This document discusses effective science communication. It notes that traditional methods assume people are rational actors, but research shows most behavior is unconscious and influenced by others. The document recommends knowing your audience and their interests. It advocates using images to tell stories and conveying just a few key messages or slides. The document also suggests thinking like a journalist by focusing on compelling stories, relevance, and concise explanations of why findings matter. Overall it emphasizes crafting clear, memorable messages and reinforcing them consistently across communications.
4. What is the issue with science?
Cartoon by Ian McGee (1997)
5. Science Society
Background
Finding
Supporting
Detail So What?
Finding
Bottom line
6. How we like to think about ourselves
• People are rational
• We always make
conscious decisions
• We are self-
determining individuals
We are clever
and intellectual
9. The Truth
• There is no rational
wo/man.
• Most behaviour is
unconscious.
• We’re influenced mainly
by those around us.
We are social !
Even scientists.
53. Experts and journalists have A LOT in
common in their search for
knowledge…
and NOTHING in common when
reporting their results.
54. Science & Journalist
Background
Finding
Supporting
Detail So What?
Finding
Bottom line
55. What journalists need from you
• A compelling STORY
• Ability to explain “so what?”
• Ability to be concise, to the point
• Connections to more sources
• Relevant, timely responses to inquiries
56. Stories packaged in a message box
Problems?
Benefits? Issue So What?
Solutions?
57. Myers and Worm, 2003
How did they turn
the analysis of
abundance of
predatory fish into a
compelling story
that spurred people
to action?
58. Problems?
Overfishing removed 90% of
large fish
Benefits? So What?
Maintain Threathens
economic and functioning of
ecological ocean
value in future ecosystems
Solutions?
Fishing effort needs to be
reduced
59. Think like a journalist when
“presenting” your findings