These slides were presented at the workshop "The political economy of peer production", 14 – 16 November 2007, Nottingham Trent University

1. Women’s collective action in the
free software world
Yuwei Lin
●
ESRC National Centre for e­Social Science
●
University of Manchester
●
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

2. Voluntary work = Unpaid labour?
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

3. Motivations of Participating
Just for fun
●
Gratification
●
Reputation
●
Mutuality
●
For work (protestant work ethics)
●
Self help: To fix a problem at hand
●
God told me so
●
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

4.
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

5. What is visible?
men
coding
hacking
taking control
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

6. Invisible Values of Free Software
Freedom
●
Openness
●
Networking
●
Collaboration
●
6
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

7. Invisible Values of Free Software
Freedom Diversity
● ●
Openness Democracy
● ●
Networking Equity
● ●
Collaboration Mutuality
● ●
7
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

8. Problems
overemphasis on coding and hacking
●
visibility of women in free software
●
current societal inequality and knowledge gap
●
8
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

9. Barriers of Including Women
Cyberbulling & trolling, sexist & discriminative languages
●
Unfriendly and inhumane online environment (e.g. RTFM)
●
gendered role in FLOSS development ­ inequality of different
●
types of knowledge & women's reduced role
Housework (child­rearing) – lack of time
●
Lack of role models, mentors and support
●
Education
●
A male­dominated competitive worldview (reputation, flaming)
●
Any other reasons that differ from culture to culture, nation to
●
nation, region to region?
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

10. Women's Voices and Networks
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

11. Contexualisation
Embodiment
Beyond numbers and the binary gender codes
and biological differences
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

12. Methods & Data Sources
virtual ethnography (reflexive & participatory) +
●
content analysis (webpages, mailing list) & informal
conversations
Text Mining + Corpus Analysis of messages on the
●
mailing lists
Debian­Women (mixed sex) & GenderChanger (single
●
sex)
who (memberships), said what (topics), done what
●
(actions)
12
limits: neither real life nor real time
●
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

13. IMC­Women
13
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

14. GenderChanger Academy
14
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

15. Belonging to a group
15
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

16. Helping
16
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

17. Participating
17
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

18. Bodies and Technologies
ICTs used: mailing lists, irc, cvs, wiki, webpages
●
common participants: names
●
issues: events, problems, sharing information
●
(forwarding messages)
(technological­oriented) experiences embedded
●
in the conversation about fixing problems or bugs
emotions
●
18
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

19. Debian­Women
training and providing support
●
for women interested in
Debian and FLOSS sector
organising online tutorials,
●
bug­squashing parties,
mentoring
6 female Debian Developers
●
http://women.debian.org/
●
19
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

20.
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

21. <http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~hmw26/join­the­dots/2005/03/30/friendlier­debian/>
I’m one of these males on #debian­woman and mailling list. I found your “debian­friendly”
project idea extremely interesting. I’d like a more collaborative and less competitive Debian
world and I think that’s exactly why DW has been so successful.
—Carlos (comment)
March 31, 2005 @ 8:51 am
I’m not a developer and have never been on debian­women or any other developer
site/group/list but I use debian­user a lot and do think there’s something gettting very
struck about the culture: a focus on programming and fixing compatibility problems but in a
rather macho way. The result is that we don’t have a good hardware compatibility list for
Debian, we don’t have good documentation, we don’t have good ways the expertise on,
say, the user list, creates FAQs etc. I’m not sure what the answer is but I think it is linked
with a stereotypically Western male gendered component to the problem. If there’s a way I
can help I’ll try but time is very limited sadly.
Chris (male, end user of Debian for years now)
—Chris (comment)
April 10, 2005 @ 3:30 pm P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

22. <http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~hmw26/join­the­dots/2005/03/30/friendlier­debian/>
(continued)
The DW project got my attention because it promoted a “positive, welcoming and friendly
atmosphere” still I did not try to participate because I’m, well… male.
I would very much like to see a “positive, welcoming and friendly atmosphere” Debian project
for all people.
I will be using Ubuntu for the time being as it has this “much love” way about it. :)
(And it “just works” most of the time)
—Tim (comment)
April 06, 2005 @ 4:07 pm
thanks for your article!! Sometimes I get worry about the idea of the “invasion” by men in
women­groups… but is interesting to see this places like “friendly places” where everybody
can have access to (without gender specific).
—gaba (comment)
April 09, 2005 @ 2:19 am P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

23. Where the joy lies?
SELF­REFLECTION
●
(Emotion + Body + Technology)
●
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

24. But we have achieved *a lot*. I don't feel anymore it is a
taboo to talk about females within Debian (be it Developers,
Translators, Users or whatever form of involvement), and
are no longer stuck with XXL night-gown sized tshirts in
Debconf (LOL). To me it has made a great difference and my
involvement in the project feels more quot;normalizedquot; to me.
Also, in RL meetings, the default assumption that the
attending females were $girlfriends of some male quot;actuallyquot;
interested in the meeting has decreassed significantly.
I don't know whether it is related, but since Debian Women
exists the feeling of a quot;socialquot; community on top of the
quot;technicalquot; community has been much reinforced. This
might be my subjective perception of quot;belongingquot; to this
community, improved by the existance of other females in
it, and other members of the project being welcoming and
inclusive about us.
(DWZL220106) P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

25. % M W U
2005­06 61,88 36,78 1,34 Statistics about the IRC channel
2005­07 56,01 40,72 3,27
2005­08 60,02 37,49 2,49
2005­09 52,66 42,66 4,68
2005­10 50,3 42,37 7,33
2005­11 58,05 36,57 5,38
2005­12 65,14 30,58 4,28
2006­01 59,69 37,89 2,42
2006­02 70,8 26,96 2,24
2006­03 70,72 28,4 0,88
2006­04 73,54 25,58 0,88
As one can see, even if I can't quot;identifyquot; one third of the people, I have identified the most
contributing people.
I see an interesting tendency for men participation to increase while women participation
decreases. I already have this feeling for quite a long time but it seems that numbers are
proving me correct. Is it good or bad: I leave this up to you, people...:)
(CPDW250406)
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

26. I'm not sure if it's inherent aggression in male communication style as much as it's
simply how communication on a quot;real­timequot; text­based medium goes. A situation
where are several people in one quot;areaquot; holding several different conversations is
much different than say Jabber or AIM where you are speaking directly to one
person, and you wait for their response before you type again. Sometimes
comments get lost in the shuffle because people are trying to follow multiple
conversations, other times that conversation thread simply dies out. I don't attribute
this to inherent aggression of males, but rather the way conversations flow on IRC.
I tried to introduce family members to IRC­like gathering areas, thinking it would be
worthwhile to actually be able to hold conversations with more than one person at a
time. It very much didn't work. They felt the same way ­ that people were quot;talking
overquot; them, ignoring them ­ that they couldn't keep up with everything going on
because one group of people was talking about one thing, another about a
completely different topic and yet another group of people poking fun at each other.
They gave up because they just couldn't catch up and keep up with the conversation
flows.
Practice + Experience + Body + Technology
(PLDW260406) P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

27. GenderChangers Academy
since Nov. 1999
●
ladies only (on the etc­int list)
●
/etc ­ eclectic tech carnival
●
DIY or DIO (hands­on training)
●
exchanging computer related skills
●
grass root and local
●
The /etc is named for the /etc directory in which
●
Linux stores system configuration files. 27
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

28. The Eclectic Tech Carnival
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

29. Subject: [etc­int] edit drupal
hi
I am trying to edit a post on the page http://eclectictechcarnival.org/drupal/ but cant seem
to find where I can log in to edit it..? does someone knows how can I do that?
many thankx
t
the site in http://drupal.eclectictechcarnival.org is working as that one was working before...
in the same version. We are gonna do something with drupal soon...
g
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

30. thank you so much gaba! I was completely lost.. hehe..
xt
hey gaba,
if you need any help while working with drupal let me know.
dri
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

31. How Girls Make Knowledge
coding knowledge is still considered as more
●
advanced (reproduction of hegemonic hacker
culture)
layered & networked & embodied epistemic culture
●
sense & sensibility
●
hybrid: femininity (complex, layered, strategic,
●
adaptive) + masculinity (disconnected,
emotionally avoidant, simplistic, one­dimensional)
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

32. Achievements
visibility & awareness raising
●
identity building (exploring & experimenting)
●
knowledge sharing, mutual learning and
●
support (“a low­RTFM environment)
creating a more intimate collaborative space
●
beyond the simplistic and superficial categories
●
of different talks, it's women's play embodied in
these online narratives; a women's version of
'just for fun' P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham
32

33. Women's Play on GNU/Linux
strengthens the importance of sharing everyday
●
experiences and problem­solving tips, of
socialising and social capitals in FLOSS dev.
creating a more harmonised & reflexive space
●
In Janice Raymond's words: 'The empowering
●
of female friendship can create the conditions
for a new feminist politics in which the personal
is most passionately political'.
resistance & change
● 33
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham

34. Whose Wonder Woman?
Whose Female Hacker?
Global or Local?
34
P2P Workshop, 15 November 2007, Nottingham