presentation
Campus Crest Communities Investor PresentationCampus Crest Communities
 

Ähnlich wie 97901279 business-statstics-series-3-2007-code3009 (20)

Paper W3 2003
Paper W3 2003Paper W3 2003
Paper W3 2003
 
P79 mba202
P79 mba202P79 mba202
P79 mba202
 
Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docx
Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docxQuestion 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docx
Question 1 – Exercise 8.3Why is it not possible in Example 8.1 o.docx
 
Demand Forcasting
Demand ForcastingDemand Forcasting
Demand Forcasting
 
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 Results
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 ResultsVIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 Results
VIVO - Apresentation of 4th Quarter 2007 Results
 
Embraer 4 q10 results_final
Embraer 4 q10 results_finalEmbraer 4 q10 results_final
Embraer 4 q10 results_final
 
Wmt Model Template
Wmt Model TemplateWmt Model Template
Wmt Model Template
 
Inaugural Lecture
Inaugural LectureInaugural Lecture
Inaugural Lecture
 
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 Eng
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 EngTim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 Eng
Tim Presentation Deutsche Conference Set09 Eng
 
Cs207 4
Cs207 4Cs207 4
Cs207 4
 
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallSix Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
 
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berenson
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by BerensonSolutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berenson
Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics 13th Edition by Berenson
 
2008 -Feb -MAT
2008 -Feb -MAT2008 -Feb -MAT
2008 -Feb -MAT
 
2020 technologies annual report 2009
2020 technologies annual report 20092020 technologies annual report 2009
2020 technologies annual report 2009
 
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)
How To Pitch - Genesis Partners (Gil Dibner)
 
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013Inst Presentation IR - February 2013
Inst Presentation IR - February 2013
 
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013Inst Presentation IR - January 2013
Inst Presentation IR - January 2013
 
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012
Apresentação Institucional RI - Maio 2012
 
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graph
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graphDatainterpretation tabulation and bar graph
Datainterpretation tabulation and bar graph
 
Campus Crest Communities Investor Presentation
Campus Crest Communities Investor PresentationCampus Crest Communities Investor Presentation
Campus Crest Communities Investor Presentation
 

97901279 business-statstics-series-3-2007-code3009

  • 2. Business Statistics Level 3 Series 3 2007 How to use this booklet Model Answers have been developed by Education Development International plc (EDI) to offer additional information and guidance to Centres, teachers and candidates as they prepare for LCCI International Qualifications. The contents of this booklet are divided into 3 elements: (1) Questions – reproduced from the printed examination paper (2) Model Answers – summary of the main points that the Chief Examiner expected to see in the answers to each question in the examination paper, plus a fully worked example or sample answer (where applicable) (3) Helpful Hints – where appropriate, additional guidance relating to individual questions or to examination technique Teachers and candidates should find this booklet an invaluable teaching tool and an aid to success. EDI provides Model Answers to help candidates gain a general understanding of the standard required. The general standard of model answers is one that would achieve a Distinction grade. EDI accepts that candidates may offer other answers that could be equally valid. © Education Development International plc 2007 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the Publisher. The book may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover, other than that in which it is published, without the prior consent of the Publisher. 1
  • 3. QUESTION 1 Over the past 9 years a company has achieved the following market share Year Market Share % 1998 22.3 1999 21.6 2000 22.0 2001 21.1 2002 20.8 2003 19.9 2004 19.5 2005 18.4 2006 17.6 (a) Plot the data on a graph and comment on the pattern shown. (4 marks) (b) Calculate and state the least squares regression line for Market Share dependent on Year. (10 marks) (c) Use the regression line found in (b) to estimate the year in which market share is likely to fall to 15% and comment upon the accuracy of your estimate. (6 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 2
  • 4. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 1 (a) Market Share % v Time 23 22 21 Market Share % 20 19 18 17 16 15 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year Comment: ‘The market share is decreasing over time.’ (b) Year Market Share % x y x2 xy 1 22.3 1 22.3 2 21.6 4 43.2 3 22.0 9 66.0 4 21.1 16 84.4 5 20.8 25 104.0 6 19.9 36 119.4 7 19.5 49 136.5 8 18.4 64 147.2 9 17.6 81 158.4 45 183.2 285 881.4 Σx Σy Σx2 Σxy 3009/3/07/MA 3 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE
  • 5. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 1 CONTINUED n∑ xy − (∑ x )(∑ y ) b= n∑ x 2 − (∑ x ) 2 (9 x881.4) − (45 x183.2) b= 9 x 285 − 45 2 b = -311.4 = -0.577 (-0.58) 540 a= ∑ y −b∑x n n If x goes from 1998 to 2006 the 183.2 45 equation is y = 1174.84-0.577x a= − −0.577 x 9 9 a = 20.36 +2.89 = 23.25 Y = 23.25 – 0.577x (c) Y = 23.25-0.557x 15 = 23.25 –0.577x x = 23.25 – 15 0.577 x = 14.29 Round up to 15 Therefore year is 2012 The answer is an extrapolation and therefore subject to uncertainty. In real life the business might change strategy to protect its market share. A better estimate would have been obtained from using the regression line for year on market share. 3009/3/07/MA 4
  • 6. QUESTION 2 (a) Explain what is meant by a 90% confidence interval for a sample proportion. (4 marks) A company is concerned about the level of customer satisfaction with the service provided by its domestic and overseas call centre operations. A random sample of customers calling its domestic call centre showed that 267 out of 400 were satisfied or very satisfied with the service. A random sample of customers calling its overseas call centre showed that 350 out of 500 were satisfied or very satisfied with the service. (b) Test whether there is a difference in the proportion of customers satisfied or very satisfied with the service provided at the two call centres. (12 marks) (c) Explain what is meant by a type 2 error. Might such an error have been committed in part (b) above? (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 5
  • 7. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 2 (a) The 90% confidence interval means that if samples of the same size are taken the sample proportion will lie within the stated range 90 times out of 100. (b) Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the customer service from its domestic and overseas call centres. Alternative hypothesis: there is a difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the customer service from its domestic and overseas call centres. Critical z value = 1.96/2.58 p1 = 267/400 = 0.6675, p2 = 350/500 = 0.7 267 + 350 617 Pooled value of p = = = 0.6856 400 + 500 900 0.6675 − 0.7 − 0.0325 z= = = - 1.04 ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ 0.2156(0.0045) 0.6856(1 − 0.6856)⎜ + ⎟ ⎝ 400 500 ⎠ Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level. There is no difference in the proportion satisfied or very satisfied with the customer service from its domestic and overseas call centres. (c) A type 2 error is to accept the null hypothesis when it is false. A type 2 error may have been committed. 3009/3/07/MA 6
  • 8. QUESTION 3 The consumer price index and the index of average earnings are as follows: Year Consumer Index of Average Price Index Earnings 1996 100.0 83.3 1997 101.8 86.8 1998 103.4 91.3 1999 104.8 95.7 2000 105.7 100.0 2001 106.9 104.4 2002 108.3 108.1 2003 109.8 111.7 2004 111.2 116.7 2005 113.5 121.4 2006 116.7 127.0 estimate (a) Rebase the index of average earnings to 1996 as the base year = 100 (4 marks) (b) Using the information in the table and your answer to part (a), calculate an index of average real earnings with 1996 as the base year. (4 marks) A worker’s wage has risen, between the years 1996 to 2006, from £350.64 to £420.78. (c) What further increase would be necessary to enable the worker’s wage to keep pace with the Real Earnings Index? (4 marks) (d) (i) Explain how you would carry out a Quota Sample and give one advantage and one disadvantage of the method. (ii) Explain how you would carry out a Systematic Sample and give one advantage and one disadvantage of the method. (8 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 7
  • 9. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 3 (a) Conversion of Index of Average Earnings to base year 1996 = 100 Divide by 83.3 multiply by 100 throughout Index of Average Index of Earnings Year Average Rebased Earnings 1996 =100 1996 83.3 100.0 1997 86.8 104.2 1998 91.3 109.6 1999 95.7 114.9 2000 100.0 120.0 2001 104.4 125.3 2002 108.1 129.8 2003 111.7 134.1 2004 116.7 140.1 2005 121.4 145.7 2006 127.0 152.5 estimate (b) Index of average real earnings Divide Rebased Index of Earnings by Consumer Price Index Index of Average Consumer Index of Earnings Year Price Real Rebased Index Earnings 1996 =100 1996 100 100.0 100.0 1997 101.8 104.2 102.4 1998 103.4 109.6 106.0 1999 104.8 114.9 109.6 2000 105.7 120.0 113.5 2001 106.9 125.3 117.2 2002 108.3 129.8 119.9 2003 109.8 134.1 122.1 2004 111.2 140.1 126.0 2005 113.5 145.7 128.4 2006 116.7 152.5 130.7 estimate (c) £350.64 x 130.7/100 = £458.29 -£420.78 = £37.51 3009/3/07/MA 8 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE
  • 10. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 3 CONTINUED (d) (i) Quota sampling involves taking a sample with a given number of people. Often this is done by stopping people in the street. Interviewers are given quota controls i.e. the characteristics that the respondents should have. These often relate to age, gender and income. The advantages are the sample is relatively cheap; there is no need for a sampling frame and no need for call-backs. The disadvantages are there may be bias in the choice of respondents, theoretically the standard error cannot be calculated so significance tests are not valid. (ii) Systematic sampling involves taking a sample at a given interval. The interval is determined by the sampling proportion e.g. a 10% sampling proportion would mean items are chosen every 10 items. The first item to be chosen would be selected randomly between 1 and 10 e.g. 4 and the 4th, 14th, 24th etc item sampled. The advantages are the method is relatively cheap. The disadvantages are there may be a natural period in the subjects and the method excludes or includes particular subjects and theoretically the standard error cannot be calculated so significance tests are not valid. 3009/3/07/MA 9
  • 11. QUESTION 4 (a) Explain the difference between a paired t test and a two independent sample means test. (4 marks) Two random samples of twelve car hire companies were taken in countries X and Y. The car rental costs in £ per 10 day hire for a standard four door 2000 cc saloon are given in the table below. Car Rental Costs in Car Rental Costs in Country X Country Y 350 525 525 340 550 430 525 520 390 670 540 470 525 520 570 540 530 650 650 650 540 680 590 450 (b) Test whether the car rentals paid in country X differ from those paid in Country Y. (12 marks) (c) Explain what is meant by the sampling distribution of the mean. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 10
  • 12. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 4 (a) A paired t test is used when a single sample is subject to two treatments, for example, before and after: a two independent sample means test is used when the results from two separate samples are compared in respect of a stated parameter, the mean. (b) Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the car rentals paid in country X and country Y. Alternative hypothesis: There is a difference in the car rentals paid in country X and country Y Degrees of freedom n + m –2 = 12+12 –2 = 22 Critical t values 2.07/2.82 x y x2 y2 (x − x ) (y − y ) 2 2 350 525 122500 275625 30189.06 1.5625 525 340 275625 115600 1.5625 33764.06 550 430 302500 184900 689.0625 8789.063 525 520 275625 270400 1.5625 14.0625 390 670 152100 448900 17889.06 21389.06 540 470 291600 220900 264.0625 2889.063 525 520 275625 270400 1.5625 14.0625 570 540 324900 291600 2139.063 264.0625 530 650 280900 422500 39.0625 15939.06 650 650 422500 422500 15939.06 15939.06 540 680 291600 462400 264.0625 24414.06 590 450 348100 202500 4389.063 5439.063 6285 6445 3363575 3588225 71806.25 128856.3 Σx Σy Σx2 Σy2 ( Σ x−x ) Σ (y − y ) 2 2 6285 6445 x= = 523.75 y = = 537.083 12 12 − − ( x − x ) 2 + ( y − y) 2 71806.25 + 128856.3 s = 95.5 (95.0) s= s= n+m−2 12 + 12 − 2 x− y 523.75 − 537.083 = -0.34 t= t= 1 1 1 1 s + 95.5 + n m 12 12 Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. There is no difference in the car rentals paid in country X and country Y. (c) When a large number of samples of a given size are taken from a population the mean values will vary from sample to sample. If the sample size is large (30 and greater) the sample means will be normally distributed. If the sample size is small (less than 30) the means will be distributed in accordance with the t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom. 3009/3/07/MA 11
  • 13. QUESTION 5 (a) Explain what the difference is between a one tail and a two tail test. (4 marks) The records of a company for two manufacturing plants X and Y, contain the following data on order value for the past year: Plant X Plant Y Mean order value £ 760 698 Median order value £ 720 665 Standard deviation £ 145 135 Sample size 35 40 (b) Calculate the coefficient of skewness for both plants and comment on your answers. (4 marks) (c) Test whether the mean order value is significantly higher in plant X than in plant Y. (8 marks) When the order values of the two plants are combined the mean order value for the company as a whole is found to be £726.93 and the standard deviation is £139.76. (d) Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the overall mean order value. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 12
  • 14. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 5 (a) A one tail test tests if the difference between two samples varies in a single direction either greater or smaller; a two tail test tests if the difference between two samples varies in either direction (greater or smaller). (b) Coefficient of Skew = 3(Mean – Median) Standard Deviation Plant X = 3(760 -720) = 120/145 = 0.828 145 Plant Y = 3(698 – 665) = 99/135 = 0.733 135 Both distribution are positively skewed, Plant X is more skewed than plant Y. (c) Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the mean order value between plant X and plant Y. Alternative hypothesis: The mean order value in plant X is greater than in plant Y. Critical z value = 1.64/2.33 x1 − x 2 760 − 698 62 z= = = = 1.908 s12 s 2 2 1452 1352 600.71 + 455.625 + + n1 n2 35 40 Conclusions: There is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level; the mean order value at plant X is greater than the mean order value at plant Y. At the 0.01 level there is insufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis; the mean order value does not differ between the two plants. σ 139.76 (e) 95% confidence interval = x ± 1.96 = 726.93 ± 1.96 n 75 = 726.93 ± 31.63 = £695.30 to £758.56 3009/3/07/MA 13
  • 15. QUESTION 6 A random sample is taken of workers in different sectors of the economy and the number of days they are absent on sick leave in 2006 are recorded in the table below. Sector of the Economy Public Sector Domestic Owned Foreign Owned Sick Leave Taken Private Private Less than 5 days sick 35 45 20 leave 5 days and less than 10 95 102 35 days sick leave 10 or more days sick 70 53 45 leave (a) Test whether there is any association between the sector of the economy and the amount of sick leave taken. (12 marks) In a similar survey carried out 5 years earlier the proportions of people taking sick leave were as follows. Less than 5 and less than 10 10 or more days days sick leave days sick leave sick leave 17% 54% 29% (b) Test whether the pattern of sick leave taken has changed over the period. (8 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 14
  • 16. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 6 (a) Null hypothesis: there is no association between the sector of the economy and the number of days sick leave taken. Alternative hypothesis: there is association between the sector of the economy and the number of days sick leave taken. Degrees of freedom (R-1)(C-1) = (3-1)(3-1) = 4 Critical Χ2 = 9.49/13.28 Observed 35 45 20 95 102 35 70 53 45 Expected 40 40 20 92.8 92.8 46.4 67.2 67.2 33.6 Contributions to X2 0.625 0.625 0 0.052155 0.912069 2.800862 0.116667 3.000595 3.867857 X2 = 12.00021 Conclusions: The calculated value of X2, 12.00 is more than the critical value of X2 at the 0.05 level: reject the null hypothesis there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. There is association between the work sector and the number of days sick leave taken. The calculated value of X2, 12.00 is less than the critical value of X2 at the 0.01 level, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis: there is no association between the work sector and the number of day’s sick leave taken. (b) Null hypothesis: the pattern of sick leave has not changed. Alternative hypothesis: the pattern of sick leave has changed. Degrees of freedom = n-1 = 3-1 = 2 Critical X2 = 5.99/9.21 Observed 100 232 168 Expected 85 270 145 Contributions to X2 2.65 5.35 3.65 X2 = 11.65 Conclusions: The calculated value of X2 is greater than the critical value of X2 at both the 0.05 and 0.01 levels: reject the null hypothesis accept the alternative hypothesis. There is strong evidence to support the alternative hypothesis, the pattern of sick leave has changed. 3009/3/07/MA 15
  • 17. QUESTION 7 A company’s largest selling product has average weekly sales of 2500 units with standard deviation 250 units. Assume that weekly sales are normally distributed. (a) Find the probability that weekly sales: (i) exceed 3050 units (ii) lie between 3100 units and 2200 units (8 marks) (b) Find the level of sales which will be exceeded on 90% of occasions. (3 marks) The same company is planning the launch of a new product. It estimates that the probability of good economic conditions is 70%. If economic conditions are good the probability of the workforce accepting a new wage offer is 30%; if economic conditions are poor the probability of the workforce accepting a new wage offer is 50%. (c) Find the probability that the wage offer is accepted. (5 marks) (d) If the wage offer is accepted what is the probability that the economic conditions were poor. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 16
  • 18. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 7 (a) (i) probability that sales exceed 3050 units x−x 3050 − 2500 550 z= = = = 2.2 σ 250 250 Probability = 1 – 0.986 = 0.014 (ii) probability that sales lie between 3100 units and 2200 units. Probability of sales between 2500 and 3100 x−x 3100 − 2500 600 z= = = = 2.4 σ 250 250 Probability = 0.992 –0.5 = 0.492 Probability of sales between 2500 and 2200 x−x 2200 − 2500 300 z= = = = 1.2 σ 250 250 Probability = 0.885 –0.5 = 0.385 Probability of sales 2200 to 3100 = 0.492 +0.385 = 0.877 (b) Nearest table value for 90%/0.90 is z = 1.3 x−x z= , σ x − 2500 − 1.3 = 250 x = (-1.3 x 250) + 2500 - 325 +2500 = 2175 units (c) Probability that the wage offer is accepted. Good economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.7 x 0.3 = 0.21 + Poor economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15 = 0.36 (d) Probability poor economic conditions and wage offer accepted = 0.15 = 0.4167 (0.42) Probability wage offer accepted 0.36 3009/3/07/MA 17
  • 19. QUESTION 8 (a) Explain how the mean and range chart are used in quality control. (4 marks) Quality control procedures are used which set the warning limits at the 0.025 probability point and action limits at the 0.001 probability point. This means, for example, that the upper action limit is set so that the probability of the means exceeding the limit is 0.001. The weight of a packet of biscuits is set at 150 grams with a standard deviation of 8 grams. Samples of 8 items at a time are taken from the production line to check the accuracy of the manufacturing process. (b) (i) Calculate the values of the action and warning limits and construct a quality control chart to monitor the manufacturing process. (8 marks) (ii) The results for 7 samples are given below. Plot these on your quality control chart and comment on the results. (4 marks) sample number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 sample mean (grams) 150.5 156.4 143.9 152.9 148.13 159.5 157.6 (c) Find the probability that a single item taken from the production line lies outside the action limits. You may assume that the control chart was correctly set up with mean 150 grams and standard deviation 8 grams. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3009/3/07/MA 18
  • 20. MODEL ANSWER TO QUESTION 8 (a) When a product is made to a standard the aim is that average dimension of a sample is close to the specified value. It is also intended that the variability of the item should remain constant. The mean chart checks that the average stays within acceptable limits and the range chart checks that the variability of the product stays within acceptable limits. σ 8 (b) Warning Limits = x ± 1.96 = 150 ± 1.96 = 144.5 to 155.5 n 8 σ Action Limits = x ± 3.09 = 141.3 to 158.7 n Quality Control Chart 165.0 160.0 UAL 155.0 UWL Weight grams Mean 150.0 145.0 LWL LAL 140.0 135.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sample Number The process is outside the action limits at sample 6. It needs to be stopped and adjusted. (c) Probability an item lies above the upper action limit x−μ 158.7 − 150 z= = z= = 8.7/8 = 1.09 σ 8 Probability for table value for z = 1.09 (1.1) = 0.864 Required probability = 1- 0.864 = 0.136 Probability an item lies below the lower action limit = 0.136 Total Probability = 0.272 3009/3/07/MA 19 © Education Development International plc 2007