The document summarizes research from MarketingProfs on effective B2B marketing tactics in 2011. Some key findings include:
- B2B marketing budgets were bouncing back after dropping in 2008-2009, with many companies expecting increased budgets in 2011.
- Generating leads and building brand awareness were top priorities. Traditional tactics were still widely used but online channels like webinars and search marketing were becoming more effective.
- Content marketing strategies, including webinars and optimizing corporate websites, were seen as important ways to generate leads and build brands. Community engagement and influencer marketing were also growing tactics.
15. High Level Findings: Online Webinars, Search Marketing, and Corporate Website ranked most highly effective Not deemed as highly effective as traditional channels
18. High Level Findings: Branding Brand Awareness Traditional tactics remain important Inside Sales seen as improving Webinars seen as most effective online tactic Bumped websites to second place
25. Other Insights: Marketing Automation Marketing Automation Adoption Still Slow Proliferation of channels and tactics Increasing complexity of marketing function Still, companies remain cautious
49. Final Thoughts Lead generation remains central to B2B marketing Some traditional tactics continue to deliver but need support from—and integration with—new tactics Importance of online research in buying process drives demand for content strategies The only “silver bullet” is experimentation
Hinweis der Redaktion
Thank people for their time
spending money on the things we need to do
Sales/Telemarketing – holdingTradeshows – moved up in rankExec Bfast – most popular among big companies
social networks seeing the biggest increasewebinars and webcasts cross the 50where spend is and perceived effectiveness don’t always jibe
Still
Or at least not as widely perceived to be effective47% see telemarketing as highly effective40% see tradeshows as highly effectivetheir very ubiquity
Everything is in decline – PR slipping the most
The interesting thing here is the influence on your company’s brand has moved off the homepage, so to speakAlso, email is starting to slip
Touch and content
Even though blogging isn’t ranked that highly
Websites (47.8%), webinars (47.7%) and search marketing (47.5%) are among the top threeThe majority respondents plan to engage more with social networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn (62.9%), and blogs (53.7%) with Twitter close behind at 48.3%
Social Media spend, while growing, still a fraction of totalChallenge is integrating the traditional tactics (inside sales, executive events) with emerging tactics (search marketing, blogging, online communities, etc.)
Budget increases bring renewed scrutiny of ROITop line performance metrics (followers/site visits) waning in valueChallenge lies in linking tactics to specific buyer behaviorsHighlights need for tracking and automation
Also, Printing for Less
Think “Content Program”= White Paper + Webinar + Micro-sitePodcasts, video, gamesIntegration with sales
Altium and Nanoboard3000 – you got to dig a littleForbes.com
Easy way to get community going and find existing communitieslinkedin answers as a great biz dev tool, especially for agenciesVisitors who come to your site via linkedin tend to stay longer
Hubspot
250K sale: Shoretel or Avaya - http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/it-pays-to-listen-avayas-250k-twitter-sale/
When seeking out influencers to help you achieve your marketing objectives, it’s important to understand what makes them truly influential. For example, a team of HP researchers found that the number of followers someone has on Twitter is a poor gauge of their real influence or how far their messages will travel. Instead, influence depends more on the extent to which an individuals’ followers, fans, friends, blog readers/subscribers, etc. revere, respond to, and act on their opinions and advice. Another way to formalize influence is to follow the lead of the marketing executives consulted by Brian Solis and the folks at Vocus when putting together their “Influencer Grudge Match” study. These executives cited the quality or focus of the individual’s network (60%), the quality of the content they share (55%), their capacity to cause measurable outcomes (55%) and the depth of their relationships (40%) as the factors that most contribute to making a person influential.