SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
54 55
Poland has an expensive set of priorities that it needs to
address to continue its economic development. Innovation
is one of them – Poland only spends a fraction of 1% of gross
domestic product on R&D while the top European countries
spend closer to 3%. Then there’s demographics: as Poland’s
population shrinks, the government needs to figure out how
it is going to pay a growing number of senior citizens their
pensions while increasing payments at the same time. These
problems will cost billions of złoty to solve – but not all of
the funding that the government has at its disposal is going
to address them. Why? One reason is that an awful lot of it is
being dumped down Silesian coal pits.
Yes, innovation is on the lips of all
of the government’s ministers. But
in the first days of her term in office,
did Poland’s newly appointed Prime
Minister Ewa Kopacz meet with sci-
entists, start-up founders or innova-
tors? No. Instead, she did what nearly
all of her predecessors have had to do
at one point or another: she rushed
to appease the miners, who had threat-
ened to bring Warsaw to a standstill
with their protests. She bowed to them
then, but just a few months later coal
miners once again stole the spotlight.
Clouds have been looming over
Poland’s coal mining sector for years,
but recently the big state-owned mining
companies have become so unprofita-
ble and indebted that they have begun
considering the unthinkable: trimming
employee benefits. This triggered
a wave of discontent across Silesia,
because in line with tradition – albeit
against all economic sense – Silesian
miners expect to keep producing coal
nobody needs, at prices no-one can
afford, and on employment terms set
by the employees themselves.
Between a rock and a hard place
Poland’s state-owned coal mines have
been struggling for months to return to
profit as they cope with low coal prices,
weak demand and high operating costs.
Cheap oil and the impact of the US
shale boom on energy prices reduced
the cost of coal over the past 18 months
to levels that made many of Poland’s mines unviable. Plagued
by powerful trade unions, which have effectively sabotaged
any real restructuring over the past two decades, they sur-
vive thanks to politicians, against market forces. In the first
half of 2014 Polish coal mining companies posted a loss
of €173m after tax. Looking at the sector’s core business
– coal sales – their predicament becomes even more grim.
Here, the loss exceeded €240m.
Europe’s largest coal miner, the ailing state-owned giant
Kompania Węglowa, was responsible for the bulk of the sec-
tor’s woes. It lost €260m in the first 11 months of 2014, and
has liabilities of almost €1bn. As of late, Kompania Węglowa
has been losing approximately €14 for every tonne of coal it
mines. The company had to give up a bond issue in November
2014 after investors demanded sky-high yields.
The key problem for Polish coal mines are high production
costs. It cost €75 to produce a tonne of coal in Poland in the
first half of 2014, against the global average of approximately
€54 per tonne. At the same time, the price of coal in Poland
dropped 8% y/y in that period, to around €67. Following
decades of intensive exploitation, Silesian mines have had
to dig deeper and deeper for coal,
which, together with excessive benefits,
is pushing costs beyond affordable lev-
els. Polish coal mines extracted slightly
more than 34m tonnes of coal in the
first six months of 2014 (down by 2.8m
tonnes y/y) with sales reaching 31.8m
tonnes (down by 4.3m). As of the end of
November, Polish mines had stockpiles
of unsold coal totalling 8.2m tonnes.
Although Poland’s coal reserves are the
second largest in Europe, it is cheaper
for Polish power plants (at least the
ones not bound by long-term contracts
with mines) to import coal from abroad.
Digging their heels in
Polish mineworkers are tough folk.
With more than 100,000 employees
and powerful trade unions, Poland’s
coal mining industry has effectively
resisted any real change. Fearing strikes
and civil unrest, no government in the
past quarter of a century has dared take
on the miners, who continue to enjoy
wage levels and perks that are unheard
of in any other industry. Despite
the sector’s miserable financial condi-
tion, trade unions are demanding pay
increases that had been promised when
prospects seemed better. Proposals
that miners give up some perks, includ-
ing double-than-average pensions,
two annual bonuses, discounts for city
transport, free coal allowances and
school subsidies for children, are being
met with strong resistance on the part
of the unions, who believe their mem-
bers deserve what their fathers and grandfathers got. A little
less than a decade ago, the Solidarity union blocked govern-
ment plans to raise the retirement age for miners after dem-
onstrations turned into street fights.
The memory of those scuffles remains vivid among Polish
politicians, which explains why the government had been tip-
toeing around the issue for months, never failing to empha-
size that job cuts at Kompania Węglowa were not an option.
However, the latest restructuring plan for the sector, unveiled
in January, included a handful of more daring proposals.
BUSINESS
‘Silesian miners
expect to keep
producing coal
nobody needs,
at prices no-one
can afford, and
on employment
terms set by
the employees
themselves’
Inefficient operations
Annually, Kompania Węglowa produces just
620 tonnes of coal per employee (35m tonnes
in total). Globally, the worst-performing com-
panies mine about 1,000 tonnes per full-time
employee. Britain’s coal mines, slimmed down
after the drastic Thatcherite restructuring,
produce more than four times as much coal
per employee as Polish ones.
Lech Kaczanowski
is the editor of Poland
Today's weekly
newsletter, Business
Review+. From 2002
to 2013 he covered
business and eco-
nomic news from
Poland for Sweden's
Bonnier Group and
other Nordic media.
A former Open Soci-
ety Institute Fellow
at Duke University
in North Carolina,
Lech has degrees
in economics,
sociology, and
journalism.
Diggingahole
Poland’s miners are fighting to keep their state-funded benefits in a sinking industry
This led some to hope Ewa Kopacz could become Poland’s
‘Iron Lady’. According to the plan, Kompania Węglowa was
to be taken apart, its four worst-performing pits shut down
and the remaining nine mines to be transferred to a special
purpose company owned by Polish coal trader Węglokoks.
The ministers had expected the entire rescue package, includ-
ing generous severance payments for up to 4,800 redundant
workers, to cost some €530m. It took little more than a week
of largely peaceful protests on the part of miners for the gov-
ernment to backtrack on its plan yet again. Under a union-
approved settlement, the chronically unprofitable mines are
to be “restructured” and then sold, with Poland’s state-con-
trolled energy groups being mentioned as potential buyers.
Rock bottom?
Poland, which relies on coal for 90% of its electricity, has
been trying for years to reduce its dependence on this highly
polluting form of fuel. However, the government has recently
been pushing for stronger ties between Polish energy pro-
ducers (which are profitable and fully restructured) and
coal mines (see box). Time and again the authorities have
found creative ways to avoid any drastic measures in Silesia,
and with parliamentary and presidential elections all due
in the coming months, the current government will be
no different. The successful dismantling of the original
restructuring plan for Kompania Węglowa by the unions
encouraged workers at other coal mining firms to reject any
calls for more rational spending.
Early February saw employees of Poland’s top coking coal
producer JSW orchestrate strikes and street fights, demand-
ing the dismissal of their CEO, who had dared to propose
a range of cutting measures in order to keep the company
from going under. As long as the decisions with regard to the
mines are purely political in nature, it is impossible to properly
assess the true potential of the sector.
According to a recent report by economic think tank
CASE, state subsidies for the mining industry amounted
to €5.25bn over the 2010-2013 period alone. Between 1990
and 2012 Poland’s coalmining sector received more than
€40bn worth of aid, an amount of money that could finance all
of Poland’s universities and state-run run R&D institutions
– for more than a decade.
The ostrich strategy applied by Poland’s decision mak-
ers simply prolongs the sector’s agony and increases
the end cost to taxpayers, but as long as citizens are content
to watch passively as their tax money continues to disappear
down the depths of Silesian mine shafts, politicians will keep
their heads in the sand. Thousands of miners have the unions
to raise hell on their behalf.
Meanwhile, millions of employees in other sectors have
yet to find someone to represent them. Scientists, who need
funding for research, find it abroad after hearing repeatedly
that the state coffers are empty. Entrepreneurs, whose bud-
ding businesses creak under the weight of Poland’s many
fiscal burdens, quickly lose motivation to innovate. As a coun-
try that still has plenty of catching up to do, Poland may
one day realize the price it paid for social harmony was too high.
Let others have their Apples and Samsungs. Poland will have
its coal. by Lech Kaczanowski
Spreading the burden
One way of maintaining the status quo in the mining sector is by
making other, better performing state-controlled industries pick up the
tab. Last year, Tauron, the country’s second-biggest utility, agreed to pay
€75m to buy a stake in one of Kompania Węglowa’s businesses, while
JSW, the biggest coking coal producer in the EU, paid €357m for another.
A few months later JSW itself ended up in dire straits and its manage-
ment’s cost-cutting plan was violently rejected by the unions in early
February. PGE, Poland’s largest utility, revived a €2.8bn coal-fired
power plant project and will buy coal from Kompania.
2013 average
salaries:
– Poland: 3,823.32
– Mining sector*:
8,615.37
*Traditionally, miners
are paid 14 monthly
salaries per year.
Source: Central
Statistical Office
(GUS)
BUSINESS
photos:FilipBłażejowski(Forum)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (6)

Fun Filled Family Activities
Fun Filled Family ActivitiesFun Filled Family Activities
Fun Filled Family Activities
 
Fire Safety Prevention
Fire Safety PreventionFire Safety Prevention
Fire Safety Prevention
 
Riviera del Sol Resort, pronto para viver no mais luxuoso do Recreio.
Riviera del Sol Resort, pronto para viver no mais luxuoso do Recreio.Riviera del Sol Resort, pronto para viver no mais luxuoso do Recreio.
Riviera del Sol Resort, pronto para viver no mais luxuoso do Recreio.
 
Bhbw gemeente-huisbezoek
Bhbw gemeente-huisbezoekBhbw gemeente-huisbezoek
Bhbw gemeente-huisbezoek
 
Reingenieria
ReingenieriaReingenieria
Reingenieria
 
Globalización y derecho 2015
Globalización y derecho 2015Globalización y derecho 2015
Globalización y derecho 2015
 

Ähnlich wie Mining

1 depletion of natural resources in poland
1 depletion of natural resources in poland1 depletion of natural resources in poland
1 depletion of natural resources in polandSybilla Vorreiter
 
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014MSL
 
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...Pomcert
 
Modernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleModernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleForum Energii
 
COAL INDUSTRY ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013
COAL  INDUSTRY  ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013COAL  INDUSTRY  ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013
COAL INDUSTRY ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013Cláudio Carneiro
 
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail Shale
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail ShaleMSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail Shale
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail ShaleMSL
 
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014Maciej Chyz
 
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009Michael Clay
 
Poland, going through an economic and energy transition
Poland, going through an economic and energy transitionPoland, going through an economic and energy transition
Poland, going through an economic and energy transitionLeonardo ENERGY
 
Energy Boost for Poland
Energy Boost for PolandEnergy Boost for Poland
Energy Boost for PolandForum Energii
 
Baltic Energy Report
Baltic Energy ReportBaltic Energy Report
Baltic Energy ReportSwedbank
 
Migration Case Study Poland To Uk
Migration Case Study   Poland To UkMigration Case Study   Poland To Uk
Migration Case Study Poland To UkKieron Hunter
 
Migration case-study-poland-to-uk
Migration case-study-poland-to-ukMigration case-study-poland-to-uk
Migration case-study-poland-to-ukIanGrant24
 
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in Poland
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in PolandWarsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in Poland
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in PolandLukasz Jachowicz
 
Migration case study poland to uk
Migration case study   poland to ukMigration case study   poland to uk
Migration case study poland to ukpjjacko
 
Sulev vedler presentation
Sulev vedler presentationSulev vedler presentation
Sulev vedler presentationrebaltica
 
Poland economy and market October 2010
Poland economy and market October 2010 Poland economy and market October 2010
Poland economy and market October 2010 Michael Clay
 

Ähnlich wie Mining (20)

1 depletion of natural resources in poland
1 depletion of natural resources in poland1 depletion of natural resources in poland
1 depletion of natural resources in poland
 
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014
Keeping The Lights On - MSLGROUP Energy Report January 2014
 
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...
2.6 "Doswiadczenia w dzialaniach zwiazanych z wydobyciem gazu z lupkow - LNG ...
 
Modernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleModernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangle
 
COAL INDUSTRY ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013
COAL  INDUSTRY  ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013COAL  INDUSTRY  ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013
COAL INDUSTRY ACROSS EUROPE 5th edition 2013
 
A2 poland
A2 polandA2 poland
A2 poland
 
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail Shale
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail ShaleMSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail Shale
MSLGROUP EMEA Energy Report June 2013: Snail Shale
 
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014
Hydrocarbons_geopolitics_2014
 
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009
Export To Poland Presentation 2nd June 2009
 
Poland, going through an economic and energy transition
Poland, going through an economic and energy transitionPoland, going through an economic and energy transition
Poland, going through an economic and energy transition
 
Energy Boost for Poland
Energy Boost for PolandEnergy Boost for Poland
Energy Boost for Poland
 
Baltic Energy Report
Baltic Energy ReportBaltic Energy Report
Baltic Energy Report
 
Strategy Metals Bulletin #56
Strategy Metals Bulletin #56Strategy Metals Bulletin #56
Strategy Metals Bulletin #56
 
Migration Case Study Poland To Uk
Migration Case Study   Poland To UkMigration Case Study   Poland To Uk
Migration Case Study Poland To Uk
 
Migration case-study-poland-to-uk
Migration case-study-poland-to-ukMigration case-study-poland-to-uk
Migration case-study-poland-to-uk
 
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in Poland
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in PolandWarsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in Poland
Warsaw Insight #2 - key policy developments in Poland
 
01.04.2011, NEWSWIRE, Issue 161
01.04.2011, NEWSWIRE, Issue 16101.04.2011, NEWSWIRE, Issue 161
01.04.2011, NEWSWIRE, Issue 161
 
Migration case study poland to uk
Migration case study   poland to ukMigration case study   poland to uk
Migration case study poland to uk
 
Sulev vedler presentation
Sulev vedler presentationSulev vedler presentation
Sulev vedler presentation
 
Poland economy and market October 2010
Poland economy and market October 2010 Poland economy and market October 2010
Poland economy and market October 2010
 

Mining

  • 1. 54 55 Poland has an expensive set of priorities that it needs to address to continue its economic development. Innovation is one of them – Poland only spends a fraction of 1% of gross domestic product on R&D while the top European countries spend closer to 3%. Then there’s demographics: as Poland’s population shrinks, the government needs to figure out how it is going to pay a growing number of senior citizens their pensions while increasing payments at the same time. These problems will cost billions of złoty to solve – but not all of the funding that the government has at its disposal is going to address them. Why? One reason is that an awful lot of it is being dumped down Silesian coal pits. Yes, innovation is on the lips of all of the government’s ministers. But in the first days of her term in office, did Poland’s newly appointed Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz meet with sci- entists, start-up founders or innova- tors? No. Instead, she did what nearly all of her predecessors have had to do at one point or another: she rushed to appease the miners, who had threat- ened to bring Warsaw to a standstill with their protests. She bowed to them then, but just a few months later coal miners once again stole the spotlight. Clouds have been looming over Poland’s coal mining sector for years, but recently the big state-owned mining companies have become so unprofita- ble and indebted that they have begun considering the unthinkable: trimming employee benefits. This triggered a wave of discontent across Silesia, because in line with tradition – albeit against all economic sense – Silesian miners expect to keep producing coal nobody needs, at prices no-one can afford, and on employment terms set by the employees themselves. Between a rock and a hard place Poland’s state-owned coal mines have been struggling for months to return to profit as they cope with low coal prices, weak demand and high operating costs. Cheap oil and the impact of the US shale boom on energy prices reduced the cost of coal over the past 18 months to levels that made many of Poland’s mines unviable. Plagued by powerful trade unions, which have effectively sabotaged any real restructuring over the past two decades, they sur- vive thanks to politicians, against market forces. In the first half of 2014 Polish coal mining companies posted a loss of €173m after tax. Looking at the sector’s core business – coal sales – their predicament becomes even more grim. Here, the loss exceeded €240m. Europe’s largest coal miner, the ailing state-owned giant Kompania Węglowa, was responsible for the bulk of the sec- tor’s woes. It lost €260m in the first 11 months of 2014, and has liabilities of almost €1bn. As of late, Kompania Węglowa has been losing approximately €14 for every tonne of coal it mines. The company had to give up a bond issue in November 2014 after investors demanded sky-high yields. The key problem for Polish coal mines are high production costs. It cost €75 to produce a tonne of coal in Poland in the first half of 2014, against the global average of approximately €54 per tonne. At the same time, the price of coal in Poland dropped 8% y/y in that period, to around €67. Following decades of intensive exploitation, Silesian mines have had to dig deeper and deeper for coal, which, together with excessive benefits, is pushing costs beyond affordable lev- els. Polish coal mines extracted slightly more than 34m tonnes of coal in the first six months of 2014 (down by 2.8m tonnes y/y) with sales reaching 31.8m tonnes (down by 4.3m). As of the end of November, Polish mines had stockpiles of unsold coal totalling 8.2m tonnes. Although Poland’s coal reserves are the second largest in Europe, it is cheaper for Polish power plants (at least the ones not bound by long-term contracts with mines) to import coal from abroad. Digging their heels in Polish mineworkers are tough folk. With more than 100,000 employees and powerful trade unions, Poland’s coal mining industry has effectively resisted any real change. Fearing strikes and civil unrest, no government in the past quarter of a century has dared take on the miners, who continue to enjoy wage levels and perks that are unheard of in any other industry. Despite the sector’s miserable financial condi- tion, trade unions are demanding pay increases that had been promised when prospects seemed better. Proposals that miners give up some perks, includ- ing double-than-average pensions, two annual bonuses, discounts for city transport, free coal allowances and school subsidies for children, are being met with strong resistance on the part of the unions, who believe their mem- bers deserve what their fathers and grandfathers got. A little less than a decade ago, the Solidarity union blocked govern- ment plans to raise the retirement age for miners after dem- onstrations turned into street fights. The memory of those scuffles remains vivid among Polish politicians, which explains why the government had been tip- toeing around the issue for months, never failing to empha- size that job cuts at Kompania Węglowa were not an option. However, the latest restructuring plan for the sector, unveiled in January, included a handful of more daring proposals. BUSINESS ‘Silesian miners expect to keep producing coal nobody needs, at prices no-one can afford, and on employment terms set by the employees themselves’ Inefficient operations Annually, Kompania Węglowa produces just 620 tonnes of coal per employee (35m tonnes in total). Globally, the worst-performing com- panies mine about 1,000 tonnes per full-time employee. Britain’s coal mines, slimmed down after the drastic Thatcherite restructuring, produce more than four times as much coal per employee as Polish ones. Lech Kaczanowski is the editor of Poland Today's weekly newsletter, Business Review+. From 2002 to 2013 he covered business and eco- nomic news from Poland for Sweden's Bonnier Group and other Nordic media. A former Open Soci- ety Institute Fellow at Duke University in North Carolina, Lech has degrees in economics, sociology, and journalism. Diggingahole Poland’s miners are fighting to keep their state-funded benefits in a sinking industry This led some to hope Ewa Kopacz could become Poland’s ‘Iron Lady’. According to the plan, Kompania Węglowa was to be taken apart, its four worst-performing pits shut down and the remaining nine mines to be transferred to a special purpose company owned by Polish coal trader Węglokoks. The ministers had expected the entire rescue package, includ- ing generous severance payments for up to 4,800 redundant workers, to cost some €530m. It took little more than a week of largely peaceful protests on the part of miners for the gov- ernment to backtrack on its plan yet again. Under a union- approved settlement, the chronically unprofitable mines are to be “restructured” and then sold, with Poland’s state-con- trolled energy groups being mentioned as potential buyers. Rock bottom? Poland, which relies on coal for 90% of its electricity, has been trying for years to reduce its dependence on this highly polluting form of fuel. However, the government has recently been pushing for stronger ties between Polish energy pro- ducers (which are profitable and fully restructured) and coal mines (see box). Time and again the authorities have found creative ways to avoid any drastic measures in Silesia, and with parliamentary and presidential elections all due in the coming months, the current government will be no different. The successful dismantling of the original restructuring plan for Kompania Węglowa by the unions encouraged workers at other coal mining firms to reject any calls for more rational spending. Early February saw employees of Poland’s top coking coal producer JSW orchestrate strikes and street fights, demand- ing the dismissal of their CEO, who had dared to propose a range of cutting measures in order to keep the company from going under. As long as the decisions with regard to the mines are purely political in nature, it is impossible to properly assess the true potential of the sector. According to a recent report by economic think tank CASE, state subsidies for the mining industry amounted to €5.25bn over the 2010-2013 period alone. Between 1990 and 2012 Poland’s coalmining sector received more than €40bn worth of aid, an amount of money that could finance all of Poland’s universities and state-run run R&D institutions – for more than a decade. The ostrich strategy applied by Poland’s decision mak- ers simply prolongs the sector’s agony and increases the end cost to taxpayers, but as long as citizens are content to watch passively as their tax money continues to disappear down the depths of Silesian mine shafts, politicians will keep their heads in the sand. Thousands of miners have the unions to raise hell on their behalf. Meanwhile, millions of employees in other sectors have yet to find someone to represent them. Scientists, who need funding for research, find it abroad after hearing repeatedly that the state coffers are empty. Entrepreneurs, whose bud- ding businesses creak under the weight of Poland’s many fiscal burdens, quickly lose motivation to innovate. As a coun- try that still has plenty of catching up to do, Poland may one day realize the price it paid for social harmony was too high. Let others have their Apples and Samsungs. Poland will have its coal. by Lech Kaczanowski Spreading the burden One way of maintaining the status quo in the mining sector is by making other, better performing state-controlled industries pick up the tab. Last year, Tauron, the country’s second-biggest utility, agreed to pay €75m to buy a stake in one of Kompania Węglowa’s businesses, while JSW, the biggest coking coal producer in the EU, paid €357m for another. A few months later JSW itself ended up in dire straits and its manage- ment’s cost-cutting plan was violently rejected by the unions in early February. PGE, Poland’s largest utility, revived a €2.8bn coal-fired power plant project and will buy coal from Kompania. 2013 average salaries: – Poland: 3,823.32 – Mining sector*: 8,615.37 *Traditionally, miners are paid 14 monthly salaries per year. Source: Central Statistical Office (GUS) BUSINESS photos:FilipBłażejowski(Forum)