25. Two weeks ago, we had:
a bug report
a detailed description how to possibly fix this issue
What we did NOT have was:
any reaction by the patch author or any maintainer
(although with the exception of Linus, the recipients of the problem
description were exactly the same as the ones in this email)
A few days later, the patch that includes this bug was included in
Linus' tree.
Two weeks later, the bug is still present in both latest mm and Linus'
tree.
Linus, please do a
gitrevert a5e1b94008f2a96abf4a0c0371a55a56b320c13e
26. > Linus, please do a
> gitrevert a5e1b94008f2a96abf4a0c0371a55a56b320c13e
Fair enough. Reverted.
I think I'll stop accepting any ACPI patches at all that add new features,
as long as there doesn't seem to be anybody who reacts to bugreports. We
don't need ACPI features.
We need somebody who answers when people like Andrew asks about patches to
support things like memory hotplug (which was also a problem over the last
weeks). Here's a quote from Andrew from a week or so ago: quot;repeat seven
times over three months with zero response.quot;.
It's not worth it to accept new stuff if we know it's not going to get any
attention ever afterwards.