2. Overview of SCC
ï±âSafety, Quality, People and Innovationâ-
Form the core of the company values
ï±1700 Employees
ï±$700 million revenue, consistent GM ratio
of >6%
ï±Transportation & Water Infrastructure
ï±Government highway projects
ï±Has seamlessly acquired other entities over
the years to expand its geographic footprint
Sterling Construction Company
7. Executive Compensation - Justified by
Performance?
Sterling Construction Company
Title Name Salary (including Bonus)
Chairman Mr. Patrick Manning $618,240.00
Chief Executive Officer Mr. Peter MacKenna $1,701,641.00
Executive Vice President, CFO Elizabeth Brumley
$345,026.00
EVP Operations Mr. Anthony F. Colombo $405,382.00
Director Mr. Milton L. Scott
$75,542.00
Director Mr. David R A Steadman
$75,542.00
8. Market overview
Sterling Construction Company
ïš Sterling Construction relies heavily on
government highway work & has been
adversely affected by Congress' inability to
pass the Federal Highway Bill.
ïš In response to the uncertain outlook Sterling
refocused on project execution and
conservative bidding.
ïš The Past 2 years have been difficult but
Sterling has tried its best in Balance Sheet
management (esp. control A/R collection days)
12. Financial Metrics and Ratios
Sterling Construction Company
11 10.11
13.91 13.63
7.95 7.53
-6.24
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Gross Profit Ratio
Gross Profit
Ratio 2.35
2.62 2.51 2.55
2.37
2.13
1.72
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Current Ratio
Current Ratio
0.98
0.82
0.67
0.47
0.41
0.56
0.73
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Debt to Equity Ratio
Debt to Equity
Ratio 7.65
9.71 9.71 9.78
-17.19
4.52
-10.36
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Return on Assets
Return on
Assets
13. Financial Ratios
Sterling Construction Company
15.15
17.68 16.23
14.34
-24.31
7.05
-17.89
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Return on Equity
Return on
Equity
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Earnings per Share
Earnings per
Share
64.83
53.27
77.16
61.14 58.94
47.37
143.74
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
A/R Collection in days
A/R Collection in
days
36.42
25.54
35.38 32.56
27.24 29.97
78.47
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
A/P payables in Days
A/P payables
in Days
14. Ratio Overview
Sterling Construction Company
ïš Revenues declined 8.5% due to the
completion of several large projects in Utah
partially offset by execution on jobs in
TX, CA, NV
ïš GM impacted due to execution of several low
margin contracts awarded pre-2012
ïš SG&A increased due to long term investments
in operational efficiency especially IT
infrastructure, leadership team and certain
non-recurring costs
15. Stock Prices from Semesterâs
Beginning
Sterling Construction Company
16. Stock Prices from Semesterâs
Beginning
Sterling Construction Company
Lowest in this semester: $8.67 on 8th October
2013
Highest in this semester: $11.47 currently
17. Pro forma and Trends
Sterling Construction Company
Future Net Income Analysis
3
6.5
10
13.5
17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2012.5 2013 2013.5 2014 2014.5 2015 2015.5 2016 2016.5 2017 2017.5
Net Income
Net Income
20. Recommendations
ïš Expand into new service lines & Geography
ïš Increase market leadership in core geographic
markets (UT, TX, NV)
ïš Focus on shorter duration/higher margin
projects
ïš Streamline operations through functional
integration of subsidiaries using the new IT
infrastructure
ïš Continue attracting new innovative talent to
keep in line with the high revenue per
employee (Revenue of 410,000$ per
Sterling Construction Company
21. SO, Should we buy this stock?
Sterling Construction Company
YES, This is a value stock
and it is the right time to buy
this stock
Hinweis der Redaktion
Museum of Marine Corps in Virginia â project was under $50M.
Jacobs earned 246M of profit in 2010. Craig Martinâs base salary is 0.4% of profit. 71% of CEOâs pay comes from stocks and options.
Stock price peaked in 2008 at $98 per share, and plummeted 57% to an average of $42 per share after 2008. Yet in 2010, total executive compensation was only 28% lower than its peak in 2008.