The document discusses chronic viral hepatitis and liver biopsy. It provides details on grading liver inflammation and staging liver fibrosis using various scoring systems. Grading assesses necroinflammatory activity, such as interface hepatitis and lobular necrosis. Staging evaluates the extent of fibrosis from none to cirrhosis. Accurately grading and staging on biopsy is important for prognosis and treatment decisions in chronic hepatitis patients.
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24Ă7 In Ahmedabad
Â
Chronic Viral Hepatitis - Part 1 - Kuwait
1. Neil D. Theise, MD Depts. of Pathology and Medicine (Digestive Diseases) Beth Israel Medical Center â Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York City www.neiltheise.com Chronic Viral Hepatitis
2. Neil D. Theise, MD Depts. of Pathology and Medicine (Digestive Diseases) Beth Israel Medical Center â Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York City SLIDESHARE.NET www.neiltheise.com See: âChronic Viral Hepatitis: A Personal, Practical Guideâ Chronic Viral Hepatitis
7. A C U T E HAV HEV Incidence in Kuwait: 13/100,000 Incidence in Kuwait: 1.4/100,000 RATE OF SPORADIC ENTERICALLY TRANSMITTED VIRAL HEPATITIS IN KUWAIT BETWEEN 1998 AND 2001 AQ Al-Anezi, R Al-Awayesh, F Al-Ali, KM Peltekian Kuwait Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait City, Kuwait & Division of Gastroenterology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
11. HBV HCV HDV Prevalence: 4.6% Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C infection in patients admitted at Tertiary Eye Care Centre: A hospital based study. Junejo SA, Khan NA, Lodhi AA. Pak J Med Sci 2009;25(4):597-600. Prevalence: 13% C O N S O N A N T S H R O N I C
12. HBV HCV HDV Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C infection in patients admitted at Tertiary Eye Care Centre: A hospital based study. Junejo SA, Khan NA, Lodhi AA. Pak J Med Sci 2009;25(4):597-600. Prevalence of co-infection: 3.9% C O N S O N A N T S H R O N I C
14. HBV HCV HDV Prevalence: 4% in acute HBV 31% in chronic HBV C O N S O N A N T S H R O N I C Hepatitis delta virus infection in acute hepatitis in Kuwait. Al-Kandari S, Nordenfelt E, Al-Nakib B, Hansson BG, Ljunggren K, Al-Nakib Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(1):15-9.
15.
16. Prevalence of HCV Antibody NHANES III Adapted from Alter MJ, et al.,. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:556â562. 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 Prevalence 6-11 12-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Age distribution 90s 00s
17. Natural History of Hepatitis C Acute Hepatitis C Chronic Hepatitis 75%- 85 % Cirrhosis 20 % 10-20+ years - Hoofnagle JH, Hepatology. 1997 - Di Bisceglie A, Hepatology, 2000
18. Decompensation, 6% HCC, 4% Death or Tx, 4% Annual rate - Hoofnagle JH, Hepatology. 1997 - Di Bisceglie A, Hepatology, 2000 Natural History of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis, 20 %
19. Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Intermediate progressors Slow progressors Poynard et al, Hepatology 1999 n=1157 0 1 2 3 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 Years F Metavir Rapid progressors
20.
21. Natural History of Chronic Liver Disease Chronic hepatitis with fibrosis 10-50 years Cirrhosis Normal liver Hepatocellular Carcnoma
56. Confluent necrosis, think about: - HBeAg to Ab conversion - HDV super-infection on HBV - HCV acute exacerbation - HIV co-infection - Autoimmune hepatitis - Drug induced injury, as always
57. LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, âŠâŠâŠ. active withâŠâŠ. (stage âŠ/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: A. Interface hepatitis: Absent (0/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, few portal areas (1/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, most portal areas, >5-50% (2/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around <50% of tracts/septa (3/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around >50% of tracts/septa (4/4). B. Confluent necrosis: Absent (0/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Focal (1/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in some areas (2/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in most areas (3/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Occasional portal-central bridging necrosis (4/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Frequent portal-central bridging necrosis (5/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Panacinar or multiacinar collapse (6/6). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: Absent (0/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: < 1 focus per acinus (1/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 2-4 foci per acinus or nodule (2/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 5-10 foci per acinus or nodule (3/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: >10 foci per acinus nodule (4/4). D. Portal inflammation: None (0/4). D. Portal inflammation: Mild, some or all portal tracats (1/4). D. Portal inflammation: Moderate, some or all portal areas (2/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, not all portal areas (3/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, all portal areas (4/4). E. Staging: No fibrosis (0/4). E. Staging: Fibrous portal enlargement (1/4). E. Staging: Fibrous septa (2/4). E. Staging: Transition to cirrhosis (3/4). E. Staging: Cirrhosis (4/4).
58. No fibrosis 0 Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 1 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 2 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal bridging 3 Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging portal-portal and/or portal-central 4 Marked bridging (portal-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis) 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 So what do I do�
59. LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, âŠâŠâŠ. active withâŠâŠ. (stage âŠ/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: A. Interface hepatitis: Absent (0/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, few portal areas (1/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, most portal areas, >5-50% (2/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around <50% of tracts/septa (3/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around >50% of tracts/septa (4/4). B. Confluent necrosis: Absent (0/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Focal (1/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in some areas (2/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in most areas (3/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Occasional portal-central bridging necrosis (4/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Frequent portal-central bridging necrosis (5/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Panacinar or multiacinar collapse (6/6). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: Absent (0/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: < 1 focus per acinus (1/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 2-4 foci per acinus or nodule (2/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 5-10 foci per acinus or nodule (3/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: >10 foci per acinus nodule (4/4). D. Portal inflammation: None (0/4). D. Portal inflammation: Mild, some or all portal tracats (1/4). D. Portal inflammation: Moderate, some or all portal areas (2/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, not all portal areas (3/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, all portal areas (4/4). E. Staging: No fibrosis (0/4). E. Staging: Fibrous portal enlargement (1/4). E. Staging: Fibrous septa (2/4). E. Staging: Transition to cirrhosis (3/4). E. Staging: Cirrhosis (4/4).
60. LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, âŠâŠâŠ. active withâŠâŠ. (stage âŠ/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: A. Interface hepatitis: Absent (0/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, few portal areas (1/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Focal, most portal areas, >5-50% (2/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around <50% of tracts/septa (3/4). A. Interface hepatitis: Continuous around >50% of tracts/septa (4/4). B. Confluent necrosis: Absent (0/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Focal (1/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in some areas (2/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Zone 3 necrosis in most areas (3/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Occasional portal-central bridging necrosis (4/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Frequent portal-central bridging necrosis (5/6). B. Confluent necrosis: Panacinar or multiacinar collapse (6/6). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: Absent (0/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: < 1 focus per acinus (1/4) C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 2-4 foci per acinus or nodule (2/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: 5-10 foci per acinus or nodule (3/4). C. Lobular necrosis or inflammation: >10 foci per acinus nodule (4/4). D. Portal inflammation: None (0/4). D. Portal inflammation: Mild, some or all portal tracats (1/4). D. Portal inflammation: Moderate, some or all portal areas (2/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, not all portal areas (3/4). D. Portal inflammation: Marked, all portal areas (4/4). E. Staging: No fibrosis (0/4). E. Staging: Fibrous portal enlargement (1/4). E. Staging: Fibrous septa (2/4). E. Staging: Transition to cirrhosis (3/4). E. Staging: Cirrhosis (4/4). Mild Moderate Severe
70. No fibrosis 0 Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 1 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 2 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal bridging 3 Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging portal-portal and/or portal-central 4 Marked bridging (portal-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis) 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 No fibrosis 0 Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 1 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 2 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal bridging 3 Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging, portal-portal and/or portal-central 4 Marked bridging (portal-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis) 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 Ishak et al. staging scheme
71. No fibrosis 0 Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 1 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 2 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal bridging 3 Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging portal-portal and/or portal-central 4 Marked bridging (portal-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis) 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 No fibrosis 0 Portal fibrosis 1 Focal Septa 2 Frequent septa 3 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 4 METAVIR staging
73. No fibrosis 0 Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 1 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa 2 Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal bridging 3 Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging portal-portal and/or portal-central 4 Marked bridging (portal-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis) 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 So what do I do�
74. No fibrosis 0 Focal portal fibrosis, w or w/o short fibrous septa 1 Widespread portal fibrosis, w or w/o short fibrous septa 2 Focal portal-portal septa 3 Frequent septa (portal-central and/or portal portal) 4 Marked septa with occasional nodules 5 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 6 No fibrosis 0 Portal fibrosis 1 Focal Septa 2 Transition to cirrhosis 3 Cirrhosis, probable or definite 4 Theise modification of Ishak staging ? Ishak et al. staging scheme
86. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, mildly active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C.
87. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, mildly active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis.
88. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, mildly active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis. There is no confluent necrosis.
89. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, moderately active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis. There is no confluent necrosis. Trichrome and reticulin stains highlight focal fibrous septa, and focal nodularity Indicative of cirrhosis.
90. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, moderately active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis. There is no confluent necrosis. Trichrome and reticulin stains highlight focal fibrous septa, and focal nodularity Indicative of cirrhosis. There is focal steatosis in a pattern typical of that seen with chronic hepatitis C.
91. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, moderately active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis. There is no confluent necrosis. Trichrome and reticulin stains highlight focal fibrous septa, and focal nodularity Indicative of cirrhosis. There is focal steatosis in a pattern typical of that seen with chronic hepatitis C. No significant hemosiderosis or alpha-1-antitrypsin globules are identified (iron, PAS-D stains).
92. For example: LIVER: NEEDLE BIOPSY - Chronic hepatitis, moderately active with transition to cirrhosis (modified Ishak stage 3/4), compatible with hepatitis C. Comment: There is a mild to moderate portal/septal mononuclear infiltrate associated with widespread interface hepatitis and focal lobular hepatitis. There is no confluent necrosis. Trichrome and reticulin stains highlight focal fibrous septa, and focal nodularity Indicative of cirrhosis. There is focal steatosis in a pattern typical of that seen with chronic hepatitis C. No significant hemosiderosis or alpha-1-antitrypsin globules are identified (iron, PAS-D stains).
93. Case 1B 47 year old man Hepatitis C positive; ultrasound guided biopsy of left lobe, for staging and grading.
111. Diffuse HBcAg Suspect: Immunosuppression, in particular: HBV + HIV!!!
112. HCV + HIV? Increased Activity Decreased Activity Increase rate of progression Decreased rate of progression
113. HCV + HIV? On HAART: In large cohorts, possibly more aggressive, but individual biopsies look the same as HCV alone. Beware: drug toxicity
114. HCV + HIV? Untreated: Often more severe activity. Often more advanced disease.
115. HCV + HIV? Untreated: Often more severe activity. Often more advanced disease. Rare: fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis
116. HCV + HIV? Untreated: Often more severe activity. Often more advanced disease. Rare: fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis Beware: Infiltrating neoplasms, granulomas, HSV, CMV, biliary tract disease, etc.
The prevalence of disease was based on the NHANES III data. The analysis assumed a population distribution that matched the 1991 US population census estimates (the midpoint of the NHANES III study), which divided the 251 million Americans into 12 age groups. Because none of the patients younger than 6 years were tested for HCV antibodies, the computer simulation considered 9 age groups. The 30- to 39-year-old group had the highest prevalence of HCV antibodyâ3.9%, for an estimated 1.6 million HCV infected individuals. Among those who were antibody positive, an estimated 2.7 million people (70% of those infected) had detectable serum HCV RNA. Currently, persons aged 40 to 59 years have the highest prevalence of HCV infection, and in this age group, the prevalence is highest in African Americans (6.1 percent). However, uncertainty persists regarding its natural history and future health burden. In 1991, nearly 4 million Americans had antibody evidence of hepatitis C exposure. Computer projections corroborated CDC predictions that mortality from HCV-related liver disease may increase 2- to 3-fold over the next 10 to 20 years.
Based on studies conducted in the last decade since the publication by Kiyosawa et al., it has become possible to formulate an algorithm of the natural history of hepatitis C using data from a combination of prospective studies of posttransfusion and long-term follow-up of patients with established HCV infection. 75%-85% of patients will become chronically infected. Over a variable time period 10-20 years, 20% of patients will develop cirrhosis.
Based on studies conducted in the last decade since the publication by Kiyosawa et al., it has become possible to formulate an algorithm of the natural history of hepatitis C using data from a combination of prospective studies of posttransfusion and long-term follow-up of patients with established HCV infection. Of the 20% of cirrhotic patients, approximately 6% of patients can be expected to develop hepatic decompensation per year , 4% will develop HCC per year, and 3% to 4% per year can be expected to die or require liver transplantation.
HCV is usually only fatal when it leads to cirrhosis, the final stage of liver fibrosis. Therefore, an estimate of fibrosis progression represents an important surrogate end-point for the evaluation of the vulnerability of an individual patient. Progression of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C is variable. Using the median fibrosis progression rate, in untreated patients, the median expected time to cirrhosis was 30 years (intermediate progressors); 33% of patients had an expected median time to cirrhosis of less than 20 years (rapid progressors) and 31% will only progress to cirrhosis after more than 50 years, if ever (slow progressors). Several factors have been clearly shown to be associated with fibrosis progression rate including duration of infection, age, male gender, consumption of alcohol, HIV co-infection and low CD 4 count. The progression from infection to cirrhosis depends strongly on sex and age.
Factors Associated With Disease Progression Key Points Age older than 40 years, male gender, and consumption of alcohol are significant risk factors for fibrosis progression. An immunocompromised state, occurring secondary to HIV or HBV infection, also increases the risk for progression. Objective : To assess the natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C and determine the factors associated with this progression. Methods : Treatment-naĂŻve patients with documented HCV and at least one liver biopsy were enrolled in the study. Fibrosis progression was defined as the ratio between fibrosis stage in METAVIR units and duration of infection. A 2-step process was used to identify factors associated with progression: analysis between progression and 9 risk factors, and analysis of the association between fibrosis stage and the risk factors. Results : A total of 2235 subjects participated in the study; among those for whom the duration of infection was known (1157), the mean rate of fibrosis progression was 0.252 (median, 0.133). The mean duration from infection to cirrhosis was 30 years. A highly statistically significant ( P <.0001) association was identified between stage of fibrosis and age at biopsy and duration of infection. Risk factors associated with fibrosis progression included consumption of alcohol daily ( P <.001), male gender ( P <.001), and infection occurring at age 40 years or older ( P <.001). Factors that were not associated with risk for progression were cause of infection, genotype, and viremia. Conclusion : Host factorsâage, male gender, and alcohol consumptionâhave a stronger relationship with risk for fibrosis progression than virologic factors. Immunosuppression secondary to HIV coinfection and HBV, also increases the risk for progression, perhaps through immune dysfunction and/or direct cytotoxicity. References National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Management of hepatitis C: 2002. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; June 10-12, 2002. Poynard T, Bedrossa P, Opolon P, for the OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC group. Randomised trial of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus interferon alfa-2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C. Lancet . 1997;349:825-832.
Utility of Liver Biopsy In the last 50 years, use of the liver biopsy has grown to serve multiple purposes: (1) confirmation of clinical diagnosis, (2) assessment of severity of necroinflammation and fibrosis, (3) evaluation of possible concomitant disease processes, and (4) assessment of therapeutic intervention. Liver biopsy remains the best method for assessing the severity of hepatitis C however remains controversial. For many clinicians, the histologic appearance of the liver substantially influences the decision of whom to treat and whether to continue treatment in patients with non-life threatening adverse reactions. The findings may also serve as a baseline in establishing extent of liver damage and determining the prognosis. Although the current guidelines for use of biopsy are controversial, as therapy becomes more successful and safer, it is likely that HCV-infected persons will routinely be started on therapy without biopsy. If necessary, patient may be referred to a radiologist for the liver biopsy. Reference Brunt E. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: the Knodell histology activity index and beyond. Hepatology. 2000;31:241-246.
Utility of Liver Biopsy In the last 50 years, use of the liver biopsy has grown to serve multiple purposes: (1) confirmation of clinical diagnosis, (2) assessment of severity of necroinflammation and fibrosis, (3) evaluation of possible concomitant disease processes, and (4) assessment of therapeutic intervention. Liver biopsy remains the best method for assessing the severity of hepatitis C however remains controversial. For many clinicians, the histologic appearance of the liver substantially influences the decision of whom to treat and whether to continue treatment in patients with non-life threatening adverse reactions. The findings may also serve as a baseline in establishing extent of liver damage and determining the prognosis. Although the current guidelines for use of biopsy are controversial, as therapy becomes more successful and safer, it is likely that HCV-infected persons will routinely be started on therapy without biopsy. If necessary, patient may be referred to a radiologist for the liver biopsy. Reference Brunt E. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: the Knodell histology activity index and beyond. Hepatology. 2000;31:241-246.