SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 61
Prepared by: PARTH PATEL
                                  (M.Pharm sem II)




                      Guided by : Dr. Rina H. Gokani
                                 (Associate professor)
                                 ( M.Pharm ,Ph.D)

S.J. Thakkar Pharmacy college, Opp.Drive in cinema,Avadh Road,Opp
N.R.I. Bunglow, Kalawad Road,Rajkot.360005.
                                                              1
INTRODUCTION

• Parenteral preparations are sterile products intended for
  administration by injection, infusion or implantation into
  the body. They may be preparations intended for direct
  parenteral administration or they may be parenteral
  products for constituting or diluting prior to
  administration.

• Sterile drug product, which is presented in the form of
  solution, suspension, emulsion, or reconstituted
  lyophilized powder.


                                                            2
.
    Administration by injection, subcutaneous, intramuscular,
    and intravenous ,intrathecal, intraarterial, intraspinal,and
    intradermal routes to achieve local or systemic effects.

    Advantages
    Rapid absorption and distribution, high bioavailability


     Zero enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract


    An ability to be administered to unconscious patient

    Major drawback of parenteral delivery is the pain and
    discomfort associated with needle injection
                                                               3
CLASSIFICATION
1. Small-volume parenteral
   (SVP)
2. Large-volume parenteral
   (LVP)
3. Lyophilized products.




                                 4
Why   quality   assurance                           is
needed for parenteral?

Higher propensity for improper administration of
 injectable products

Administered directly into the human bloodstream


Risker than oral solid dosage


Compromised immune systems, among other things.
                                                     5
Characteristics of parenteral
       dosage forms
 •   Sterility
 •   Free from pyrogenic contamination and
     endotoxins
 •   Freedom from particulate matter
 •   Physical, chemical, and microbiological
     stability
 •   Compatibility.
 •   Isotonicity

                                               6
Properties evaluated for the API
• Color and odour

• Particle size, shape, and crystallinity.

• Melting point and thermal analytical profile.

• Hygroscopicity

• Absorbance spectra


                                                  7
• Solubility as a function of pH in a typical range of pH 2–
  11 pH of the solution, and pKa of the API

• Stability profile as a function of solution pH

• Heat, light, and oxygen sensitivity of the drug substance
  (API).

• Accelerated stability of the drug substance (API).

• Impurity profile.
                                                           8
The following aspects should be addressed to successfully
  formulate a parenteral dosage form.
• Selection of a suitable vehicle.

•   Selection of formulation adjuvants.

•   Processing equipment.

• Final packaging system(container closure integrity).

• Stability of the finished product.
                                                         9
• Solubility of the drug substance and other critical
  excipients in water and co-solvent systems.

• Solubility of the drug substance and other critical
  excipients in different buffer systems.

• Metal compatibility, filter absorption, and plastic
  tubing/stopper absorption study.

• Autoclave study.

                                                        10
• Comparison to innovator product (for generics)

• Testing of container and closure components

• Particle size distribution of suspension or emulsion

• Water content of the lyophilized products

• Stability evaluation of the finished product, including
sensitivity to light and/or headspace oxygen


                                                            11
Pharmaceutical analysis during
        formulation and process
             development
• Pre-formulation and formulation stages.

• The physicochemical properties and excipients compatibility of the
  pharmaceutical active ingredient (API) should be thoroughly
  evaluated

• The test method requirements are similar to those for oral dosage
  forms.

                                                                12
Difficulties in Analysis during
    formulation and process development
• Solubilization of the drug

• Formation of salt, pH adjustment using a buffer system, and
  incorporation of a co-solvent

• Evaluation of the stability and solubility

• Analytical method, mostly HPLC is required

• Method should be able to discern the drug substance from its
  degradation products and provide an accurate assay for the potency of
  the drug substance
                                                                    13
ANALYTICAL TESTING FOR RAW MATERIALS
• Testing must be performed before they can be used for
  manufacturing a batch of the product.

• Assay and ordinary impurity determinations are performed
  by HPLC methods.

• When a reference standard for the active ingredient is not
  available, assay by titration is the method of choice.

• In the HPLC, main advantage is to have a different sample
  concentration for the assay and in-process impurity
  determinations.

                                                              14
• Relative response factors (RRFs) to the active ingredient
  can be used to quantitate impurity concentrations.

• RRFs can be determined spectrophotometrically by
  comparing the molar absorptivity of the impurity to that of
  the active component.

• RRFs determined by HPLC by comparing peak area.

• More     accurate   than    those     determined        by
  spectrophotometric method. TLC can also used.

                                                          15
• Quantitative measurements by densitometry or
  fluorescence measurements.

• The spots can also be carefully removed and dissolved in
  a suitable solvent for spectrophotometric measurement.

• Residual solvent analysis for drug substances is
  performed by gas chromatographic methods.

• Monograph tests such as those for water, residue on
  ignition, chloride, sulfate content are performed as part
  of the release testing of a bulk drug substance (API).

                                                         16
• The near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy technique is used
  to perform raw material, in-process, and finished
  product testing for quality control.

• NIR spectral information can be quickly obtained for a
  single substance or a multicomponent sample .

• By eliminating the need for sample preparation, the NIR
  method provides improved method precision over
  chromatographic methods while equivalent accuracy is
  maintained.

                                                           17
Analytical testing for finished
             parenteral products
• To ensure that each requirements for a parenteral
  product is properly met.
• Two type of test generally carried out:
     (A) Chemical test:
      Degradation study
      Identification test for API
      Potency assay
      Stability
      pH
                                                      18
Osmolarity ,Apperance,Particle size.
        distribution for suspensions and emulsions
      Water content for lyophilized dosage form.
      Particulate contamination.
      Integrity of container & closure.
(B) Microbiological testing
       Sterility testing.
      Bacterial endotoxins testing.
      Particulate matter testing
      Bioburden analysis.
      Closure/ container integrity.
                                                     19
(a) Chemical Test
(1) Identification test for API:

 By color development test :
 Mixing the test product with a chemical reagent to
 produce a characteristic color.
 E.g. Phenolic compounds react with ferric chloride to
 produce an intense dark color.

• If no unique color reaction test available, a thin-layer
  chromatography (TLC) Rf value is used.
                                                             20
(2) Potency assay


• By HPLC method.

• An accurately measured aliquot of the product is diluted
  with a diluent (normally the mobile phase) and the
  resulting sample solution is injected into the HPLC.

• In case of emulsion or a suspension ultrasonication,
  filtration, etc. must be carried out to dissolve the
  product to achieve a clear solution.
                                                         21
• Sample concentration choosen should be such that the
  peak areas obtained from multiple injections of sample are
  reproducible with min variance (<2%RSD).
• A reference std solution should have the same
  concentration and same diluent as the sample solution is
  prepared.

 Prepare the standard plot of API an calculate the
  concentration of test sample.
 Tailing factor should LT 1.5 , capacity factor should LT1Peak
  shape and retention time important for precision of the
  assay.
                                                           22
(3) Determination of degradation products or process
                  related impurities:


• Majority by chromatography (HPLC) , UV, mass, DSC etc.

• A concentrated sample solution is commonly used to
  enhance the sensitivity of the method.

• Whenever possible a degradation reference standard
  must be used for the estimation of each known
  degradation product.
                                                       23
• The active peak must be distinguish from impurity
  and/or degradation peaks along with excipient-related
  peaks.

• For example, dextrose-related 5 hydroxymethylfurfural
  (5-HMF) and related substances are degradation
  products of dextrose formed primarily during the heat
  sterilization processes.




                                                      24
HPLC chromatogram of midazolam hydrochloride
injection. (Benzyl alcohol and benzaldehyde are
excipient-related peaks; desfluoromidazolam is an in-
process impurity peak.)
                                                    25
 Lactic acid can be determined by back titration of
 excess alkali with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid.

 If the formulation contains dextrose, the titration
  method for lactic acid cannot be used treatment of
  dextrose with alkali results in hydrolysis of dextrose into
  organic acids.

 Alternate method for the determination of lactic acid is
  an enzymatic colorimetric method using the
  biochemical lactate reagent.

                                                          26
 Principle: Conversion of the lactate to pyruvate and
 hydrogen peroxide by lactate oxidase.

 In the presence of the peroxide formed, peroxidase
 catalyzes the oxidative condensation of chromogenic
 precursor to produce a colored dye with an absorption
 maximum at 540 nm.

 Modification : In the determination of lactic acid in the
 injection formulation of a cardiotonic drug, The
 interesters of lactic acid are hydrolyzed by overnight
 heating of the product in an oven at 100 ◦C.

                                                       27
(4) pH

  pH determinations are performed routinely for release
 testing of parenteral.

• Commercially available buffer solutions can be usedthey
  are standardized by National Institute of Standards and
  Technology.

• Before test sample measurements, the pH meter should
  be standardized using two buffer solutions that bracket
  the expected test material pH and whose difference in pH
  does not exceed 4 units.
                                                       28
• E.g. : At 25oC pH of buffer solution is
                             pH range
     • Potassium tetraoxalate   0.05 – 1.68
     • Potassium biphthalate    0.05 – 4.01
     • Equimolal phosphate      0.05 – 6.86
     • Sodium tetraborate       0.01 - 9.18




                                              29
(5) Stability study:

• For the determination of shelf life of product.

• It carried out by subjecting the product to forced
  degradation usually by heat, acid, alkali, light, and
  peroxide.

• Condition (time and temperature) must be controlled
  so that no more than 20-30% degradation occurs.

• The degraded samples are then analyzed.
                                                          30
(6) Particulate contamination

• Done by visual inspection(manually).

• Inspecting the product against a black and white
  background using light with an intensity of 100-350 foot-
  candles at 10 min, distance usually with a magnifying
  lens (2.5x)

• Inspector has normal vision will be able to detect
  particles in the range of 40-50 µm.

                                                        31
(B)Microbiological testing

                     (1) Sterility test:

• Label claim that the contents are sterile.
• There should be a complete absence of viable
  microorganism.

Two general methods for sterility test.
  1. Direct innoculation method
  2. Membrane filtration method

                                                 32
FIGURE Schematic diagram of the Millipore MicroStar microbial enumeration
system.
                                                                            33
Growth media:
 1. Fluid thioglycolate medium(FTM)
 2. Alternate fluid thioglycolate medium(AFTM)
 3. Soybean-casein digest medium(SCD)

Sampling
Generally 10-20 units are randomly sampled from the lot.
• If the lot size is between 20 to 200 units, then n=10.
• If the lot size is >200 units, then n=20.



                                                     34
 Time & temperature of incubation:
  20-25°C for SCD , 30-35°C for FTM.
  The incubation period for aseptically filled products is NLT
  14 days if the membrane filtration method is used.

 Interpretation of results:
• There should be no evidence of microbial growth in the
  media test containers.
• If any growth occur, repeat the test with fresh samples
  and must be carried out with exceptional care to prevent
  reoccurrence of accidental contamination.
                                                          35
• If growth occur in second test, further repeat unless the
  same organism is found in second test.

• If the third test is negative, sample passes and if positive,
  it fails.

(2) Bacterial endotoxins test(LAL test)
• BET measures the concentration of bacterial endotoxins
  present using a lysate derived from the hemolymph cells
  or amoebocytes from the horseshoe crab, Limulus
  polyphemus.

                                                            36
 Principle
• The addition of a solution containing endotoxins to a
  solution of the lysate produces turbidity, precipitation or
  gelation of the mixture.
• The rate of reaction depends on the concentration of
  endotoxin, the pH and the temperature.
• The quantities measured in Endotoxin Units .

 Mechanism: Intracellular serine protease zymogens in the
  crab’s blood stream are triggered by presence of bacterial
  endotoxins that produces coagulin gel clot.

                                                            37
• Methods: The following six methods are described in the British
  Pharmacopoeia 2007:


          Method A: Gel clot method: Limit test.
          Method B: Gel clot method: Semi quantitative
          method.
          Method C: Turbidimetric Kinetic method
          Method D: Chromogenic kinetic method
          Method E: Chromogenic end- point method
          Method F: Turbidimetric end point method.

                                                              38
Preparation of test solutions(Preparatory testing)
   – Negative product control(water BET)
   – Positive water control(control standard endotoxins con.
     2 λ)
   – Positive water control(contain sample solution)

• Procedure:
   – Carry out the in duplicate receptacles.Add to each
     receptacle an equal volume of constituted lysate.
   – Mix the sample/lysate mixture gently.
   – Incubate at 37±1o C temp for 60 ± 2 min.
                                                          39
A positive reaction ( formation of a firm gel) that retains its
     integrity when inverted through 180o . Record this result as
     positive (+).

     A negative result ( the absence of such a gel or by
     theformation of a viscous gel) that does not maintain its
     integrity. Record such a result as negative (-).

• Interpretation of results :
   – The substance or preparation complies with BET test if the
     positive product control is positive and the negative controls
     are negative.
                                                                 40
• The test is invalid if the positive product control is
  negative or negative control is positive.

• If a positive result is found for one of the test
  duplicates(negative water control) and a negative
  result for the other, the test may be repeated as
  described above.

• The results of the retest should be interpreted as for
  the initial test.

                                                           41
(3) Particulate matter testing:

• Two test approaches (by the USP).
    – Light obscuration method or the light (laser) scattering
      method for SVPs
    – The microscopic method for LVPs.
(1) Light obscuration method
• A beam of light is passed through the test solution and is
   measured by a photodiode detector.

• Particles passing through the light path disrupt the light in
  a size-proportional manner.
                                                             42
• Advantages
  (1) Ease of use,
  (2) Enhanced reproducibility
  (3) Relative ease of method automation.
• Disadvantages
  (1) Expensive instrumentation,
  (2) It does not provide information on the identification
      of particles
  (3) Artifacts such as air bubbles can be counted as
      particles.

                                                         43
(2) The light-scattering method

• The behavior of light after it strikes a particle
  suspended in a clear solution.

• Measurements of scattered light taken at fixed angles
  from the direction of the incurrent light beam are
  proportional to the size of the particle.

• Rapid and can measure particles in as many as six size
  ranges simultaneously.
                                                      44
(3) Microscopic method
• This method involves the use of ultraclean membrane
  filtration equipment.

• 25 milliliters of test solution is filtered and the
  membrane is examined by optical microscopy.( 100×
  magnification).

• Particles 10 μm and 25 μm are manually sized and
  counted by highly trained personnel.

• Used for emulsions, suspensions, and other nonclear
  fluid injectable products.                          45
• Interpretation of Results—Particulate Matter Testing

   Results of particulate matter tests are interpreted as
     following:
   a. For the light obscuration method:
       • ≥10 μm – 6000 per container
       • ≥ 25 μm – 600 per container
   b. For the microscopic method:
       • ≥ 10 μm – 25 per ml
       • ≥ 25 μm – 3 per ml

                                                            46
PACKAGING COMPONENTS TESTING

•   Mainly three container material
•   Glass/plastic containers
•   Elastomeric closures
•   plastic bags.
•   Type I glass
•   Type II and type III glass
•   Type iv



                                      47
PROCESS DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT

• Analytical method must be available before
  preformulation.

• Analytical method should be capable of separating the
  active and any major degradation product(for stability).

• Titration and ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy are not used.

• HPLC hasbeen widely used as the method of choice.
                                                             48
 Preliminary validation of the method, which includes
accuracy, precision, and linearity.


 Specificity is demonstrated by subjecting the product to
forced degradation stress studies, such as heat, acid, alkali,
light, and peroxide and analyzing the resulting mixture.

 All degradation peaks must be clearly separated.


 Peak purity of the analyte peak is evaluated by using a
diode-array detector.
                                                           49
IN-PROCESS TESTING

• Essential part of the manufacturing process

• Way to confirm that the concentration of the active
  ingredient in the bulk solution is accurate and within
  specification limits.

• Used to test for homogeneity

• UV spectrophotometric method is usually selected.
                                                       50
Why uv spectroscopy is selected???


• Time saving compare to HPLC.

• It does not require elaborate instrument.

• Easily set up in a manufacturing environment.

• Excipients in the formulation interfer eg. benzyl
  alcohol 260 nm

                                                      51
RELEASE TESTING

• Simple identification test is required.

• The identification test is typically a color
  development test - mixing the test product +
  chemical reagent to produce a characteristic color.

• Eg…phenolic compounds react with ferric chloride to
  produce an intense dark color.


                                                        52
When there is no unique color reaction test, thin-
  layer chromatography (TLC) Rf value or an HPLC is
  used.

• An HPLC method for the estimation of potency and
  determination of degradation products is an integral
  part of release testing.

• The analytical method should be SELECTIVE , SPECIFIC
  & stability indicating.


                                                         53
• Ex Lactic acid – common excipient used in parenteral is
  determine by back titration of excess alkali with 0.1N
  HCL.because dextrose+alkali results in hydrolysis of
  dextrose to organic acids.

• The titration is performed after removing active drug in
  formulation by using chromatography.

• Alternatively it is done by enzymatic colorimetric
  using biochemical reagent.


                                                        54
• In presence of hybrogen peroxide,peroxidase catalyzes
  oxidative condensation of chromogenic precausors to
  produce colored dye with 540nm (max wave length)

• Lactate in presence of lactate oxidase converts in to
  pyruvate and hydrogen peroxide.




                                                          55
DOCUMENTATION
• “It is a systematic & scientific process of collecting &
   recontrolling
• In India underschedule ‘U’ & schedule ‘M’ to the drugs
   and cosmetics
• Rules that record are manes and path-own they are
   failing.
1. Batch reconciliation record
2. Environmetal control record
3. Raw material requiring sheet
4. Recovery addition sheet
                                                         56
5. Manufacturing instrunmentation
6. Bottle filling & washing record
7. Leakes test record
8. Finished goods release record
9. Personnel records
10. SOP records.
11. Packaging material record
12. Packaging record




                                     57
.




RECENTLY DEVELOPED ANALYTICAL METHOD




                                  58
Questions
1 Enlist the analytical tests of parenteral preparation. Discuss BET.

2 Describe particulate matter testing for parenteral preparation.

3 Give characteristics of parenteral dosage forms. Describe requirements for
  successfully formulated parenteral dosage forms.

4   Discuss Bioburden testing of parenteral preparation.

5    Describe pharmaceutical analysis during
      1)Formulation and process development.
      2)Finished parenteral preparations.

6 Discuss sterility testing.

                                                                               59
References

1. Handbook of modern pharmaceautical analysis
   by Satinder Ahuja and Stephen Scypinski,
   volume 3

2. United state pharmacopoeia.

3. International Journal of Research in
   Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

                                                 60
61

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An Overview
Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An OverviewPharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An Overview
Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An OverviewPrincy Agarwal
 
Co processed excipient
Co processed excipientCo processed excipient
Co processed excipientRutuja Gund
 
Parameters in Preformulation Studies
Parameters in Preformulation StudiesParameters in Preformulation Studies
Parameters in Preformulation StudiesCognibrain Healthcare
 
Physical stability tablets & capsules
Physical stability tablets & capsulesPhysical stability tablets & capsules
Physical stability tablets & capsulesShweta Singh
 
Drug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studiesDrug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studieskinju19
 
Dissolution Testing Apparatus
Dissolution Testing ApparatusDissolution Testing Apparatus
Dissolution Testing ApparatusSourav Kar
 
Disintegration Tester.pptx
Disintegration Tester.pptxDisintegration Tester.pptx
Disintegration Tester.pptxANANT NAG
 
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testing
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testingInvitro : dissolution and drug release testing
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testingDurgadevi Ganesan
 
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...NRx Hemant Rathod
 
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...Sanathoiba Singha
 
Microencapsulation methods
Microencapsulation methodsMicroencapsulation methods
Microencapsulation methodsJehan Essam
 
Dissolution profile comparison
Dissolution profile comparisonDissolution profile comparison
Dissolution profile comparisonMohammad Imran
 
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gels
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gelsQuality control tests for liquid orals and gels
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gelsSandhya Chintalacheruvu
 
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materials
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and  Secondary packing materialsQuality control test: Containers, Closures and  Secondary packing materials
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materialsPranali Polshettiwar
 
Quality control tests for parenterals ppt
Quality  control  tests  for  parenterals pptQuality  control  tests  for  parenterals ppt
Quality control tests for parenterals pptsuraj p rajan
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Supac
SupacSupac
Supac
 
Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An Overview
Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An OverviewPharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An Overview
Pharmaceutical Containers and Closures: An Overview
 
Co processed excipient
Co processed excipientCo processed excipient
Co processed excipient
 
Parameters in Preformulation Studies
Parameters in Preformulation StudiesParameters in Preformulation Studies
Parameters in Preformulation Studies
 
Physical stability tablets & capsules
Physical stability tablets & capsulesPhysical stability tablets & capsules
Physical stability tablets & capsules
 
Drug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studiesDrug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studies
 
Preformulation
PreformulationPreformulation
Preformulation
 
IVIVC
IVIVCIVIVC
IVIVC
 
Dissolution Testing Apparatus
Dissolution Testing ApparatusDissolution Testing Apparatus
Dissolution Testing Apparatus
 
Preformulation
PreformulationPreformulation
Preformulation
 
Disintegration Tester.pptx
Disintegration Tester.pptxDisintegration Tester.pptx
Disintegration Tester.pptx
 
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testing
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testingInvitro : dissolution and drug release testing
Invitro : dissolution and drug release testing
 
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
 
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...
Quality Control tests for pharmaceutical containers, closures and secondary p...
 
Microencapsulation methods
Microencapsulation methodsMicroencapsulation methods
Microencapsulation methods
 
Dissolution profile comparison
Dissolution profile comparisonDissolution profile comparison
Dissolution profile comparison
 
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gels
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gelsQuality control tests for liquid orals and gels
Quality control tests for liquid orals and gels
 
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materials
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and  Secondary packing materialsQuality control test: Containers, Closures and  Secondary packing materials
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materials
 
Quality control tests for parenterals ppt
Quality  control  tests  for  parenterals pptQuality  control  tests  for  parenterals ppt
Quality control tests for parenterals ppt
 
Nasopulmonary Drug Delivery System
Nasopulmonary Drug Delivery SystemNasopulmonary Drug Delivery System
Nasopulmonary Drug Delivery System
 

Andere mochten auch

ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM
ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE  DOSAGE FORMANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE  DOSAGE FORM
ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORMNasir Pawar
 
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010Patel Parth
 
Analysis of solid oral
Analysis of solid oralAnalysis of solid oral
Analysis of solid oralPatel Parth
 
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva copy
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva   copyAutomated analysis by yatin sankharva   copy
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva copyPatel Parth
 
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCT
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCTQUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCT
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCTMuhammad Arsal
 
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009Patel Parth
 
Compendial testing by ketan mishra
Compendial testing by ketan mishraCompendial testing by ketan mishra
Compendial testing by ketan mishraRXKETANMISHRA
 
Ipqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsIpqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsceutics1315
 
Automated analysis 112070804013
Automated analysis 112070804013Automated analysis 112070804013
Automated analysis 112070804013Patel Parth
 
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral products
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral productsPackaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral products
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral productsRfinDmelomaniac Abir
 
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layout
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layoutParenteral preparation, equipments and layout
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layoutswapnil_pharmacist
 
Stability studies of drugs
Stability studies of drugsStability studies of drugs
Stability studies of drugsPromila Sharan
 
Extended stability for parenteral drugs 5th preface
Extended stability for parenteral drugs  5th prefaceExtended stability for parenteral drugs  5th preface
Extended stability for parenteral drugs 5th prefaceROBERTO CARLOS NIZAMA
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM
ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE  DOSAGE FORMANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE  DOSAGE FORM
ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM
 
Parenteral drug delivery
Parenteral drug deliveryParenteral drug delivery
Parenteral drug delivery
 
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010
Analysis of solid oral dosage forms 112070804010
 
Analysis of solid oral
Analysis of solid oralAnalysis of solid oral
Analysis of solid oral
 
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva copy
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva   copyAutomated analysis by yatin sankharva   copy
Automated analysis by yatin sankharva copy
 
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCT
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCTQUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCT
QUALITY CONTROL OF PARENTERALS,STERILE PRODUCT
 
parenterals
parenteralsparenterals
parenterals
 
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009
Analytical tech in pre formulation 112070804009
 
Compendial testing by ketan mishra
Compendial testing by ketan mishraCompendial testing by ketan mishra
Compendial testing by ketan mishra
 
Ipqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsIpqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenterals
 
Compendial herbal
Compendial herbalCompendial herbal
Compendial herbal
 
Automated analysis 112070804013
Automated analysis 112070804013Automated analysis 112070804013
Automated analysis 112070804013
 
Parenterals
ParenteralsParenterals
Parenterals
 
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral products
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral productsPackaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral products
Packaging of Ophthalmic and parenteral products
 
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layout
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layoutParenteral preparation, equipments and layout
Parenteral preparation, equipments and layout
 
preformulation
preformulationpreformulation
preformulation
 
1. preformulation
1. preformulation1. preformulation
1. preformulation
 
Stability studies of drugs
Stability studies of drugsStability studies of drugs
Stability studies of drugs
 
Compendial testing
Compendial testingCompendial testing
Compendial testing
 
Extended stability for parenteral drugs 5th preface
Extended stability for parenteral drugs  5th prefaceExtended stability for parenteral drugs  5th preface
Extended stability for parenteral drugs 5th preface
 

Ähnlich wie Analysis of parenteral dosage forms bjl final seminar

Preformulation studies
Preformulation studiesPreformulation studies
Preformulation studiesSureshVijay7
 
Preformulation and product development
Preformulation and product developmentPreformulation and product development
Preformulation and product developmentBishnu Koirala
 
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...Medicines Discovery Catapult
 
Preformulation Power Point Presentation
Preformulation Power Point PresentationPreformulation Power Point Presentation
Preformulation Power Point PresentationBHAGYASHRI BHANAGE
 
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptx
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptxIPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptx
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptxSohailSheikh62
 
Preformulation by Raghul Pharmacist
Preformulation by Raghul PharmacistPreformulation by Raghul Pharmacist
Preformulation by Raghul PharmacistRaghul Kalam
 
Preformulation a overview of product development
Preformulation a overview of product developmentPreformulation a overview of product development
Preformulation a overview of product developmentKH. Hussan Reza
 
Preformulation guide
Preformulation guidePreformulation guide
Preformulation guideRitul Shah
 
Stability study slideshare
Stability study slideshareStability study slideshare
Stability study slideshareAsgharullahKhan
 
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptx
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptxanalytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptx
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptxDr Priyanka Patil
 
Drug product performance (joel)
Drug product performance (joel)Drug product performance (joel)
Drug product performance (joel)PradheepPradheep2
 
Preformulation Studies of Herbal Cosmetics
Preformulation Studies of Herbal CosmeticsPreformulation Studies of Herbal Cosmetics
Preformulation Studies of Herbal CosmeticsChhavi Singh
 

Ähnlich wie Analysis of parenteral dosage forms bjl final seminar (20)

Preformulation studies
Preformulation studiesPreformulation studies
Preformulation studies
 
Preformulation and product development
Preformulation and product developmentPreformulation and product development
Preformulation and product development
 
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...
MDC Connects Series 2021 | A Guide to Complex Medicines: The Advantages of Go...
 
Preformulation Power Point Presentation
Preformulation Power Point PresentationPreformulation Power Point Presentation
Preformulation Power Point Presentation
 
Preformulation Guide
Preformulation GuidePreformulation Guide
Preformulation Guide
 
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptx
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptxIPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptx
IPQC Tests for Opthalmic Preparations.pptx
 
Preformulation by Raghul Pharmacist
Preformulation by Raghul PharmacistPreformulation by Raghul Pharmacist
Preformulation by Raghul Pharmacist
 
Preformulation a overview of product development
Preformulation a overview of product developmentPreformulation a overview of product development
Preformulation a overview of product development
 
Bioanalysis overview
Bioanalysis overviewBioanalysis overview
Bioanalysis overview
 
JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION (20L81S0701-PA)
JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION (20L81S0701-PA)JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION (20L81S0701-PA)
JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION (20L81S0701-PA)
 
Endotoxin testing
Endotoxin testing Endotoxin testing
Endotoxin testing
 
Preformulation guide
Preformulation guidePreformulation guide
Preformulation guide
 
Stability study slideshare
Stability study slideshareStability study slideshare
Stability study slideshare
 
Preformulation.
Preformulation.Preformulation.
Preformulation.
 
HPLC
HPLCHPLC
HPLC
 
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptx
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptxanalytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptx
analytical parameters of lepa & malahara.pptx
 
Drug product performance (joel)
Drug product performance (joel)Drug product performance (joel)
Drug product performance (joel)
 
Invitro dissolution
Invitro dissolutionInvitro dissolution
Invitro dissolution
 
Biowaiver
BiowaiverBiowaiver
Biowaiver
 
Preformulation Studies of Herbal Cosmetics
Preformulation Studies of Herbal CosmeticsPreformulation Studies of Herbal Cosmetics
Preformulation Studies of Herbal Cosmetics
 

Mehr von Patel Parth

Anda registration in us eu
Anda registration in us  euAnda registration in us  eu
Anda registration in us euPatel Parth
 
Analysis of data (pratik)
Analysis of data (pratik)Analysis of data (pratik)
Analysis of data (pratik)Patel Parth
 
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018Patel Parth
 
A seminar on applications of various analytical technique
A seminar on applications of various analytical techniqueA seminar on applications of various analytical technique
A seminar on applications of various analytical techniquePatel Parth
 
23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms
23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms
23117 copy of oral solid dosage formsPatel Parth
 
4016 solid state analysis
4016 solid state analysis4016 solid state analysis
4016 solid state analysisPatel Parth
 
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotechPatel Parth
 
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002A.a sequence analysis 112070804002
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002Patel Parth
 
Sterility testing 112070804014
Sterility testing 112070804014Sterility testing 112070804014
Sterility testing 112070804014Patel Parth
 
Ria 112070804007
Ria 112070804007Ria 112070804007
Ria 112070804007Patel Parth
 
Qc lab 112070804001
Qc lab 112070804001Qc lab 112070804001
Qc lab 112070804001Patel Parth
 
Pyrogen testing 112070804005
Pyrogen testing  112070804005Pyrogen testing  112070804005
Pyrogen testing 112070804005Patel Parth
 
Pyrogen 112070804004
Pyrogen  112070804004Pyrogen  112070804004
Pyrogen 112070804004Patel Parth
 
Microbial limit test 112070804013
Microbial limit test  112070804013Microbial limit test  112070804013
Microbial limit test 112070804013Patel Parth
 
Gcp 112070804017
Gcp 112070804017Gcp 112070804017
Gcp 112070804017Patel Parth
 
Eva. bio. & toxicity 112070804015
Eva. bio. & toxicity  112070804015Eva. bio. & toxicity  112070804015
Eva. bio. & toxicity 112070804015Patel Parth
 
Clinical reaserch 112070804001
Clinical reaserch 112070804001Clinical reaserch 112070804001
Clinical reaserch 112070804001Patel Parth
 

Mehr von Patel Parth (20)

Anda registration in us eu
Anda registration in us  euAnda registration in us  eu
Anda registration in us eu
 
Anda ppt
Anda pptAnda ppt
Anda ppt
 
Analysis of data (pratik)
Analysis of data (pratik)Analysis of data (pratik)
Analysis of data (pratik)
 
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018
Analysis of cosmetics 112070804018
 
Agencies dhwani
Agencies dhwaniAgencies dhwani
Agencies dhwani
 
A seminar on applications of various analytical technique
A seminar on applications of various analytical techniqueA seminar on applications of various analytical technique
A seminar on applications of various analytical technique
 
23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms
23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms
23117 copy of oral solid dosage forms
 
4016 solid state analysis
4016 solid state analysis4016 solid state analysis
4016 solid state analysis
 
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech
4003 regulatory aspect_of_bulk,pharmaceutical,biotech
 
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002A.a sequence analysis 112070804002
A.a sequence analysis 112070804002
 
Chi square test
Chi square testChi square test
Chi square test
 
Sterility testing 112070804014
Sterility testing 112070804014Sterility testing 112070804014
Sterility testing 112070804014
 
Ria 112070804007
Ria 112070804007Ria 112070804007
Ria 112070804007
 
Qc lab 112070804001
Qc lab 112070804001Qc lab 112070804001
Qc lab 112070804001
 
Pyrogen testing 112070804005
Pyrogen testing  112070804005Pyrogen testing  112070804005
Pyrogen testing 112070804005
 
Pyrogen 112070804004
Pyrogen  112070804004Pyrogen  112070804004
Pyrogen 112070804004
 
Microbial limit test 112070804013
Microbial limit test  112070804013Microbial limit test  112070804013
Microbial limit test 112070804013
 
Gcp 112070804017
Gcp 112070804017Gcp 112070804017
Gcp 112070804017
 
Eva. bio. & toxicity 112070804015
Eva. bio. & toxicity  112070804015Eva. bio. & toxicity  112070804015
Eva. bio. & toxicity 112070804015
 
Clinical reaserch 112070804001
Clinical reaserch 112070804001Clinical reaserch 112070804001
Clinical reaserch 112070804001
 

Analysis of parenteral dosage forms bjl final seminar

  • 1. Prepared by: PARTH PATEL (M.Pharm sem II) Guided by : Dr. Rina H. Gokani (Associate professor) ( M.Pharm ,Ph.D) S.J. Thakkar Pharmacy college, Opp.Drive in cinema,Avadh Road,Opp N.R.I. Bunglow, Kalawad Road,Rajkot.360005. 1
  • 2. INTRODUCTION • Parenteral preparations are sterile products intended for administration by injection, infusion or implantation into the body. They may be preparations intended for direct parenteral administration or they may be parenteral products for constituting or diluting prior to administration. • Sterile drug product, which is presented in the form of solution, suspension, emulsion, or reconstituted lyophilized powder. 2
  • 3. . Administration by injection, subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous ,intrathecal, intraarterial, intraspinal,and intradermal routes to achieve local or systemic effects. Advantages Rapid absorption and distribution, high bioavailability  Zero enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract An ability to be administered to unconscious patient Major drawback of parenteral delivery is the pain and discomfort associated with needle injection 3
  • 4. CLASSIFICATION 1. Small-volume parenteral (SVP) 2. Large-volume parenteral (LVP) 3. Lyophilized products. 4
  • 5. Why quality assurance is needed for parenteral? Higher propensity for improper administration of injectable products Administered directly into the human bloodstream Risker than oral solid dosage Compromised immune systems, among other things. 5
  • 6. Characteristics of parenteral dosage forms • Sterility • Free from pyrogenic contamination and endotoxins • Freedom from particulate matter • Physical, chemical, and microbiological stability • Compatibility. • Isotonicity 6
  • 7. Properties evaluated for the API • Color and odour • Particle size, shape, and crystallinity. • Melting point and thermal analytical profile. • Hygroscopicity • Absorbance spectra 7
  • 8. • Solubility as a function of pH in a typical range of pH 2– 11 pH of the solution, and pKa of the API • Stability profile as a function of solution pH • Heat, light, and oxygen sensitivity of the drug substance (API). • Accelerated stability of the drug substance (API). • Impurity profile. 8
  • 9. The following aspects should be addressed to successfully formulate a parenteral dosage form. • Selection of a suitable vehicle. • Selection of formulation adjuvants. • Processing equipment. • Final packaging system(container closure integrity). • Stability of the finished product. 9
  • 10. • Solubility of the drug substance and other critical excipients in water and co-solvent systems. • Solubility of the drug substance and other critical excipients in different buffer systems. • Metal compatibility, filter absorption, and plastic tubing/stopper absorption study. • Autoclave study. 10
  • 11. • Comparison to innovator product (for generics) • Testing of container and closure components • Particle size distribution of suspension or emulsion • Water content of the lyophilized products • Stability evaluation of the finished product, including sensitivity to light and/or headspace oxygen 11
  • 12. Pharmaceutical analysis during formulation and process development • Pre-formulation and formulation stages. • The physicochemical properties and excipients compatibility of the pharmaceutical active ingredient (API) should be thoroughly evaluated • The test method requirements are similar to those for oral dosage forms. 12
  • 13. Difficulties in Analysis during formulation and process development • Solubilization of the drug • Formation of salt, pH adjustment using a buffer system, and incorporation of a co-solvent • Evaluation of the stability and solubility • Analytical method, mostly HPLC is required • Method should be able to discern the drug substance from its degradation products and provide an accurate assay for the potency of the drug substance 13
  • 14. ANALYTICAL TESTING FOR RAW MATERIALS • Testing must be performed before they can be used for manufacturing a batch of the product. • Assay and ordinary impurity determinations are performed by HPLC methods. • When a reference standard for the active ingredient is not available, assay by titration is the method of choice. • In the HPLC, main advantage is to have a different sample concentration for the assay and in-process impurity determinations. 14
  • 15. • Relative response factors (RRFs) to the active ingredient can be used to quantitate impurity concentrations. • RRFs can be determined spectrophotometrically by comparing the molar absorptivity of the impurity to that of the active component. • RRFs determined by HPLC by comparing peak area. • More accurate than those determined by spectrophotometric method. TLC can also used. 15
  • 16. • Quantitative measurements by densitometry or fluorescence measurements. • The spots can also be carefully removed and dissolved in a suitable solvent for spectrophotometric measurement. • Residual solvent analysis for drug substances is performed by gas chromatographic methods. • Monograph tests such as those for water, residue on ignition, chloride, sulfate content are performed as part of the release testing of a bulk drug substance (API). 16
  • 17. • The near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy technique is used to perform raw material, in-process, and finished product testing for quality control. • NIR spectral information can be quickly obtained for a single substance or a multicomponent sample . • By eliminating the need for sample preparation, the NIR method provides improved method precision over chromatographic methods while equivalent accuracy is maintained. 17
  • 18. Analytical testing for finished parenteral products • To ensure that each requirements for a parenteral product is properly met. • Two type of test generally carried out: (A) Chemical test: Degradation study Identification test for API Potency assay Stability pH 18
  • 19. Osmolarity ,Apperance,Particle size. distribution for suspensions and emulsions Water content for lyophilized dosage form. Particulate contamination. Integrity of container & closure. (B) Microbiological testing  Sterility testing. Bacterial endotoxins testing. Particulate matter testing Bioburden analysis. Closure/ container integrity. 19
  • 20. (a) Chemical Test (1) Identification test for API: By color development test : Mixing the test product with a chemical reagent to produce a characteristic color. E.g. Phenolic compounds react with ferric chloride to produce an intense dark color. • If no unique color reaction test available, a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) Rf value is used. 20
  • 21. (2) Potency assay • By HPLC method. • An accurately measured aliquot of the product is diluted with a diluent (normally the mobile phase) and the resulting sample solution is injected into the HPLC. • In case of emulsion or a suspension ultrasonication, filtration, etc. must be carried out to dissolve the product to achieve a clear solution. 21
  • 22. • Sample concentration choosen should be such that the peak areas obtained from multiple injections of sample are reproducible with min variance (<2%RSD). • A reference std solution should have the same concentration and same diluent as the sample solution is prepared.  Prepare the standard plot of API an calculate the concentration of test sample.  Tailing factor should LT 1.5 , capacity factor should LT1Peak shape and retention time important for precision of the assay. 22
  • 23. (3) Determination of degradation products or process related impurities: • Majority by chromatography (HPLC) , UV, mass, DSC etc. • A concentrated sample solution is commonly used to enhance the sensitivity of the method. • Whenever possible a degradation reference standard must be used for the estimation of each known degradation product. 23
  • 24. • The active peak must be distinguish from impurity and/or degradation peaks along with excipient-related peaks. • For example, dextrose-related 5 hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) and related substances are degradation products of dextrose formed primarily during the heat sterilization processes. 24
  • 25. HPLC chromatogram of midazolam hydrochloride injection. (Benzyl alcohol and benzaldehyde are excipient-related peaks; desfluoromidazolam is an in- process impurity peak.) 25
  • 26.  Lactic acid can be determined by back titration of excess alkali with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid.  If the formulation contains dextrose, the titration method for lactic acid cannot be used treatment of dextrose with alkali results in hydrolysis of dextrose into organic acids.  Alternate method for the determination of lactic acid is an enzymatic colorimetric method using the biochemical lactate reagent. 26
  • 27.  Principle: Conversion of the lactate to pyruvate and hydrogen peroxide by lactate oxidase.  In the presence of the peroxide formed, peroxidase catalyzes the oxidative condensation of chromogenic precursor to produce a colored dye with an absorption maximum at 540 nm.  Modification : In the determination of lactic acid in the injection formulation of a cardiotonic drug, The interesters of lactic acid are hydrolyzed by overnight heating of the product in an oven at 100 ◦C. 27
  • 28. (4) pH pH determinations are performed routinely for release testing of parenteral. • Commercially available buffer solutions can be usedthey are standardized by National Institute of Standards and Technology. • Before test sample measurements, the pH meter should be standardized using two buffer solutions that bracket the expected test material pH and whose difference in pH does not exceed 4 units. 28
  • 29. • E.g. : At 25oC pH of buffer solution is pH range • Potassium tetraoxalate 0.05 – 1.68 • Potassium biphthalate 0.05 – 4.01 • Equimolal phosphate 0.05 – 6.86 • Sodium tetraborate 0.01 - 9.18 29
  • 30. (5) Stability study: • For the determination of shelf life of product. • It carried out by subjecting the product to forced degradation usually by heat, acid, alkali, light, and peroxide. • Condition (time and temperature) must be controlled so that no more than 20-30% degradation occurs. • The degraded samples are then analyzed. 30
  • 31. (6) Particulate contamination • Done by visual inspection(manually). • Inspecting the product against a black and white background using light with an intensity of 100-350 foot- candles at 10 min, distance usually with a magnifying lens (2.5x) • Inspector has normal vision will be able to detect particles in the range of 40-50 µm. 31
  • 32. (B)Microbiological testing (1) Sterility test: • Label claim that the contents are sterile. • There should be a complete absence of viable microorganism. Two general methods for sterility test. 1. Direct innoculation method 2. Membrane filtration method 32
  • 33. FIGURE Schematic diagram of the Millipore MicroStar microbial enumeration system. 33
  • 34. Growth media: 1. Fluid thioglycolate medium(FTM) 2. Alternate fluid thioglycolate medium(AFTM) 3. Soybean-casein digest medium(SCD) Sampling Generally 10-20 units are randomly sampled from the lot. • If the lot size is between 20 to 200 units, then n=10. • If the lot size is >200 units, then n=20. 34
  • 35.  Time & temperature of incubation: 20-25°C for SCD , 30-35°C for FTM. The incubation period for aseptically filled products is NLT 14 days if the membrane filtration method is used.  Interpretation of results: • There should be no evidence of microbial growth in the media test containers. • If any growth occur, repeat the test with fresh samples and must be carried out with exceptional care to prevent reoccurrence of accidental contamination. 35
  • 36. • If growth occur in second test, further repeat unless the same organism is found in second test. • If the third test is negative, sample passes and if positive, it fails. (2) Bacterial endotoxins test(LAL test) • BET measures the concentration of bacterial endotoxins present using a lysate derived from the hemolymph cells or amoebocytes from the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. 36
  • 37.  Principle • The addition of a solution containing endotoxins to a solution of the lysate produces turbidity, precipitation or gelation of the mixture. • The rate of reaction depends on the concentration of endotoxin, the pH and the temperature. • The quantities measured in Endotoxin Units .  Mechanism: Intracellular serine protease zymogens in the crab’s blood stream are triggered by presence of bacterial endotoxins that produces coagulin gel clot. 37
  • 38. • Methods: The following six methods are described in the British Pharmacopoeia 2007: Method A: Gel clot method: Limit test. Method B: Gel clot method: Semi quantitative method. Method C: Turbidimetric Kinetic method Method D: Chromogenic kinetic method Method E: Chromogenic end- point method Method F: Turbidimetric end point method. 38
  • 39. Preparation of test solutions(Preparatory testing) – Negative product control(water BET) – Positive water control(control standard endotoxins con. 2 λ) – Positive water control(contain sample solution) • Procedure: – Carry out the in duplicate receptacles.Add to each receptacle an equal volume of constituted lysate. – Mix the sample/lysate mixture gently. – Incubate at 37±1o C temp for 60 ± 2 min. 39
  • 40. A positive reaction ( formation of a firm gel) that retains its integrity when inverted through 180o . Record this result as positive (+). A negative result ( the absence of such a gel or by theformation of a viscous gel) that does not maintain its integrity. Record such a result as negative (-). • Interpretation of results : – The substance or preparation complies with BET test if the positive product control is positive and the negative controls are negative. 40
  • 41. • The test is invalid if the positive product control is negative or negative control is positive. • If a positive result is found for one of the test duplicates(negative water control) and a negative result for the other, the test may be repeated as described above. • The results of the retest should be interpreted as for the initial test. 41
  • 42. (3) Particulate matter testing: • Two test approaches (by the USP). – Light obscuration method or the light (laser) scattering method for SVPs – The microscopic method for LVPs. (1) Light obscuration method • A beam of light is passed through the test solution and is measured by a photodiode detector. • Particles passing through the light path disrupt the light in a size-proportional manner. 42
  • 43. • Advantages (1) Ease of use, (2) Enhanced reproducibility (3) Relative ease of method automation. • Disadvantages (1) Expensive instrumentation, (2) It does not provide information on the identification of particles (3) Artifacts such as air bubbles can be counted as particles. 43
  • 44. (2) The light-scattering method • The behavior of light after it strikes a particle suspended in a clear solution. • Measurements of scattered light taken at fixed angles from the direction of the incurrent light beam are proportional to the size of the particle. • Rapid and can measure particles in as many as six size ranges simultaneously. 44
  • 45. (3) Microscopic method • This method involves the use of ultraclean membrane filtration equipment. • 25 milliliters of test solution is filtered and the membrane is examined by optical microscopy.( 100× magnification). • Particles 10 μm and 25 μm are manually sized and counted by highly trained personnel. • Used for emulsions, suspensions, and other nonclear fluid injectable products. 45
  • 46. • Interpretation of Results—Particulate Matter Testing Results of particulate matter tests are interpreted as following: a. For the light obscuration method: • ≥10 μm – 6000 per container • ≥ 25 μm – 600 per container b. For the microscopic method: • ≥ 10 μm – 25 per ml • ≥ 25 μm – 3 per ml 46
  • 47. PACKAGING COMPONENTS TESTING • Mainly three container material • Glass/plastic containers • Elastomeric closures • plastic bags. • Type I glass • Type II and type III glass • Type iv 47
  • 48. PROCESS DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT • Analytical method must be available before preformulation. • Analytical method should be capable of separating the active and any major degradation product(for stability). • Titration and ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy are not used. • HPLC hasbeen widely used as the method of choice. 48
  • 49.  Preliminary validation of the method, which includes accuracy, precision, and linearity.  Specificity is demonstrated by subjecting the product to forced degradation stress studies, such as heat, acid, alkali, light, and peroxide and analyzing the resulting mixture.  All degradation peaks must be clearly separated.  Peak purity of the analyte peak is evaluated by using a diode-array detector. 49
  • 50. IN-PROCESS TESTING • Essential part of the manufacturing process • Way to confirm that the concentration of the active ingredient in the bulk solution is accurate and within specification limits. • Used to test for homogeneity • UV spectrophotometric method is usually selected. 50
  • 51. Why uv spectroscopy is selected??? • Time saving compare to HPLC. • It does not require elaborate instrument. • Easily set up in a manufacturing environment. • Excipients in the formulation interfer eg. benzyl alcohol 260 nm 51
  • 52. RELEASE TESTING • Simple identification test is required. • The identification test is typically a color development test - mixing the test product + chemical reagent to produce a characteristic color. • Eg…phenolic compounds react with ferric chloride to produce an intense dark color. 52
  • 53. When there is no unique color reaction test, thin- layer chromatography (TLC) Rf value or an HPLC is used. • An HPLC method for the estimation of potency and determination of degradation products is an integral part of release testing. • The analytical method should be SELECTIVE , SPECIFIC & stability indicating. 53
  • 54. • Ex Lactic acid – common excipient used in parenteral is determine by back titration of excess alkali with 0.1N HCL.because dextrose+alkali results in hydrolysis of dextrose to organic acids. • The titration is performed after removing active drug in formulation by using chromatography. • Alternatively it is done by enzymatic colorimetric using biochemical reagent. 54
  • 55. • In presence of hybrogen peroxide,peroxidase catalyzes oxidative condensation of chromogenic precausors to produce colored dye with 540nm (max wave length) • Lactate in presence of lactate oxidase converts in to pyruvate and hydrogen peroxide. 55
  • 56. DOCUMENTATION • “It is a systematic & scientific process of collecting & recontrolling • In India underschedule ‘U’ & schedule ‘M’ to the drugs and cosmetics • Rules that record are manes and path-own they are failing. 1. Batch reconciliation record 2. Environmetal control record 3. Raw material requiring sheet 4. Recovery addition sheet 56
  • 57. 5. Manufacturing instrunmentation 6. Bottle filling & washing record 7. Leakes test record 8. Finished goods release record 9. Personnel records 10. SOP records. 11. Packaging material record 12. Packaging record 57
  • 59. Questions 1 Enlist the analytical tests of parenteral preparation. Discuss BET. 2 Describe particulate matter testing for parenteral preparation. 3 Give characteristics of parenteral dosage forms. Describe requirements for successfully formulated parenteral dosage forms. 4 Discuss Bioburden testing of parenteral preparation. 5 Describe pharmaceutical analysis during 1)Formulation and process development. 2)Finished parenteral preparations. 6 Discuss sterility testing. 59
  • 60. References 1. Handbook of modern pharmaceautical analysis by Satinder Ahuja and Stephen Scypinski, volume 3 2. United state pharmacopoeia. 3. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences 60
  • 61. 61