A lecture on the information cycle by Dr. Rajesh Mangrulkar, M.D. This lecture was taught as a part of the University of Michigan Medical School's M1 - Patients and Populations Sequence.
View the course materials:
http://open.umich.edu/education/med/m1/patientspop-decisionmaking/2010/materials
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Â
The Information Cycle
1. Author(s): Rajesh Mangrulkar, M.D., 2011
License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution–Non-commercial–Share Alike 3.0 License:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and
adapt it. The citation key on the following slide provides information about how you may share and adapt this material.
Copyright holders of content included in this material should contact open.michigan@umich.edu with any questions, corrections, or
clarification regarding the use of content.
For more information about how to cite these materials visit http://open.umich.edu/education/about/terms-of-use.
Any medical information in this material is intended to inform and educate and is not a tool for self-diagnosis or a replacement for
medical evaluation, advice, diagnosis or treatment by a healthcare professional. Please speak to your physician if you have questions
about your medical condition.
Viewer discretion is advised: Some medical content is graphic and may not be suitable for all viewers.
2. Attribution Key
for more information see: http://open.umich.edu/wiki/AttributionPolicy
Use + Share + Adapt
{ Content the copyright holder, author, or law permits you to use, share and adapt. }
Public Domain – Government: Works that are produced by the U.S. Government. (17 USC § 105)
Public Domain – Expired: Works that are no longer protected due to an expired copyright term.
Public Domain – Self Dedicated: Works that a copyright holder has dedicated to the public domain.
Creative Commons – Zero Waiver
Creative Commons – Attribution License
Creative Commons – Attribution Share Alike License
Creative Commons – Attribution Noncommercial License
Creative Commons – Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike License
GNU – Free Documentation License
Make Your Own Assessment
{ Content Open.Michigan believes can be used, shared, and adapted because it is ineligible for copyright. }
Public Domain – Ineligible: Works that are ineligible for copyright protection in the U.S. (17 USC § 102(b)) *laws in
your jurisdiction may differ
{ Content Open.Michigan has used under a Fair Use determination. }
Fair Use: Use of works that is determined to be Fair consistent with the U.S. Copyright Act. (17 USC § 107) *laws in your
jurisdiction may differ
Our determination DOES NOT mean that all uses of this 3rd-party content are Fair Uses and we DO NOT guarantee that
your use of the content is Fair.
To use this content you should do your own independent analysis to determine whether or not your use will be Fair.
3. Patients and Populations
Medical Decision-Making
Shifting Probabilities and Questions
Rajesh S. Mangrulkar, M.D.
University of Michigan
Department of Internal Medicine
Division of General Medicine
Fall 2011
4. Learning Objectives for Today
• By the end of this lecture, you will…
– describe Bayesian probabilistic rules, as they
apply to a basic diagnostic question
– summarize how uncertainty in diagnostic
reasoning interacts with trust of the practitioner.
– explain the difference between background and
foreground clinical questions
– recognize how individual targeted searches for the
answers to clinical questions drive self-directed
learning that is crucial for all practitioners
– be able to craft foreground questions for both
diagnosis and treatment, using the PICO format
5. A Clinical Tale
• 20 year-old woman presents for genetic
testing
• Mother had breast and ovarian cancer,
likely has the BRCA gene (autosomal
dominant)
• With this assumption, the patient’s
likelihood of having the gene is…50%
• She decides not to get tested.
6. The Tale Continues…FFwd
• At age 75 she has not been diagnosed
with breast or ovarian cancer.
• Is her probability of having the BRCA
gene different at age 75 than it was at
age 20?
– Yes: it is lower
– How much lower?
7. Conditional Probabilities
• What is the probability of event B, given
an event A? Written as P(B | A).
– Example: P (BRCA | no breast cancer)
• Key concept:
– Conditional probabilities can be combined
with prior probabilities to create joint
probabilities
8. Basic Probabilistic Rules
Examples of types of Events
• Dependent events: occurrence of 1 depends
to some extent on the other
– Example: The same person passing step 1 of the
boards and then passing step 2 of the boards 2
years later.
• Independent events: both can occur
– Example: 2 different people passing step 1 of the
boards (abiding by the honor code)
• Mutually exclusive events: cannot both occur
– Example: A person getting >250 on step 1 of the
boards, or the same person getting 220-250 on
step 1.
9. Combining Probabilities of Events
• Pr (A B) = Pr (A) + Pr (B)
– If A and B are mutually exclusive events
• Pr (A B) = Pr (A) * Pr (B)
– If A and B are independent events
• Pr (A B) = Pr (A) * Pr (B|A)
– If A and B are dependent events (Joint
probability)
= OR = AND
10. Back to our story
75 yo woman whose mother very likely
had the BRCA gene, but who has not
herself been diagnosed with breast
cancer.
• Our patient wants to know:
– What is P (BRCA | no breast ca)?
11. Considering both sides…
Dependent Events
Pr (A B) = Pr (A) * Pr (B|A)
•Step 1:
P (BRCA and no breast cancer)
= P(BRCA) * P(no breast ca | BRCA)
= 0.5 * 0.3 (from studies)
= 0.15
•Step 2:
P (NO BRCA and no breast ca)
= P(NO BRCA)*P(no breast ca|NO BRCA)
= 0.5 * 0.875(from studies)
= 0.4375
12. But that doesn’t tell the full story…
• Joint probabilities
– P (BRCA and no breast ca) = 0.15
– P (NO BRCA and no breast ca) = 0.4375
• The assumption is that these are NOT
independent events.
• Again, our patient wants to know:
– What is P (BRCA | no breast ca)?
14. Step 3: Bayes Theorem
• Conditional probability is the relative proportion of the
relevant joint probability to the sum of all the joint
probabilities.
• P(BRCA | no breast ca)
= P (BRCA & no breast ca)
P (no breast ca)
= P(BRCA) * P (no breast ca | BRCA)
P (no breast ca)
• P (no breast ca) = sum of all the joint probabilities
• P (no breast ca & BRCA)
• P (no breast ca & NOT BRCA)
15. Applying Bayes Theorem
• P (BRCA | no breast ca) =
0.15
------------------- = 26%
0.15 + 0.4375
• 26% is significantly lower than 50% (our
prior probability)
16. Why is this important?
• Illustration of changing probabilities, and
shifting uncertainty…
…because of test results
…because of events
…because of time
• Fundamentally, clinicians deal with shifting
probabilities and uncertainty with each patient
they encounter
– Many tools to help (Bayes, 2x2, Likelihood ratios)
18. Who is this man?
Image of “The Riddler” is used for illustrative purposes, in an
effort to advance the instructor’s teaching goals. This use is
Fair and consistent with the U.S. Copyright Act. (USC
17 § 107)
Frank Gorshin - a.k.a. “The Riddler”
19. Riddle me this...
• How many questions do clinicians ask
while they care for patients? 4 per patient
• Why is question-generation a critical
skill? (1) Targeting Information Resources
(2) Generating Search Terms
21. The Well-Structured Clinical Question
• Purposes
– Target resources
– Define search terms
– Define what you and the patient care about
• Two Types
– Background
– Foreground
22. Anatomy of a Background Question
• What • Disorder
• How • Syndrome
• Where • Finding
• When • Health state
• Who • Concern
• Why
23. Background Questions -- Examples
• Who should get influenza vaccine and when?
• Which drugs to treat HIV can cause
pancreatitis?
• What is the metabolic pathway for cholesterol
synthesis?
• Why do patients with sleep apnea have high
blood pressure?
24. Background vs. Foreground
Questions
• Background: Designed to improve
general knowledge about a subject
• Foreground: Patient-specific
questions, strong implications for
decisions, often with comparisons
25. An Evolution in Question Type
100
90
80
70
60
Foreground
50
Background
40
30
20
10
0
M1-M2 M3-M4 Residency Practice
26. Background Questions: A Case
Using the following case, jot down 2 questions with
your partner that may help you care for this patient:
A 42 year old woman comes to her primary care
practitioner’s office for follow up of her diabetes. She
is currently on glyburide 10 mg twice daily. However,
her morning and evening blood sugars still stay
elevated. You are the medical student who sees
this patient with your attending. Afterwards, your
attending asks whether you think she should add
metformin to her regimen. You say that you don’t
know because your knowledge of diabetes
medications are sketchy.
27. Background Questions
• What kind of medication is glyburide?
• In what classes of medication do metformin
and glyburide fall?
• What is the initial dosage of metformin?
• What are the adverse effects of metformin
that I must be cautious about?
• Is it safe to be on glyburide and metformin at
the same time?
29. Foreground Questions -- Examples
• In patients with chronic • In patients with acute
atrial fibrillation over the chest pain of less than
age of 70, does warfarin 6 hours’ duration, what
anticoagulation reduce is the diagnostic
the rate of stroke and accuracy of a single
death when compared troponin level when
with aspirin? compared with serial
EKG’s and enzymes?
30. Foreground Questions -- Examples
Therapy
• In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation over
the age of 70, does warfarin anticoagulation
reduce the rate of stroke and death when
compared with aspirin?
Diagnosis
• In patients with acute chest pain of less than
6 hours’ duration, what is the diagnostic
accuracy of a single troponin level when
compared with serial EKG’s and enzymes?
31. PICO: A Tool to Structure the
Foreground Question
Therapy Diagnosis
P Patient Pop Disease
I Intervention Test
C Comparison Gold Standard
O Outcome Accuracy
This will NOT be the only time you encounter Bayes Theorem. This example is meant to only familiarize you with the principle. You will be spending much more time with this concept in your Human Genetics component and in the small group sessions there.
As we practice medicine (and as you begin to take care of patients), you ’ ll realize that there is more to it than just the 4 A ’ s. Step 1 is of course asking the right question and getting answers Step 2 mandates that we assess the strength of the evidence. remember that studies do NOT prove the truth, rather they lend credence to it. They present weak, moderate or strong evidence in support of it. In step 3, this is where EBM stops, and MDM (medical decision-making) begins. It involves weighing the latest knowledge with your own beliefs, the values of the patient, and society ’ s values. Maybe a therapy would not be covered. Maybe a patient ’ s understanding of his or her own disease is such that he would not accept the therapy you are prescribing. This is the most complex step. This is the art.
Let ’ s first start with Step 1: Asking questions… First, how does this skill practically help you? Well it does in 3 ways: First, understanding your question can greatly help you figure out where to go to find the answer. For example, a controversial question that you know has been studied extensively (e.g., how to screen for prostate cancer) may be best answered with a practice guideline. A general knowledge question (what is Hashimoto ’ s thyroiditis?), is better found in a textbook, rather than on MEDLINE. Second, defining your question helps determine your search terms. It ’ s very easy to go from the question to the search this way, if you ’ re clear up front what you are interested in. Finally, and I think most importantly, it helps you define what you and your patient are most interested in looking at up-front. This last extremely important benefit will be more clear as we work through some examples.
The main categorization that some proponents of EBM make, is that between background and foreground questions. We will define this as follows: <read> Background…We tend to ask these questions very frequently in our careers, especially early on. They may or may not be related to a specific patient, and may not be linked to a specific decision you have to make. They are very important, because they lay the foundation to asking more sophisticated Foreground questions. <read> . Let ’ s step through a case to help illustrate the differences.