1. Mae Guerra - Net Servers Project
2/10/09
Website Rubric 1- Poor 4 - Excellent
1. Accessible -
The links are
working and the
page is easy to
navigate
http://www.havenworks.com/
• Voted worst web page in
2008 by
http://www.webpagesthatsu
ck.com/worst-web-sites-of-
2008.html
• Not easily accessible
because it is difficult to
navigate and links are not all
working
http://www.expedia.com/
• Obviously this web page is meant to
be easy to use and navigate through
• All links are working and the page is
arranged in an easy to view format
for better access to all readers
• Excellent web site for the vast
majority of web surfers (people of all
ages could use this site)
2. Accurate -
The information
is up-to-date and
accurate
http://www.d-b.net/dti/
• This website is just plain
weird. It promotes human
cloning but has not been
updated since November 4,
1997!
• Information is not up-to-
date or accurate
http://www.toyota.com/
• As with any commercial web site
designed to be up-to-date with
customers needs, this website
provides the most accurate
information involving Toyota cars
3. Concise - The
information is
complete and
concise
http://webpagesthatsuck.smugmug.c
om/gallery/6872802_vfkua -
440962016_WRpSV-A-LB
• The 5th Worst Web Site of
2008 according to Web
pages that suck --
Honorary. This site was a
promotion for a game where
having a meaningful web
site wasn't important.
• There is apparently no
information to go along with
this page and it leaves the
reader empty handed as far
as what the purpose of this
site is about
http://www.australiaun.org/
• Straightforward- perfectly simple
and well put together
• Information is concise and complete
• While navigating through the page
you notice that the information is not
to long or short – it is just the right
length to get the information across
to its readers
• This website was found on
http://www.un.org/events/workshop/
dpi-unitar/2003/dreamweaver/bad-
design.htm - a website that reviews
good and bad web site design
4. Memorable -
The information
is interesting
and memorable
(not redundant
or boring)
http://egov.ocgov.com/portal/site/oc
gov/
• To much information and
not enough organization
causes this website to be
boring and not memorable
to the reader
http://www.apple.com/
• This website presents complicated
information in a simple and
understandable way
• Information is not redundant or
boring