The document provides an agenda for a student reassignment committee meeting. The meeting will include a call to order, roll call, approval of previous meeting minutes, discussion of committee operating procedures, scenario review and revision, and a report to the school board. The next meeting will be on July 17th to discuss scenarios.

3. STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High School
Monday, June 25, 2012 - 4:00 pm
 Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward
 Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
 Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2012 & June 12, 2012 Meetings
 Committee Operating Procedure
 Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller, OREd
 Report to School Board 8/6/12
 Questions?
Next Meeting
Scenario Discussion
July 17, 2012
6:00 pm
3

4. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools

5. Jan-Aug 2012 Aug - 2012 Aug – Dec 2012 August 2013
Committee Committee Public Input/ Community
Deliberations/ Recommendations Engagement Implementation
Monthly Reports to Presented to the
the School Board School Board Board of Education
Approval
5

6. Board of Public Engagement
Education
Committee Chairs
Technical Support
Community
Feedback Committee
ORED
Staff 6

7. Contiguous boundaries:
 Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using
satellite attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods:
 Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other
guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways,
railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools:
 While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating
school boundaries.
7

8. Modify feeder systems:
 In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each
site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would
allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on
mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities:
 Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the
four high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth:
 Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to
ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly
more than the others.
Enrollment balance:
 In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic
and economic populations at each middle and high school.
8

9.  February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process
 March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
 April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
 May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
 June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
 June 25 – Final (?) Scenario Presentation
9

10.  Transparent
 Lines of Communications
 Committee Meetings
 Open to the public
 Website
 Information posted immediately after each meeting
 E-mail/ Phone Line
 An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has
been established to ensure seamless communication and to
make all information readily available to the public.
 A phone line has been established for those with limited or no
internet access to provide feedback to the committee.

11. Mike Miller, OREd
11

12.  Middle School Scenarios
 Clean feeder to HS
 Based on Scenario HS 02, Rev. 1
 Parker as 6th grade center for RM school(s)
 2 options
 Elementary School Scenario
 Minor adjustments to current zones
 Informed by optimal scenario ES 01 (Proximity + Utilization)
 Relief for Benvenue (currently at 111%)
12

13.  Free/Reduced Lunch – percentage of impacted population
eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch . Data supplied in aggregate
form by NRMPS, calculated across K-12.
 Academic Proficiency – percentage of impacted population
scoring Proficient in both Reading and Math. Data supplied by
NRMPS, calculated across grades 3-8.
 Minority – percentage of non-white impacted population . Data
obtained from NCWISE download, calculated by level (E/M/H)
 Data represented in aggregate form only as percentage of school
population.
13

14.  Metrics measure current student
demographics by residence.
 Metrics are used as planning tool for
demographic balance.
 Metrics are not intended as a forecast of
future school demographics/performance.
14

15.  IMPACT + FEEDER
 Maximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently 105%)
 Minimum Utilization: 98%
 Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 736

16. CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1
16

17. 6-8 Student Count
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Southern NEW MS (RM
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak
Nash HS site)
CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0
IMPACT + METRICS (MS
448 614 483 885 946 428
03, Rev. 1)
IMPACT + METRICS (MS
558 614 279 885 946 522
04, Rev. 1)
(See data tables in handout.)

18. Utilization
140%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
NEW MS (RM
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
HS site)
CURRENT 88% 94% 78% 107% 129% 0%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 60% 92% 87% 104% 111% 57%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 74% 92% 50% 104% 111% 70%
Minority %
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
NEW MS (RM
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
HS site)
CURRENT 78% 67% 88% 59% 51% 0%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 76% 50% 86% 56% 54% 96%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 80% 50% 89% 56% 54% 89%

19. Free/Reduced Lunch %
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
NEW MS (RM
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
HS site)
CURRENT 73% 68% 78% 58% 64% 0%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 72% 54% 77% 57% 67% 86%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 74% 54% 81% 57% 67% 81%
Academic Proficiency %
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
NEW MS (RM
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
HS site)
CURRENT 51% 54% 55% 69% 63% 0%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 50% 68% 48% 69% 62% 46%
IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 46% 68% 50% 69% 62% 50%

20.  Maximum Utilization: 111% (SNMS, currently 129%)
 Minimum Utilization: 50% (Parker, MS 04 Rev.1, currently 78%)
 All clean feeder to High Schools except Edwards
split to NCHS and RMHS
 Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned
 MS 03, Rev. 1: 1093 (~ 350 to New MS)
 MS 04, Rev. 1: 1221 (~ 510 to New MS)

21. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 03, REV. 1
21

22. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 04, REV. 1
22

23. K-5 Student Count
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Red
MB Winste
Baskerv Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo
Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng
ille ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd
d lewood
Creek
CURRENT 620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081
UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 620 341 625 221 624 452 492 340 625 302 673 550 557 1073
(See data tables in handout.)

24. Utilization
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Red
MB Winste
Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo
Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng
ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd
d lewood
Creek
CURRENT 93% 80% 111% 99% 104% 83% 96% 81% 104% 90% 72% 101% 75% 95%
UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 93% 80% 94% 99% 104% 79% 96% 81% 92% 97% 83% 101% 96% 95%
Minority %
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Red
MB Winste
Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo
Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng
ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd
d lewood
Creek
CURRENT 65% 98% 74% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 49% 99% 44% 51% 97% 64%
UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 65% 98% 71% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 50% 99% 43% 51% 97% 63%

25. Free/Reduced Lunch %
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Red
MB Winste
Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo
Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng
ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd
d lewood
Creek
CURRENT 71% 94% 68% 73% 47% 91% 70% 70% 52% 91% 46% 65% 92% 59%
UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 71% 94% 65% 73% 47% 90% 70% 70% 53% 92% 46% 65% 92% 59%
Academic Proficiency %
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Red
MB Winste
Baskerv Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo
Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng
ille ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd
d lewood
Creek
CURRENT 62% 45% 63% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 71% 35% 72% 60% 35% 61%
UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 62% 45% 65% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 69% 35% 73% 60% 35% 62%

26.  Maximum Utilization: 104% (Coopers, currently 104%)
 Minimum Utilization: 79% (Johnson, currently 83%)
 Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363

27. CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 01, REV.2
27

28.  Middle School Scenarios: Impact + Metrics
 5 MS feeding 4 HS
 Scenario MS 03, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center for New
MS and Edwards
 Scenario MS 04, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center for New
MS
 Clean feeder to HS, except for Edwards
 Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned: 1093 – 1221
 Elementary School Scenario: Utilization + Impact
 Optimal Scenario ES 01, Rev. 2
 Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363
28

29. 29

30. February 13 (4:00-5:30)
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
May 29 (6:00)
June 12 (6:00)
Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)
July/August - TBD

31. QUESTIONS