2. New Teaching Ways
More technology is being incorporated
Videoconferencing- when two
different classes learn together virtually
Innovative educational tool
Positives
Negatives
Real life applications
http://www.sony.co.uk/res/attachment/file/95/11870
79500895.jpg
3. Has Videoconferencing positively or
negatively effected education?
http://www.cardinalglennon.com/News/Publishin
gImages/Jeremy%20Courtois%20class%20for%20w
eb.jpg
5. Builds community among teachers, schools and
parents
“Two heads are better than one”
Many on-line resources
Student involvement
Students can be teacher’s aid
Students may participate in lesson
http://www.edb.utexas.edu/education/assets/images/ltc/
news/2007/videoconf01.jpg
6.
7. Many educators are not aware of how
videoconferencing works
Some districts do not have to the resources to
provide educators with training on how to use
videoconferencing.
Districts already use their limited resources
on basic technology such as computers
8. A teacher’s viewpoint:
◦ “After leaving the classroom for years and returning
I feel overwhelmed by the amount of new
technology, and although I feel that
videoconferencing would be beneficial to my
students I do not feel that I have the knowledge to
incorporate it into my classroom.”
- Ernestina Adornato, Bermudian Springs High School
9.
10. Videoconferencing can be difficult to
incorporate into district’s budgets due to the
cost of equipment and training
Most schools have a difficult time staying
within their budget for necessary items such
as books
11. Based on both the negative and positive
aspects of videoconferencing we have
concluded that the positive outweighs the
negative and videoconferencing does indeed
have a positive effect on education.
14. Helps the student keep up with their work
Students still feel like they are part of their
class because they can see their classroom
and everything going on
It helps them maintain their normal lifestyle
while being treated
15. 1. www.txccc.org
2. Forester, S. (2008, February 10). Technology links St. Luke's
students with Boise-area schools: Seriously ill children can now
interact with teachers and students during recovery. Idaho
Statesman, The (Boise, ID), Retrieved February 22, 2009, from
Newspaper Source database
http://www.sony.co.uk/res/attachment/file/95/1187079500895.jp
g
http://www.cardinalglennon.com/News/PublishingImages/Jeremy%2
0Courtois%20class%20for%20web.jpg
http://blog.syracuse.com/news/2008/12/IMG_2390.jpg
http://www.edb.utexas.edu/education/assets/images/ltc/news/200
7/videoconf01.jpg
16. Gill, D., Parker, C., & Richardson, J. (2005). Twelve tips for teaching
using videoconferencing. Medical Teacher, 27, 573-577.
Hasselbacher, S. (2007). Take a field trip without leaving the
classroom: Museums, zoos, and interactive videoconferencing.
Multimedia & Internet@Schools, 14, 8-11.
Higgs-Horwell, M., & Schwelik, J. (2007). Building a professional
learning community: Getting a large return on a small investment.
Library Media Connection, 26, 36-38.
17. Picture 1:
◦ http://www.woodseaves.org.uk/page32.html
◦ Interview: Ernestina Adornato, Bermudian Springs High School
Bell, J. K., & Unger, L. C. (2003). Videoconferencing Takes Cape Elizabeth Middle Schoolon a Distance
Learning Adventure.. T H E Journal. 2003, 51-54.
Cannavina, G., Stokes, C., & Cannavina, C. (2003). Evaluation of video-conferencing as a means to
facilitate outreach and work based learning.. Work Based Learning in Primary Care. 2, 136-147.
Egert, C. (2000).Language Learning across Campuses.. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 13.
Knight, M. G., Dixon, I. A., Norton, N. E., & Bentley, C (2004). Extending Learning Communities: New
Technologies, Multiple Literacies, and Culture Blind Pedagogies.. Urban Review, 36, 101-118.
Ludlow, Barbara, & Duff, M. (2002). Live Broadcasting Online: Interactive Training for RuralSpecial
Educators.. Rural Special Education Quarterly. 4, 26-30.
