1. Students: Please read at least two others’ papers. Complete this form for each paper
and turn the paper copies in at our last class.
Author of the Paper _______Megan Gerdts_______________________________
Title of Paper ________She doesn’t say_____________________________________
Reviewer ______Lauren Nourse___________________________________________
Date _______July 15. 2010___________________________
Please check and give feedback on:
o Formatting: needs page numbers
o Citations: seem correct
o Active vs. passive voice: see my notes for suggested changes
o Areas for more elaboration
o Organizational flow of ideas/themes: flowed well
o Clarity:
o Spelling: no changes
o Grammar: no changes
o Continuity of voice – not just a recitation of the researchers linked together
Well constructed description of project
At times repetitive but may be the nature of the review
o Intro to the problem and the study
Is there a research part to this or will the project be the creation of the
user manual?
o Importance of the issue/themes contributing to analysis of the issue
Very well documented on need for the training.
o Summary tells us key research findings/gaps/justification for the research
project
Clearly defined the gaps necessitating a project: just not sure esactly
the extent of the project
o Were you convinced? ______X_YES ___________NO
Additional Comments:
Clearly and effectively reviewed the gap in training on technology and clearly
restated the TPACK philosophy and how it will be used in her study.