13. Workshop I: overview
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
14. Workshop I: projects
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
15. Workshop I: findings
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
16. Workshop II: overview
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
17. Workshop II: projects
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
18. Workshop II: materials
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
19. Workshop II: materials
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
20. Workshop II: materials
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
21. Workshop II: materials
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
22. Workshop II: findings
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
23. Workshop II: findings
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
24. Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
25. Design Implications
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
26. Design Implications
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
27. Questions?
Fatih K. Ozenc, Miso Kim, John Zimmerman, Stephen Oney, Brad Myers | Carnegie Mellon University | CHI 2010
Hinweis der Redaktion
Need to go to SchoneStory of an industrial designer.refinr and refine.... reach some point and know they are done.THen show a paper. ID make something like this.
This is what I (industrial designer?) do... this is what ID handle (pape) this is widly different...KEY PROBLEM: People are building thins before what they know what theyknow they should be building.
But, interaction designers have hard time having this conversation with material because of the immateriality of the material.Interaction designers lost how to interact with materials, like other designers
Understand this monkey tribe :0Tool to normalize (to help them to do “natural” design process (conversation with material) like other designers
Rationale: We really want to know how ID work. becuase they are different from other designers.*** Rationale for why participatory design (in relation to conversation with material, poor ID designers… etc)
Maybe two Findings: ones that are most surprising...Leave it in a list but pull out in detail something more interesting. (inthe findings)Findings: Examples, context. body.... pick up one or two. Talk about howthat goes back to conversation iwht material.No good tools to capture movement...I can't sit and play with movement really easily now.multiple version... less interesting. keep in the list but... detail:capturingmovment...
Maybe two Findings: ones that are most surprising...Leave it in a list but pull out in detail something more interesting. (inthe findings)Findings: Examples, context. body.... pick up one or two. Talk about howthat goes back to conversation iwht material.No good tools to capture movement...I can't sit and play with movement really easily now.multiple version... less interesting. keep in the list but... detail:capturingmovment...
Maybe two Findings: ones that are most surprising...Leave it in a list but pull out in detail something more interesting. (inthe findings)Findings: Examples, context. body.... pick up one or two. Talk about howthat goes back to conversation iwht material.No good tools to capture movement...I can't sit and play with movement really easily now.multiple version... less interesting. keep in the list but... detail:capturingmovment…
Scope of the tool: ? seems to wonder off.How can designers have this co-creative space? boundary object...Keep relating back to conversation with material.Not that designers are programming...Key problem: People are building thins before what they know what theyknow they should be building.
Scope of the tool: ? seems to wonder off.How can designers have this co-creative space? boundary object...Keep relating back to conversation with material.Not that designers are programming...Key problem: People are building thins before what they know what theyknow they should be building.
