SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 18
Case Studies Research into other films of the same genre and format of “Spinning Time”
Wild Child (2008) Featuring still fairly unknown teen star Emma Roberts, whose initial claim to fame was that she was Julia Roberts’ niece. She previously headlined in her own sitcom 'Unfabulous' on Nickelodeon in 2004. 	The film proved popular in some countries but didn't procure as much financially as it was expected to. It was estimated to gross $20 million dollars but it just missed it's target only grossing $19.8 million.    	According to reviewers the issue with the film wasn't the newbie stars that were in it, rather with the content of the film. They said it was a fairly plausible concept - spoilt brat being sent away to boarding school - but instead of "Wild Child“ it should've been "Mild Child" as protagonist Poppy didn't do anything anywhere near mild, "unless you think short skirts and “horse face” put-downs are outrageous" said the Sun online. Teen Star: Emma Roberts 	Budget: 20,000,000 Gross Revenue: $19,786,125
The HANNAH Montana Movie (2009) ,[object Object]
 
Reviewers had pretty positive things to say about the movie. Saying it was perfect for the target audience, claiming Hannah Montana fans wouldn't befdissapointed.illlkjljkljkljjklkjljklkjlkjjljjlkjlkjlk
Teen Star: Miley Cyrus
Budget: $35,000,000
Gross Revenue: $155,545,279,[object Object]
A Cinderella Story (2004) This film with Hilary Duff, is as you can guess, a remake/adaptation of the fairytale Cinderella. The plot is straightforward as it is a take on the well known story. For it’s target audience, teen girls, it’s fun, has eye candy and is not too taxing on the mind...so in other words – perfect! Hilary Duff was very popular at this time as the whole “Lizzie McGuire” franchise was still going strong, with the movie of the TV series being released just one year prior to this film. That also did very well bringing on over $55million from a $17million budget. Whilst teen heartthrob Chad Michael Murray had just begun melting girls hearts everywhere, weekly as Lucas Scott in long running drama ‘One Tree Hill.’ The film’s success even spurred a sequel – ‘Another Cinderella Story,’ starring Selena Gomez and Drew Seeley, however this was released straight to TV.  Teen Star(s): Hilary Duff 		          Chad Michael Murray Budget: $19,000,000 Gross Revenue:$70,067,909  
New York Minute (2004) This chick flick, the last from the identical duo was not a financial success; with it bringing in less than was originally spent on it. Critically, the film didn’t do very well either. Roger Egbert and, hosts of US film review show, “At The Movies” gave the film two thumbs down, whilst Rotten Tomatoes gave it  a meagre 11% Aside from the film’s critical and financial failings, Rob Blackwelder, of contactmusic.com gave an enlightening review –http://www.contactmusic.com/new/film.nsf/reviews/nyminute Most interestingly was this... “But the Olsen twins -- who despite being quite pretty don't need the clumsy pratfalling of Hilary Duff, Amanda Bynes and Lindsay Lohan to make them seem accessible and average -- have the charisma to help this movie earn the grins it needs to satisfy parents and others dragged along with the less-demanding fans already inclined to see it.” Teen Star(s): Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen Budget: $30,000,000	 Gross Revenue: $21,300,000
Mean Girls (2004) This film was major success, being written by comedy wonder woman Tina Fey and starring well established teen star Lindsay Lohan this movie attracted girls of varying ages, and was sure to be a hit! Having grown up in front of the camera, at the age of 18 this was Lohan’s fourth feature film. The role, gained her much acclaim as she was nominated and won several awards for her performance including ‘Choice Movie Breakout Star’, ‘Best Female Performance’ and ‘Choice Actress-Comedy.’ Teen Star: Lindsay Lohan Budget: $17,000,000 Gross Revenue: $129,042,871
What A GIRL Wants (2003) Amanda Bynes was very popular around the time this film was released. As her comedy sketch series ‘The Amanda Show’ had run for three seasons on Nickelodeon, 1999-2002 and she’d recently starred along side Frankie Muniz in the highly successful ‘Big Fat Liar.’ Although the movie was pretty much a financial success, it received quite a beating in regards to reviews. Most said, although fun ‘for tween girls too young to recognize its artificiality’ it was completely inconsistent, and as such, off-putting for the more discerning viewer.  For example, Father of Bynes’ character, Colin Firth saying ‘“She has my eyes,” when Bynes’ peepers are big, round, bright and green while his are narrow, overcast and dark brown?’  All this and others are valid points, they’re really just nit picks and as such disposable. The film despite its flaws still did well because of its popular teen star. Which sort of begs the question, can anything no matter the quality, do well if it has a big enough star in it? Answer; Probably, yes...but not in the case of the next film. Teen Star: Amanda Bynes Budget: $25,000,000 Gross Revenue: $50,732,139

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Alex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskAlex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskNicolavickery
 
Alex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskAlex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskNicolavickery
 
Analysis of rom com film posters
Analysis of rom com film postersAnalysis of rom com film posters
Analysis of rom com film postersL0ui5P1P
 
print vs digital
print vs digitalprint vs digital
print vs digital18001927
 
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary Products
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary ProductsAnalysis Of 3 Ancillary Products
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary Productsalltimejas
 
Twinkie Marketing Plan
Twinkie Marketing PlanTwinkie Marketing Plan
Twinkie Marketing PlanTaylor Cox
 
Me and my movies
Me and my moviesMe and my movies
Me and my moviesmapuk7
 
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2)
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2) Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2)
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2) alltimejas
 
Fixation ppt
Fixation pptFixation ppt
Fixation pptec2613
 
Cinderella and Chappie
Cinderella and ChappieCinderella and Chappie
Cinderella and Chappiekelseykiki
 
Isaiah lesley pitch deck
Isaiah lesley pitch deckIsaiah lesley pitch deck
Isaiah lesley pitch deckIsaiahLesley
 
Characters and Casting
Characters and CastingCharacters and Casting
Characters and CastingJadeMelady
 
Taylors Films in Xmas Term
Taylors Films in Xmas TermTaylors Films in Xmas Term
Taylors Films in Xmas Termghsmedia
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

THE TELL TALE HEART
THE TELL TALE HEARTTHE TELL TALE HEART
THE TELL TALE HEART
 
Alex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskAlex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking task
 
Alex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking taskAlex cross tracking task
Alex cross tracking task
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Me and my movies
Me and my moviesMe and my movies
Me and my movies
 
Analysis of rom com film posters
Analysis of rom com film postersAnalysis of rom com film posters
Analysis of rom com film posters
 
print vs digital
print vs digitalprint vs digital
print vs digital
 
Script prop (2)
Script prop (2)Script prop (2)
Script prop (2)
 
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary Products
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary ProductsAnalysis Of 3 Ancillary Products
Analysis Of 3 Ancillary Products
 
Twinkie Marketing Plan
Twinkie Marketing PlanTwinkie Marketing Plan
Twinkie Marketing Plan
 
Me and my movies
Me and my moviesMe and my movies
Me and my movies
 
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2)
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2) Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2)
Analysis of 3 (Ancillary Product 2)
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Fixation ppt
Fixation pptFixation ppt
Fixation ppt
 
Cinderella and Chappie
Cinderella and ChappieCinderella and Chappie
Cinderella and Chappie
 
Isaiah lesley pitch deck
Isaiah lesley pitch deckIsaiah lesley pitch deck
Isaiah lesley pitch deck
 
Characters and Casting
Characters and CastingCharacters and Casting
Characters and Casting
 
Evaluation 2- Aleks
Evaluation 2- AleksEvaluation 2- Aleks
Evaluation 2- Aleks
 
Media q2
Media q2Media q2
Media q2
 
Taylors Films in Xmas Term
Taylors Films in Xmas TermTaylors Films in Xmas Term
Taylors Films in Xmas Term
 

Andere mochten auch

Walt disney studios
Walt disney studiosWalt disney studios
Walt disney studiosJade Fogg
 
Marketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionMarketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionCharlotte Gray
 
Walt Disney World
Walt Disney WorldWalt Disney World
Walt Disney Worldajf310
 
Charlotte Gray's Media Product Evaluation
Charlotte Gray's Media Product EvaluationCharlotte Gray's Media Product Evaluation
Charlotte Gray's Media Product EvaluationCharlotte Gray
 
Institutional research walt disney pictures Jushna
Institutional research walt disney pictures JushnaInstitutional research walt disney pictures Jushna
Institutional research walt disney pictures Jushnahaverstockmedia
 
Walt disney presenation
Walt disney presenationWalt disney presenation
Walt disney presenationLauraDobson
 
Marketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionMarketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionCharlotte Gray
 
Walt Disney Storyboard
Walt Disney StoryboardWalt Disney Storyboard
Walt Disney Storyboardtmh17
 
Conventions of opening sequences of films
Conventions of opening sequences of filmsConventions of opening sequences of films
Conventions of opening sequences of filmsKiera Jade Rickford
 
L' analisi Swot Sintesi
L' analisi Swot SintesiL' analisi Swot Sintesi
L' analisi Swot Sintesiprogettare
 
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualità
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualitàCome fare un'analisi swot di qualità
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualitàsuiteufficio
 

Andere mochten auch (15)

Walt disney studios
Walt disney studiosWalt disney studios
Walt disney studios
 
Marketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionMarketing and distribution
Marketing and distribution
 
Walt Disney World
Walt Disney WorldWalt Disney World
Walt Disney World
 
Charlotte Gray's Media Product Evaluation
Charlotte Gray's Media Product EvaluationCharlotte Gray's Media Product Evaluation
Charlotte Gray's Media Product Evaluation
 
Institutional research walt disney pictures Jushna
Institutional research walt disney pictures JushnaInstitutional research walt disney pictures Jushna
Institutional research walt disney pictures Jushna
 
Walt disney presenation
Walt disney presenationWalt disney presenation
Walt disney presenation
 
Marketing and distribution
Marketing and distributionMarketing and distribution
Marketing and distribution
 
Walt Disney Storyboard
Walt Disney StoryboardWalt Disney Storyboard
Walt Disney Storyboard
 
Conventions of opening sequences of films
Conventions of opening sequences of filmsConventions of opening sequences of films
Conventions of opening sequences of films
 
Disneyland
DisneylandDisneyland
Disneyland
 
L' analisi Swot Sintesi
L' analisi Swot SintesiL' analisi Swot Sintesi
L' analisi Swot Sintesi
 
Walt Disney BIO
Walt Disney BIOWalt Disney BIO
Walt Disney BIO
 
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualità
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualitàCome fare un'analisi swot di qualità
Come fare un'analisi swot di qualità
 
Disney World Powerpoint Template - SlideWorld
Disney World Powerpoint Template - SlideWorldDisney World Powerpoint Template - SlideWorld
Disney World Powerpoint Template - SlideWorld
 
Walt disney ppt
Walt disney pptWalt disney ppt
Walt disney ppt
 

Ähnlich wie Case Studies

Influential figures
Influential figuresInfluential figures
Influential figuresAELMedia
 
PR1 How do we analyse film?
PR1 How do we analyse film?PR1 How do we analyse film?
PR1 How do we analyse film?Emily Jepp
 
Influential figures
Influential figuresInfluential figures
Influential figuresAELMedia
 
Stardom research.docx
Stardom research.docxStardom research.docx
Stardom research.docxAmyKilbride2
 
Evaluation 1
Evaluation 1Evaluation 1
Evaluation 1beavis2l
 
Our pitch/film treatment
Our pitch/film treatmentOur pitch/film treatment
Our pitch/film treatmentAbbeyfield
 
Influential factors
Influential factors Influential factors
Influential factors AELMedia
 
Coming of age research
Coming of age researchComing of age research
Coming of age researchRachel Moffat
 
Welling high blog post pptx
Welling high blog post pptxWelling high blog post pptx
Welling high blog post pptxjazminesims1
 
Who would be the audience for your media product
Who would be the audience for your media productWho would be the audience for your media product
Who would be the audience for your media productconnoredmonds
 
Chick flick pitch
Chick flick pitchChick flick pitch
Chick flick pitchtlkilden
 
Pr4 how do we analyse films
Pr4   how do we analyse filmsPr4   how do we analyse films
Pr4 how do we analyse filmsLouiseMaher18
 
Our target audience
Our target audienceOur target audience
Our target audienceLouisHodges3
 
Boys Like That Evaluation
Boys Like That EvaluationBoys Like That Evaluation
Boys Like That Evaluationsmp1234
 

Ähnlich wie Case Studies (20)

Influential figures
Influential figuresInfluential figures
Influential figures
 
Tricia Helfer_story-CP
Tricia Helfer_story-CPTricia Helfer_story-CP
Tricia Helfer_story-CP
 
PR1 How do we analyse film?
PR1 How do we analyse film?PR1 How do we analyse film?
PR1 How do we analyse film?
 
Influential figures
Influential figuresInfluential figures
Influential figures
 
Stardom research.docx
Stardom research.docxStardom research.docx
Stardom research.docx
 
Top 10 directors
Top 10 directorsTop 10 directors
Top 10 directors
 
Evaluation 1
Evaluation 1Evaluation 1
Evaluation 1
 
Our pitch/film treatment
Our pitch/film treatmentOur pitch/film treatment
Our pitch/film treatment
 
Influential factors
Influential factors Influential factors
Influential factors
 
Coming of age research
Coming of age researchComing of age research
Coming of age research
 
Welling high blog post pptx
Welling high blog post pptxWelling high blog post pptx
Welling high blog post pptx
 
Question 2
Question 2 Question 2
Question 2
 
Who would be the audience for your media product
Who would be the audience for your media productWho would be the audience for your media product
Who would be the audience for your media product
 
Precious
Precious Precious
Precious
 
Chick flick pitch
Chick flick pitchChick flick pitch
Chick flick pitch
 
Pr4 how do we analyse films
Pr4   how do we analyse filmsPr4   how do we analyse films
Pr4 how do we analyse films
 
Our target audience
Our target audienceOur target audience
Our target audience
 
Boys Like That Evaluation
Boys Like That EvaluationBoys Like That Evaluation
Boys Like That Evaluation
 
Essay research
Essay researchEssay research
Essay research
 
Pr6
Pr6Pr6
Pr6
 

Case Studies

  • 1. Case Studies Research into other films of the same genre and format of “Spinning Time”
  • 2.
  • 3. Wild Child (2008) Featuring still fairly unknown teen star Emma Roberts, whose initial claim to fame was that she was Julia Roberts’ niece. She previously headlined in her own sitcom 'Unfabulous' on Nickelodeon in 2004. The film proved popular in some countries but didn't procure as much financially as it was expected to. It was estimated to gross $20 million dollars but it just missed it's target only grossing $19.8 million.    According to reviewers the issue with the film wasn't the newbie stars that were in it, rather with the content of the film. They said it was a fairly plausible concept - spoilt brat being sent away to boarding school - but instead of "Wild Child“ it should've been "Mild Child" as protagonist Poppy didn't do anything anywhere near mild, "unless you think short skirts and “horse face” put-downs are outrageous" said the Sun online. Teen Star: Emma Roberts Budget: 20,000,000 Gross Revenue: $19,786,125
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.  
  • 7. Reviewers had pretty positive things to say about the movie. Saying it was perfect for the target audience, claiming Hannah Montana fans wouldn't befdissapointed.illlkjljkljkljjklkjljklkjlkjjljjlkjlkjlk
  • 10.
  • 11. A Cinderella Story (2004) This film with Hilary Duff, is as you can guess, a remake/adaptation of the fairytale Cinderella. The plot is straightforward as it is a take on the well known story. For it’s target audience, teen girls, it’s fun, has eye candy and is not too taxing on the mind...so in other words – perfect! Hilary Duff was very popular at this time as the whole “Lizzie McGuire” franchise was still going strong, with the movie of the TV series being released just one year prior to this film. That also did very well bringing on over $55million from a $17million budget. Whilst teen heartthrob Chad Michael Murray had just begun melting girls hearts everywhere, weekly as Lucas Scott in long running drama ‘One Tree Hill.’ The film’s success even spurred a sequel – ‘Another Cinderella Story,’ starring Selena Gomez and Drew Seeley, however this was released straight to TV. Teen Star(s): Hilary Duff Chad Michael Murray Budget: $19,000,000 Gross Revenue:$70,067,909  
  • 12.
  • 13. New York Minute (2004) This chick flick, the last from the identical duo was not a financial success; with it bringing in less than was originally spent on it. Critically, the film didn’t do very well either. Roger Egbert and, hosts of US film review show, “At The Movies” gave the film two thumbs down, whilst Rotten Tomatoes gave it a meagre 11% Aside from the film’s critical and financial failings, Rob Blackwelder, of contactmusic.com gave an enlightening review –http://www.contactmusic.com/new/film.nsf/reviews/nyminute Most interestingly was this... “But the Olsen twins -- who despite being quite pretty don't need the clumsy pratfalling of Hilary Duff, Amanda Bynes and Lindsay Lohan to make them seem accessible and average -- have the charisma to help this movie earn the grins it needs to satisfy parents and others dragged along with the less-demanding fans already inclined to see it.” Teen Star(s): Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen Budget: $30,000,000 Gross Revenue: $21,300,000
  • 14.
  • 15. Mean Girls (2004) This film was major success, being written by comedy wonder woman Tina Fey and starring well established teen star Lindsay Lohan this movie attracted girls of varying ages, and was sure to be a hit! Having grown up in front of the camera, at the age of 18 this was Lohan’s fourth feature film. The role, gained her much acclaim as she was nominated and won several awards for her performance including ‘Choice Movie Breakout Star’, ‘Best Female Performance’ and ‘Choice Actress-Comedy.’ Teen Star: Lindsay Lohan Budget: $17,000,000 Gross Revenue: $129,042,871
  • 16.
  • 17. What A GIRL Wants (2003) Amanda Bynes was very popular around the time this film was released. As her comedy sketch series ‘The Amanda Show’ had run for three seasons on Nickelodeon, 1999-2002 and she’d recently starred along side Frankie Muniz in the highly successful ‘Big Fat Liar.’ Although the movie was pretty much a financial success, it received quite a beating in regards to reviews. Most said, although fun ‘for tween girls too young to recognize its artificiality’ it was completely inconsistent, and as such, off-putting for the more discerning viewer. For example, Father of Bynes’ character, Colin Firth saying ‘“She has my eyes,” when Bynes’ peepers are big, round, bright and green while his are narrow, overcast and dark brown?’ All this and others are valid points, they’re really just nit picks and as such disposable. The film despite its flaws still did well because of its popular teen star. Which sort of begs the question, can anything no matter the quality, do well if it has a big enough star in it? Answer; Probably, yes...but not in the case of the next film. Teen Star: Amanda Bynes Budget: $25,000,000 Gross Revenue: $50,732,139
  • 18.
  • 19. First daughter (2004) The film had a very similar story line to ‘Chasing Liberty’ starring Mandy Moore released just a few years earlier in 2001. In fact ‘Chasing Liberty's’ working title was First Daughter. Both plots follow the president’s daughter as she tries to embark on an independent life away from the White House, and similarly to ‘Chasing Liberty’ the film was not received well by critics. ‘The film was a financial failure’ according to Wikipedia, ‘Opening in fifth place at the box office...It was Katie Holmes' second least successful mainstream film.’ At the time of the film’s release Holmes was already a household name. Having starred as ‘Joey Potter’ from 1998 to 2003 on primetime drama “Dawson’s Creek.” Holmes received world wide attention for the role and Life magazine wrote... "Holmes has had seismic influences on teen life... Through it all, Joey has managed to hang on to her integrity... The show—and Katie's character in particular—has touched a nerve.“ Homles had also just prior to this film, headlined in another film ‘Pieces of April’ in 2003 which was made on a tiny budget of $300,000 but returned a grand $3,272,028! The film’s lack of success wasn’t down to the star as she was practically America’s Sweetheart at the time. Reviewer’s site the plot as the let down. Teen(ish) Star: Katie Holmes Budget: $20,000,000 Gross Revenue: $10,400,000
  • 20. The above film’s I looked at seemed quite successful compared to their own budgets and other films in the same genre as themselves. However, in comparison to the highest grossing films released in the year they were, their grossing seem quite meagre. The film’s below had much bigger budgets but I think this demonstrates the weighting of chick flick’s in the media field. None of the films in the highest grossing list (that can be seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films) can be describes as chick flicks, so this gives a very good idea of how successful I can expect my film to be. It will by no circumstance be the biggest the film of the year. The highest grossing Romantic Comedy, which sort of falls under the umbrella of a chick flick, is ‘My Big Fat Greek Wedding’ (2002) with a lifetime gross of $241,438,208. Which is still very little in comparison to the highest grossing film of that year, which was ‘The Lord of The Rings: The Two Towers with $925,282,504.
  • 21. These are images of the protagonists of all the films I’ve looked at so far. To be a leading lady you have to be attractive. And all of these girls, fit the prototype of beauty today. A basis of relating to a character is if you can recognise elements of yourself in them, and an aspect of that is what the character looks like. These actresses are generic and commercial, and can represent masses of girls from all of the world. This presents me with a decision – does my protagonist have to look like these girls to seem relatable and accessible?
  • 22. Conclusively Looking at all of these different films with similar formulas to mine has given me a very good idea of how to market the film in terms of poster, magazine and the teaser itself. I have a much more realistic view of how successful the film can be, due to the research into the financial details of these movies. I clearly know the audience I am targeting, and looking at the leading ladies of all of these films has given me a better idea of how to style my protagonist. The teens I’m targeting all admire the life style of celebrities and teen stars like the one that will be in my film, but I recognise the importance of making the protagonist seeming authentic and accessible - not just like a rich kid playing the role of the average teen. As Egbert said before about Mary Kate and Ashley seeming more charming and average than girls like ‘Hilary Duff’ and ‘Lindsay Lohan,’ who appear more like superstars than the average girl at school, so they have to make fools of themselves to seem more normal, like falling over and humiliating themselves in front of loads of people, which appears false on screen. As I do plan on having elements of slapstick, like most of these films do, this will have to be something I consider carefully because I don’t want it to translate as false and staged to the audience. Finally, looking into these films has given me great insight when it comes to my own film. I’ve been given many things to think about it terms of choosing a leading lady, and how to style my protagonist to make her relatable and accessible to my target audience.