SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 23
During the Vietnam War, American pilots flew aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom II, equipped with long-range AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. However, air crews were frequently unable to fire AIM-7 Sparrow missiles at radar targets without having visually identified the target first, thus losing this technological advantage. The AIM-7 missile was also not very reliable, making heavy use of delicate components such as vacuum tubes which had to endure the SE Asia climate, carrier takeoffs, and high stress maneuvers. Additionally, early versions of the F-4 (prior to the E model) relied solely on missiles, having no guns nor lead-computing Gyro gunsight, and were therefore very vulnerable in the gun-range combat that could ensue. Lightweight, short-endurance, point-defense fighters such as the MiG-17 and MiG-21 are typically far more agile than heavy, long-range, fighter-bombers (see the F-105 Thunderchief). Still, using superior tactics, the AIM-9 Sidewinder short range missiles, and cannon fire, American pilots were able to gain significant victories in the air over North Vietnam, especially after the US Navy instituted the Top Gun program to restore dogfighting capability to its pilots. http://www.history.com/
Losses of aircraft in  combat  over NORTH Vietnam:  . Source is Red River Valley Fighter Pilot's Ass'n 30th Anniversary Memorial Progam. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MIG-21  MIG-17
F-4
Operation Rolling Thunder
Goals of Rolling Thunder ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Aircraft of Rolling Thunder A-6
F-105
F-4
F-100
Two principal areas from which supplies came — Haiphong and the Chinese border — were off limits to aerial attack, as were fighter bases.   Restrictions on the bombing of civilian areas enabled the North Vietnamese to use them for military purposes, such as siting anti-aircraft guns on school grounds.  Rolling Thunder's  gradual  escalation has been given as one reason for its failure, by giving the North Vietnamese time to adapt .
July 1966, Rolling Thunder expanded to include N. Vietnamese ammo dumps and oil storage facilities, and spring of 1967, further expanded to include power plants, factories, and airfields in the Hanoi-Haiphong area. Operation Rolling Thunder was closely controlled by the White House and at times targets were personally selected by President Johnson. 1965 -1968, 643,000 tons of bombs were dropped on N. Vietnam. Nearly 900 U.S. aircraft were lost during  the operation.  The operation continued, with occasional suspensions, until LBJ, under increasing domestic political pressure, halted it on October 31, 1968.
Operation Linebacker ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Thud Ridge
U.S. aircraft losses during Linebacker Between May 10 and October 23, 1972, the United States lost a total of 134 aircraft either over the north or as a direct result of Linebacker missions. 104 were lost in combat and 30 were destroyed in operational accidents. Losses by service were:
USAF : -  70 total 51 combat losses  (22 to MiGs, 5 induced losses,[ 20 to AAA, 4 to SAMs)  43 F-4D/E Phantom II (+17 non-combat losses)  2 RF-4C Photo Recon (+1 non-combat loss)  4 F-105G Wild Weasel (+1 non-combat loss)  2 F-111A “Aardvark”  USN : -  54 total 43 combat losses  (1 MiG, 2 induced, 13 SAM, 27 AAA)  8 F-4B/J Phantom II (+3 non-combat losses)  22 A-7A/C/E Corsair II (+3 non-combat losses)  3 A-6A Intruder  2 F-8J Crusader (+3 non-combat losses)  5 A-4F Skyhawk (+1 non-combat loss)  1 RA-5C Vigilante  2 RF-8G Photo Crusader (+1 non-combat loss)  USMC : -  10 total 10 combat losses  (1 MiG, 1 SAM, 8 AAA)  4 F-4J Phantom II  2 A-4E Skyhawk  4 A-6A Intruder
*Linebacker  had played a crucial role in blunting the northern offensive by drying up its vital sources of supply. PAVN (People’s Army N. Vietnam) had evolved into a conventional military force, and such a force depended upon a complex logistical system, which made it vulnerable to aerial attack.  *By September, imports into North Vietnam were estimated at 35 to 50 percent below what they had been in May, bolstering claims that the campaign had been successful in its interdiction effort.  *Air Force General Robert N. Ginsburgh, of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, summed up the attitudes of U.S. commanders by remarking that  Linebacker  had  "a greater impact in its first four months of operation than  Rolling Thunder  had in three and one-half years."
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
769 additional sorties were flown by the Air Force and 505 by the Navy and Marine Corps in support of the bombers.12 of these aircraft were lost on the missions (two F-111s, three F-4s, two A-7s, two A-6s, an EB-66, an HH-53 rescue helicopter, and an RA-5C reconnaissance aircraft) During these operations, ten American aviators were killed, eight captured, and 11 rescued. Overall Air Force losses included fifteen B-52s, two F-4s, two F-111s, one EB-66 and one HH-53 search and rescue helicopter.  Navy losses included two A-7s, two A-6s, one RA-5, and one F-4. Seventeen of these losses were attributed to SA-2 missiles, three to daytime MiG attacks, three to antiaircraft artillery, and four to unknown causes.  A total of eight Migs were shot down during the operation including two by B-52 tail gunners.
B-52 Stratofortess payload
Linebacker II Operation Linebacker II operations were initiated on 18 December 1972 and were directed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS)    The primary objective would be to force the North Vietnamese government to enter into purposeful negotiations concerning a cease-fire agreement.  The operation employed air power to its maximum capabilities to destroy all major target complexes such as radio stations, railroads, power plants, and airfields located in the Hanoi and Haiphong areas.  Unlike previous bombing campaigns, Linebacker II provided the Air Force and U.S. Naval forces with specific objectives and removed many of the restrictions that had previously caused frustration within the Pentagon.
Air Force and Navy tactical aircraft and B-52s commenced an around-the-clock bombardment of the North Vietnamese heartland. The B-52s struck Hanoi and Haiphong during hours of darkness with F-111s and Navy tactical aircraft providing diversionary/suppression strikes on airfields and surface-to-air missile sites. Daylight operations were primarily carried out by A-7s and F-4s. Linebacker II caused severe damage to North Vietnam’s infrastructure and war support capabilities. The operation persuaded the North Vietnamese to return to the conference table.
The impact of Linebacker II  During bombing raids, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy aircraft encountered intense enemy defensive actions that resulted in the loss of 26 aircraft in the 12-day period. Air Force losses included  15 B-52s,  2 F-4s,  2 F-111s, and  1 HH-53 search and rescue helicopter.  Navy losses included  2 A-7s, 2 A-6s,  1 RA-5, and  1 F-4. Seventeen of these losses were attributed to SA-2 missiles, 3 to daytime MiG attacks, 3 to antiaircraft artillery, and 3 to unknown causes.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's terms
Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's termsMig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's terms
Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's termsmishanbgd
 
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011Dan Goodwin
 
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...GLOBAL HEAVYLIFT HOLDINGS
 
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 Fulcrum
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 FulcrumHow to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 Fulcrum
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 FulcrumLige Tesla
 
Bent spear research proposal
Bent spear research proposalBent spear research proposal
Bent spear research proposalhigginbomb
 
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over Taiwan
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over TaiwanUS airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over Taiwan
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over TaiwanAlex Yerukhimov
 
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda Triangle
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda TriangleFlight 19 Incident Bermuda Triangle
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda TriangleBhavik A Shah
 
Nishitani presentation oct_13th
Nishitani presentation oct_13thNishitani presentation oct_13th
Nishitani presentation oct_13thstimson
 
The battle of midway
The battle of midwayThe battle of midway
The battle of midwaysmannino95
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

JFQ Spring 1998
JFQ Spring 1998JFQ Spring 1998
JFQ Spring 1998
 
Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's terms
Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's termsMig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's terms
Mig-21and fighter maneuverability in today's terms
 
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011
Combat Aircraft F-18 Article April 2011
 
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...
The Defense Industrial Base: Issues to be Considered and Recommendations - Dr...
 
Battle Of Midway
Battle Of MidwayBattle Of Midway
Battle Of Midway
 
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 Fulcrum
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 FulcrumHow to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 Fulcrum
How to Fly and Fight in Mig 29 Fulcrum
 
History project
History projectHistory project
History project
 
Bent spear research proposal
Bent spear research proposalBent spear research proposal
Bent spear research proposal
 
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over Taiwan
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over TaiwanUS airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over Taiwan
US airpower distribution strategies to deter chinese air power over Taiwan
 
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda Triangle
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda TriangleFlight 19 Incident Bermuda Triangle
Flight 19 Incident Bermuda Triangle
 
Battle of midway
Battle of midwayBattle of midway
Battle of midway
 
Fbfmunicipalsitebulletin
FbfmunicipalsitebulletinFbfmunicipalsitebulletin
Fbfmunicipalsitebulletin
 
SAGE
SAGESAGE
SAGE
 
Battle of Midway
Battle of MidwayBattle of Midway
Battle of Midway
 
Roles in wwii
Roles in wwiiRoles in wwii
Roles in wwii
 
Nishitani presentation oct_13th
Nishitani presentation oct_13thNishitani presentation oct_13th
Nishitani presentation oct_13th
 
The battle of midway
The battle of midwayThe battle of midway
The battle of midway
 
WW II Aircraft Program
WW II Aircraft ProgramWW II Aircraft Program
WW II Aircraft Program
 
V14n2 jfk fort_bragg_visit
V14n2 jfk fort_bragg_visitV14n2 jfk fort_bragg_visit
V14n2 jfk fort_bragg_visit
 

Ähnlich wie Air war in Vietnman

Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North Kor
Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North KorDescribe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North Kor
Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North KorLinaCovington707
 
The doolittle raids
The doolittle raidsThe doolittle raids
The doolittle raidsrobandben123
 
Israeli Air Force At 59 Plastic Models By Yoav
Israeli Air Force At 59   Plastic Models By YoavIsraeli Air Force At 59   Plastic Models By Yoav
Israeli Air Force At 59 Plastic Models By YoavArt 37
 
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certificationwaqas ahmed
 
World airforces2013
World airforces2013World airforces2013
World airforces2013jesusrob21
 
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II Fighter
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II FighterPhoto Tribute To The F35 Lightening II Fighter
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II FighterMetalphoto Of Cincinnati
 
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq war
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq warTechnology used in the Iran-Iraq war
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq warKliment Serafimov
 
Military_Aviation.pptx
Military_Aviation.pptxMilitary_Aviation.pptx
Military_Aviation.pptxMaclenny
 
The Bunker Newbury a History
The Bunker Newbury a HistoryThe Bunker Newbury a History
The Bunker Newbury a HistoryRenos Georgiou
 
Marine Corps History Essay
Marine Corps History EssayMarine Corps History Essay
Marine Corps History EssayJessica Lopez
 
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docx
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docxAirica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docx
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docxnettletondevon
 

Ähnlich wie Air war in Vietnman (19)

F 20
F 20F 20
F 20
 
F 20
F 20F 20
F 20
 
Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North Kor
Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North KorDescribe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North Kor
Describe U.S. response to the invasion of South Korea by North Kor
 
4.2 Naval Aviation
4.2 Naval Aviation4.2 Naval Aviation
4.2 Naval Aviation
 
The doolittle raids
The doolittle raidsThe doolittle raids
The doolittle raids
 
F 20
F 20F 20
F 20
 
F 20
F 20F 20
F 20
 
Israeli Air Force At 59 Plastic Models By Yoav
Israeli Air Force At 59   Plastic Models By YoavIsraeli Air Force At 59   Plastic Models By Yoav
Israeli Air Force At 59 Plastic Models By Yoav
 
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification
171705017 appendix-14-mi g-21-airworthiness-certification
 
World airforces2013
World airforces2013World airforces2013
World airforces2013
 
Mil_Mi_4.pdf
Mil_Mi_4.pdfMil_Mi_4.pdf
Mil_Mi_4.pdf
 
F- 20
F- 20F- 20
F- 20
 
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II Fighter
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II FighterPhoto Tribute To The F35 Lightening II Fighter
Photo Tribute To The F35 Lightening II Fighter
 
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq war
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq warTechnology used in the Iran-Iraq war
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq war
 
Military_Aviation.pptx
Military_Aviation.pptxMilitary_Aviation.pptx
Military_Aviation.pptx
 
Mikoyan MiG-31 ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Mikoyan MiG-31 ( PDFDrive ).pdfMikoyan MiG-31 ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Mikoyan MiG-31 ( PDFDrive ).pdf
 
The Bunker Newbury a History
The Bunker Newbury a HistoryThe Bunker Newbury a History
The Bunker Newbury a History
 
Marine Corps History Essay
Marine Corps History EssayMarine Corps History Essay
Marine Corps History Essay
 
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docx
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docxAirica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docx
Airica WalthallF-35 Joint Strike Fighter ProgramAP.docx
 

Mehr von mrpachankis (19)

chapter 14
 chapter 14 chapter 14
chapter 14
 
chapter 13
 chapter 13 chapter 13
chapter 13
 
chapter 29
 chapter 29 chapter 29
chapter 29
 
Chapter 18
Chapter 18Chapter 18
Chapter 18
 
Rise Of The Dictators
Rise Of The DictatorsRise Of The Dictators
Rise Of The Dictators
 
Chapter 16
Chapter 16Chapter 16
Chapter 16
 
Chapter 17
Chapter 17Chapter 17
Chapter 17
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
WWII PTO
WWII PTOWWII PTO
WWII PTO
 
Eto WWII
Eto WWIIEto WWII
Eto WWII
 
Tar2 Chapter 11
Tar2 Chapter 11Tar2 Chapter 11
Tar2 Chapter 11
 
Tar2 Chapter 10
Tar2 Chapter 10Tar2 Chapter 10
Tar2 Chapter 10
 
Chapter 09
Chapter 09Chapter 09
Chapter 09
 
Chapter 08
Chapter 08Chapter 08
Chapter 08
 
Tar2 Chapter 27
Tar2 Chapter 27Tar2 Chapter 27
Tar2 Chapter 27
 
Chapter 25
Chapter 25Chapter 25
Chapter 25
 
WWI
WWIWWI
WWI
 
Chapt 24
Chapt 24Chapt 24
Chapt 24
 
Tar2 Chapter 23
Tar2 Chapter 23Tar2 Chapter 23
Tar2 Chapter 23
 

Air war in Vietnman

  • 1. During the Vietnam War, American pilots flew aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom II, equipped with long-range AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. However, air crews were frequently unable to fire AIM-7 Sparrow missiles at radar targets without having visually identified the target first, thus losing this technological advantage. The AIM-7 missile was also not very reliable, making heavy use of delicate components such as vacuum tubes which had to endure the SE Asia climate, carrier takeoffs, and high stress maneuvers. Additionally, early versions of the F-4 (prior to the E model) relied solely on missiles, having no guns nor lead-computing Gyro gunsight, and were therefore very vulnerable in the gun-range combat that could ensue. Lightweight, short-endurance, point-defense fighters such as the MiG-17 and MiG-21 are typically far more agile than heavy, long-range, fighter-bombers (see the F-105 Thunderchief). Still, using superior tactics, the AIM-9 Sidewinder short range missiles, and cannon fire, American pilots were able to gain significant victories in the air over North Vietnam, especially after the US Navy instituted the Top Gun program to restore dogfighting capability to its pilots. http://www.history.com/
  • 2.
  • 4. F-4
  • 6.
  • 7. Aircraft of Rolling Thunder A-6
  • 9. F-4
  • 10. F-100
  • 11. Two principal areas from which supplies came — Haiphong and the Chinese border — were off limits to aerial attack, as were fighter bases. Restrictions on the bombing of civilian areas enabled the North Vietnamese to use them for military purposes, such as siting anti-aircraft guns on school grounds. Rolling Thunder's gradual escalation has been given as one reason for its failure, by giving the North Vietnamese time to adapt .
  • 12. July 1966, Rolling Thunder expanded to include N. Vietnamese ammo dumps and oil storage facilities, and spring of 1967, further expanded to include power plants, factories, and airfields in the Hanoi-Haiphong area. Operation Rolling Thunder was closely controlled by the White House and at times targets were personally selected by President Johnson. 1965 -1968, 643,000 tons of bombs were dropped on N. Vietnam. Nearly 900 U.S. aircraft were lost during the operation. The operation continued, with occasional suspensions, until LBJ, under increasing domestic political pressure, halted it on October 31, 1968.
  • 13.
  • 15. U.S. aircraft losses during Linebacker Between May 10 and October 23, 1972, the United States lost a total of 134 aircraft either over the north or as a direct result of Linebacker missions. 104 were lost in combat and 30 were destroyed in operational accidents. Losses by service were:
  • 16. USAF : - 70 total 51 combat losses (22 to MiGs, 5 induced losses,[ 20 to AAA, 4 to SAMs) 43 F-4D/E Phantom II (+17 non-combat losses) 2 RF-4C Photo Recon (+1 non-combat loss) 4 F-105G Wild Weasel (+1 non-combat loss) 2 F-111A “Aardvark” USN : - 54 total 43 combat losses (1 MiG, 2 induced, 13 SAM, 27 AAA) 8 F-4B/J Phantom II (+3 non-combat losses) 22 A-7A/C/E Corsair II (+3 non-combat losses) 3 A-6A Intruder 2 F-8J Crusader (+3 non-combat losses) 5 A-4F Skyhawk (+1 non-combat loss) 1 RA-5C Vigilante 2 RF-8G Photo Crusader (+1 non-combat loss) USMC : - 10 total 10 combat losses (1 MiG, 1 SAM, 8 AAA) 4 F-4J Phantom II 2 A-4E Skyhawk 4 A-6A Intruder
  • 17. *Linebacker had played a crucial role in blunting the northern offensive by drying up its vital sources of supply. PAVN (People’s Army N. Vietnam) had evolved into a conventional military force, and such a force depended upon a complex logistical system, which made it vulnerable to aerial attack. *By September, imports into North Vietnam were estimated at 35 to 50 percent below what they had been in May, bolstering claims that the campaign had been successful in its interdiction effort. *Air Force General Robert N. Ginsburgh, of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, summed up the attitudes of U.S. commanders by remarking that Linebacker had "a greater impact in its first four months of operation than Rolling Thunder had in three and one-half years."
  • 18.
  • 19. 769 additional sorties were flown by the Air Force and 505 by the Navy and Marine Corps in support of the bombers.12 of these aircraft were lost on the missions (two F-111s, three F-4s, two A-7s, two A-6s, an EB-66, an HH-53 rescue helicopter, and an RA-5C reconnaissance aircraft) During these operations, ten American aviators were killed, eight captured, and 11 rescued. Overall Air Force losses included fifteen B-52s, two F-4s, two F-111s, one EB-66 and one HH-53 search and rescue helicopter. Navy losses included two A-7s, two A-6s, one RA-5, and one F-4. Seventeen of these losses were attributed to SA-2 missiles, three to daytime MiG attacks, three to antiaircraft artillery, and four to unknown causes. A total of eight Migs were shot down during the operation including two by B-52 tail gunners.
  • 21. Linebacker II Operation Linebacker II operations were initiated on 18 December 1972 and were directed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) The primary objective would be to force the North Vietnamese government to enter into purposeful negotiations concerning a cease-fire agreement. The operation employed air power to its maximum capabilities to destroy all major target complexes such as radio stations, railroads, power plants, and airfields located in the Hanoi and Haiphong areas. Unlike previous bombing campaigns, Linebacker II provided the Air Force and U.S. Naval forces with specific objectives and removed many of the restrictions that had previously caused frustration within the Pentagon.
  • 22. Air Force and Navy tactical aircraft and B-52s commenced an around-the-clock bombardment of the North Vietnamese heartland. The B-52s struck Hanoi and Haiphong during hours of darkness with F-111s and Navy tactical aircraft providing diversionary/suppression strikes on airfields and surface-to-air missile sites. Daylight operations were primarily carried out by A-7s and F-4s. Linebacker II caused severe damage to North Vietnam’s infrastructure and war support capabilities. The operation persuaded the North Vietnamese to return to the conference table.
  • 23. The impact of Linebacker II During bombing raids, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy aircraft encountered intense enemy defensive actions that resulted in the loss of 26 aircraft in the 12-day period. Air Force losses included 15 B-52s, 2 F-4s, 2 F-111s, and 1 HH-53 search and rescue helicopter. Navy losses included 2 A-7s, 2 A-6s, 1 RA-5, and 1 F-4. Seventeen of these losses were attributed to SA-2 missiles, 3 to daytime MiG attacks, 3 to antiaircraft artillery, and 3 to unknown causes.