The Giving Business - CAF Australi payroll giving promo information
Masters fundraising 101 acu australian catholic university
1. • Proposed overview for ACU fundraising day
• The market – who raises what, how
– Using actual transactional data from Benchmarking study of 68 major charities
and annual reports of another 100 or so
• Types of non-governmental fundraising, pros, cons and scale
– Corporate, trusts, events, face to face, major donors, mail, phone, online, mobile
– Including breaking these down into types of campaign
• Brand and propositions
– Developing the offer – how to motivate
– The essence of great story telling
• Budgeting
• Managing upwards – the barriers to growth
– Boards, cost of fundraising issues, unrealistic expectations
• All illustrated with case studies
• Interaction would be through lots of questions from me, then group work looking at
fundraising mix, branding, proposition and story telling (which will be their favourite
bit); mixing people up so that they are not in the same groups as their colleagues.
12. But maths doesn’t work without a cause
• Your brand must be about your beneficiaries
• Every single communication should reinforce this brand
position – including what you just told me
• Lets look at your charities’ website (or your favourite
charity’s)
13. Charities that do it well from the start
• Cancer Council NSW
• Make a Wish
• Oasis (Salvation Army)
16. ANALYTICAL
-Your Growth
- Your donor
Behaviour
-Used for targeting
ENVIRONMENTAL
-How much is given
- Growth
- Competition
PERSONAL
-Transactions
- Legacy status
- Pet name
STRATEGIC DATA
- informs
TECHNICAL DATA
- used
38. My last job
GBP ('000) Income Inc/ F'Raiser Income Inc/ F'Raiser
Bequests 871 871 1,154 1,154
Trusts and Foundations * 1,412 1,412 1,892 757
Direct Marketing 1,309 261 1,878 375
Corporate 62 62 170 68
* 60% comes from the National Lottery
Case Study - MIND (UK - Largest Mental Health Charity)
1999/00 2002/03
39. The Big Picture
Overall Fundraising Strategy
Government
Trusts &
foundations
Consider
Corporate &
Events
40. The Big Picture
Overall Fundraising Strategy
Government
Trusts &
foundations
Consider
Corporate &
Events
Consider
Associations,
groups
41. The Big Picture
Overall Fundraising Strategy
Government
Trusts &
foundations
Consider
Corporate &
Events
Consider
Associations,
groups
Individuals – Long term growth
42. The Big Picture
Overall Fundraising Strategy
Government
Trusts &
foundations
Consider
Corporate &
Events
Consider
Associations,
groups
Individuals – Long term growth
The Giving Constituency
43. The Big Picture
Overall Fundraising Strategy
Government
Trusts &
foundations
Consider
Corporate &
Events
Consider
Associations,
groups
Individuals – Long term growth
The Giving Constituency
Bequests /
Legacies
Major Donors Regular Giving
51. Gross income by year
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Income
Millions
Year
Gross Individual Giving Income by Year
Bequest Cash Regular Gift
PFBM9_IncomeSummary_v1.xlsm
54. New Recruits Value (1st yr value)
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Millions
Cash Regular Gift
PFBM9_Analysis_ALL_v5.xlsm
43%
57%
43%
57%
55. Average bequest by year
$54
$57
$57
$53
$60
$59
$49
$50
$46
$50
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
Average Bequest Amount
Thousands
Year
PFBM9_IncomeSummary_v1.xlsm
56. The Second Most Important Thing in
Fundraising
• Maths. (Sorry, but again it is)…
Age.
why is age important in fundraising?
57. The only two STRATEGIC ways to raise $
from young people (<45 years). Number 1.
Face to Face
fundraising*
58. The only two STRATEGIC ways to raise $
from young people (<45 years). Number 2
Wait 20-40
years
59. The only single STRATEGIC ways to raise $
from even younger people (<30 years).
Number 2
Wait even
longer
60.
61.
62. 1 off income by channel of solicitation
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Income
Millions
Year
IndividualGross Cash Income by Solicitation Channel
Direct Mail Media Online Other Phone
PFBM9_IncomeSummary_v1.xlsm
63. Individual RG income by channel of solicitation
Base: All giving
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Income
Millions
Year
RG Income (Year & Channel of Solicitation)
Direct Mail Face to Face Media Online Other Phone 2Step
PFBM9_IncomeSummary_v1.xlsm
64. F2F recruit Yr1 attrition
by Age
51%
48%
41%
35%
30% 28% 31% 28%
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Year1 Attrition Recruits
PFBM10_AdditionalAnalysis_v2.xlsm
Av age at
acquisition: 36
One year active: 38
All active F2F
donors: 42
71. • Massive!
• The only way to get
committed donations from
younger people
• A brand new audience
• Added more money to
charity coffers than
anything else in last ten
years
• Getting a supplier is a
nightmare
• Don’t bother trying to do it
yourself
• Cash flow issues
• Minimum investment
>$100,000
Pros Cons
72. Average five yr RG Gift Value
Base: All DM & F2F regular giving recruits
Direct Mail Face to Face
Year5 Inc $174.80 $91.99
Year4 Inc $180.33 $106.09
Year3 Inc $163.44 $124.24
Year2 Inc $178.17 $155.83
Year1 Inc $194.18 $231.78
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
Year of recruitment
Value to Date - F2F Recruits (All)
73. • Dynamic – can test and
adjust fast
• Great to adjust in
emergency
• Volumes can be ramped
up
• Plenty of experience in
the market
• Donors upgrade by
phone
• New Audience
• Cash and RG both work
• Takes a while to get
satisfactory ROI
• Needs constant
management, every hour
• Lower volumes than
F2F
Pros Cons
74. • Dynamic – can test and
adjust fast
• Great to adjust in
emergency
• When it works – very,
very cheap cost per
donor possible
• High visibility
• Non traditional donor
market
• Very hard to get
working
• Lower loyalty
• Needs mail and phone
to keep donors giving
• Distraction for younger
fundraisers
• Limited bequest
potential (but better
than F2F)
Pros Cons
75. • Targeted Reach / High
frequency
• High Awareness
• Engages 2/5 Human
Sensory Attributes
• Visual Representation
of ‘the Need’
• Storytelling 60/30/15sec
• Targeted Placement
• Direct Response
• Increasingly
Fragmented
• Cluttered Environment
at specific times of year
(i.e. Christmas)
• Rising costs
Pros Cons
76. • ‘Call to Action’ in
conjunction with other
media
• Low Cost Channel
• No Visual Storytelling
• Difficult to Highlight
‘the Need’
• Low volume
Pros Cons
77. • Proven track record and
going through renaissance
• Older donors (new audience
for WV & bequest potential)
• Brilliant ROI on rollouts
• Story telling
• Reaches more targeted
people than anything else
• ~ RG conversion prospect
• Great passive advocacy
opportunity
• Tough to get it working at
first
• Success heavily reliant on
creative
• Finite lists
• Growing competition
• Best results are now
• Mostly single gift donors
Pros Cons
78. Variables for growth
• Region
• Type
– Health, developing, etc
• Age
• Fundraising Technique
• Legacy presence
• Internet presence
• Twitter traffic
• Fundraising
expenditure
• Awareness
• PR / celebrity
involvement
• Consultant / supplier
?
79. Variables for growth
• Region
• Type
– Health, developing, etc
• Age
• Fundraising Technique
• Legacy presence
• Internet presence
• Twitter traffic
• Fundraising
expenditure
• Awareness
• PR / celebrity
involvement
• Consultant / supplier
104. Fundraising v Other Investments
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
Property capital gain @ 8.4% Leaving in investments @ 10% Good fundraising program
Five Year ROI
If you love animals, this works. If you don’t, it doesn’t. Management stuff and everything else is irrelevant to the masses.
Ask for them to complete this. We will come back to it later.
Draw a chart and guess where Canadian & US money comes from
01:46Let’s look at America – home of capitalism and the most generous nation on earth
01:48With so many companies doing green stuff, Triple bottom line, - flick through slides
01:58Looking beyond the top 500, we find individuals give $8.2bn. And here CAF show us the small amount corporates give us compared to the amount of effort charities put in.
Compassion to the awareness lecture
Chart shows how much income has grown in each gift type since 2005Bump in BQ is due to 4-5 big bequests, NOT house price changes
74% recruits are 1 off in 201076% recruits are 1 off in 2010
Despite more people being recruited to 1 off, RG and 1 off provide equal 1st yr valueIN 2009, 48% of Yr1 income came from 1 off recruits
Bequests are almost certainly key for you. But let’s not scare them like this guy is doing
Hang in there, more data to come…
We don’t include donors who never give a giftWe take first donation as start date, we look at who’s last donation is within the one year of that first donation date******************************CR Notes:Most donors 25-34Lowest attrition in older donors
Ask if any Buddhists. Tell me about bequest program
114 year old Besse Cooper.Draw the age chart.
Warm – it is not either or, but for cold it is only MAIL – except Honeymoon
Interestingly, investment level in rg/mg has a great correlation with growth – but what do you think is the most important variable…in other words, which of these variables when plotted next to growth over last decade has the best correlation
It is how much they spend on fundraising. Technique second, but I reckon mistakes would be close too.
Tell me about your mail program
Tell me about your mail program
One of the most expensive packs I have ever seen…
Why are you not doing F2F?
Do targeting graph
Qualitative research shows donors care. Quote some numbers.
02:53If growth is driven by individuals – what about you!?