Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!
Art 8 arbitration. Mgt already agreed they shouldn't have mandated non-ODL carriers but refused to abide by prior cease and desist orders and prior Informal A, Formal A, and Step B decisions that awarded non-ODL carriers a financial remedy and refused to agree that their way of mandating non-ODL carriers (first in the door, first sent back out) was a violation even if it didn't go by juniority. Mgt also argued that cease and desist remedies were improper and so were remedies to the non-ODL carriers. Arbitrator Bierig was NOT a good arbitrator for this case and yet we still prevailed.