1. WELCOME

5. Structural classification of systems Classification of agroforestery based on components Agrisilviculture- crops (including shrubs / vines & tress Silvipastoral – pasture / animals & tree agro–silvipastoral – crops, pasture, animals & tree (Nair, 1999 )

12. Table :1 Nutrient content (%) in foliage of important tree sp (Dhir et al ., 1995) 30.3 100-130 0.118 0.066 1.11 0.22 1.6 L.leucocephala 23.0 20 0.178 0.067 1.11 0.35 2.16 A. Nilotica 39.2 60-110 0.194 0.056 1.49 0.50 3.05 A. Indica 45.3 88-132 0.208 0.085 1.51 0.75 4.80 P. Juliflora N P Na k mg Ca Litter g m-2 nutrient Tree sp

13. Table :2 Soil fertility improvement in teak based silvipastoral system (Browaldh, 1997) 40.0 145.6 6.00 448 1.29 0.75 Teak + fodder - 1.48 0.17 4.35 - 0.018 CD (0.05) - 202.0 11.2 420 1.28 0.74 Teak 26.2 156.8 8.96 336 0.40 0.23 Pure fodder grass - 134.4 3.92 252 0.20 0.11 Open land Fodder K P N O.M Org C Available nutrients (Kg/ha ) Treatments

17. Table3: Quantities of N2 fixed by different tree sp (Mac dicken, 1994) 224-274 L. leucocephala 88-132 P. Juliflora 40-60 C. equisetifolia 34 A. pennatula 200 A. mearnsii N2 fixed (Kg ha-1 yr-1) Species

21. Fresh yield of Gliricidia loppings of forages crops in inter spaces Dagar(1990 ) Fodder crops Fresh forage yield Fresh lopped biomass or Gliricidia (t/ha) Without Gliricidia With Gliricidia Penisetum purpureum 73.3 36.8 53.4 Setaria anceps 48.9 35.0 109.6 Panicum maximum 54.1 46.8 69.6

22. Effect of Prosopis – leptochloa on an abandoned alkali soil (Gurbachan Sing et al., (1997) Soil property Original soil Prosopis Prosopis juliflora + leptochloa P H soil depth 0-15cm 15-30cm 10.30 10.30 9.70 9.90 9.40 9.80 ECC(dsm -1 ) 0-15cm 15-30cm 2.20 1.50 0.66 0.78 0.42 0.63 Organic carbon(%) 0-15cm 15-30cm 0.18 0.13 0.30 0.19 0.43 0.21 Available ‘N’ 0 -15cm 15-30cm 79.00 73.00 100.00 84.00 139.0 104.0

25. Status of land degradation in india MOA, 1994 0.34 Mines, landslides 2.68 Ravines 24.90 Degraded forests 2.38 Shifting cultivation 9.52 Salt – affected and water logging 10.46 Wind erosion 57.16 Water erosion Area (m.ha) Type

29. Soil and nutrient loss from different land use system Grewal, 1993 K% N% 5.00 1.10 0.55 3.00 0.52 0.90 51.30 23.0 5.65 Cultivated fallow 5.90 4.80 1.54 Poplar – Leucaena 2.08 3.30 0.43 Teak – Leucaena - Bhabar 42.50 20.50 2.69 Sesame – rape seed 6.97 2.00 0.24 A. Catechu – forage grass 0.46 0.05 0.07 Eucalyptus – Bhabar grass Nutrient loss Runoff % Soil loss(t/ha) Land use system

30. Survival and growth characteristics of MPTS on salt affected soils; IGFRI, Jhansi (1993) Survival and growth characteristics of MPTS on salt affected soils IGFRI, Jhansi (1993) MPTS March 1993 October 1993 Survival % Plant height Collar girth Survival % Plant height Collar girth Dalbergia sissoo 100 125 2.8 90 140 4.8 Eucalyptus hybrid 62 155 2.9 58 170 4.2 Albezia lebbek 68 60 2.3 65 90 4.0 Azadirachta indica 100 80 3.2 62 90 4.7 Prosopis juliflora 100 110 2.5 100 180 6.0 Leucaena leucocephala 82 140 4.2 78 190 5.6

35. Income from various crops grown with poplars Jagadish chandar (1998 ) Poplar with Yield kg/ha Duration Gross income Net income Onion 15,000 5 7,500 18,000 Ginger 11,000 8-9 11,000 3,400 Turmeric 4,000 8-9 14,500 3,900 Mustard 8,800 3-4 2,400 1,400 Berseem 50,000 5-6 5000 2,400

36. Yield and return from different inter crops with coconut (Kannan and Nambiar.,1985) 455 150 965 60.5 Cocoa 715 1463 6250 58.8 colacasia 1503 544 15452 61.0 Taopica 885 1164 850 70.8 Rice Profit from intercrop (Rs/ha/yr) Additional rweturns from coconut (Rs/ha/yr) Yield of inter crop (Kg/ha/yr) Yield of coconut (nuts/palm/year) Inter crop

47. Pasture production(in t/ha/yr) – Silivi-pastoral combination in Bundelkhand region (IGFRI, Jhansi 1998) Tree Grass Dry forage yield(t/ha/yr) Fodder yield(leaf) Acacia tortilus Cenchrus ciliaris 3.4 3.2 Albizia lebbek Chrosopogon fulvus 7.8 5.4 Dalbergia sissoo Natural pasture 4.3 1.9 Leucaena leucocephala Cenchrus ciliaris 4.1 1.5 Albizia amara Sehima nervosum 3.3 13.5

49. Horti-Silvicultural system Effect of fast growing species on fruit yield of Mandarin orange Debroy et al., 1989 Main plot Fruit yield of Mandarin (kg plant -1) Eucalyptus Casuarina Grevillea Control Mandarin on trifoliate rootstock 2.5 7.8 5.1 6.3 Mandarin on citrange rootstock 2.1 10.9 6.8 10.1

50. Agri-silvihortipastoral system Sapota yield and maize fodder yield as affected by different tree sp (Osman and Rao., 1996) 47.6 10.60 Maize + Sapota + D. sisso +grass 42.3 13.30 Maize + Sapota + Teak +grass 41.1 10.71 Maize + Sapota + casurina +grass 30.0 5.12 Maize + Sapota +Eucalyptus +grass 73.2 7.86 Maize + Sapota + grass Maize fodder yield (tonnnes per hactare) Sapota fruit yield ( Kg per plant) Treatments

56. THANK YOU