Adapting Data Quality Assurance Approaches and Tools to Meet Local Needs
1. Adapting Data Quality Assurance
Approaches and Tools
to Meet Local Needs
Stephanie Mullen
MEASURE Evaluation
End-of-Phase-III Event, May 22, 2014
2. Why Do We Care
About Data Quality?
UNAIDS “Organizing
Framework for a Functional
National HIV M&E System”
3. Data Quality Tools
Data Quality Audit Tool Routine Data Quality Assessment Tool
Organization The Global Fund, USAID,
MEASURE Evaluation,
2008
MEASURE Evaluation
Purpose Assess data accuracy,
reporting performance,
and strengths and
weakness of underlying
M&E system that
generates the data
Streamlined version of the DQATool that is used
to verify the quality of reported data for key
indicators at selected sites and assess the ability
of the data management system to collect,
manage, and report high quality data
Uses Used by GF, USAID and
others to conduct
independent data quality
audits of their program
Used as a self-assessment tools by programs to
assess the quality of their data and use the
findings to develop action plans to strengthen
their data management and reporting systems
Languages English, French, Spanish,
Portuguese
English, French, Spanish, Portuguese
7. Adapting Data Quality Assurance
Approaches and Tools to Meet
Local Needs in Botswana
Suzanne Cloutier, Sergio Lins
MEASURE Evaluation
End-of-Phase-III Event, May 22,
2014
8.
9. Data Quality Assurance Approach
Objective
Routine Monitoring
(all health programs)
Sampling
Purposive
Data Collectors
Health Programs
District Health
Management
Teams (DHMT)
Data Users
Health Programs
DHMTs
Service Delivery
Sites
16. Evidence of Success
• M&E Officers conduct RDQAs
• Present results to District Health
ManagementTeams
District
• M&E Officers presented findings
from data quality assessments
• Included action plans
National M&E
Forum
• Formalize RDQAs as a routine
activity for districts
National Health
M&E Plan
18. Adapting Data Quality Assurance
Approaches and Tools to Meet
Local Needs in Tanzania
Karen Foreit, Mari Hickmann, Zaddy Kibao,
Dawne Walker, and Willis Odek
MEASURE Evaluation Phase III EOP, May 22, 2014
19. MEASURE Evaluation in Tanzania
Strengthen M&E
systems and capacity
Improve data quality
Enhance individual and
organizational capacity
Promote data for decision
making
20. DQA for M&E Capacity-building
New sampling
procedures
New instruments
Tailored training
Measure change
21. Stratify sites:
By size (large vs. small) and
By location (close to vs. far
from regional office/HQ)
Select from all strata
New Sampling Procedures
22. New Data Collection Instrument
Community Trace
and Verify
Visit “claimed”
beneficiaries
Ask what services
they received
Compare answers
to activity reports
23. No more “M&E 101”!
Tailored Capacity-building
Prioritize problems
identified by DQA
Group participants with
common problems
Follow group training
with individualized
mentoring
27. Results
Measurable
improvements in M&E
plans, performance and
data quality
Partners budgeting for
M&E and hiring staff,
providing supportive
supervision, building
capacity, conducting
internal DQA
29. Concluding Thoughts
Adapt for local use
Adaptions should be
careful documented
RDQA should be
institutionalized within the
local organization
Use “actionable findings”