The purpose of this survey was to collect data from companies from all industries on enabling technology currently used to support key areas of their Quality Management System. Data was collected from the LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network group representing over 77,000 professionals worldwide. Over 620 members from multiple industries participated in this survey.
Quality Management System Vendor Software System Use Benchmark March2014
1.
2. OVERVIEW
The purpose of this survey was to collect data from companies on enabling technology currently
used to support key areas of their Quality Management System.
Data was collected from the LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network group representing over 77,000
professionals worldwide. Over 620 members from multiple industries participated.
Key Findings:
•
Although many enabling technologies are available for both small and global companies, the
majority of organizations still use manual methods to track and manage their Quality
Management System.
•
Many participants commented on the both the benefits of an electronic system and platform and
also the challenge on configuring and sustaining quality software especially globally.
Listing of all Software Vendors mentioned by participants in this survey can be found in the
Appendix.
Any questions about this Survey can be sent to Nikki Willett, Founder/Owner LinkedIn Quality &
Regulatory Network.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
LinkedIn, the LinkedIn logo, the IN logo and InMail are registered trademarks or trademarks of
LinkedIn Corporation and its affiliates in the United States and/or other countries. All other
references to company and product names are copyright in their own right.
Copyright 2014 . Quality & Regulatory Network by Nikki Willett. All rights reserved.
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
2
3. DEMOGRAPHICS
REPRESENTATION FROM PARTICIPANTS ABOUT THEIR INDUSTRY
35.0%
29.1%
30.0%
25.0%
21.5%
20.0%
15.0%
9.3%
10.0%
5.0%
9.0%
4.3%
3.9%
1.0%
1.3% 1.0%
1.6% 1.0%
4.2% 3.2%
2.4%
5.0%
1.0%
1.6%
0.0%
Note: Some answers were consolidated under one industry while those with only a single response were allocated to "Other."
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
3
4. DEMOGRAPHICS
REPRESENTATION FROM PARTICIPANTS ABOUT THEIR COMPANY ANNUAL REVENUE
AND THEIR ROLE OR FUNCTION WITHIN THE COMPANY
Annual Revenue
Role / Function
70.0%
60.4%
60.0%
50.0%
more than
1B
27%
less than
25M
33%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
500-999M
12%
10.0%
9.0%
3.7%
1.0%
3.9%
1.3% 2.6% 0.8%
7.5%
0.0%
26-500M
28%
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
4
5. INTERNAL/EXTERNAL AUDIT
OTHERS:
123Compliance
Lotus Notes
Arena PLM
MetricStream
AssurX CatsWeb
Microsoft Navision
Audit Utopia
Montrium Connect
Bespoke
Neomatics ExpressPack Quality
BLUe-CAT Synergy
NextDocs
BSI Entropy
Omnify Empower
Cama Software
Optiva (Infor)
30.0%
CIQA QA Manager
Pastel
CloudForge
Prodom (I.A.C.T.)
20.0%
CloudQMS
Q5 Systems
ComplianceControl Centre
QAD
DNV.GL Synergi
Qasys Software (Umbani)
Documentum
QPR
eMatrix
Quality Online (Icologiq)
Ensur Mystic
Quality Works
Entropy (BSI)
Harrington Group
International
Qualtrax
HP Quality Center
Salesforce
IBS
ServiceNow
Ideagen Workbench
SoftExpert Excellence Suite
IHS
SoftTech QMS
InfoRouter
Solabs
Intelex
Stemsoft
Intertek
Sword Achiever
ION Simple Trak
TipQA
IQS
Veeva
Jira (Atlassian)
Vivaldi Software
LabExpert
WQS
60.0%
50.0%
50.1%
40.0%
11.5%
9.7%
10.0%
3.4% 3.8%
1.3%
4.1% 2.7%
3.6%
1.4%
1.3%
4.9%
1.4%
0.7%
Other
Traction Teampage
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
SharePoint
SAP
Qumas
Q-Pulse
Pilgrim Software
Oracle
MasterControl / QAAD
Infotehna Quality Expert
ETQ
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Rivo Safeguard
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
5
6. CAPA
45.0%
OTHERS:
40.7%
40.0%
123Compliance
NovaTek
BLUe-CAT Synergy
Process Pro
35.0%
Bugzilla
Prodom
Cama Software
Q5
Cebos
Qasys
25.0%
CIQA QA Manager
QPR
CloudForge
QSTAT
20.0%
CloudQMS
Quads
CloudQMS
Quality Online Icologiq
ComplianceControl Centre
Quality-Works
Compliancewire
Qualtrax
Documentum
QuickControl
Ensur
QUIPS
Entropy
Redmine
Grand Avenue
Rivo Safeguard
HP Quality Center
ServiceNow
IBS
Simple Trak
Ideagen Workbench
Soft Expert
Intelex
SoftTech QMS
Intertek
SOLABS QM
IQS
STEMSOFT
JIRA
Sword Achiever
Job Boss
The QAB
Lotus Notes
TipQA
MetricStream
Title21
Montrium Connect
Veeva
Neomatics
Vivaldi Software
30.0%
15.1%
12.8%
Other
1.1%
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
SharePoint
SAP
Pilgrim Software
Oracle
MasterControl
Infotehna
ETQ
AssurX CATSWeb
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Qumas
4.5%
3.4% 2.6% 3.2% 2.4% 3.2%
1.5%
1.1%
1.1%
Q-Pulse
2.4% 1.1%
5.0%
3.6%
PLM software (i.e., Agile,
Arena, Dassault, Omnify, PTC,…
10.0%
Traction Teampage
15.0%
NextDocs
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
6
7. CHANGE CONTROL
45.0% 40.7%
40.0%
OTHERS:
123Compliance
LabExpert
AssurX CATSWeb
Lotus Notes
30.0%
Audit Weaver
MetricStream
BLUe-CAT Synergy
Micros Inspire
25.0%
Bugzilla
Montrium Connect
Cama Software
Neomatics
CIQA QA Manager
NextDocs
CloudForge
NovaTek
CloudQMS
PDXpert
ComplianceControl Centre
Process Pro
Ensur
Prodom
Entropy
Q5
e-Packmat
Qasys
Grand Avenue
Harrington Group
International
Quads
IBM Rational Change
Qualtrax
IBS
QuickControl
Ideagen-Workbench
SoftExpert Excellence Suite
IHS
Solabs
Intelex
STEMSOFT
IQS
Sword Achiever
ITSM
TipQA
JD Edwards
Title21
JIRA
Veeva
Kintana
Vivaldi Software
Lab Vantage
ZenDoc
35.0%
20.0%
14.9%
13.9%
15.0%
10.0%
2.6% 1.1% 2.0% 1.3% 3.3% 2.2% 2.0%
5.0%
6.7%
3.2%
1.3%
3.2%
1.1%
1.1%
Other
Traction Teampage
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
SharePoint
SAP
Qumas
Q-Pulse
PLM software (Arena, Dassault,
Omnify, PTC, Siemens)
Pilgrim Software
Oracle
MasterControl
Infotehna
ETQ
Documentum
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Quality Online
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
7
8. COMPLAINTS
60.0% 53.9%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
25.7%
19.6%
20.0%
10.0%
4.7% 4.7%
5.8%
4.7% 3.3%
4.4%
4.1%
1.9%
1.9%
1.4%
1.1%
10.2%
1.4% 1.7%
Other
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
Traction TeamPage
SharePoint
SAP
SalesForce.com
Qumas
Q-Pulse
PLM (Agile, Arena, Omnify)
Pilgrim Software
Oracle Siebel
Oracle Argus
MasterControl
Infotehna
ETQ
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
OTHERS:
123Compliance
ARISg
AssurX CATSWeb
Beacon
Bespoke systems
BLUe-CAT Synergy
Breeze
Bugzilla
CALLS (Volos)
Cama Software
CIQA QA Manager
CIS
CloudForge
CloudQMS
ComplianceControl Centre
CTQ
CTS
Documentum
Donor Dialogue's DRM
Touch
Ensur
Entropy
ePowerCenter
EthicsPoint
Grand Avenue
Harrington Group
International
IBS
Ideagen Workbench
Infor
Intelex
IQMS
IQS
JIRA
Lotus Notes
MetricStream
Microsoft CRM
Microsoft Dynamics
Montrium Connect
Neomatics
NetRegulus
NorthStar
Optiva
PQMS
Prodom
Q5
Qasys
Quads
Quality Online
Quality-Works
Qualtrax
QuickControl
Sage
SCEPTRE
SE SUITE SOFTEXPERT
ServiceNow
Simple Trak
SoftTech QMS
Sunquest
Sword Achiever
TIP QA
Vivaldi Software
WMS
WQS
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
8
9. DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
60.0%
OTHERS:
AssurX CATSWeb
Montrium Connect
Audit Weaver
Neomatics
BLUe-CAT Synergy
NovaTek
BPLM
Oracle Contract Manager
40.0%
Cama
PDXpert
CIQA
PMED
30.0%
CloudForge
PONDUS
CloudQMS
ComplianceControl
Centre
Prodom
DCS
Qasys
Docspace
QSi
eDocs
Quality Online
eMatrix
Quality-Works
Entropy
Qualtrax
Epiware
Regula
Grand Avenue
SE SUITE - SOFTEXPERT
HP Quality Center
Simple Trak
HQMS
SoftTech QMS
IBM FileNet
Solabs
Ideagen Workbench
STEMSOFT
Intelex
Sword Achiever
IQS
The QAB
JIRA
TIP QA
Knowledge Tree
Title21
LabExpert
TRIM
Liquent
Vivaldi software
LiveDrive
Xerox
MetricStream
ZenDoc
50.8%
50.0%
23.2%
20.0%
13.6%
Veeva
Traction TeamPage
1.4% 1.7%
SharePoint
SAP
Qumas
Pilgrim Software
OpenText
NextDocs
MasterControl
Lotus Notes
Infotehna
FirstDoc
ETQ
Ensur
Documentum
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Q-Pulse
2.5%
PLM (Agile, Arena,
Dassault, Omnify, PTC,…
10.0%
10.2%
8.5%
5.6% 4.5%
5.1% 4.2% 5.1%
3.7% 2.8% 3.7%
2.0% 1.4%
1.4%
Product Vision
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
9
10. EXCEPTIONS
(DEVIATIONS, EVENTS, NONCONFORMANCES, OUT OF SPEC/TOLERANCE/TREND)
70.0% 62.8%
60.0%
OTHERS:
123Compliance
Neomatics
AssurX CATSWeb
NextDocs
Blue Mountain
NovaTek
BLUe-CAT Synergy
Prodom
CIQA QA Manager
Qasys
CloudForge
Quads
CloudQMS
Quality Online
Compliance 360
Quality-Works
ComplianceControl Centre
Qualtrax
Documentum
QuickControl
eDocs
Rivo Safeguard
eMatrix
SE SUITE - SOFTEXPERT
Ensur
ServiceNow
Entropy
SharePoint
Epiware
Simple Trak
Grand Avenue
SoftTech QMS
IHS
STEMSOFT
Intelex
Sword Achiever
IQS
Synergi
JIRA
TIP QA
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.3%
Other
Traction TeamPage
1.1%
SAP
Qumas
Q-Pulse
PLM (Agile, Arena, Omnify,
PTC)
Pilgrim Software
Oracle
MetricStream
MasterControl
Lotus Notes
Infotehna
ETQ
Cama Software
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
MES (Camstar, Epicor,
Rockwell, Siemens, SAP,…
2.9% 1.1% 2.9% 1.6% 1.1% 5.6% 1.3% 1.1% 1.9% 4.3% 4.5% 4.3% 1.6%
10.0%
8.8%
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
20.0%
18.7%
Kintana
Title21
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Vivaldi in
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the Montrium but are included Software
chart Connect
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
10
11. LABORATORY MANAGEMENT
80.0%
70.0%
OTHERS:
69.0%
ApolloLIMS
60.0%
Blaze LIMS
50.0%
FoxPro
Lims1
40.0%
Maximo
30.0%
Northwest Analytics
17.7%
20.0%
10.0%
2.4%
1.7%
5.4%
1.4%
Oracle Harvest
5.1%
4.4%
8.2%
6.1%
SLIM (InterCAX)
Other
Thermo Scientific
StarLMS
LabWare
LabVantage
Labtronics
CoreLIMS
Accelrys
Custom Developed
0.0%
Manual
SAP
SQL*LIMS
UniLab (Siemens)
ZuMatrix
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Multiple lab products provided by a Vendor were consolidated under the Vendor's name. Those
software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in the list
of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
11
12. TRAINING
70.0% 63.3%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
23.2%
20.0%
10.0%
4.1%
7.0%
1.2% 1.5%
5.0% 5.9% 4.1% 3.2% 3.8%
1.8% 2.1%
1.2% 2.1% 2.1% 1.8% 1.2%
10.3%
2.1% 1.2% 1.2% 4.4%
Other
Trackwise (Sparta
Systems)
Train Track (Halogen)
Traction TeamPage
SumTotal
SAP (SuccessFactors,
Plateau, etc.)
Saba
Qumas
Q-Pulse
Pilgrim Software
Oracle (Peoplesoft,
Learn.com, etc.)
MasterControl
IsoTrain
IQS
Infotehna
eTraininfo
ETQ
Ensur
Compliancewire (UL
Eduneering)
Cornerstone
Cama Software
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
12
13. TRAINING (VENDORS LIST)
OTHERS:
AssurX CATSWeb
Entropy
Noverant
Taleo
Axentis (Omnicare)
FoxPro
OCS
TEDS
CAP Software
Grand Avenue
Pilgrim
TIP QA
Cebos
Harrington Group International
PLM (Agile, Omnify)
Title21
CIQA
HealthStream
Quality Online
Uperform
CloudForge
iLearning (Seertech)
Qualtrax
Veeva
CloudQMS
Intelex
SE SUITE - SOFTEXPERT
Vivaldi Software
Compliance 360
Learning Plus
SharePoint
WindFarmManager
ComplianceControl Centre
MetricStream
Simple Trak
Workday
Dokeos
Montrium Connect
Smart HR
ZenDoc
eMatrix
NextDocs
Solabs
Engage (HR Software)
NovaTek
Sword Achiever
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
13
14. SUPPLIER QUALITY
80.0%
70.0%
OTHERS:
69.4%
AssurX CATSWeb
10.0%
2.3% 2.9% 1.6% 3.6% 2.6% 2.1% 3.6% 1.3% 1.8%
Other
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
SRM (Ariba, Epicor, EPIQ,
JDA, SAP, etc.)
SharePoint
SAP
PLM (i.e. Agile, Arenea,
Omnify)
Qumas
Q-Pulse
Pilgrim Software
Oracle
MasterControl
Infotehna
ETQ
Custom Developed
Manual
0.0%
Qualtrax
ComplianceControl Centre
1.3% 1.0%
Qasys
Compliance 360
10.6%
PROTEAN
QUBE
Documentum
20.0%
Prodom
CloudForge
CloudQMS
20.0%
Prism
CIQA
15.3%
Pharmschul (GMP Software)
Cama Software
30.0%
Optiva
BPCS
40.0%
Neomatics
BLUe-CAT Synergy
50.0%
MS Navision
Bespoke
60.0%
Infor Movex M3
Audit Weaver
QuickControl
Ensur
Rover Data systems Millenium 3
Entropy
SE SUITE - SOFTEXPERT
FoxPro
Simple Trak
Harrington Group International Sword Achiever
HP Quality Center
The QAB
IBS
TIP QA
Intelex
Title21
IQS
Traction Teampage
Job Boss
Vivaldi Software
Lotus Notes
WMS
MetricStream
Note: Some participants may have selected multiple systems if represented within their organizations.
Those software vendors with less than a 1% response are not reflected in the chart but are included in
the list of other Vendors.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
14
15. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY PARTICIPANTS
• Make use of secure / cloud based document repository.
• We are in the process of implementing an ERP system and this will make it much easier to manage our Quality system. Full integration is
definitely the way forward.
• It needs to be integral part of overall approach over all areas of the value chain QMS, DMS, Dossier management, RIM, IDMP, R&D, Clinical, PV.
• Bite the bullet and go for it. Best thing we have done.
• We have been planning an EQMS system, but there are only few systems that are available also for small companies. And systems that are able
to serve our company though the growth are in current situation expensive for us when costs for the start e.g. validation of the system are
about the same as the system itself.
• I can't find a good one. They all look clunky at the back despite nice display functions at the front. They lack user interface capability to be
intuitive. I get the impression they are all working off a similar 10-15year old backbone.
• Whichever system is used needs to be customized to suit needs of individual company, especially when transitioning form paper based.
• Make sure they have a compliance consulting group available for help.
• Sometimes getting started is the hardest part. A good systems evaluation will always get the ball rolling. If you don't have those resources onsite using a consulting company can be a great place to start. really great job. No pressure, told us just what we needed with no overselling.
• The best would be a QMS to incorporate all these modules and have reports for Management Review.
• Integration is key.
• Trouble making business case for quality related technology.
• I prefer one large system that can manage as many aspects of my QMS as possible.
• Next generation is SAP.
• Commercial systems are complicated and not very intuitive. Always need customization (extra time and cost) and cost more than original
quotes.
• If done correctly and with one system, the system can deliver the Annual Report for each product within hours instead of weeks if done
manually.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
15
16. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY PARTICIPANTS
• Global processes are challenging to create, deploy and maintain.
• "Quality efforts should always be embedded in, and supportive of, the business operations. In my view, too many of the QMS software
systems are too standalone - they don't integrate with what the business is doing."
• "QMS software systems are never accessible to everyone, which defeats the object."
• "I have developed and implemented QMS software systems in some very large international companies - they weren't entirely successful
(the clients were happy) because the company culture prevented access by all."
• People sometimes forget How / What they have to do and so leave it, then the efficiency of the system does not work.
• Understand your processes and linkages and spend time mapping them out and improving them before turning to technology. Ensure
whatever system is chosen is scalable.
• My company will introduce company wide SW platforms for these topics in the coming 1-2 years, as part of a Quality improvement
program.
• Software tools are great, but the downfall I have found with multiple systems is the initial configuration that causes problems once in use.
It is well worth the time and effort engaging the software vendors early and getting robust feedback from your sites regarding how the
system will be used in 5 years time to ensure that the configuration is thought through properly. Usually the system gets blamed for the
problems a company has when it was the set up and knowledge regarding how it was to be used that was at fault.
• The full benefits of introducing an enabling technology are difficult to define but also, the costs of implementation and maintenance are
often not well understood ( training and validation in particular).
• Enterprise Quality Management needs to lead to global corporate process standardization.
• It is never what you want. You have always to change your existing process.
• Many products tend to be 'over-built'.
• PLM seems like the trend to integrate all business.
• Would love to have QMS software system(s), but unable to afford at this time.
• Virtual company - just starting our QMS electronically.
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
16
18. TOTAL LIST OF VENDOR SOFTWARE COMPANIES
123Compliance
Accelrys
ApolloLIMS
Arena PLM
ARISg
AssurX CatsWeb
Audit Utopia
Audit Weaver
Axentis (Omnicare)
Beacon
Bespoke
Blaze LIMS
CIQA QA Manager
CIS
CloudForge
CloudQMS
Compliance 360
ComplianceControl Centre
Compliancewire (UL Eduneering)
CoreLIMS
Cornerstone
CTQ
CTS
DCS
Ensur Mystic
Entropy (BSI)
e-Packmat
Epiware
ePowerCenter
EthicsPoint
ETQ
eTraininfo
FirstDoc
FoxPro
Grand Avenue
Harrington Group International
BLUe-CAT Synergy
DNV.GL Synergi
HealthStream
Blue Mountain
Breeze
Bugzilla
CALLS (Volos)
Documentum
Docspace
Dokeos
Donor Dialogue's DRM Touch
HP Quality Center
IBM FileNet
IBM Rational Change
IBS
Cama Software
CAP Software
Cebos
eDocs
eMatrix
Engage (HR Software)
Ideagen Workbench
IHS
iLearning (Seertech)
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
Note: Many of the company and product names captured within the Comments section
of each question have not been validated.
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
18
19. TOTAL LIST OF VENDOR SOFTWARE COMPANIES
Infor Movex M3
Infor Optiva
InfoRouter
Infotehna
Intelex
Intertek
ION Simple Trak
NovaTek
Noverant
OCS
Omnify Empower
OpenText LiveLink
Oracle
Oracle Argus
IQMS
IQS
IsoTrain
ITSM
JD Edwards
Learning Plus
Lims1
Liquent
LiveDrive
Lotus Notes
MasterControl / QAAD
Maximo
MES (Camstar, Epicor, Rockwell,
Siemens, SAP, Wonderware)
MetricStream
Micros Inspire
Microsoft CRM
Microsoft Dynamics
Jira (Atlassian)
Microsoft Navision
PDXpert
Job Boss
Kintana
Microsoft SharePoint
Montrium Connect
Knowledge Tree
LabExpert
Neomatics
NetRegulus
Pharmschul (GMP Software)
Pilgrim Software
PLM software (i.e., Agile, Arena, Dassault,
Omnify, PTC, Siemens)
PMED
Labtronics
Lab Vantage
LabWare
NextDocs
NorthStar
Northwest Analytics
PONDUS
PQMS
Prism
Oracle Contract Manager
Oracle Harvest
Oracle (Peoplesoft, Learn.com, etc.)
Oracle Siebel
Pastel
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
Note: Many of the company and product names captured within the Comments section
of each question have not been validated.
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
19
20. TOTAL LIST OF VENDOR SOFTWARE COMPANIES
Prodom (I.A.C.T.)
Process Pro
PROTEAN
Q5 Systems
QAD
Qasys Software (Umbani)
QPR
Q-Pulse
QSi
QSTAT
Quads
Quality Online (Icologiq)
Rover Data Systems Millenium 3
Saba
Sage
Salesforce.com
SAP
SAP (SuccessFactors, Plateau)
SCEPTRE
ServiceNow
Simple Trak
SLIM (InterCAX)
Smart HR
SoftExpert Excellence Suite
Sword Achiever
Taleo
TEDS
The QAB
Thermo Scientific
TipQA
Title21
Trackwise (Sparta Systems)
Traction Teampage
Train Track (Halogen)
UniLab (Siemens)
Uperform
Quality Works
SoftTech QMS
Veeva
Qualtrax
QUBE
Qumas
QuickControl
Redmine
Regula
Rivo Safeguard
Solabs
SQL*LIMS
SRM (Ariba, Epicor, EPIQ, JDA, SAP)
StarLMS
Stemsoft
SumTotal
Sunquest
Vivaldi Software
WindFarmManager
Workday
WMS
WQS
XEROX
ZenDoc
ZuMatrix
*Source Data: LinkedIn Quality & Regulatory Network Group, March 2014
Note: Many of the company and product names captured within the Comments section
of each question have not been validated.
QUALITY & REGULATORY NETWORK
Copyright 2014 Quality & Regulatory Network
20