Global Sustainable Technology & Innovation conference
Smart City Conference Seville A. Garcia (ENoLL)
1. European
Network
of
Living
Labs
(ENoLL)
European
smart
ci9es
and
smart
city
projects
in
user
empowered
innova9on
ecosystems:
CitySDK
project,
Helsinki
and
Amsterdam
cases
Ana
Garcia
European
Network
of
Living
Labs
(ENoLL)
“Smart
City:
Las
oportunidades
en
la
Internet
del
futuro”
Seville,
Nov
6th
2012
4. What
is
ENoLL?
European Network of Living Labs, Brussels
based international non-profit organisaton,
facilitates the cooperation and the exploitation
of sy n erg ie s betwee n i ts 30 0+ m embers
worldwide.
W i t h i n E N o L L , t h e w h o le
ean
innovation cycle i.e end-users, E urop
with nd
SMEs, coorporations, citizens, ed ic i e s a ly
L i n k s s i o n p o l s p e c i al
public sector, NGOs, academia i e
Co m m ve s and ital
a n d t h e w i d e r re s e ar c h t i in Dig p e
i n i t i a ze d value E u r o
communities form a ni
recog d a f o r Citie ,
s,
d e d i cat e d n e t w o r k o f n t
Age gh S m ar n
De sig ,
thematically organised Living u e t,
(t h r o I n t e r n n, Culture
Labs.
F u t u r e nno vatio …)
Soci al I ern ance,
, eGo v
Health
5. The
European
Network
of
Living
Labs
Real-‐life
test
and
experimenta9on
Public-‐Private-‐People
Partnerships
(PPPP)
environments
for
user-‐driven
open
innova9on
320
Living
Labs
5
6. What
is
a
Living
Lab
A
Living
Lab
is
a
real-‐life
test
a n d
e x p e r i m e n t a 9 o n
environment
where
users
and
producers
co-‐create
innova9ons.
Living
Labs
have
been
characterised
by
the
European
Commission
as
Public-‐Private-‐People
Partnerships
(PPPP)
for
co-‐crea9on,
prototyping,
valida9on
and
tes9ng
of
new
technologies,
services,
products,
etc,
in
real-‐life
contexts.
7.
8. Inputs
from
FIREBALL
Fireball
project
(www.fireball4smartci9es.eu)
a
CA
of
the
FP7
for
ICT
(2010-‐2012).
Bring
together
the
FIRE/Future
Internet
community,
Living
Lab
and
urban
development.
9. Some
findings
from
FIREBALL
“How
European
ci.es
are
currently
developing
strategies
towards
becoming
smarter
ci.es
and
the
lessons
we
can
draw
for
the
future.
These
strategies
are
also
based
on
a
new
understanding
of
innova.on,
grounded
in
the
concept
of
Open
innova:on
ecosystems,
global
innova:on
chains
and
on
ci:zen’s
empowerment
for
shaping
innova:on
and
urban
development.
These
new
ways
of
innova:on
are
characterised
1)
high
level
of
ci:zen
involvement
in
co-‐crea:ng
internet-‐based
applica:ons
and
services
and
2)
emergence
of
new
forms
of
collabora.on
(e.g.
PPPs)”*
“Open
innova:on
and
ci:zen’s
engagement
aim
to
bridge
the
gap
between
the
R&D
of
ICT
and
actually
experimen.ng
and
using
Internet-‐based
applica.ons
in
ci.es.
These
applica:ons
and
services
are
intended
to
bring
societal
and
economic
benefits
in
areas
such
as
healthcare,
independent
living,
enterprising
and
SMEs,
par:cipa:ve
government,
energy
efficiency,
environment
and
quality
of
life.”*
*All
inputs
come
from
the
FIREBALL
whitepaper:
h_p://www.fireball4smartci9es.eu/
10. Some
findings
from
FIREBALL
(2)
“Smart
ci:es
need
to
develop
strategies
and
migra.on
paths
regarding
how
they
will
make
use
of
available
internet
infrastructures,
testbed
facili.es,
applica.ons
and
know-‐how,
and
how
they
will
develop
PPP
for
their
access,
use
and
exploita:on.
A
par:cular
point
of
aOen:on
is
how
those
assets
can
be
made
openly
accessible
for
both
users
and
developers
in
order
to
s:mulate
experimenta:on
and
innova:on
in
becoming
part
of
the
innova:on
ecosystem
of
ci:es.”
“Three
important
gaps
are
outlined,
which
ci:es
have
to
overcome
namely:
1. Digital
skills
gap:
that
concerns
to
the
ability
of
ci:zens
and
companies
to
master
web-‐technologies
and
offer
solu:ons
over
the
net
2. The
crea.vity
gap:
that
separates
web
technologies
and
applica:ons
3. The
entrepreneurship
gap:
that
takes
place
between
digital
applica:ons
and
innova:ve
services”
*All
inputs
come
from
the
FIREBALL
whitepaper:
h_p://www.fireball4smartci9es.eu
11. Some
findings
from
FIREBALL
(3)
“Recommenda:on
in
the
paper:
ci:es
have
to
explore
various
business
models
and
iden:fy
the
ones
suitable
for
each
type
of
service.
Living
Lab
methodologies,
social
experiments,
crowdsourcing,
and
open
city
plaTorms
for
crea:ng
and
promo:ng
applica:ons
and
services
may
offer
good
solu:ons
to
this
end
and
mobilize
crea:ve
skills
of
the
en:re
popula:on
of
the
city.”
“Ci.es
provide
many
opportuni.es
of
aJrac.ve
explora.on
and
valida.on
environments.
There
is
s:ll
a
gap
between
Future
Internet
research
and
ci:zens’
expecta:ons.”
*All
inputs
come
from
the
FIREBALL
whitepaper:
h_p://www.fireball4smartci9es.eu
14. SDK
for
Pan-‐European
City
• Service
development
toolkit
for
the
ci9es:
– Open
and
interoperable
digital
service
interfaces
– Processes,
guidelines
and
usability
standards.
• “App
Store”
for
the
City
à Cross-‐city
transfer
of
Smart
City
Applica9ons
14
15. CitySDK
Ecosystem
Public delivery
Infrastructures; App Stores
urban displays
Engaged SME Developers’ new Services
exploiting the City SDK ecosystem, or open source pilot apps
Project Pilots
Demonstrators, open source
CitySDK Ecosystem
CitySDK components
The image cannot
be displayed. Your
computer may not
have enough
memory to open the
image, or the image
may have been
corrupted. Restart
your computer, and
then open the file
Unified Open City Interfaces through Pilots
as CitySDK components
Cities’ prior platforms, services, interfaces, open data
15
16. Why
CitySDK?
1. Developing
new
services
and
scaling
them
to
wider
audiences
becomes
easier:
à More
efficient
use
of
innova9on
capacity
à More
opportuni9es
for
developers
à Be_er
services
faster
2. Helping
to
manage
the
constant
technological
change
16
17. CitySDK
Developers
• Created
and
developed
with
and
for
the
developers
• Lightweight,
modular,
no
new
pladorms
• On-‐going
process,
not
top
down
and
outdated
For
• Ci9es’
in-‐house
service
developers
• Commercial
service
developers
• SMEs
• Large
corpora9ons
• 3rd
sector
&
hack9vists
• Research
organisa9ons
17
19. CitySDK
in
“The
economist”
“CITIES
ARE
TURNING
INTO
VAST
DATA
FACTORIES”
The
Economist
ar9cle
makes
the
case
that
it
is
not
just
about
new
infrastructure
but
about
data
itself
and
how
ci9zens
and
businesses
can
both
generate
and
use
the
city
data
to
create
new
services
20. Public delivery
Infrastructures; App Stores
urban displays
Engaged SME Developers’ new Services
exploiting the City SDK ecosystem, or open source pilot apps
CitySDK Pilots
Smart Smart
Smart
Participation Mobility Tourism
CitySDK
Ecosystem
FixMyStreet
Personal Travel Personal Tour
Assistant Guide
Unified Open City Interfaces through Pilots
as CitySDK components
Cities’ prior platforms, services, interfaces, open data
20
22. Smart
Par9cipa9on
• Bringing
the
City's
issue
repor9ng
and
feedback
channels
closer
to
the
residents
• Providing
ci9es
with
more
accurate
feedback
and
avoiding
unnecessary
feedback
• Making
development
of
issue
repor9ng
and
feedback
channels
easier
• Inspired
by
Open311
and
FixMyStreet
22
23. Smart
Par9cipa9on
–
Lead
Pilot
in
Helsinki
When you spot an issue; fallen
street sign
Do:
1. Report the issue via:
a. Sanoma Publishers’ web
portal Omakaupunki.fi
b. SMS
c. E-mail
à Direct issue reporting to the right
department within the city
Don’t
spend time looking through the
City's official portal to find the official
form for reporting such an issue.
23
24. Smart
Mobility
–
Lead
Pilot
in
Amsterdam
Intelligent
social
traveling
People
as
informa:on
agents
The
Personal
Travel
Assistant
makes
you
a
social
traveler
and
helps
you
• To
make
your
experience
help
others
• To
bring
structure
in
your
traveling
chaos
• To
connect
with
fellow
travellers
• To
make
your
experience
enhance
public
service
Aggrega:ng
of
messages
adapted
to
your
journey
to
separate
the
relevant
from
the
irrelevant
informa:on
24
Lauri
Vanhala:
Helsinki
Public
Transport
Visualized:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGllzWt0acU
25. Smart
Tourism
–
Lead
Pilot
in
Lisbon
Personal
Travel
guide
–
real
9me
informa9on
for
tourists
and
travellers
• Unifying
access
to
loca9on-‐
and
9me-‐based
tourism-‐related
data,
and
subsequent
service
genera9on.
• U9lizing
innova9ve,
user-‐centric/Internet
of
Things
technologies
e.g.:
– Augmented
Reality
– NFC/RFID
– Public
Urban
Displays,
and
– Geo-‐loca9on
25
26. Helsinki
“Towards
a
smart
city
cluster
build
upon
user
empowered
innova9on”
The
municipali9es
use
LLs
for
Universi9es,
City
owned
economic
development
and
development
agencies
societal
ac9va9on
in
energy
(Forum
Virium
Helsinki),
issues,
or
sevice
provision
in
companies
and
SMEs
have
health
care
of
the
elderly,
established
Living
Labs.
preven9ve
care,
or
urban
living.
Companies
as
Nokia
use
LLs
Cross-‐municipal
collabora9on
as
user-‐centered
hubs
for
in
seong
up
an
innova9on
idea9on
and
product
pladorm
around
open
data
development
and
na9onal
aiming
at
smart
services
for
research
ins9tu9ons
use
ci9zens
Living
Labs
as
pladorms
for
innova9on.
Helsinki
city
and
Helsinki
region.
Model
Provide
plaIorms
for
of
a
Smart
City:
organizing
compe99ons
for
innovaHon
that
are
open
to
development
of
new
innova9on
applica9ons
to
all
municipal
and
regional
parHes
with
an
interest
in
technologies
within
a
encourage
the
development
mul9-‐leveled
of
new
mobile
applica9ons
developing
new
products
and
services
u9lizing
Open
Data
infrastructure
and
towards
the
creaHon
of
new
business
sectors.
*
inputs
come
from
the
FIREBALL
whitepaper:
h_p://
www.fireball4smartci9es.eu
27. Helsinki
(2)
“All
the
smart
city
ac:vi:es
in
Helsinki
boil
down
to
community
engagement,
enabling
the
dialogue
between
the
city,
ci:zens
and
companies“
-‐ CitySDK
-‐ Helsinki
Region
Infoshare:
www.hri.fi/en/
-‐ Aims
to
make
regional
informa9on
quickly
and
easily
accessible
to
all.
The
data
may
be
used
by
ci9zens,
businesses,
universi9es,
academies,
research
facili9es
or
municipal
administra9on.
-‐ The
data
on
offer
is
ready
to
be
used
freely
at
no
cost.
-‐ At
the
moment
at
www.hri.fi
there
are
almost
900
data
catalogues
opened
so
far.
-‐ The
project
was
started
in
2009
ini9ated
by
Forum
Virium,
City
of
Helsinki
Urban
Facts
and
ci9es
of
Helsinki,
Vantaa,
Espoo
and
Kauniainen.
In
2014
the
ownership
and
maintaining
of
the
HRI
will
be
transfered
from
Forum
Virium
and
Urban
Facts
to
the
municipali9es
themselves.
*
Inputs
from
Forum
Virium
Helsinki
29. Helsinki
(4)
-‐ Apps4Finland:
h_p://apps4finland.fi/en/
-‐ Apps4Finland
contest
is
organized
for
the
3rd
9me
this
year,
with
ever
increasing
amount
of
compe9ng
apps,
visualiza9ons,
ideas
and
data
openings.
-‐ Also
other
organiza9ons
in
Helsinki
have
found
the
"virtues"
of
app
contest,
as
Helsinki
Region
Transport
Authority
and
Sanoma
Publishing
organiza9ons
have
also
been
arranging
specific
App
contests.
*
Inputs
from
Forum
Virium
Helsinki
30. Helsinki
(5)
-‐ Helsinki
Region
Transport
Authority:
-‐ HRT
opened
its
all
interfaces
on
2009
and
today
they
have
approximately
70
different
applica9ons
and
widgets
developed
by
its
developer
community
members.
-‐ At
the
same
9me
when
opening
the
APIs
HRT
opened
its
own
web-‐based
Journey
Planner
which
is
currently
one
of
the
most
popular
web
applica9ons
in
Finland.
-‐ All
other
service
development
it
let
to
the
developer
community,
resul9ng
in
very
heterogeneous
variety
of
applica9ons
serving
with
highly
specified
apps
also
the
very
narrow
niche
markets.
-‐ One
good
example
app
is
the
Mobitransit
(real-‐9me
tracking
of
trams
and
buses
in
Helsinki)
applica9on
which
is
developed
by
a
developer
from
Valencia,
who
has
never
visited
Helsinki,
but
was
able
to
access
the
HRT
API
through
web.
*
Inputs
from
Forum
Virium
Helsinki
32. Amsterdam
(2)
(Source:
Amsterdam
Smart
city
/
AIM*)
Challenges/statements
in
Smart
city
development:
Invo l
veme
It is nt of
nd not o us
gy a p aware nly a ers:
te bo ut
Stra adma n e ss
Ro chang but also
trans e and
for ma
t io n
Business case
34. What
is
next?
-‐ Future
Internet,
Ci9es
and
Living
Labs
à
“City
as
a
laboratory”*
and
more
-‐ Collabora9on
FI-‐PPP
and
Smart
City
projects
-‐ FI-‐PPP
phase
3
*
Artur
Serra,
ENoLL
board
member
35. THANK YOU!!
Ana
Garcia
European
Projects
European
Network
of
Living
Labs
Ana.garcia@enoll.org
@openlivinglabs
info@enoll.org
www.openlivinglabs.eu
@citysdk
marja.mattila@forumvirium.fi
www.citysdk.eu
@FI_PPP
info@fi-ppp.eu
www.fi-ppp.eu