LOR development in TLU

•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•

0 gefällt mir•301 views

The document discusses two educational technology projects: LeMill and Waramu. LeMill is an environment for creating and collaborating on learning materials that was developed by an international team from 2005-2008. It allows users to search, view, and store content and metadata. Waramu is an Estonian learning resource repository with over 3,000 records that is compatible with the LER-LOM metadata standard and supports metadata harvesting. Plans are discussed to further integrate Waramu with other learning portals and sites.

Business Technologie

Repository Development P rojects LeMill & Waramu Tallinn University Centre for Educational Tecnology Estonia

LeMill ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Environment for creating learning materials in collaboration

LeMill development plans ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Waramu is ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Waramu development plans ,[object Object],[object Object]

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

OER Projects

deepak singh

Towards educational resource cloud

Mart Laanpere

Understanding Open Educational Resources

CEMCA

Tallinn University School of Digital Technologies

Hans Põldoja

Streamlining online learning experience with integrations and interface desig...

juhamartikainen

Eduworks kick-off presentation: TCD

Eduworks Network

The SSS as an Infrastructure for WP LA

Dominik Kowald

In this paper, we analyze the influence of social status on opinion dynamics and consensus building in collaboration networks. To that end, we simulate the diffusion of opinions in empirical collaboration networks by taking into account both the network structure and the individual differences of people reflected through their social status. For our simulations, we adapt a well-known Naming Game model and extend it with the Probabilistic Meeting Rule to account for the social status of individuals participating in a meeting. This mechanism is sufficiently flexible and allows us to model various situations in collaboration networks, such as the emergence or disappearance of social classes. In this work, we concentrate on studying three well-known forms of class society: egalitarian, ranked and stratified. In particular, we are interested in the way these society forms facilitate opinion diffusion. Our experimental findings reveal that (i) opinion dynamics in collaboration networks is indeed affected by the individuals’ social status and (ii) this effect is intricate and non-obvious. In particular, although the social status favors consensus building, relying on it too strongly can slow down the opinion diffusion, indicating that there is a specific setting for each collaboration network in which social status optimally benefits the consensus building process. Paper: http://www.know-center.tugraz.at/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ASONAM_2015_Paper.pdf Reference: Hasani-Mavriqi I, Geigl F, Pujari SC, Lex E, Helic D (2015) The influence of social status on consensus building in collaboration networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining 2015, ASONAM ’15ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 162–169 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2808887&CFID=851242713&CFTOKEN=32991930

The influence of social status on consensus building in collaboration networks

Ilire Hasani-Mavriqi

Was ist angesagt? (8)

OER Projects

Towards educational resource cloud

Understanding Open Educational Resources

Tallinn University School of Digital Technologies

Streamlining online learning experience with integrations and interface desig...

Eduworks kick-off presentation: TCD

The SSS as an Infrastructure for WP LA

The influence of social status on consensus building in collaboration networks

Ähnlich wie LOR development in TLU

Opal case study 57 estonia

OPAL2010

Building a Learning Resource Exchange (LRE) Service for Schools

jimayre

Why, why, why DELILA? A project to promote the open sharing of our informatio...

Centre for Distance Education

Building a Learning Resource Exchange

David Massart

ELTE ICT project

ELTE University Faculty of Informatics

Paul Seiler: Eportfolios for ULearn 2010 workshop

Nick Rate

Towards educational cloud

Mart Laanpere

412 The request for new learning resources, Leo Hojsholt-Poulsen

SURFfoundation

Creating and sharing OER

Francesc Busquets

DELILA project overview

Jane Secker

Mart Laanpere: EDU cloud IFI seminar

ifi8106tlu

Strijker, A (2001). Teletop And Reuse

Saxion

Scientix 10th SPNE Brussels 26 Feb 2016: Digital School

Brussels, Belgium

Koolielu 2.0: next generation educational portal

Mart Laanpere

School-based users, both students and educators, have always been a primary target audience for museum on-line content. Museums and other cultural organisations have made significant investments in developing and disseminating content on-line to reach and engage these users. Yet despite the obvious logic of this connection, in practice it has proven difficult to build effective permanent bridges between the wealth of museum digital content and the classroom environment. While many individual institutions host outstanding educational content on their individual Web sites, this material may remain inaccessible or under utilised in a classroom environment due to technology and security constraints, or simply through lack of awareness or discoverability. We are yet to develop effective and sustainable supply chains of museum digital content from multiple institutions for use in classroom environments. In Australia and Canada two new national approaches to solving the supply chain problem have been developed by two agencies working with museum organisations to facilitate the flow of content into classroom environments. This paper examines the imperatives driving these initiatives and the lessons learned in creating an integrated national approach to developing digital supply chains for school-based users of museum content.

Darren Peacock, Stuart Tait and Corey Timpson, Reaching School-based users wi...

museums and the web

Sofware freedom day 2010

Paul Seiler

Strijker, A. (2004 04 05). Knowledgemanagement Reuse Of Learningmaterial

Saxion

EdReNe - a brief presentation and status

edrene01

Estonian Teachers' Portal Koolielu.ee

Mart Laanpere

The EdReNe Network

UNI-C

Ähnlich wie LOR development in TLU (20)

Opal case study 57 estonia

Building a Learning Resource Exchange (LRE) Service for Schools

Why, why, why DELILA? A project to promote the open sharing of our informatio...

Building a Learning Resource Exchange

ELTE ICT project

Paul Seiler: Eportfolios for ULearn 2010 workshop

Towards educational cloud

412 The request for new learning resources, Leo Hojsholt-Poulsen

Creating and sharing OER

DELILA project overview

Mart Laanpere: EDU cloud IFI seminar

Strijker, A (2001). Teletop And Reuse

Scientix 10th SPNE Brussels 26 Feb 2016: Digital School

Koolielu 2.0: next generation educational portal

Darren Peacock, Stuart Tait and Corey Timpson, Reaching School-based users wi...

Sofware freedom day 2010

Strijker, A. (2004 04 05). Knowledgemanagement Reuse Of Learningmaterial

EdReNe - a brief presentation and status

Estonian Teachers' Portal Koolielu.ee

The EdReNe Network

Mehr von Martin Sillaots

eAdventureEN

LOR development in TLU

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (8)

Ähnlich wie LOR development in TLU

Ähnlich wie LOR development in TLU (20)

Mehr von Martin Sillaots

Mehr von Martin Sillaots (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

LOR development in TLU