SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Representation of Females
By Millie, Jenny, Olivia and Katy
Laura Mulvey’s Theory
Laura Mulvey’s theory is stating that women are objectified and viewed through the eyes of a
heterosexual male. This male would then be seen as active, which would be looking and the woman
would be passive, meaning she is being looked at.
This theory can be applied to our production because she is in the male gaze for Jack, the male
character of interest, although she doesn’t actually know she is in the male gaze of Jack. However,
when she changes her image, this theory can no longer be applied to our film, as she is no longer in
the male gaze but sexualising herself in hope that she is in the male gaze.
Janice Winship’s Theory
This theory states that the female is complicit in creating the ideal version of herself for a male audience, because
of the gratification she will receive.
This applies to our production because she does indeed create what she thinks is the ideal version of herself, in
the hope of receiving the gratification she wants. However, this method of Arabella’s fails, as the gratification she
receives isn't what she was hoping for.
David Gauntlett’s theory does not apply to our production, this is because this theory states that women are in
control of their sexuality, however their sexuality isn’t for men, it’s for themselves. This doesn’t apply to Arabella
because she is controlling her sexuality for Jack, her love interest, not necessarily because she wants to.
Judith Butler’s Theory
Butler argues we are born a certain sex, but gender is performance. A man is not inherently masculine or a
female inherently feminine. We perform aspects of different genders. Gender does not exist outside of these
performances. For example, the act of wearing make up defines a person’s gender, rather than their gender
defining the act.
This applies to our production as Arabella, our main protagonist, is quite masculine, in a sense that she is a
very clumsy, tom-boy like character who isn’t interested in stereotypical female activities.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von katywatson

Gigglebox Evaluation Final
Gigglebox Evaluation FinalGigglebox Evaluation Final
Gigglebox Evaluation Finalkatywatson
 
Gigglebox evaluation,;
Gigglebox evaluation,;Gigglebox evaluation,;
Gigglebox evaluation,;katywatson
 
Sponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionsSponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionskatywatson
 
Results for questionnaire
Results for questionnaireResults for questionnaire
Results for questionnairekatywatson
 
Conventions form and genre- radioooo
Conventions  form and genre- radiooooConventions  form and genre- radioooo
Conventions form and genre- radiooookatywatson
 
Results for questionnaire
Results for questionnaireResults for questionnaire
Results for questionnairekatywatson
 
Sponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionsSponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionskatywatson
 
Gigglebox evaluation
Gigglebox evaluationGigglebox evaluation
Gigglebox evaluationkatywatson
 
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequences
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequencesConventions of tv sponsorship sequences
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequenceskatywatson
 
Acorn profiling
Acorn profilingAcorn profiling
Acorn profilingkatywatson
 
Locations analysis
Locations analysisLocations analysis
Locations analysiskatywatson
 
Tv ads institutions
Tv ads institutionsTv ads institutions
Tv ads institutionskatywatson
 
Sponsership choice
Sponsership choiceSponsership choice
Sponsership choicekatywatson
 
Resources and equipment
Resources and equipmentResources and equipment
Resources and equipmentkatywatson
 
Progress report
Progress reportProgress report
Progress reportkatywatson
 
location decisions
location decisions location decisions
location decisions katywatson
 
Representation of females theoretical research
Representation of females  theoretical researchRepresentation of females  theoretical research
Representation of females theoretical researchkatywatson
 

Mehr von katywatson (20)

Gigglebox Evaluation Final
Gigglebox Evaluation FinalGigglebox Evaluation Final
Gigglebox Evaluation Final
 
Gigglebox evaluation,;
Gigglebox evaluation,;Gigglebox evaluation,;
Gigglebox evaluation,;
 
Sponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionsSponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnions
 
Results for questionnaire
Results for questionnaireResults for questionnaire
Results for questionnaire
 
Conventions form and genre- radioooo
Conventions  form and genre- radiooooConventions  form and genre- radioooo
Conventions form and genre- radioooo
 
Results for questionnaire
Results for questionnaireResults for questionnaire
Results for questionnaire
 
Sponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnionsSponsroship convetnions
Sponsroship convetnions
 
Gigglebox evaluation
Gigglebox evaluationGigglebox evaluation
Gigglebox evaluation
 
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequences
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequencesConventions of tv sponsorship sequences
Conventions of tv sponsorship sequences
 
Acorn profiling
Acorn profilingAcorn profiling
Acorn profiling
 
Locations analysis
Locations analysisLocations analysis
Locations analysis
 
Costumes
CostumesCostumes
Costumes
 
Tv ads institutions
Tv ads institutionsTv ads institutions
Tv ads institutions
 
Sponsership choice
Sponsership choiceSponsership choice
Sponsership choice
 
Resources and equipment
Resources and equipmentResources and equipment
Resources and equipment
 
Manhattan
ManhattanManhattan
Manhattan
 
Progress report
Progress reportProgress report
Progress report
 
Conventions
ConventionsConventions
Conventions
 
location decisions
location decisions location decisions
location decisions
 
Representation of females theoretical research
Representation of females  theoretical researchRepresentation of females  theoretical research
Representation of females theoretical research
 

Representation of females 1

  • 1. Representation of Females By Millie, Jenny, Olivia and Katy
  • 2. Laura Mulvey’s Theory Laura Mulvey’s theory is stating that women are objectified and viewed through the eyes of a heterosexual male. This male would then be seen as active, which would be looking and the woman would be passive, meaning she is being looked at. This theory can be applied to our production because she is in the male gaze for Jack, the male character of interest, although she doesn’t actually know she is in the male gaze of Jack. However, when she changes her image, this theory can no longer be applied to our film, as she is no longer in the male gaze but sexualising herself in hope that she is in the male gaze.
  • 3. Janice Winship’s Theory This theory states that the female is complicit in creating the ideal version of herself for a male audience, because of the gratification she will receive. This applies to our production because she does indeed create what she thinks is the ideal version of herself, in the hope of receiving the gratification she wants. However, this method of Arabella’s fails, as the gratification she receives isn't what she was hoping for. David Gauntlett’s theory does not apply to our production, this is because this theory states that women are in control of their sexuality, however their sexuality isn’t for men, it’s for themselves. This doesn’t apply to Arabella because she is controlling her sexuality for Jack, her love interest, not necessarily because she wants to.
  • 4. Judith Butler’s Theory Butler argues we are born a certain sex, but gender is performance. A man is not inherently masculine or a female inherently feminine. We perform aspects of different genders. Gender does not exist outside of these performances. For example, the act of wearing make up defines a person’s gender, rather than their gender defining the act. This applies to our production as Arabella, our main protagonist, is quite masculine, in a sense that she is a very clumsy, tom-boy like character who isn’t interested in stereotypical female activities.