2. RESIDENTIAL STUDY BACKGROUND
Survey mailed June 2011
4000 homes randomly sampled.
470/12% returned.
400 returned surveys analyzed
Provides margin of error of ± 5 percentage points
2
3. RESIDENTIAL STUDY: WHO RESPONDED
County % of Total respondents County pop as % of
Meramec Region
Population
Crawford 9% 12%
Dent 5% 8%
Gasconade 16% 7%
Maries 6% 5%
Osage 22% 7%
Phelps 16% 22%
Pulaski 14% 26%
Washington 7% 13%
5% indicated other or a county outside of the region. 3
4. RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: WHO RESPONDED ?
Age
Range 20-95, Mean=58
Household Income
$5700K to $200K,
Mean=$54,730K
10% “Rent”
94% White
4
13. BUSINESS STUDY BACKGROUND
Online survey available from:
April 2011 to July 2011
103 local businesses responded
16% were satellite offices
23% had satellite locations
32 questions about broadband or high-speed
Internet services in the Meramec region
13
14. BUSINESS STUDY – RESPONSES BY COUNTY
By County:
Crawford 7%
Dent 7%
Gasconade 7%
Maries 5%
Osage 8%
Phelps 42%
Pulaski 8%
Washington 15%
14
17. DO YOU HAVE INTERNET SERVICE AT YOUR BUSINESS?
Do you have Internet service at your business?
NO =4% Yes = 96%
Lack of availability and cost were the two
reasons cited for not having Internet service.
100% indicated they would subscribe as soon
as broadband was available.
17
18. CURRENT INTERNET PROVIDER
Top 5 Mentioned
Fidelity
CenturyTel
Socket
AT&T
Embarq
Service established 1990’s-2011
18
25. ONLINE BUSINESS SURVEY
44 businesses had other comments about
broadband service availability in the region. Some
included:
A must for rural areas.
Federal government must help improve infrastructure.
Cities should develop networks.
Low interest loans to private sector to incent them to
build rural areas.
More competition is the key.
Unsatisfactory business climate.
Improve residential too, because our customers can’t
always access our product in Missouri.
25
26. INDIVIDUAL SECTOR DATA
Agriculture Local Government
Economic Public Safety
Development Sector Tourism
Energy Sector Workforce
Environment Sector Development
Healthcare Sector
Higher Ed Sector
K-12 Education Sector
Library Sector
26
27. MAPS
Review maps provided by State of Missiouri
27
29. BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING
Will identify strategies, and related directions,
initiatives, goals and objectives, that can be
employed by interested parties within the
region.
It is a large scale, high-level planning exercise
It provides specific guideposts and pathways
to better help the region build long term
broadband sustainability
Addresses both availability (supply) and
adoption (demand) within the region.
29
30. BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
The Strategic Planning process is split into four (4)
phases:
Phase 1 (Today): Needs Assessment and Existing
Information Review – A detailed understanding of the
current broadband climate and the current and future
broadband-related needs in the region.
Phase 2 (Beginning Today): How to move from the
current broadband environment to the one needed
within the region.
Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC)
analysis will be performed.
30
31. SWOC ANALYSIS
The definitions of the four (4) SWOC elements are as
follows:
Strengths – Broadband-related systems, practices,
processes, and resources that are highly valued by the
region.
Weaknesses – Areas that need improvement; reasons why
stakeholders are not able to wholeheartedly embrace
broadband; and, areas that tend to compromise the
achievement of high levels of availability and adoption.
Opportunities – Favorable situations/circumstances not yet
taken advantage of that may positively impact the
development and acceptance of broadband.
Challenges – Present and future situations/circumstances
that may negatively impact broadband development and
acceptance as perceived by the region.
31
32. SWOC ANALYSIS
Phase 2: cont’d
The analysis should cover a wide range of issues
including those centered on:
residential, business and institutional broadband availability
and adoption,
whether available bandwidth(s) are sufficient for current as well
as near and long term needs and applications,
potential upgrade and expansion possibilities,
reliability of existing networks,
related matters.
Providersare asked during Phase 2 to present their
ideas on possibilities for advancing the broadband
environment.
32
34. SWOC ANALYSIS
The definitions of the four (4) SWOC elements are as
follows:
Strengths – Broadband-related systems, practices,
processes, and resources that are highly valued by the
region.
Weaknesses – Areas that need improvement; reasons why
stakeholders are not able to wholeheartedly embrace
broadband; and, areas that tend to compromise the
achievement of high levels of availability and adoption.
Opportunities – Favorable situations/circumstances not yet
taken advantage of that may positively impact the
development and acceptance of broadband.
Challenges – Present and future situations/circumstances
that may negatively impact broadband development and
acceptance as perceived by the region.
34
35. BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PURPOSE
AND PROCESS
Phase 3: Findings Review and Initial Strategic
Plan Element Development – The RTPT will
review the initial findings, priorities, potential
strategic directions and actions, timelines and
resources needed related to those potential
directions.
In this phase, a number of potential strategic
directions and initiatives will be identified,
reviewed, discussed, and then incorporated into the
initial draft of the Strategic Plan.
35
36. BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PURPOSE
AND PROCESS
Phase 4: Drafting and Finalization of the Strategic
Plan by the RTPT.
The Strategic Plan will consist of :
1. Introduction and Regional Overview
2. Purpose Statement
3 Detailed SWOC Findings and Analysis
4. Strategic Direction(s)
Short, medium and long term goals and objectives to boost broadband
adoption and availability.
Action Items and Implementation Plan
5. Financial, human and organizational resource considerations
6. Timelines and benchmarks for measuring progress
36