Lean Six Sigma Group Free Project Case Study Overviews http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Lean-Six-Sigma-37987
Sponsored by the International Standard for Lean Six Sigma, e-Zsigma http://www.e-zsigma.com, IQPC, and PEX Network.
Please contact Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt, Steven Bonacorsi, Owner of the Lean Six Sigma Group to have your project case studies to be added to the Lean Six Sigma Group Library. Steve Bonacorsi sbonacorsi@comcast.net
1. Deploy Image
Cycletime
BMW Account
Project Leader: Charles Vitellaro Master Black Belt:
Add Project Leader Function Here Steven Bonacorsi
Start Date: September 11, 2002
2. Six Sigma in Action
Deploy Image Cycletime
Customer Profile – 1500 seat Marketing and Sales HQ for BMW company
Business Problem & Impact Process Capability – Before
Deployment of new equipment taking to long. Customer deploy
Image cycle time is on average 45 min. and can take a max of
1 week due to no account ID, vacations or travel. BMW users Mean 61.8 min
are not setup for their start date creating a loss of productivity. 1.5 Z_ST
Measure & Analyze
Data Collection: Speed to unpack, setup, image, and deploy.
The existing process sigma was 1.5
Root Causes: Slow image time and imaging one unit at a
time.
Improve & Control Process Capability Analysis for Cycle Time
Process Capability – After
Setup new image server with 24 port switches and three
USL
workstation area with keyboard, mouse and monitor USL
Process Data
Mean 1 min 46.0000
Within
switches.Server setup as stand-alone (not on BMW Target
LSL
*
* Overall
Network) and running at 100 Mps. Trained 5 engineers in Mean
6 Z_ST
Sample N
0.5804
24
using Ghost via server imaging and improve process. StDev (Within) 0.0069380
StDev (Overall) 0.0063091
Potential (Within) Capability
Results/Benefits Cp *
CPU 2182.16
After the project, the customer saved US$170K, or 30%, as a
CPL *
Cpk 2182.16
result of reduced end user downtime. Cpm *
0 10 20 30 40 50
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp * PPM < LSL * PPM < LSL * PPM < LSL *
A Savings of US$170K in 2003!
PPU
PPL
Ppk
2399.68
2399.68
*
PPM > USL
PPM Total
0.00
0.00
PPM > USL
PPM Total
0.00
0.00
PPM > USL
PPM Total
0.00
0.00