1. lcome to the world of
urnalism, where
porters have been
gging dirt, raking muck,
king headlines and
adlines for centuries
w. It’s a history full of
bloid trash, of slimy
nsationalists, of
runkards, deadbeats and
mmers” (as a Harvard
iversity president once
scribed reporters).
But it’s a history full of
roes, too: men and
men risking their lives
tell stories of war and
agedy, risking
prisonment to defend
ee speech. And as you
n see here, reports have
come beloved characters
p culture, too, turning up
movies, comics and TV
ows as if guided by an
cult hand.
Every culture seeks
effective ways to spread
new information and gossip.
In ancient times, news was
written on clay tablets. In
Caesar’s age, Romans read
newsletters compiled by
correspondents and
handwritten by slaves.
Wandering minstrels spread
news (and the plague) in the
Middle Ages. Them came
ink on paper. Voices on
airwaves. Newsreels, Web
sites, And 24-hour cable
news networks.
Thus when scholars
analyze the rich history of
journalism, some view it in
terms of technological
progress—for example, the
dramatic impact of bigger,
faster printing presses.
Others see journalism as
a specialized form literary
expression, one that’s
constantly evolving,
reflecting and shaping its
culture.
Others see it as an
inspiring quest for free
speech, an endless power
struggle between Authority
(trying to control
information) and the People
(trying to learn the truth).
Which brings to mind the
words of A.J. Liefling:
“Freedom of the press is
guaranteed only to htose
who own one.”
In the pages ahead, we’ll
take a quick tour of 600
years of journalism history,
from hieroglyphics to
hypertext: the media, the
message and the politics.
Technical advances and
brilliant ideas forged a new
style of journalism. It was a
century of change, and
newspapers changed
dramatically. The typi
newspaper of 1800 wa
undisciplined mishma
legislative proceeding
long-winded essays a
secondhand gossip. B
1900, a new breed of
tor had emerged. Jour
had become big busin
Reporting was becom
disciplined craft. And
newspapers were bec
more entertaining and
essential than ever, w
most of the features w
expect today: Snappy
headlines, Ads, Comic
Sports pages. And an
“inverted pyramid” sty
writing that made stori
tighter and newsier.
Radio and television
brought an end to
newspapers’ media
monopoly. Why? Well
yourself: Which did yo
Public relations
Inside Reporting
Tim Harrower
10
2.
3. Public relations
3
What is public relations?
Planning a public relations strategy
Writing news releases
Balance and bias and media manipulations
15. What is public relations?
15
Businesses and
organizations must:
Get their message out.
Encourage media coverage.
Project positive
public image.
Every organization has a story to tell.
PR professionals tell it.
16. What is public relations?
16
Identify the goal
Craft the message
Monitor the results
The PR process
17. What is public relations?
17
Common myths
PR is glamorous.
PR is a business.
PR is easy.
PR is as rigorous as news
reporting.
PR is sleazy.
PR is useful, even vital.
What public relations is NOT
18. What is public relations?
18
Writing news releases.
Organizing news
conferences.
Coordinating crisis
communications.
What public relations is…
Crafting an
organization’s public
image.
Planning the launch of
new products and
services.
19. What is public relations?
19
Producing newsletters
and media for
employees.
Sponsoring tours,
exhibitions and special
events.
What public relations is…
Attending conferences
and delivering
speeches.
Acting as the
organization’s
spokesperson.
20. What is public relations?
20
How Public Relations Differs
from Journalism
Serves general public Serves organizations
Avoids taking sides Promotes clients
Controls all information Provides information
Depends upon PR Depends upon journalist
Uses one form of media Employs range of media
Individualistic Team player
Goal: inform the public Goal: generate goodwill
Journalist PR Specialist
21. What is public relations?
21
How Public Relations Differs
from Advertising
Tries to seduce Tries to motivate with fact
Controls the message Provides information
Flashy with exaggeration Low-key and serious
Expensive Relatively inexpensive
Relies on repetition Efforts are fresh
Broad audience Aimed at specific audience
People try to avoid ads People seek out stories
Advertising Public Relations
33. Planning a public relations
strategy
33
Four steps to creating
and implementing a PR
plan
Without a strategy, you can’t achieve your goals
• Analyze situation
• Plan strategy
• Implement plan
• Evaluate results
34. Planning a public relations
strategy
34
The news release
At least half the content of newspapers
originates from news releases (some
estimates as much as 70 percent)
Video news release (for television and
web)
Matching your message to the most effective
medium
35. Planning a public relations
strategy
35
Other interactive PR
options
Speeches
News conferences
Special events
Exhibits
Lobbying
Matching your message…
The media kit
Promotional material
Designed to make
reporters say, “This will
make a good story.”
36. Writing news releases
36
Newsworthy information
Clear presentation
Requires personal relationships
with reporters and editors
News releases (sometimes called press
releases) provide ideas and information that
become news
37. Writing news releases
37
Use an engaging
headline.
Give it a compelling
lead.
Avoid distortion.
Avoid jargon.
Use proper AP style
style.
Tips for writing better news releases10
• Keep it crisp and tight.
• Stress the benefits.
• Proofread carefully.
• Deliver the release at
the right time.
• Deliver the release to
the right person.
38. Writing news releases
38
Customize your pitch.
Prepare yourself.
When dealing with the media
• Make demands.
• Go off record.
• Keep score.
• Bribe reporters.
• Be cagey or evasive.
• Lie.
DO: DON’T:
39. Balance, bias and media
manipulations
39
Be honest and
accurate in all
communications.
Act promptly to
correct erroneous
communications.
Ethics in the practice of PR
Avoid deceptive
practices.
Think about how
readers can actually
benefit from the
information you possess.
40. Balance, bias and media
manipulations
40
• Doublespeak – language
crafted to disguise, distort
or evade the truth.
• Euphemisms – inoffensive
terms substituted for more
disturbing words.
Spinning the news: Common terms
Cherry-picking –
selecting facts that support
your argument.
Glittering
generalities –
vague-but-emotionally-
appealing abstractions.
41. Balance, bias and media
manipulations
41
• Bridging – transitioning a
question to a more
comfortable topic.
• Non-denial denial –
criticizing the criticism.
Spinning the news: Common terms
• Astroturfing – creating
illusion of widespread
grassroots support.
• Managing the news –
planting questions at press
conferences.
42. lcome to the world of
urnalism, where
porters have been
gging dirt, raking muck,
king headlines and
adlines for centuries
w. It’s a history full of
bloid trash, of slimy
nsationalists, of
runkards, deadbeats and
mmers” (as a Harvard
iversity president once
scribed reporters).
But it’s a history full of
roes, too: men and
men risking their lives
tell stories of war and
agedy, risking
prisonment to defend
ee speech. And as you
n see here, reports have
come beloved characters
p culture, too, turning up
movies, comics and TV
ows as if guided by an
cult hand.
Every culture seeks
effective ways to spread
new information and gossip.
In ancient times, news was
written on clay tablets. In
Caesar’s age, Romans read
newsletters compiled by
correspondents and
handwritten by slaves.
Wandering minstrels spread
news (and the plague) in the
Middle Ages. Them came
ink on paper. Voices on
airwaves. Newsreels, Web
sites, And 24-hour cable
news networks.
Thus when scholars
analyze the rich history of
journalism, some view it in
terms of technological
progress—for example, the
dramatic impact of bigger,
faster printing presses.
Others see journalism as
a specialized form literary
expression, one that’s
constantly evolving,
reflecting and shaping its
culture.
Others see it as an
inspiring quest for free
speech, an endless power
struggle between Authority
(trying to control
information) and the People
(trying to learn the truth).
Which brings to mind the
words of A.J. Liefling:
“Freedom of the press is
guaranteed only to htose
who own one.”
In the pages ahead, we’ll
take a quick tour of 600
years of journalism history,
from hieroglyphics to
hypertext: the media, the
message and the politics.
Technical advances and
brilliant ideas forged a new
style of journalism. It was a
century of change, and
newspapers changed
dramatically. The typi
newspaper of 1800 wa
undisciplined mishma
legislative proceeding
long-winded essays a
secondhand gossip. B
1900, a new breed of
tor had emerged. Jour
had become big busin
Reporting was becom
disciplined craft. And
newspapers were bec
more entertaining and
essential than ever, w
most of the features w
expect today: Snappy
headlines, Ads, Comic
Sports pages. And an
“inverted pyramid” sty
writing that made stori
tighter and newsier.
Radio and television
brought an end to
newspapers’ media
monopoly. Why? Well
yourself: Which did yo
Public relations
Inside Reporting
Tim Harrower
10
Hinweis der Redaktion
Bridgestone began receiving complaints about their Firestone tires treads' tendency to separate, often resulting in horrific accidents, starting in 1998.But they refused to admit that there was a real problem until 2000, when the NHTSA launched a large-scale investigation. After much waffling in the press, Bridgestone finally accepted blame, and on August 9, 2000, they announced the recall of 6.5 million tires -- the second-largest recall in U.S. history.According to CBS News, the NHTSA eventually announced that nearly 200 deaths and more than 700 injuries had been caused by the faulty tires.Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-corporate-pr-disasters-of-the-decade-2009-12#bridgestone-tire-debacle-2000-1#ixzz16iZAIa4c
Can you put a positive spin on smoking deaths? Philip Morris thought so, when they released the results of a study conducted in the Czech Republic proving that smokers' deaths had "positive effects" financially for the Czech government.According to CNN, the tobacco giant conducted the study in response to the Czech government's argument that the financial costs of smoking outweighed its benefits. Not so, said Philip Morris: smoking actually resulted in a net gain of around $147 million, including saving "between 943 million and 1.2 billion korunas (about $24 million-to-$30 million) in health-care, pension and public-housing costs due to the early deaths of smokers."The company, of course, faced a huge public backlash as a result of the release, which was intended to create positive PR for an already-struggling industry. CBS News reports that it also subsequently canceled its plans for similar studies in other countries.Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-corporate-pr-disasters-of-the-decade-2009-12#philip-morris-says-smoking-deaths-have-positive-effects-2001-2#ixzz16iZayeXU
In April 2002, Abercrombie & Fitch released a line of t-shirts depicting caricatures of Asian stereotypes. Corporate commentary? "We personally thought Asians would love this T-shirt." (10News)A month later, the company introduced racy thong underwear in childrens' sizes, aimed at girls aged 10 to 14. Corporate commentary? "The underwear for young girls was created with the intent to be lighthearted and cute." (Direct Mag)Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-corporate-pr-disasters-of-the-decade-2009-12#thongs-for-little-girls-and-racist-t-shirts-double-bad-move-af-2002-3#ixzz16icwDdys
Get rich by "buying stolen properties, pimpin hoes, building crack houses and getting car jacked!"“You got yo whole neighborhood addicted to crack. Collect $50.” Score!With lines like that, how could Urban Outfitters have predicted that people would be offended by it selling and promoting "Ghettopoly"?
Even though preliminary studies in 2000 had suggested that painkiller Vioxx posed a potential heart health risk, executives at pharmaceutical giant Merck chose not to pursue those studies further.Four years later, Merck was forced to recall that very drug because of evidence that it may have caused heart attacks and cardiac deaths in thousands of its users. The recall turned into a massive scandal as reports came out that Merck had known about the serious risk, yet continued to promote the drug anyways.The company faced an SEC investigation and hundreds of lawsuits as a result of its actions. The scandal was finally laid to rest in 2009, according to the Wall Street Journal, when Merck settled litigation for $80 million.
Most of us, when presented with a book proposal about how a man would have killed his wife, would probably realize that it might be a bad idea to publish it. Take into account the fact that the author's name is O.J. Simpson, and change that "probably" to a "definitely."HarperCollins publisher Judith Regan did not have such a response. Neither did Fox News, who decided to schedule a two-part interview with Simpson about the same subject.Oh yeah, and both companies are owned by Rupert Murdoch's NewsCorp.Facing scathing condemnation from the public, Murdoch quickly fired Regan and cancelled both endeavors, saying, “I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," according to the New York Times.
Cartoon Network's guerilla advertising campaign to promote their offbeat show "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" could have been cool -- had the company not chosen devices that made people think they were bombs.According to the Boston Globe, CN's campaign involved 38 magnetic, light-up signs placed around the city in random public places, such as this one under a bridge. Unfortunately, the mysterious signs lacked any explanation, causing many locals to believe they were dangerous and a threat.Police were inundated by phone calls, bomb squads were deployed, and parts of the subway system were shut down for a period of time. The head of Cartoon Network eventually resigned after taking blame for approving the stunt, and the two men who were deemed physically responsible for putting up the devices faced criminal charges for the hoax.
What would you do with $85 billion in government rescue money? Host a corporate retreat at the posh St. Regis resort in California, of course.One week after receiving a massive federal bailout, AIG did exactly that, with a retreat that supposedly cost $434,343.71.Not surprisingly, the public and lawmakers were quite upset. The company's actions prompted an admonishment from the White House, who called it "despicable," and widespread re-vamping of corporate retreat policies.
In early 2007, nine JetBlue flights at JFK airport were delayed for up to 11 hours because of serious inclement weather. Normally, this wouldn't have resulted in much more than a few really irritated travelers, but in this case, JetBlue decided to keep its nearly 1,000 passengers trapped in the runway-bound planes for the entire time.According to CBS News, passengers described the experience as "horrific." As snacks depleted and the bathroom situation grew unpleasant, people on the planes grew more and more upset that they were not being allowed to de-plane and just walk to the terminal, which was within sight. They were only permitted to leave the aircrafts when official airport vehicles finally arrived to transport them.JetBlue at first defended it's decision, arguing that its passengers' safety in the ice storm was top priority, but the incident sparked government debate about passengers' rights. According to Consumer Affairs, a week later, JetBlue announced its own "Passengers' Bill of Rights," which detailed different levels of compensation for varying types of delays, as well as a promise to de-plane passengers after five hours' delay in the future.
You'd think if you were heading to Washington to beg for a $25 billion bailout, you would be smarter than to show up in an expensive private jet.Unfortunately, the CEOs of GM, Chrysler, and Ford made that very mistake in November 2008. At a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee, CNN reported: "Rep. Brad Sherman, D-California, pressed the private-jet issue, asking the three CEOs to 'raise their hand if they flew here commercial.'"Of course, none of them had, prompting ridicule from the public and press. The three execs learned their lesson, choosing to drive hybrid cars to their next hearing in the hopes of staving off more bad press.
Even the government (especially the government) makes a really bad PR move now and again.Imagine you're a New Yorker, in a post-9/11 world. You're working downtown, when all of a sudden you see a plane flying unusually low over the city, pursued by a fighter jet. What would you assume?This thought never crossed the minds of those down at the Department of Defense, who organized this Air Force One photo-op without notifying anyone in New York City. Unfortunately, the event resulted in widespread panic throughout lower Manhattan, with many people evacuating their offices and reporting the incident to police.According to ABC News, President Obama was "furious" that no one had been informed, while Mayor Bloomberg was quoted as saying, "Poor judgment would have been a nice way to put it."The official responsible for the mistake resigned.