This presentation was given at the Global Symposium on Health System Research in November 2010. The authors are L P Singh, Olakunle Alonge, Anubhav Agarwal,
Kayhan Natiq, S D Gupta and David Peters.
Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda â 9332606886 â Call Me For Genuine ...
Â
Afghanistan Health Sector Balanced Scorecard
1. Afghanistan Health Sector
Balanced Scorecard
National Results 2004 - 2008
L P Singh1, Olakunle Alonge2, Anubhav Agarwal1,
Kayhan Natiq2, S D Gupta1 and David Peters2
1 Indian Institute of Health Management Research (IIHMR)
2 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
2. Overview
1. Afghanistan public health sector and BPHS
2. Introduction to the Afghanistan Health Sector Balanced
Scorecard
3. National results â Discussion by domains and indicators
4. Summary
5. Looking AheadâŚ
3. Afghanistan Public Health Sector
Source:
A Basic Package of Health Services for Afghanistan â 2010/1389 â MoPH, Afghanistan
4. Basic Package of Health Services (BPHS)
o Developed in 2002 by MoPH in consultation with major
stakeholders of Afghanistan Health sector
o Provides clear guidelines on the various aspects of health
services delivery
o BPHS Implementation
⢠MoPH = Stewardship role
⢠Implementation through contracting (NGOs, MoPH-SM)
o Third-party monitoring using the Balanced Scorecard
approach, annually since 2004.
5. What is a Balanced Scorecard?
o Philosophy of Balanced Scorecard
⢠Translating strategy into action
o Classic definition by Kaplan and Norton
⢠âA multi-dimensional framework for describing, implementing and
managing strategy at all levels of an enterprise by linking
objectives, initiatives, and measures to an organizationâs strategyâ
6. o Alternative definition:
âA strategic planning and management system that is used
extensively in business and industry, government, and
nonprofit organizations worldwide to align organizational
activities to the vision and strategy of the organization,
improve internal and external communications, and
monitor organizational performance against strategic
goals.â
Source: http://www.balancedscorecard.org
What is a Balanced Scorecard?
7. ď Enables MoPH and partners to view a snapshot of several domains of
health system performance and track trends over time
ď Enables provinces and agencies to benchmark performance
⢠Achievable performance targets appropriate for Afghanistan
ď Management innovation
⢠Afghanistan is one of the pioneers in LMIC to apply BSC to manage national
health system
Why a Balanced Scorecard for Afghanistan?
8. ď Promotes focus on attainment of measurable results
ď Provides actionable evidence on areas of strength and weakness at
multiple levels: national, provincial
ď Provides a basis for corrective action
ď Measurement of performance essential for effective management
and accountability
Why a Balanced Scorecard for Afghanistan?
9. Benchmarking in the BSC
ď Benchmarks established using 2004 data and applied to
subsequent annual rounds
ď Upper Benchmark: Minimum level of performance achieved
by provinces in the top quintile in 2004
ď Lower Benchmark: Minimum level of performance achieved
by provinces above the bottom quintile in 2004
10. Color Coding in the BSC
Score meeting Upper Benchmark
Score between Lower and Upper Benchmarks
Score below Lower Benchmark
11. ďˇ Health worker satisfaction
ďˇ Salary payments current
ďˇ Equipment functionality
ďˇ Drug availability
ďˇ Family planning availability
ďˇ Laboratory functionality
ďˇ Staffing levels
ďˇ Provider knowledge score
ďˇ Staff received training in last year
ďˇ HMIS use
ďˇ Clinical guidelines
ďˇ Infrastructure
ďˇ Patient record keeping
ďˇ Monitoring of TB treatment
⢠Facilities with user fee guidelines
⢠Facilities with exemptions for
poor patients
⢠Overall patient satisfaction
⢠Patient perceptions of quality
⢠Shura-e-sehie activity in
community
⢠Equity of service delivery
⢠Equity of patient satisfaction
⢠Females as % of new outpatients
Staff
Financial
Systems
Patients
&
Community
Overall
Vision
Service
Provision
Capacity
for
Service
Provision
DOMAINS
⢠Patient history and physical
exam
⢠Patient counseling
⢠Proper sharps disposal
⢠Average new outpatient visits
per month (BHC>750 visits)
⢠Time spent with patient
(> 9 minutes)
⢠Provision of antenatal care
⢠Provision of delivery care
The Framework of the Balanced Scorecard
13. Benchmarks Kabul
Lower Upper 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
A. Patients & Community
1 Overall Patient Satisfaction 66.4 90.9 84.8 75.6 94.8 76.3 82.6
2 Patient Perception of Quality Index 66.2 83.9 86.9 72.8 86.5 80.9 71.6
3 Written Shura-e-sehie activities in community 18.1 66.5 33.3 80.1 59.8 53.7 29.6
B. Staff
4 Health Worker Satisfaction Index 56.1 67.9 68.8 66.1 78.4 62.3 60.2
5 Salary payments current 52.4 92.0 52.4 91.4 94.8 93.3 50.3
C. Capacity for Service Provision
6 Equipment Functionality Index 61.3 90.0 75.6 80.8 80.8 83.2 74.3
7 Drug Availability Index 53.3 81.8 76.8 71.3 86.8 69.6 66.5
8 Family Planning Availability Index 43.4 80.3 65.4 76.7 89.4 89.1 97.8
9 Laboratory Functionality Index (Hospitals & CHCs)
5.6 31.7 30.4 44.1 43.7 41.6 51.7
10 Staffing Index -- Meeting minimum staff guidelines
10.1 54.0 54.0 79.7 85.3 77.2 73.4
11 Provider Knowledge Score* 44.8 62.3 59.1 73.8 78.5 73.3 N/A
11a Revised Provider Knowledge Score
71.5 86.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 82.2
12 Staff received training in last year 30.1 56.3 36.6 76.5 68.0 66.8 45.0
13 HMIS Use Index 49.6 80.7 80.7 63.6 62.8 61.0 60.3
14 Clinical Guidelines Index 22.5 51.0 38.4 64.9 60.7 77.7 62.3
15 Infrastructure Index 49.3 63.2 56.5 55.1 53.4 41.2 39.5
16 Patient Record Index 56.1 92.5 59.5 79.2 71.3 62.0 51.0
17 Facilities having TB register 8.3 26.6 10.7 7.8 38.0 51.2 51.8
14. D. Service Provision
18 Patient History and Physical Exam Index 55.1 83.5 70.6 79.7 92.4 92.6 63.6
19 Patient Counseling Index 23.3 48.9 37.5 52.0 64.8 65.4 35.0
20 Proper sharps disposal 34.1 85.0 54.4 59.7 66.1 65.9 44.6
21
Average new outpatient visit per month (BHC >
750 visits)
6.7 57.1 11.1 90.9 69.2 85.7 46.7
22 Time spent with patient (> 9 minutes) 3.5 31.2 31.2 19.0 25.1 5.9 0.7
23 BPHS facilities providing antenatal care 28.9 82.8 80.2 87.9 85.0 100.0 91.7
24 Delivery care according to BPHS 10.5 39.3 27.9 27.3 30.6 58.3 42.2
E. Financial Systems
25 Facilities with user fee guidelines* 80.3 100.0 100.0 91.3 100.0 100.0 0.0
26 Facilities with exemptions for poor patients* 64.4 100.0 64.0 47.5 100.0 100.0 100.0
F. Overall Vision
27 Females as % of new outpatients 46.5 59.7 62.6 64.7 61.8 64.3 61.0
28 Outpatient visit concentration index 48.0 52.7 51.9 50.6 50.0 49.9 55.3
29 Patient satisfaction concentration index 49.0 50.9 49.9 50.9 50.6 50.0 49.3
* Indicators not included in composite scores
Revised Composite Scores
32 Percent of Upper Benchmarks Achieved 7.7 26.9 23.1 38.5 61.5 50.0 34.6
33 Percent of Lower Benchmarks Achieved 69.2 88.5 100.0 96.2 100.0 96.2 84.6
Mean scores across 26 indicators 46.2 54.9 53.4 64.2 67.3 66.4 56.1
Benchmarks Kabul
Lower Upper 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
15. Sample
Unit
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Number of Provinces 33 30 30 30 29
Number of facilities 617 629 630 636 618
Number of Observations of
Patient-Provider Interactions
5719 5856 5964 6089 5970
Number of Exit Interviews 5597 5862 5964 6087 5950
Number of Health Workers
Interviewed
1553 1452 1723 1940 2233
33. o Two indicators on user fees
⢠Indicator 25: Facilities with user fee guidelines
⢠Indicator 26: Facilities with exemptions for poor patients
o No longer relevant - MoPH discontinued user fees at BPHS
facilities in 2008
o Only 16 of 618 facilities surveyed (2.6%) charged fees
o None of the surveyed facilities reported charging user fees in
22 of 29 provinces
Domain E: Financial Systems
34. 55.2 57.3 57.8 60.0 60.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 49.6 49.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Females as % of new
outpatients
Outpatient visit
concentration index
Patient satisfaction
concentration index
Domain F: Overall Vision
35. 55.2 57.3 57.8 60.0 60.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 49.6 49.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Females as % of new
outpatients
Outpatient visit
concentration index
Patient satisfaction
concentration index
Domain F: Overall Vision
38. Summary of Performance: 2004 - 2008
Decrease (-2 or
less)
Patient satisfaction
Constant (+/- 2 pts)
Overall patient visit
Infrastructure index
Patient perception quality
Time spent with patient
Mild Increase (2-10 pts)
Patient records index
Provider knowledge revised
% Female patients in OPD
Overall patient satisfaction
Health worker satisfaction
index
Salary payment current
Moderate increase
(10-25)
Proper sharp disposal
Patient history and exam
index
Drug availability
Patient counseling index
Equipment functionality
HMIS Guidelines
Provider knowledge
Large increase (26 or
more)
Staff training
Staffing index
ANC provision
FP Availability Index
Provision of delivery care
Lab functionality
Availability TB Registers
Clinical guidelines
Shura guidelines
Average new patients
Change in
median
scores
40. Usage of the Balanced Scorecard
o Over the years BSC has found extensive application in the
Afghanistan health sector such as:
⢠General monitoring tool by the leadership for tracking
progress of the provinces and NGO implementing BPHS
during quarterly meetings
⢠The development partners used it as an instrument for
awarding performance bonuses (The World Bank)
⢠The NGOs used it to showcase their performance
⢠The provincial leadership used it to request additional
supplies and human resources
42. The Future Balanced Scorecard
o Domains largely sound, but:
⢠Rapidly changing health system
⢠Many benchmarks already achieved
⢠Need for revised indicators
o Revision of BSC underway
⢠Several new indicators proposed
⢠Broader picture of BPHS delivery
⢠Better adapted to goals of new health strategies
43. Future BSC Features
Lower Upper National Median
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
A. Patients & Community
1Overall Patient Satisfaction 66.4 90.9 83.1 86.3 86.0 77.7 81.0
2
Patient Perception of Quality
Index
66.2 83.9 76.0 76.2 80.3 77.6 77.5
3
Written Shura-e-sehie
activities in community
18.1 66.5 34.2 54.5 66.4 86.0 94.3
B. Staff
4
Health Worker Satisfaction
Index
56.1 67.9 63.5 64.1 68.1 69.0 69.1
5Salary payments current 52.4 92.0 76.7 90.0 81.3 90.7 82.7
C. Capacity for Service
Provision
6
Equipment Functionality
Index
61.3 90.0 65.7 67.0 78.7 83.8 88.4
7Drug Availability Index 53.3 81.8 71.1 83.7 85.7 81.0 86.3
8
Family Planning Availability
Index
43.4 80.3 61.4 70.0 82.9 93.7 94.9
9
Laboratory Functionality
Index (Hospitals & CHCs)
5.6 31.7 18.3 36.3 43.3 58.5 64.5
1
0
Staffing Index -- Meeting
minimum staff guidelines
10.1 54.0 39.3 58.0 66.9 63.9 72.1
1
1Provider Knowledge Score
44.8 62.3 53.5 69.0 68.7 68.7
1
2
Staff received training in last
year
30.1 56.3 39.0 74.3 68.9 68.5 71.1
1
3HMIS Index
49.6 80.7 67.7 65.8 74.9 91.5 92.4
1
4Clinical Guidelines Index
22.5 51.0 34.8 48.9 61.6 78.3 83.9
1
5Infrastructure Index
49.3 63.2 55.0 44.6 48.7 54.6 54.1
1
6Patient Record Index
56.1 92.5 65.6 63.2 69.4 70.0 69.9
1
7Facilities having TB register
8.3 26.6 15.8 20.6 37.4 53.7 62.9
D. Service Provision
Expanded Scope of Measurement
ď Communityâs role in health
ď Coverage indicators
ď Perspectives of non-users
Enhanced performance management
ď Communication and use at
peripheral levels
ď Documentation of best practices
ď Performance improvement tool
Decrease: - 8 pts.
Large increase: both indicators in Domain D: Service Provision (# new OPD visits: + 26.8 pts.; Delivery care: + 11.7 pts.)
Rapidly changing health system, so some benchmarks are outdated (2004 targets have largely been achieved; itâs time to âraise the barâ)
Some indicators, such as the CIs, need revision, to be more easily understood
Several new indicators are proposed that will give a broader picture of BPHS delivery. For example, coverage is not really addressed by the current BSC, and this is something weâd like to add in the future, using data from biannual household surveys and other sources.
ADDITIONS: Coverage (MCH services); access to care, OOPS,New goals/strategies: BPHS being revised (scope increasing), new H&N sector strategy, new National M&E strategy
We have been able to accomplish a lot in the last five years of the BSC in Afghanistan. Despite security and other challenges, we have consistently produced a timely measurement tool that is the first of its kind in a developing country.
However, we have several ideas for how to make the BSC even more relevant and useful in the future. First, in addition to revised benchmarks for the current indicators, we would like to expand the scope of measurement to include areas not currently addressed in the BSC: the communityâs role in health, in terms of CHW performance, as well as indicators of population health coverage, that go beyond facility quality and outputs. These will be captured through household surveys and other means, which will also allow us to look at the perspectives of non-users.
In addition to the expanded scope of measurement, we feel there is lots of room for enhanced performance management. This would take place through improved communication and use of the BSC at peripheral levels; through documentation of best practices and information sharing, and really moving the BSC from a measurement tool to a performance improvement tool.