Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Â
Lawpresent
1. Public Schools, Race and the
Law
The Legal Legacy of Segregation and American Education
2. Racial Segregation was a response
by Southern Whites to
Emancipation and the end
of Reconstruction
3. Reconstruction had established rural public education & integrated city
school systems for African-Americans for the first time in American
history
4. âJim Crowâ Segregation was established by a twofold strategy:
1) Mob violence against African-Americans
2) Southern Democratic state governments passing laws that defied
the 14th and 15th amendments
5. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
âąPlessy violated Louisianaâs Act 111, mandating
separate railway cars for Blacks and Whites.
âą7-1 Decision. Opinion authored by Justice
Henry Billings Brown.
âąRejected the view that segregation violated
the 14th Amendment so long as the facilities
Homer Plessy were âSeparate but Equalâ
JUSTICE JOHN HARLANâS DISSENT:
âOur Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates
classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal
before the law.â
8. Brown v. The Board of Education (1954)
âąOverturned Plessy v. Ferguson
âąUnanimous decision â opinion authored by Chief Justice Earl Warren
âąCombined five NAACP sponsored cases against de jure school segregation
âWe conclude that, in the field of public
education, the doctrine of âseparate but equal'
has no place. Separate educational facilities are
inherently unequal.â
9. Brown II. (1955)
âAll Deliberate SpeedâŠ.â
School desegregationâŠ.more âdeliberateâ than âspeedyâ in
practice
12. Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward
County (1964)
County school board attempted to avoid court-ordered
desegregation by closing all of the public schools and issuing
vouchers to students for private schools. All private schools were
for Whites only.
Unanimous decision. Opinion authored by Justice Hugo Black
âThe time for mere "deliberate speed" has run
out, and that phrase can no longer justify
denying these Prince Edward County school
children their constitutional rights to an
education equal to that afforded by the public
schools in the other parts of Virginiaâ.
13. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)
Unanimous decision â authored by Chief Justice
Burger
Charlotte, North Carolina had used voluntary methods
and limited busing to âneighborhood schoolsâ to
integrate to a small degree
Built upon the Green v. County School Board (1968)
decision that said âChoice Plansâ were insufficient
tool for promoting school integration
Granted the Federal courts the power to order forced
busing of students to achieve racial integration
School desegregation plans now had to consider and
remediate de facto racial segregation resulting from
housing patterns.
âForced Busingâ became one of the most explosive
education issues of the 1970âs
15. PONTIAC, MICHIGAN 10 School district buses were
dynamited in a racially polarized city by underground
members of the Ku Klux Klan
16. Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
Sharply limited the power of Federal courts to order busing
across school district lines simply to achieve a particular
racial balance (i.e. City âSuburbs)
Case involved 53 school districts in Detroit and its mostly white suburbs and the
issue of âwhite flightâ
5-4 Split decision - bitterly divided â opinion authored bty Chief Justice Burger
âąCourts needed to find de jure collusion between districts to segregate to order
cross-district busing
âąBusing students to hit particular numerical racial targets in schools or
classrooms is not a valid reason in itself for busing
âąJudges are not qualified to assume duties of regional school superintendents
or of the legislature in forcing consolidation of school systems
âąThe scope of the remedy must be determined by the nature of the Constitutional
violation
17. Parents Involved in Community Schools Inc. v.
Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson
County (Ky.) Board of Education (2007)
School districts are prohibited from assigning
students or denying them admission to schools
based on race simply for the goal of integration
Split decision â bitterly divided â opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts
on a complicated mix of cases
âąMandatory plans need to relate to the harm caused by prior de jure segregation
âąAchieving racial balance is not a compelling state interest and âpatently
unconstitutionalâ as a mandatory goal.
âąâDiversityâ as a goal requires race be one part of a broader array of
considerations.
âąSolutions should be narrowly tailored and districts must show they considered
ârace neutralâ tools and not just race based ones.
18.
19. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=163&invol=537
2. Wikipedia. âPlessy v. Fergusonâ. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
3. Taylor, Branch. Pillar of Fire. 1998. Simon & Schuster. New York, NY. 60-64, 181.
4. Foner, Eric. Nothing but Freedom: Emancipation and its Legacy. 1984. Louisiana State University Press.
5. http://brownvboard.org/
6. Friedman, Lawrence M. American Law: An Introduction. 1998. W.W. Norton & Co. 221-224, 296, 298-300, 304.
7. http://www.lib.umich.edu/exhibits/brownarchive/
8. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1853532
9. Wikipedia. âBrown v. The Boardâ. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education
10. http://afroamhistory.about.com/cs/littlerockhigh/a/littlerocknine.htm
11. GRIFFIN v. SCHOOL BOARD, 377 U.S. 218 (1964 ).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=377&page=218
12. Wikipedia. âSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educationâ.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swann_v._Charlotte-Mecklenburg_Board_of_Education
13. Wikipedia. âMiliken v. Bradleyâ. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliken_v._Bradley
14. My Wonderful World Blog. âBrown v. the Board of Education: A Geographic Reviewâ.
http://blog.mywonderfulworld.org/2009/02/february-is-black-history-month.html
15. The Detroit News.com. 1997. âIrene McCabe and her Battle Against Busingâ.
http://apps.detnews.com/apps/history/index.php?id=161
16. MILLIKEN v. BRADLEY, 418 U.S. 717 (1974). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=418&invol=717
17. Wikipedia. âParents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1â.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Involved_in_Community_Schools_v._Seattle_School_District_No._1