Public plicy analysis by CV Patton & DS Sawicki

1. B Y :
N O V I Y A N T I
1 1 6 0 3 0 1 1 7 0 1 1 0 1 1
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS
“WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY
IN MALANG CITY”

2. List of Presentation

3. … BACKGROUND …

4. … Public Policy Analysis …
 Public policy analysis used was based on the theory of public
policy analysis, CV Patton & DS Sawicki (1986).
1. Verify, define, detail the problems
2. Establish evaluation criteria
3. Identify alternative policies
4. Evaluate alternative policies
5. Display and select among alternative policies
6. Monitor policies outcomes

5. 1. Verify, define, detail the problems
Waste
Problem
Waste Management:
Sanitary Landfill
Human
Resources
Infrastructure
Community
Empowerment
Technology
The availability of the trash, trucks, wheelie bins
Public awareness to process / recycle waste
Waste recycling systems, process waste into electrical energy
The lack of a janitor and a cadre of environmental experts in the field
Cost
Every ton of waste managed in need of funds Rp75,000 per day, while the
volume of waste Malang city reach 400 tons per day. Thus, the government
needs funds Rp30 million per day for waste management

6. 2. Establish evaluation criteria

7. 3. Identify alternative policies
A. Sanitary Landfill
Sanitary Landfill is a high tech. Sanitary landfills
are equipped with a system that makes it easy to
control waste, such as leachate (waste water is
extracted from the waste) so it does not contaminate
groundwater; soil cover or overburden and also
processing the methane gas extracted out of the trash
can be fired electricity.

8. B. Decentralized waste management, involving the private
sector
 In Kitakyushu (Japan), garbage collection performed by the
government and the contractor. They even arranged the
separation and collection of waste
 In addition, waste management in Kitakyushu using Takakura
basket. It aims to reduce the volume of waste and recycle garbage.
C. Waste management into electrical energy
 In Monterey (Meksiko), Simeprodeso institution, successfully
managing the waste until it can produce electricity to illuminate
the third street lighting.
 It takes 11 million dollars, and its profit is 2 million per year.
 Incinerator is only consumes 20% of the electrical energy
generated, and the remaining 80% sold. But before trash is
separated by flammable or not, according to the trash can
provided.

9. D. Garbage Bank
 The concept of garbage bank is receiving the waste
collected which will then be replaced in the form of
money to the community in real terms. But society
will receive a savings book containing the recorded
amount of money, which later can be used for
various purposes, for example: pay the garbage
workers, pay his electricity, pay school fees
(application of waste bank at school), and others.

10. 4. Evaluate alternative policies
A. Sanitary Landfill
Net Benefit
• Increase the
economic value
of land.
• Ground water
cleanliness can
be maintained.
• utilization of
electrical
energy from
methane gas.
Effectiveness
• This system is
capable of
solving the
problem of
waste
management
because it can
meet the
expectations
and preserve
the
environment
and ensure.
Efficiency
• This system
is efficient
because the
facilities in a
single system
(sanitary
landfill) can
provide
many
benefits
Cost
• It needs to
raise about
Rp 100-200
million per
ton. While
operational
cost is Rp
100-300
thousand per
ton per day.
Administrative
• Waste
management is
not
complicated, of
any remaining
processes not
previously
used again, it
will be
processed back
to the other
benefits.

11. B. Decentralized waste management, involving the
private sector

12. C. Waste management into electrical energy

13. D. Garbage Bank
Net Benefit
• Community
gets money
from the
waste/trash
• Government
does not
bother to sort
garbage from
each
household
Effectiveness
• This policy is
not effective
because it only
solves the
problem of
waste that can
be recycled.
Efficiency
• Alternative
policy is
quite
efficient
because it
can empower
/ utilize
existing
resources.
Cost
• It does not
require
substantial
funds
Administrative
• Government
needs to
disseminate to
the society
about the
existence of the
garbage bank
so the policy
will go
smoothly.

14. 5. Display and select among alternative policies
Alternative
Policies
Detail
Problem
Sanitary
landfill
Decentralized
waste
management
Waste into
electrical
energy
Garbage Bank
Fund
(High cost)
- √ - √
Infrastructure - - - -
Community
Empowerment
√ √ - √
High
Technology
- - - √
Good Quality of
Human
Resources
√ - √ √

15. 6. Monitor policies outcomes
 Modify the existing policy alternative.
 In practice, sanitary landfill is still quite difficult to
implement, given that the government needs
substantial funds and sophisticated technology.
Therefore, garbage bank policy should be applied
while preparing for cooperation with foreign
investors to realize a sanitary landfill. Combination
sanitary landfills and garbage bank is an excellent
combination of alternative and ideal to apply.

16. … Recommendation …