SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
the official publication for the Solo and Small
                 Published in: Big News –    Firm Section from the California State Bar        September/October 2006




                                                                                                    Style Stars
                                                                                                 Roger L. Gordon



            Take The                                                                            Vincent V. Bennett




            Trash Out
            Roger L. Gordon and Vincent Vallin
            Bennett Win $1.7 Million For Injured
            Sanitation Worker




Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010
                 Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com
S T Y L E • S T A R S

                                                  ROGER L. GORDON
                                                  Currently in his 33rd year of practice, Roger L. Gordon’s verdicts in toxic tort, products
                                                  liability, construction accidents, premises liability, and medical malpractice have gar-
                                                  nered him the respect of his peers in the legal community. He has been named a Los
                                                  Angeles “Super Lawyer” for three consecutive years and is a member of the
                                                  American Board of Trial Advocates.

                                                  His success in toxic tort cases has exposed critical links between environmental
                                                  exposure and negative effects on human health. In Franco v. O’Hommel, Gordon
                                                  recovered nearly $4 million for a plaintiff exposed to lead in utero.

                                                  Gordon’s product liability cases include toxic chemical exposure and improperly
  Gordon at a Glance                              designed products. In Miller v. Amro Fabricating, the plaintiff fell six feet from
  Education: J.D., Loyola University              scaffolding onto a concrete floor. Demonstrating that the fall resulted from
  School of Law, 1972                             a scaffolding design that did not provide sufficient warning about properly latching
                                                  a guardrail, the jury returned a verdict of $3.7 million.
  Admissions: California United States
  District Court, Central District of             In medical malpractice cases, he focuses on his clients’ future medical needs along
  California Ninth Circuit Court of               with liability associated with the original event. In Romero v. Queen of the Valley, the
  Appeals, United States Supreme Court            jury returned a verdict of $24 million in future damages ($7.1 million present value)
  Affiliations: Los Angeles County Bar            to a plaintiff rendered quadriplegic and developmentally delayed due to
  Association, American Bar Association,          an obstetrician’s negligence.
  Consumer Attorneys Association of Los
  Angeles and Consumer Attorneys of
  California Association of Trial Lawyers
  of America
  Special Skills: Arbitrator, medical
  malpractice cases




V I N C E N T VA L L I N B E N N E T T
Practice Focus: Medical malpractice, products liability, toxic torts, major
personal injury, civil rights, wrongful death, class actions

Affiliations: Los Angeles County, San Fernando Valley and Mexican American
Bar Associations, American Trial Lawyers Association, Consumer Attorneys of
                                                                                             Bennett at a Glance
California and Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles                                 Education: J.D., University of California
                                                                                             at Los Angeles, 1988
Special Skills: Can communicate with clients in Spanish
                                                                                             Admissions: California United States
                                                                                             District Court, Central District of
                                                                                             California.



              Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010
 2                             Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com
F E A T U R E D

Full Frontal Assault
Roger L. Gordon and Vincent Vallin Bennett Win $1.7 Million
For Sanitation Worker Injured by Front-Loading Trash Truck
By Lisa Miller


It wasn’t just “trash talking” when plaintiff’s counsel               The defenses’ motions for new trial and also judg-
Roger L. Gordon and co-counsel Vincent Vallin                         ment notwith-standing the verdict on behalf of
Bennett decided to ask a Malibu jury for millions in                  Amrep were denied.
damages for their client Ramiro Serrano. They
believed that Serrano, disabled for life, was injured                 According to Gordon, a personal injury attorney
because of a design flaw in the front-loading                         for 35 years whose firm focuses its practice on per-
waste-disposal truck to which he was assigned.                        sonal injury, the bin slid off a forklift and broke
                                                                      Serrano’s neck, leaving him permanently disabled.
The award compensated Serrano for injuries he sus-                    Serrano continues to struggle with the demands of
tained when a trash bin fell on him as it was empty-                  daily living, such as putting on his socks.
ing into a trash truck. The defendant, Amrep, Inc.,
offered $150,000 before trial, and the plaintiff                      “The manufacturer of the truck, Amrep Inc., was
demanded $750,000 via CCP 998.                                        well aware that such an accident could easily
                                                                      occur,” Gordon says. “But [they] did nothing to
“This may be the first case to expose a very danger-                  prevent it.”
ous, but easily remedied, design flaw in waste-dis-
posal trucks,” Gordon, named partner with Los                                                                        continued page 4
Angeles’ Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton
& Goldstein, says.

Defense attorneys Michael Ayres and Timothy X.
Lane of Orange’s Brady, Vorwerck and Ryder
argued that the design is not flawed, but is fun-
damentally safe, it is accepted as the standard
in the industry, and design alternatives are not
practical. The defense asserted that the acci-
dent was the fault of the plaintiff, for not being
attentive and being in a position where he
could be hit by the load. The defense further
contended that a co-employee was responsi-
ble because he did not properly operate the fork
controls.


            Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010
                             Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com                                    3
• M A T T E R

According to Bennett, an associate at Gordon,                         Gordon says that this risk extends to workers who use
Edelstein and co-counsel, the entire tragedy could                    the trucks, pedestrians, and drivers who might be in
have been avoided. And the jury saw this in the                       the vicinity.
course of the plaintiff’s case-in-chief. The entire
trial lasted 12 days, with deliberation completed                     “One of Mr. Serrano’s co-workers testified that
in just one. “We presented testimony that Mr.                         everyone who operates such a truck drops bins by
Serrano’s crippling injuries could have been avoid-                   mistake from time to time,” Gordon says. “The
ed entirely by a few simple design considerations,”                   defendant’s own experts acknowledged in trial that
Bennett says.                                                         operator errors are inevitable, yet the defendant
                                                                      incorporated no safety devices to protect against
Gordon, with numerous multi-million dollar trial ver-                 the eventuality.”
dicts, is a member of the prestigious American
Board of Trial Advocates, and a Loyola Law School                     Gordon and Bennett demonstrated for the jury,
graduate.                                                             empanelled by Judge Cesar C. Sarmiento, that any
                                                                      of several simple, inexpensive safety devices could
“This devastating injury could have been prevented                    eliminate the risk that trash bins may slide off the
with some forethought by the manufacturer,”                           forks of the forklifts. Patents are on file for several
Gordon says. “We hope this decision gives com-                        types of safety devices that could have prevented
panies pause before releasing potentially haz-                        the accident, they asserted.
ardous products.”
                                                                      The trial involved a number of experts. The plaintiff’s
The trash bin, which weighed 500 pounds, was                          called Fred Smith, mechanical engineer; Harvey
being hoisted so that its contents could be deposit-                  Cohen, human factors; Martin Siegel, mechanical
ed in the hopper on the truck. It fell from the front                 engineer; Dr. Phil Sobel, orthopedic surgeon; Dr.
loader and struck Serrano, a 45-year-old father of                    Donna Barras, life care planner; Dr. Alfred Bloch,
four. Serrano was knocked unconscious. The impact                     psychiatrist; and Tamara Hunt, economist. The
broke his neck.                                                       defense called Mack Quan, mechanical engineer;
                                                                      and Anthony Stein, human factors.
“We presented evidence on Mr. Serrano’s behalf
showing the jury that the truck design of the front-                  The gross jury verdict totaled nearly $4 million for
loading lift did not incorporate any hooks, latches,                  medical expenses, loss of earnings and pain and suf-
self-leveling devices or even a non-slip surface on                   fering. The jury concluded that Serrano was partly
the forks of the forklift,” Gordon says. “Any of these                responsible for the accident for standing too close
would likely have prevented the accident.”                            to the truck as the trash bin was lifted. The manufac-
                                                                      turer was held liable for 30 percent of the damage,
Amrep’s waste disposal trucks rely on gravity to                      resulting in a net verdict of $1.75 million for the
keep the bins in place, according to Bennett, which                   plaintiff. The CCP 998 was worth an additional
poses an easily foreseeable risk of serious harm.                     $195,000 in costs to the plaintiff.




            Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010
4                            Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Legal Liability Insurance
Legal Liability InsuranceLegal Liability Insurance
Legal Liability Insurance
legal6
 
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance AtDoes Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
legal6
 
Legal Advice
Legal AdviceLegal Advice
Legal Advice
legal6
 
Insurance For A Business
Insurance For A BusinessInsurance For A Business
Insurance For A Business
legal6
 
Legal Wills
Legal WillsLegal Wills
Legal Wills
legal6
 
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And AccountingThe Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
legal6
 
Lemon Law Attorney New York
Lemon Law Attorney New YorkLemon Law Attorney New York
Lemon Law Attorney New York
legal6
 
E O Finalpaper
E O FinalpaperE O Finalpaper
E O Finalpaper
legal6
 
A Legal Will
A Legal WillA Legal Will
A Legal Will
legal6
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Legal Liability Insurance
Legal Liability InsuranceLegal Liability Insurance
Legal Liability Insurance
 
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance AtDoes Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
Does Blair Answer The Question An Analysis Of His Performance At
 
Legal Advice
Legal AdviceLegal Advice
Legal Advice
 
Insurance For A Business
Insurance For A BusinessInsurance For A Business
Insurance For A Business
 
Legal Wills
Legal WillsLegal Wills
Legal Wills
 
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And AccountingThe Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
The Asset Transaction Legal Land Lease Insurance Production And Accounting
 
Lemon Law Attorney New York
Lemon Law Attorney New YorkLemon Law Attorney New York
Lemon Law Attorney New York
 
E O Finalpaper
E O FinalpaperE O Finalpaper
E O Finalpaper
 
Portfolio 1
Portfolio 1Portfolio 1
Portfolio 1
 
A Legal Will
A Legal WillA Legal Will
A Legal Will
 

More from legal6

Insurance Broker Boston
Insurance Broker BostonInsurance Broker Boston
Insurance Broker Boston
legal6
 
Insurance Industry Guide
Insurance Industry GuideInsurance Industry Guide
Insurance Industry Guide
legal6
 
Health Plus Brochure
Health Plus BrochureHealth Plus Brochure
Health Plus Brochure
legal6
 
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is MediationQuestions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
legal6
 
Legal Document
Legal DocumentLegal Document
Legal Document
legal6
 
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The QuestionIf Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
legal6
 
The Legal Forms Of Business
The Legal Forms Of BusinessThe Legal Forms Of Business
The Legal Forms Of Business
legal6
 
Summary Of nsurance
Summary Of nsuranceSummary Of nsurance
Summary Of nsurance
legal6
 
Stay Legal Avoiding Insurance Fraud
Stay Legal  Avoiding Insurance FraudStay Legal  Avoiding Insurance Fraud
Stay Legal Avoiding Insurance Fraud
legal6
 
Uslf Press Kit
Uslf Press KitUslf Press Kit
Uslf Press Kit
legal6
 
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+County
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+CountyPersonal Injury Attorney Orange+County
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+County
legal6
 
Powerpamphlet
PowerpamphletPowerpamphlet
Powerpamphlet
legal6
 
Medical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
Medical Negligence Attorney PennsylvaniaMedical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
Medical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
legal6
 
Legal Software Will
Legal Software WillLegal Software Will
Legal Software Will
legal6
 
Legal Issues For Not For Profits
Legal Issues For Not For ProfitsLegal Issues For Not For Profits
Legal Issues For Not For Profits
legal6
 
Legal Divorce
Legal DivorceLegal Divorce
Legal Divorce
legal6
 
Legal Contracts
Legal ContractsLegal Contracts
Legal Contracts
legal6
 

More from legal6 (17)

Insurance Broker Boston
Insurance Broker BostonInsurance Broker Boston
Insurance Broker Boston
 
Insurance Industry Guide
Insurance Industry GuideInsurance Industry Guide
Insurance Industry Guide
 
Health Plus Brochure
Health Plus BrochureHealth Plus Brochure
Health Plus Brochure
 
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is MediationQuestions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
Questions And Answers On Mediation Question 1 What Is Mediation
 
Legal Document
Legal DocumentLegal Document
Legal Document
 
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The QuestionIf Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
If Dle+Is The Answer What Is The Question
 
The Legal Forms Of Business
The Legal Forms Of BusinessThe Legal Forms Of Business
The Legal Forms Of Business
 
Summary Of nsurance
Summary Of nsuranceSummary Of nsurance
Summary Of nsurance
 
Stay Legal Avoiding Insurance Fraud
Stay Legal  Avoiding Insurance FraudStay Legal  Avoiding Insurance Fraud
Stay Legal Avoiding Insurance Fraud
 
Uslf Press Kit
Uslf Press KitUslf Press Kit
Uslf Press Kit
 
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+County
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+CountyPersonal Injury Attorney Orange+County
Personal Injury Attorney Orange+County
 
Powerpamphlet
PowerpamphletPowerpamphlet
Powerpamphlet
 
Medical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
Medical Negligence Attorney PennsylvaniaMedical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
Medical Negligence Attorney Pennsylvania
 
Legal Software Will
Legal Software WillLegal Software Will
Legal Software Will
 
Legal Issues For Not For Profits
Legal Issues For Not For ProfitsLegal Issues For Not For Profits
Legal Issues For Not For Profits
 
Legal Divorce
Legal DivorceLegal Divorce
Legal Divorce
 
Legal Contracts
Legal ContractsLegal Contracts
Legal Contracts
 

Angeles Attorney Los Medical Negligence

  • 1. the official publication for the Solo and Small Published in: Big News – Firm Section from the California State Bar September/October 2006 Style Stars Roger L. Gordon Take The Vincent V. Bennett Trash Out Roger L. Gordon and Vincent Vallin Bennett Win $1.7 Million For Injured Sanitation Worker Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010 Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com
  • 2. S T Y L E • S T A R S ROGER L. GORDON Currently in his 33rd year of practice, Roger L. Gordon’s verdicts in toxic tort, products liability, construction accidents, premises liability, and medical malpractice have gar- nered him the respect of his peers in the legal community. He has been named a Los Angeles “Super Lawyer” for three consecutive years and is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates. His success in toxic tort cases has exposed critical links between environmental exposure and negative effects on human health. In Franco v. O’Hommel, Gordon recovered nearly $4 million for a plaintiff exposed to lead in utero. Gordon’s product liability cases include toxic chemical exposure and improperly Gordon at a Glance designed products. In Miller v. Amro Fabricating, the plaintiff fell six feet from Education: J.D., Loyola University scaffolding onto a concrete floor. Demonstrating that the fall resulted from School of Law, 1972 a scaffolding design that did not provide sufficient warning about properly latching a guardrail, the jury returned a verdict of $3.7 million. Admissions: California United States District Court, Central District of In medical malpractice cases, he focuses on his clients’ future medical needs along California Ninth Circuit Court of with liability associated with the original event. In Romero v. Queen of the Valley, the Appeals, United States Supreme Court jury returned a verdict of $24 million in future damages ($7.1 million present value) Affiliations: Los Angeles County Bar to a plaintiff rendered quadriplegic and developmentally delayed due to Association, American Bar Association, an obstetrician’s negligence. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles and Consumer Attorneys of California Association of Trial Lawyers of America Special Skills: Arbitrator, medical malpractice cases V I N C E N T VA L L I N B E N N E T T Practice Focus: Medical malpractice, products liability, toxic torts, major personal injury, civil rights, wrongful death, class actions Affiliations: Los Angeles County, San Fernando Valley and Mexican American Bar Associations, American Trial Lawyers Association, Consumer Attorneys of Bennett at a Glance California and Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles Education: J.D., University of California at Los Angeles, 1988 Special Skills: Can communicate with clients in Spanish Admissions: California United States District Court, Central District of California. Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010 2 Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com
  • 3. F E A T U R E D Full Frontal Assault Roger L. Gordon and Vincent Vallin Bennett Win $1.7 Million For Sanitation Worker Injured by Front-Loading Trash Truck By Lisa Miller It wasn’t just “trash talking” when plaintiff’s counsel The defenses’ motions for new trial and also judg- Roger L. Gordon and co-counsel Vincent Vallin ment notwith-standing the verdict on behalf of Bennett decided to ask a Malibu jury for millions in Amrep were denied. damages for their client Ramiro Serrano. They believed that Serrano, disabled for life, was injured According to Gordon, a personal injury attorney because of a design flaw in the front-loading for 35 years whose firm focuses its practice on per- waste-disposal truck to which he was assigned. sonal injury, the bin slid off a forklift and broke Serrano’s neck, leaving him permanently disabled. The award compensated Serrano for injuries he sus- Serrano continues to struggle with the demands of tained when a trash bin fell on him as it was empty- daily living, such as putting on his socks. ing into a trash truck. The defendant, Amrep, Inc., offered $150,000 before trial, and the plaintiff “The manufacturer of the truck, Amrep Inc., was demanded $750,000 via CCP 998. well aware that such an accident could easily occur,” Gordon says. “But [they] did nothing to “This may be the first case to expose a very danger- prevent it.” ous, but easily remedied, design flaw in waste-dis- posal trucks,” Gordon, named partner with Los continued page 4 Angeles’ Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein, says. Defense attorneys Michael Ayres and Timothy X. Lane of Orange’s Brady, Vorwerck and Ryder argued that the design is not flawed, but is fun- damentally safe, it is accepted as the standard in the industry, and design alternatives are not practical. The defense asserted that the acci- dent was the fault of the plaintiff, for not being attentive and being in a position where he could be hit by the load. The defense further contended that a co-employee was responsi- ble because he did not properly operate the fork controls. Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010 Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com 3
  • 4. • M A T T E R According to Bennett, an associate at Gordon, Gordon says that this risk extends to workers who use Edelstein and co-counsel, the entire tragedy could the trucks, pedestrians, and drivers who might be in have been avoided. And the jury saw this in the the vicinity. course of the plaintiff’s case-in-chief. The entire trial lasted 12 days, with deliberation completed “One of Mr. Serrano’s co-workers testified that in just one. “We presented testimony that Mr. everyone who operates such a truck drops bins by Serrano’s crippling injuries could have been avoid- mistake from time to time,” Gordon says. “The ed entirely by a few simple design considerations,” defendant’s own experts acknowledged in trial that Bennett says. operator errors are inevitable, yet the defendant incorporated no safety devices to protect against Gordon, with numerous multi-million dollar trial ver- the eventuality.” dicts, is a member of the prestigious American Board of Trial Advocates, and a Loyola Law School Gordon and Bennett demonstrated for the jury, graduate. empanelled by Judge Cesar C. Sarmiento, that any of several simple, inexpensive safety devices could “This devastating injury could have been prevented eliminate the risk that trash bins may slide off the with some forethought by the manufacturer,” forks of the forklifts. Patents are on file for several Gordon says. “We hope this decision gives com- types of safety devices that could have prevented panies pause before releasing potentially haz- the accident, they asserted. ardous products.” The trial involved a number of experts. The plaintiff’s The trash bin, which weighed 500 pounds, was called Fred Smith, mechanical engineer; Harvey being hoisted so that its contents could be deposit- Cohen, human factors; Martin Siegel, mechanical ed in the hopper on the truck. It fell from the front engineer; Dr. Phil Sobel, orthopedic surgeon; Dr. loader and struck Serrano, a 45-year-old father of Donna Barras, life care planner; Dr. Alfred Bloch, four. Serrano was knocked unconscious. The impact psychiatrist; and Tamara Hunt, economist. The broke his neck. defense called Mack Quan, mechanical engineer; and Anthony Stein, human factors. “We presented evidence on Mr. Serrano’s behalf showing the jury that the truck design of the front- The gross jury verdict totaled nearly $4 million for loading lift did not incorporate any hooks, latches, medical expenses, loss of earnings and pain and suf- self-leveling devices or even a non-slip surface on fering. The jury concluded that Serrano was partly the forks of the forklift,” Gordon says. “Any of these responsible for the accident for standing too close would likely have prevented the accident.” to the truck as the trash bin was lifted. The manufac- turer was held liable for 30 percent of the damage, Amrep’s waste disposal trucks rely on gravity to resulting in a net verdict of $1.75 million for the keep the bins in place, according to Bennett, which plaintiff. The CCP 998 was worth an additional poses an easily foreseeable risk of serious harm. $195,000 in costs to the plaintiff. Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90010 4 Phone: (213) 739-7000 Fax: (213) 386-1671 Website: www.geklaw.com