SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 33
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
MEDICAL DEVICE SINGLE
AUDIT PROGRAM
Medical Device Regulatory
Conference 2.-3.12.2015
DR. PETER DRECHSLER
IMDRF International Medical Device
Regulatory Forum
MISSION
IMDRF/MC/N1FINAL:2014
“The mission of the IMDRF [International Medical Device
Regulators Forum] is to strategically accelerate international
medical device regulatory convergence to promote an efficient
and effective regulatory model for medical devices that is
responsive to emerging challenges in the sector while
protecting and maximizing public health and safety.”
IMDRF born February 2011 as a forum to discuss future directions in medical
device regulatory harmonization.
Voluntary group of medical device regulators from around the world who
have come together to build on the strong foundational work of the Global
Harmonization Task Force on Medical Devices (GHTF)
Accelerate international medical device regulatory harmonization and
convergence.
1992 - 2012
Medical device regulatory authorities & industry
Steering committee and 5 Study Groups covering subjects:
 Device Classifications; Labeling
 Post Market Surveillance, Adverse Event Reporting, Reports Exchange, GMDN
 Risk Management, Process Validation
 Auditor Training, Regulatory Auditing Guidelines
 Clinical Evaluations, Clinical Evidence
IMDRF Management Committee (MC) regulators:
 Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Russia, and the USA
Observers:
 APEC LSIF (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Life Science Innovation Forum)
 WHO - World Health Organization
Affiliate Organizations:
 Pan American Health Organization
 Asian Harmonization Working Party
Working Groups:
 Standards; MDSAP; Submissions; UDI; NCAR; Software
IMDRF Working group items:
National Competent Authorities Report Exchange Program
Roadmap for Implementation of Unique Device Identification system
Medical Device Single Audit Program
List of Recognized Standards
Regulated Product Submission
Software as a Medical Device
THE PROGRAM
Recognize Auditing Organizations (AO)
Single Audit by AO would:
 benefit patient health and patient access
 leverage regulatory resources
 minimize medical device manufacturing disruptions due to multiple regulatory
audits
 provide global benefit both on short term goals and longer term goals by IMDRF
regulators
STATEMENT OF COOPERATION (NOV 2012)
Australia
 Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA)
Brazil
 Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária
(ANVISA)
Canada
 Health Canada/Santé Canada
United States of America
 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
COOPERATION
IMDRF
 Initial Recognition, Surveillance, and Re-Recognition Criteria for MDSAP
Recognized Auditing Organizations
 Standardized Recognized AO Auditor Competency and Competency Maintenance
Requirements
 Standardized Regulatory Authority Assessor Competency and Competency
Maintenance Requirements
Standardized Audit and Assessment Models
 Auditing of a Manufacturer by an MDSAP Recognized AO
 Assessment of MDSAP Recognized AO’s by participating Regulatory Authorities
COOPERATION
Audit duration calculations
MDSAP audit model for consistency
MDSAP report
Standardized Rating System for Manufacturer Audit Findings
Standardized Rating System for Recognized Auditing Organization
Assessment Findings
Extremely stringent impartiality requirements
THE PILOT
MDSAP PILOT
Pilot started in January 2014 (for 3 years, to Dec 2016)
CB’s from participating member states can apply to AO’s
 CMDCAS recognized registrars
Office audit and witnessed audit required
 Conducted by regulators
September 2014 AO’s started conducting audits
Operational program slated for 2017
PARTICIPATING RAS As of June 2015
USA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Canada: Health Canada/Santé Canada
Brazil: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA)
Australia: Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA)
Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) and Pharmaceuticals and
Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)
OFFICIAL OBSERVERS As of June 2015
World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Program
European Union
AUTHORIZED AO See Mid-Pilot-Report
.
BSI Group America Inc. http://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/
TÜV SÜD America Inc. http://www.tuv-sud-america.com/
SAI Global Cert. Services PTY Ltd. http://www.qmi.com
LNE G-MED http://www.gmed.fr
TÜV USA Inc. http://www.tuv-nord.com/us
Intertek Testing Services NA Inc. http://www.intertek.com
PARTICIPATING MFG. SITES Data: Mid Pilot Report
Forecast: Myself
1
10
100
1000
10000
Aug-14
Oct-14
Dec-14
Feb-15
Apr-15
Jun-15
Aug-15
Oct-15
Dec-15
Feb-16
Apr-16
Jun-16
Aug-16
Oct-16
Dec-16
Cumulative total
KIMBERLY TRAUTMAN, FDA
Associate Director, International Affairs
Office of the Center Director
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Personal communication, 2015-10-22:
“…MDSAP is definitely going full implementation in January 2017,
so manufacturers should take advantage of the ‘learning
phase’ while they can…”
BENEFITS
BENEFITS FOR MANUFACTURERS
No additional requirements for manufacturers
Single audit optimizes time and resources
Routine audits are scheduled/planned with manufacturer
Expected to improve predictability
Expected to add additional Regulatory Authorities
Some RA’s will use Pilot audit outcomes as alternatives to own inspections to process
applications for market authorization
PROCESS - INTEGRATED OR
STAND ALONE, MORE COMPLEX?
MDSAP can be integrated into existing audit cycle
CE requirements are not built into MDSAP audit tasks and not considered part of MDSAP
audit time, must added
Multi-site manufacturers do not get a certificate unless all relevant sites are audited under
MDSAP
No such thing as an MDSAP pre-assessment in traditional sense (all reports go to all RAs, all
NC’s count)
MDSAP Pilot routine audits are announced, scheduled by the Auditing Organization with the
manufacturer, with a pre-established duration.
The FDA will review MDSAP Pilot audit reports with a level of scrutiny commensurate to the
significance of audit findings, taking into account the review and follow-up performed by the
Auditing Organization.
Firms have one month to provide their full response to critical nonconformities (grade 4 and
5) to the Auditing Organization (as opposed to 15 working days following a FDA inspection).
Certification documents issued by the Auditing Organization state compliance with
applicable US regulations, which may provide a marketing advantage.
FDA will utilize other forms of Advisory Notice, where necessary instead of FDA Warning
Letters for MDSAP Audits during the Pilot. Warning Letters will only be considered when the
MDSAP audit conclusion reveals an imminent/unreasonable risk to public health.
Health Canada will operate the current Canadian Medical Devices Conformity
Assessment System (CMDCAS) and MDSAP in parallel during the three year pilot.
Health Canada will accept either an MDSAP certificate or a CMDCAS certificate for
the purpose of obtaining a new (or maintaining an existing) Class II, III, or IV medical
device license, pursuant to section 32 of the Canadian Medical Devices Regulations.
Upon the successful conclusion of the pilot, Health Canada intends to implement
MDSAP as the mechanism to achieve regulatory compliance for quality
management system requirements in Canada.
The Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA will utilize the
outcomes of the program, including the reports, to constitute an important input on
ANVISA’s pre-market and post-market assessment procedures, providing, when
applicable, key information that are expected to support regulatory technical
evaluation on these issues.
Due to recent regulatory changes (RDC 15:2014), ANVISA may use MDSAP Pilot
audits in lieu of a premarket inspection by ANVISA to grant ANVISA’s GMP
Certificate to manufacturers intending to put medical devices of class III or IV on the
Brazilian market. Undergoing an MDSAP Pilot audit may accelerate ANVISA ́s GMP
certification process, which is a pre-requisite to the marketing authorization.
ANVISA can also use MDSAP Pilot audits to renew ANVISA’s GMP Certificate bi-
annually, as an alternative to an ANVISA comprehensive inspection.
For manufacturers intending to put medical devices of class II, III or IV on the
Japanese market, an MDSAP Pilot audit report might be utilized for a desk review
instead of a premarket inspection performed by PMDA or registered certification
bodies in Japan. An MDSAP Pilot audit report might also be utilized in this manner
for periodical post market inspections.
Undergoing an MDSAP Pilot audit may accelerate the Marketing Authorization with
fewer burdens as well as reduce some burden for a post market phase.
The TGA will accept MDSAP certificates as evidence of compliance with
ISO13485:2003 where the Standard has been used to demonstrate partial
compliance with the requirements of an Australian Conformity Assessment
Procedure. It is expected that Australian Sponsors may be required to submit to the
TGA, additional technical documentation to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance and the
manufacturer’s chosen Conformity Assessment Procedure.
The TGA will take into account MDSAP audit reports when deciding whether to issue
or maintain a TGA Conformity Assessment Certificate. Under some circumstances a
manufacturer may avoid routine TGA inspections.
FURTHER READING
RESOURCES Medical Device Single Audit
Program
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/InternationalPrograms/MDSAPPilot/
http://www.imdrf.org/workitems/wi-mdsap.asp
INFORMATION
Pilot Program Announcement (brief description) - link
Program Announcement (including benefits) - link
MDSAP FAQs - link
Eligible Auditing Organizations – link
MDSAP Audit Procedures & Forms - link
NGEYABONGA – ENKOSI KAKHULU
NGIYABONGA – I NKOMU – NDI A LIVHUHA
THANK YOU – NDIYABULELA – KE ITUMETSE
KE A LEBOGA – BAIE DANKIE – DANKE SCHÖN
CONTACT DETAILS
Dr. Peter Drechsler ▪ Member of the Executive Board
qtec group ▪ Humboldtstraße 30/32 ▪ 70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen ▪ Germany
Mobile: +49 173/2462720 ▪ Phone: +49 711/469273-40
Email: peter.drechsler@qtec-group.com
Internet: www.qtec-group.com ▪ DoEasy: www.DoEasy.de
Helping you to concentrate on your core competencies: the product and the market.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...
Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...
Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...Swapnil Fernandes
 
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 Revision
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 RevisionUnderstanding the New ISO 13485:2016 Revision
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 RevisionGreenlight Guru
 
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in us
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in usRegulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in us
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in usVinod Raj
 
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017RohitParkale
 
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical Devices
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical DevicesPECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical Devices
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical DevicesPECB
 
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing Survelliance
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing SurvellianceMedical Device Exemption and Post Marketing Survelliance
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing SurvellianceCSIR-URDIP, NCL Campus, Pune
 
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and grouping
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and groupingRisk Based Classification of Medical Devices and grouping
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and groupingPaulyne Wairimu
 
Mdr 17 with 2020 rules
Mdr 17 with 2020 rulesMdr 17 with 2020 rules
Mdr 17 with 2020 rulesPrasad Bhat
 
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udi
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udiGlobal unique device identification database (gudid) and udi
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udiJoe Hage
 
Postmarket Surveillance Medical Devices
Postmarket Surveillance   Medical DevicesPostmarket Surveillance   Medical Devices
Postmarket Surveillance Medical DevicesJacobe2008
 
medical device regulatory approval in USA
medical device regulatory approval in USAmedical device regulatory approval in USA
medical device regulatory approval in USASuraj Pamadi
 
IDE Application Process and Best Practices
IDE Application Process and Best PracticesIDE Application Process and Best Practices
IDE Application Process and Best PracticesCFTCC
 
Plasma master file
Plasma master filePlasma master file
Plasma master fileSridhar S
 
Medical Device Registration in vietnam
Medical Device Registration in vietnamMedical Device Registration in vietnam
Medical Device Registration in vietnamMourad Kholti
 
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptx
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptxClinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptx
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptxreechashah2
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...
Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...
Quality System Requirements 21 CFR Part 820 and Labelling Requirements for Me...
 
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 Revision
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 RevisionUnderstanding the New ISO 13485:2016 Revision
Understanding the New ISO 13485:2016 Revision
 
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in us
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in usRegulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in us
Regulatory approval process for invitro diagnostics in us
 
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017
Short Overview of CDSCO MDR 2017
 
China: Medical Device Regulations
China: Medical Device RegulationsChina: Medical Device Regulations
China: Medical Device Regulations
 
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical Devices
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical DevicesPECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical Devices
PECB Webinar: Overview of ISO 13485 - Medical Devices
 
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing Survelliance
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing SurvellianceMedical Device Exemption and Post Marketing Survelliance
Medical Device Exemption and Post Marketing Survelliance
 
FDA Unique Device Identification (UDI) Overview
FDA Unique Device Identification (UDI) OverviewFDA Unique Device Identification (UDI) Overview
FDA Unique Device Identification (UDI) Overview
 
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and grouping
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and groupingRisk Based Classification of Medical Devices and grouping
Risk Based Classification of Medical Devices and grouping
 
Mdr 17 with 2020 rules
Mdr 17 with 2020 rulesMdr 17 with 2020 rules
Mdr 17 with 2020 rules
 
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udi
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udiGlobal unique device identification database (gudid) and udi
Global unique device identification database (gudid) and udi
 
Postmarket Surveillance Medical Devices
Postmarket Surveillance   Medical DevicesPostmarket Surveillance   Medical Devices
Postmarket Surveillance Medical Devices
 
MDD 93/42/EEC
MDD 93/42/EECMDD 93/42/EEC
MDD 93/42/EEC
 
medical device regulatory approval in USA
medical device regulatory approval in USAmedical device regulatory approval in USA
medical device regulatory approval in USA
 
Medical Device Regulations - 510(k) Process
Medical Device Regulations - 510(k) ProcessMedical Device Regulations - 510(k) Process
Medical Device Regulations - 510(k) Process
 
IDE Application Process and Best Practices
IDE Application Process and Best PracticesIDE Application Process and Best Practices
IDE Application Process and Best Practices
 
Plasma master file
Plasma master filePlasma master file
Plasma master file
 
Medical Device Registration in vietnam
Medical Device Registration in vietnamMedical Device Registration in vietnam
Medical Device Registration in vietnam
 
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptx
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptxClinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptx
Clinical investigation and evaluation of medical devices and ivd.pptx
 
UDI
UDIUDI
UDI
 

Ähnlich wie MDSAP

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)EMMAIntl
 
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017April Bright
 
MDSAP Certification: Success and Failures
MDSAP Certification: Success and FailuresMDSAP Certification: Success and Failures
MDSAP Certification: Success and FailuresGreenlight Guru
 
Exam no. 76 ashma
Exam no. 76 ashmaExam no. 76 ashma
Exam no. 76 ashmanirmikaben
 
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra Healthcare
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra HealthcareClinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra Healthcare
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra HealthcarePEPGRA Healthcare
 
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)clinical-evaluation-report (CER)
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)PEPGRA Healthcare
 
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...PECB
 
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guideline
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guidelineClinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guideline
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guidelineGRCTS
 
Malaysia Medical Devices Regulations
Malaysia Medical Devices RegulationsMalaysia Medical Devices Regulations
Malaysia Medical Devices RegulationsMourad Kholti
 
Pharmacovigilance programme of india what you need to know
Pharmacovigilance programme of india   what you need to knowPharmacovigilance programme of india   what you need to know
Pharmacovigilance programme of india what you need to knowHimanshu Bhatnagar, MD
 
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdfDeepaPansare
 
International Overview & Future Medical Devices Regulations
International Overview & Future   Medical Devices RegulationsInternational Overview & Future   Medical Devices Regulations
International Overview & Future Medical Devices Regulationsmdbio2009
 
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...EMMAIntl
 
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdfMedical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdfPranshuCorpseed
 
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...Samantha Chen, CQA
 
Mdr transmission and business strategy of device
Mdr transmission and business strategy of deviceMdr transmission and business strategy of device
Mdr transmission and business strategy of deviceKishoreSteveAustin
 

Ähnlich wie MDSAP (20)

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
 
MDSAP
MDSAPMDSAP
MDSAP
 
What is MDSAP
What is MDSAPWhat is MDSAP
What is MDSAP
 
What is MDSAP?
What is MDSAP?What is MDSAP?
What is MDSAP?
 
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017
Global Regulatory Outlook: 2017 and Beyond - OMTEC 2017
 
MDSAP Certification: Success and Failures
MDSAP Certification: Success and FailuresMDSAP Certification: Success and Failures
MDSAP Certification: Success and Failures
 
Exam no. 76 ashma
Exam no. 76 ashmaExam no. 76 ashma
Exam no. 76 ashma
 
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra Healthcare
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra HealthcareClinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra Healthcare
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra Healthcare
 
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)clinical-evaluation-report (CER)
clinical-evaluation-report (CER)
 
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...
 
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guideline
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guidelineClinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guideline
Clinical evaluation and the latest 2016 guideline
 
Malaysia Medical Devices Regulations
Malaysia Medical Devices RegulationsMalaysia Medical Devices Regulations
Malaysia Medical Devices Regulations
 
Pharmacovigilance programme of india what you need to know
Pharmacovigilance programme of india   what you need to knowPharmacovigilance programme of india   what you need to know
Pharmacovigilance programme of india what you need to know
 
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf
13 Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group.pdf
 
International Overview & Future Medical Devices Regulations
International Overview & Future   Medical Devices RegulationsInternational Overview & Future   Medical Devices Regulations
International Overview & Future Medical Devices Regulations
 
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...
Modification after Initial Review and Transparency and Real-World Performance...
 
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdfMedical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Medical Device Registration in India_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
 
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...
Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System(CMDCAS) - Training mate...
 
Apic auditing guide_201008
Apic auditing guide_201008Apic auditing guide_201008
Apic auditing guide_201008
 
Mdr transmission and business strategy of device
Mdr transmission and business strategy of deviceMdr transmission and business strategy of device
Mdr transmission and business strategy of device
 

MDSAP

  • 1. MEDICAL DEVICE SINGLE AUDIT PROGRAM Medical Device Regulatory Conference 2.-3.12.2015
  • 3. IMDRF International Medical Device Regulatory Forum
  • 4. MISSION IMDRF/MC/N1FINAL:2014 “The mission of the IMDRF [International Medical Device Regulators Forum] is to strategically accelerate international medical device regulatory convergence to promote an efficient and effective regulatory model for medical devices that is responsive to emerging challenges in the sector while protecting and maximizing public health and safety.”
  • 5. IMDRF born February 2011 as a forum to discuss future directions in medical device regulatory harmonization. Voluntary group of medical device regulators from around the world who have come together to build on the strong foundational work of the Global Harmonization Task Force on Medical Devices (GHTF) Accelerate international medical device regulatory harmonization and convergence.
  • 6. 1992 - 2012 Medical device regulatory authorities & industry Steering committee and 5 Study Groups covering subjects:  Device Classifications; Labeling  Post Market Surveillance, Adverse Event Reporting, Reports Exchange, GMDN  Risk Management, Process Validation  Auditor Training, Regulatory Auditing Guidelines  Clinical Evaluations, Clinical Evidence
  • 7. IMDRF Management Committee (MC) regulators:  Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Russia, and the USA Observers:  APEC LSIF (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Life Science Innovation Forum)  WHO - World Health Organization Affiliate Organizations:  Pan American Health Organization  Asian Harmonization Working Party Working Groups:  Standards; MDSAP; Submissions; UDI; NCAR; Software
  • 8. IMDRF Working group items: National Competent Authorities Report Exchange Program Roadmap for Implementation of Unique Device Identification system Medical Device Single Audit Program List of Recognized Standards Regulated Product Submission Software as a Medical Device
  • 10. Recognize Auditing Organizations (AO) Single Audit by AO would:  benefit patient health and patient access  leverage regulatory resources  minimize medical device manufacturing disruptions due to multiple regulatory audits  provide global benefit both on short term goals and longer term goals by IMDRF regulators
  • 11. STATEMENT OF COOPERATION (NOV 2012) Australia  Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) Brazil  Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) Canada  Health Canada/Santé Canada United States of America  Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • 12. COOPERATION IMDRF  Initial Recognition, Surveillance, and Re-Recognition Criteria for MDSAP Recognized Auditing Organizations  Standardized Recognized AO Auditor Competency and Competency Maintenance Requirements  Standardized Regulatory Authority Assessor Competency and Competency Maintenance Requirements Standardized Audit and Assessment Models  Auditing of a Manufacturer by an MDSAP Recognized AO  Assessment of MDSAP Recognized AO’s by participating Regulatory Authorities
  • 13. COOPERATION Audit duration calculations MDSAP audit model for consistency MDSAP report Standardized Rating System for Manufacturer Audit Findings Standardized Rating System for Recognized Auditing Organization Assessment Findings Extremely stringent impartiality requirements
  • 15. MDSAP PILOT Pilot started in January 2014 (for 3 years, to Dec 2016) CB’s from participating member states can apply to AO’s  CMDCAS recognized registrars Office audit and witnessed audit required  Conducted by regulators September 2014 AO’s started conducting audits Operational program slated for 2017
  • 16. PARTICIPATING RAS As of June 2015 USA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Canada: Health Canada/Santé Canada Brazil: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) Australia: Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)
  • 17. OFFICIAL OBSERVERS As of June 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Program European Union
  • 18. AUTHORIZED AO See Mid-Pilot-Report . BSI Group America Inc. http://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/ TÜV SÜD America Inc. http://www.tuv-sud-america.com/ SAI Global Cert. Services PTY Ltd. http://www.qmi.com LNE G-MED http://www.gmed.fr TÜV USA Inc. http://www.tuv-nord.com/us Intertek Testing Services NA Inc. http://www.intertek.com
  • 19. PARTICIPATING MFG. SITES Data: Mid Pilot Report Forecast: Myself 1 10 100 1000 10000 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Cumulative total
  • 20. KIMBERLY TRAUTMAN, FDA Associate Director, International Affairs Office of the Center Director Center for Devices and Radiological Health Personal communication, 2015-10-22: “…MDSAP is definitely going full implementation in January 2017, so manufacturers should take advantage of the ‘learning phase’ while they can…”
  • 22. BENEFITS FOR MANUFACTURERS No additional requirements for manufacturers Single audit optimizes time and resources Routine audits are scheduled/planned with manufacturer Expected to improve predictability Expected to add additional Regulatory Authorities Some RA’s will use Pilot audit outcomes as alternatives to own inspections to process applications for market authorization
  • 23. PROCESS - INTEGRATED OR STAND ALONE, MORE COMPLEX? MDSAP can be integrated into existing audit cycle CE requirements are not built into MDSAP audit tasks and not considered part of MDSAP audit time, must added Multi-site manufacturers do not get a certificate unless all relevant sites are audited under MDSAP No such thing as an MDSAP pre-assessment in traditional sense (all reports go to all RAs, all NC’s count)
  • 24. MDSAP Pilot routine audits are announced, scheduled by the Auditing Organization with the manufacturer, with a pre-established duration. The FDA will review MDSAP Pilot audit reports with a level of scrutiny commensurate to the significance of audit findings, taking into account the review and follow-up performed by the Auditing Organization. Firms have one month to provide their full response to critical nonconformities (grade 4 and 5) to the Auditing Organization (as opposed to 15 working days following a FDA inspection). Certification documents issued by the Auditing Organization state compliance with applicable US regulations, which may provide a marketing advantage. FDA will utilize other forms of Advisory Notice, where necessary instead of FDA Warning Letters for MDSAP Audits during the Pilot. Warning Letters will only be considered when the MDSAP audit conclusion reveals an imminent/unreasonable risk to public health.
  • 25. Health Canada will operate the current Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS) and MDSAP in parallel during the three year pilot. Health Canada will accept either an MDSAP certificate or a CMDCAS certificate for the purpose of obtaining a new (or maintaining an existing) Class II, III, or IV medical device license, pursuant to section 32 of the Canadian Medical Devices Regulations. Upon the successful conclusion of the pilot, Health Canada intends to implement MDSAP as the mechanism to achieve regulatory compliance for quality management system requirements in Canada.
  • 26. The Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA will utilize the outcomes of the program, including the reports, to constitute an important input on ANVISA’s pre-market and post-market assessment procedures, providing, when applicable, key information that are expected to support regulatory technical evaluation on these issues. Due to recent regulatory changes (RDC 15:2014), ANVISA may use MDSAP Pilot audits in lieu of a premarket inspection by ANVISA to grant ANVISA’s GMP Certificate to manufacturers intending to put medical devices of class III or IV on the Brazilian market. Undergoing an MDSAP Pilot audit may accelerate ANVISA ́s GMP certification process, which is a pre-requisite to the marketing authorization. ANVISA can also use MDSAP Pilot audits to renew ANVISA’s GMP Certificate bi- annually, as an alternative to an ANVISA comprehensive inspection.
  • 27. For manufacturers intending to put medical devices of class II, III or IV on the Japanese market, an MDSAP Pilot audit report might be utilized for a desk review instead of a premarket inspection performed by PMDA or registered certification bodies in Japan. An MDSAP Pilot audit report might also be utilized in this manner for periodical post market inspections. Undergoing an MDSAP Pilot audit may accelerate the Marketing Authorization with fewer burdens as well as reduce some burden for a post market phase.
  • 28. The TGA will accept MDSAP certificates as evidence of compliance with ISO13485:2003 where the Standard has been used to demonstrate partial compliance with the requirements of an Australian Conformity Assessment Procedure. It is expected that Australian Sponsors may be required to submit to the TGA, additional technical documentation to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance and the manufacturer’s chosen Conformity Assessment Procedure. The TGA will take into account MDSAP audit reports when deciding whether to issue or maintain a TGA Conformity Assessment Certificate. Under some circumstances a manufacturer may avoid routine TGA inspections.
  • 30. RESOURCES Medical Device Single Audit Program http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/InternationalPrograms/MDSAPPilot/ http://www.imdrf.org/workitems/wi-mdsap.asp
  • 31. INFORMATION Pilot Program Announcement (brief description) - link Program Announcement (including benefits) - link MDSAP FAQs - link Eligible Auditing Organizations – link MDSAP Audit Procedures & Forms - link
  • 32. NGEYABONGA – ENKOSI KAKHULU NGIYABONGA – I NKOMU – NDI A LIVHUHA THANK YOU – NDIYABULELA – KE ITUMETSE KE A LEBOGA – BAIE DANKIE – DANKE SCHÖN
  • 33. CONTACT DETAILS Dr. Peter Drechsler ▪ Member of the Executive Board qtec group ▪ Humboldtstraße 30/32 ▪ 70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen ▪ Germany Mobile: +49 173/2462720 ▪ Phone: +49 711/469273-40 Email: peter.drechsler@qtec-group.com Internet: www.qtec-group.com ▪ DoEasy: www.DoEasy.de Helping you to concentrate on your core competencies: the product and the market.