1. P a g e | 1
1327405
MASTERS PROGRAMME
Student number: 1327405
Course: PGCE Secondary (School Direct)
Module: EP908: PGCE Secondary Subject Studies: English
Dissertation/Assignment title: MA2 - The Impact of Seating Arrangements
on Behaviour for Low Attaining Students
Agreed Grade and
Mark
C 52
Overall comment
This study has potential, which unfortunately is not well exploited. You give a clear explanation of
the context and reason for this study and it is evident that you are interested in this area. Your
research intervention do produce some interesting data: this is evident in the appendices. There
is, however, very little reference to research methodology or acknowledgement of the constraints
and strengths of the methods you chose. In parts, especially in the early sections when you are
describing what tool place, the work is repetitive. Overall, it just merits a pass grade.
Subject Knowledge
Your understanding of the research methodologies and concepts lacks depth and breadth. You
do not recognise or comment on the strengths and limitations of these or mention reliability or
validity. You have read something about conducting research and do mention it briefly, but overall
you need to use a wider range of sources both in relation to research methodology and in relation
to the use of seating plans. What , for example are the advantages and disadvantages of using a
Likert scale? How was triangulation achieved? what have others found in relation to using seating
plans? You say a little about this but do not set your work clearly against that of others
You do give a clear rationale for choosing this study and set it clearly in context. It is also
interesting that you tried your strategies out in another context with differing results. It would have
been helpful to have hypothesised why this might be. Could cultural norms have played a part,
given the ethnic make-up of the school, for instance?
It is clear that you have personally gained a greater understanding of the importance of the
classroom environment to learning and I hope you will carry on researching this in future
Analysis and Critique
You recognise the demands of the question and cover the basic requirements. You have
analysed your data and produced charts to show the results. However, these might have been
more effective if they had been combined to show the changes in the three modes in one chart.
More importantly, although you state the findings clearly, there is a very low level of analysis and
synthesis and very little reference in this section to research and reading against which you could
set your findings. This weakens the analysis considerably: its quality is uneven. You do make
sensible commentary on the evidence . The interviews produced some interesting comment and
this could have been further exploited perhaps. You do make some sensible commentary on the
evidence
Presentation
Overall , presentation was satisfactory. The work has a satisfactory structure. The standard of
writing and written style is adequate and the work is generally referenced accurately with only a

2. P a g e | 2
1327405
few errors.
Advice for future work
Increase the depth and breadth of analysis
Make greater reference to reading and research against which to set your findings
Signed (first marker) Kate Shilvock Date 15th May 2014
Second marker’s comments where applicable
This is an interesting study and you show a good level of engagement with the work and
consideration of how this can be taken further. The opening section is good and you provide a
well-supported rational for this study, demonstrating how you have reflected on MA1 and
responded to feedback. Your section on methodology needs further development. You need to
justify your decisions and support these with evidence from secondary sources. Similarly, with
your analysis, your findings would have more validity if you could support them with other
research. You tend to narrate rather than analyse the data. So much more could have been
stated from your data. There needs to be more depth of analysis which, in turn, would provide
better conclusions.
Ensure that you reference correctly and try to avoid overusing commas.
Signed (second marker) Alison Morgan
Date 18.5.14
The Impact of Seating Arrangements on Behaviour
for Low Attaining Students
RE-CONTEXTUALISING AND METHODOLOGY. The principle focus of this study
was to discover whether seating arrangements had an impact on behaviour in the classroom.
Although pupil behaviour at this Academy was awarded outstanding by Ofsted in 2013, there
was no in-depth discussion about the classroom environment and whether the Academy’s
policy of boy/girl seating contributed to the overall behaviour of the pupils. The Academy’s
policy, of boy/girl seating, was introduced after the Academy, in its previous life, was put
into special measures due to it failing on all counts. The new senior leadership team visited
other schools who had been awarded ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted to find out how they achieved
that status. One aspect they chose to introduce to the Academy was the policy of boy/girl

3. P a g e | 3
1327405
seating, which they had witnessed in action, as a positive measure towards the behaviour of
pupils in the classroom. They felt that once they had introduced boy/girl seating the impact
on behaviour would be a positive one, therefore resulting in more engagement in lessons and
more progress being made in pupil learning. This policy has been in place ever since and as
new teachers arrive at the Academy they enforce the same policy. This mini-research study
examined the existing policy of boy/girl seating and then experimented with alternative
seating arrangements to gauge whether seating arrangements did indeed impact upon
behaviour or whether other factors resulted in changes in behaviour.
The literature review and school-based observations previously carried out have helped to
guide and inform the findings before, during and after the study. Marx et al, 1999 pointed out
that educational critics ignore[d] the fundamentals of the classroom environment…as a
physical entity and how that physical entity…influence[d] the behaviour of pupils who use
the classroom. This one piece of research, supported by other researchers and numerous
classroom observations, helped develop my research question of looking at the classroom
environment; how pupils were seated within that environment and the impact on pupil’s
behaviour and learning when not enforcing the school’s policy of boy/girl seating. However
Gump and Marx et al, 1999 based their research findings on classroom environments where
pupils and furniture within the classroom could move, or be moved. The difficulty facing this
study was that in the classroom chosen to carry out the research, all desks had a computer and
were fixed to the floor and the interactive whiteboard was fixed at the front of classroom,
making it impossible to move desks and, for health and safety reasons, difficult for pupils to
move around safely.

4. P a g e | 4
1327405
Although the focus of the research question is the impact of seating arrangements on
behaviour, the literature review feedback uncovered the need to relate learning outcomes to
behaviour and not to confuse the two. Therefore while behaviour remains the focus, there is
naturally a link to learning outcomes and this will be reflected if any conclusions are drawn.
Also as a result of the study, there will be more focus on critiquing previous researchers’
findings, using the data from the numerous observations, interviews and questions which took
place before, during and after the study. This will ensure a balanced analysis of the research
project will be presented along with comparisons to previous findings related to seating
arrangements and the impact on behaviour and learning.
REFLECTING ON THE INTERVENTION. How behaviour in the classroom is affected
by seating arrangements is a particularly contentious subject with some teachers in schools.
Some schools enforce the boy/girl seating policy, where others, especially in older year
groups, allow pupils to choose where they sit. Marx et al, 1999, quoting Weinstein, 1985
found evidence to suggest that when pupils selected their own seat, motivation, personality
variables and participation in class, including behaviour, altered considerably and teachers
would need to keep this in mind when considering how they controlled their classroom
environment, especially where pupils sat. In this Academy, all teachers are requested to
follow the boy/girl policy unless they have a specific reason for not doing so. The reason for
focussing on seating arrangements for this study was to be able to present to the senior
leadership team, in this Academy, real evidence regarding how a pupil behaves is associated
with where a pupil sits. It was also hoped the study would show that perhaps a ‘one size fits
all’ seating policy is not right for every pupil and classroom. In this particular study I wanted
to look at how behaviour is affected when enforcing the Academy’s policy of boy/girl
seating; how behaviour was affected when seating all pupils according to ability within the

5. P a g e | 5
1327405
classroom group; and what would happen to behaviour when I allowed the pupils free reign
to sit wherever they liked and next to whoever they wanted to. The added complication to this
study was the classroom the lessons took place in. The classroom has fixed desks and fixed
computers. Most of the desks are laid out in rows facing the interactive white board, however
eight of the desks are positioned so that pupils have their back to the rest of the class and one
desk is positioned right at the front of the room almost underneath the interactive white
board. When I first started teaching in this classroom, it was easier to enforce the boy/girl
seating arrangement ensuring, where possible, that the desks where pupils had their backs to
the rest of the class were not used.
The intervention for this mini-research project used a low ability year seven class over a six-
week period. The class consisted of sixteen pupils: nine girls, seven boys, two of which were
EAL pupils with low literacy levels in their first language, French, and one dyslexic pupil. A
Learning Mentor and a French speaking Teaching Assistant were assigned to the group. The
Learning Mentor and Teaching Assistant were aware of the main goal of the study and were
instructed to intervene as usual if behaviour changed within the lesson, but not to intervene if
pupils were not completing their work as instructed. The pupils were unaware of the reasons
for the changes in seating arrangements and were happy to comply when given instructions as
they entered the classroom.
All pupils prior to the intervention were aware of the rules of the classroom concerning e-
safety, eating and drinking policy and the behaviour expected of them in the learning
environment. At the start of the autumn term, each pupil reads and signs a contract relating to
behaviour and expectations. At the start of a new term each pupil is reminded of this contract
to ensure they have not forgotten the rules of the classroom.

6. P a g e | 6
1327405
The classroom used for the intervention was a second-floor, cone-shaped classroom. The
desks are benches fixed to the floor with computers, set out in four rows: row one has seven
computers; row two has six computers; row three has five computers and row four has three
computers. The bench along the side of the wall has eight computers and there is one stand-
alone desk at the front of the classroom with a computer (see appendix 1.) The entrance is at
the side of the classroom to left of the teacher’s desk and windows line the cone-shaped part
of the classroom behind the rows of computers.
The intervention took place over six weeks, observing twelve lessons. The lesson was a
Digital Studies lesson studying the Gothic genre. The scheme of work covered all aspects of
the gothic genre, studying key elements, reading various extracts of gothic novels and
working towards each pupil creating their own gothic eBook (see appendix 12.) At the start
of the intervention four lessons followed the Academy policy of boy/girl seating. This
involved all pupils being seated in the first three rows of desks. No pupil had their back to the
rest of the class and all pupils sat boy/girl where possible (see appendix 1.) During the
following four lessons pupils sat according to their ability: high ability students sat next to
high ability pupils and lower ability pupils sat next to lower ability pupils. For the last four
lessons pupils were told as they entered the classroom that they were allowed to sit wherever
they wanted.
The four lessons varied over the two week period. Each lesson lasted one hour, with no
double periods. Of the four lessons, one lesson took place before break at 11.05; two lessons
took place before lunch at 13.05 and one lesson took place after lunch at 13.40. Each lesson
contained the same structure: key word starter; extract from a Gothic novel; clip from a

7. P a g e | 7
1327405
Gothic film and then directions on how to use what they had learned in the lesson in their
own Gothic eBook.
The first four lessons strictly followed the Academy’s policy of boy/girl seating. This was to
ensure the research findings had a secure benchmark with which to analyse the data. The
pupils had been sitting in this arrangement since the autumn term, and with the exception of
three male pupils who moved out of the class to go to a lower ability set, all pupils were
comfortable with where they sat in their peer group, all worked hard and behaviour issues
were almost non-existent. The rationale for then moving them according to their ability, was
to judge whether seating pupils alongside similar ability pupils changed both behaviour and
work output. Instead of seating high ability next to low ability, I wanted to see if behaviour
and work output was affected when seating pupils together of similar ability. Finally, the
rationale for allowing pupils to sit wherever they chose, was to see the whether pupils were
capable of making the right choices regarding their education and whether the influence of
their ‘friends’ impacted on behaviour and subsequent learning.
There were three methods of collecting data from the intervention. Observations were made
by the Teacher, the Learning Mentor and Teaching Assistant. During each lesson it was
decided that when behaviour changed the usual routine would be followed to sanction poor
behaviour: 3-2-1; eye contact; use of pupil’s name, ticks on board; alert button for senior
leadership team; exclusion from lesson. The role was to observe and record our findings. The
second method was by asking the pupils questions about the lessons and, after each four
lesson session, a questionnaire was given to the pupils to fill in. It was anonymous and pupils
were instructed not to fill in their names anywhere on the sheet. The one dyslexic pupil, who
has everything printed on blue paper, was requested to work with the person sitting next to

8. P a g e | 8
1327405
them in order to be able to read the questions. The final method was a focus group after each
four-lesson session. Six pupils were selected based on their ability: high, average and low.
DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND EVALUATION. For ease of analysis the results,
from the twelve lessons during the intervention, have been divided into the four-session
lessons when seating options were the same. The data analysis offered is both quantitative
and qualitative and resulting findings and evaluation is based on results shown here.
During the first four lessons all pupils sat in the allocated seating arrangement that they had
sat in since September. After the four-lesson session had finished, all were given a
questionnaire to complete. The questions used the Likert Scale and a tick box system.
Appendix 2 shows the questionnaire used for the first four-lesson session. Of the sixteen
questionnaires handed out, all were completed. Results are shown in figure 1 regarding how
pupils felt about the existing seating arrangements.
Figure 1. Feelings relating to the normal seating arrangement: boy/girl
When asked to rate their behaviour in these first four lessons, each pupil was given six
options to choose from. These were further broken down into two sections. In figure 2 results
0
2
4
6
8
10
Normal Seating
Arrangment
Rating 1 - Like it
Rating 5 - Don't care
Rating 10 - Hate it

9. P a g e | 9
1327405
shown relate purely to changes in behaviour; in figure 3 results relate to elements of
behaviour.
Figure 2. Changes in behaviour
Figure 3. Relating to aspects of behaviour
After the first four lessons had concluded, six pupils were invited back for an informal
discussion about the existing seating arrangements and how the pupils felt it impacted on the
way they behaved in lessons. The focus group contained both equal numbers of boys to girls.
Examples of the questions asked are shown in appendix 3. It was explained again to the
pupils that they could answer in whatever way they wanted to, and would not be judged on
their answers, as I wanted to get an honest perspective on how well the Academy’s policy of
boy/girl seating worked. The Learning Mentor was present to help record the answers. As it
was such a small group and short session, I felt there was no need to physically record the
answers and I also wanted to keep the pupils comfortable and their responses open.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Normal Seating
Arrangement
Same as usual
Better than usual
Worse than usual
0
5
10
15
Normal Seating
Arrangements
More talkative
Less talkative
Able to concentrate more

10. P a g e | 10
1327405
The main question asked was ‘how did the pupils feel about sitting next to either a boy or
girl?’ The focus group contained both equal numbers of boys to girls. All said they did not
mind sitting next to either a boy or girl. One boy actually preferred sitting next to a girl as he
‘worked better.’ Another boy said he did not talk as much when he was sitting next to a girl.
He actually made a point of ‘not talking to her.’ The girls were much more vocal. All three
said they did not mind sitting next to boys but would prefer to ‘sit by their friend.’ They were
almost pleading in the way they felt ‘they would work better sitting next to their friend’ and
they would not talk as much. My next question related to the output of work in the previous
four lessons. All had completed the work to a good standard and within the timescale. I
asked whether they felt it was because they were sitting in their usual places and knew what
was expected of them. All agreed they were comfortable knowing at the start of each lesson,
where they were sitting and what was expected of them.
During the next four lessons, the seating arrangement changed according to the pupil’s
MELPs (minimum expected levels of progress). The pupils were not told the reasons they
were being seated in this specific way, so as not to create any animosity within the classroom.
High ability pupils within the group were seated next to each other on the second and third
rows of the classroom. The lower ability pupils, including the two EAL pupils and the
dyslexic pupils were seatedon the front row (see appendix 4.) There was confusion and some
reticence to sit in the new seating arrangement but, after it was explained it was temporary,
all pupils sat where they were asked to do so. Again after the second four-lesson session,
questionnaires were given out to all sixteen pupils and all sixteen were completed and
returned. To get an accurate measure of feelings and attitudes, the questions remained the
same (see figure 4.)

11. P a g e | 11
1327405
Figure 4. Feelings relating to seating arrangement according to ability
It can be seen that pupil’s feelings changed when asked to sit according to ability. There was
a slight decrease in pupils who liked the seating arrangement, but a substantial increase in
pupils hating the new seating arrangement. These feelings were substantiated by the answers
given in the next part of the questionnaire, specifically related to changes in behaviour and
learning as a result of changes in behaviour (see figures 5 and 6 respectively).
Figure 5. Changes in behaviour when seated according to ability
Figure 6. Relating to aspects of behaviour when seated according to ability
0
2
4
6
8
Seating
according to
ability
Rating 1 - Like it
Rating 5 - Don't care
Rating 10 - Hate it
0
5
10
15
Seating
according to
ability
Same as usual
Better than usual
Worse than usual
0
2
4
6
8
10
Seating
according to
ability
More talkative
Less talkative
Able to concentrate more

12. P a g e | 12
1327405
As before, after the four-lesson session, the same six pupils were asked to attend an informal
focus group. The rules were talked through again and it was explained that the questions
related to the previous four lessons only, when pupils were seated according to ability.
Examples of the questions asked are in appendix 5. Again the Learning Mentor was present
to help facilitate the group and again as the session was small and short, there was no need to
record the session. The session started off with the question ‘How did you feel when you
were told you had to sit somewhere else?’ This session was much more animated with four
out of the six asking why they had to sit where they did. The lower ability pupils hated being
put at the front of the classroom, as did the average ability pupils. Only the high achievers
actually voiced that they were quite happy with where they were sitting and who they were
sitting next to. The lower ability pupils felt they were being penalised for something and
decided they were not going to engage in the lesson. One female low ability pupil actually
felt close to tears and could not understand why she could not sit where she usually sat. When
it was, again, explained to her that it was temporary, she still felt she had talked more and
‘had not learned as much because of the behaviour of the boys around her.’ When the other
members of the focus group were asked whether they had managed to work well in the
lessons, achieve all the lesson objectives, they all agreed they had been able to. However, all
expressed the opinion that they were not as comfortable in the new seating arrangement and
would prefer to be seated in their original seats.
During the final four-lesson sessions, there was no formal seating arrangement in place. Due
to the classroom setup, the desks had to remain in the same place. On entering the classroom,
the pupils were all instructed they were able to choose who they wanted to sit by as well as
choosing where they sat in the classroom (see appendix 6). Not surprisingly all pupils
cheered at the prospect of not being forced to sit where they were told. It took them

13. P a g e | 13
1327405
approximately eleven minutes to select where they were sitting and who they were sitting
next to. Again after these four lessons were concluded, questionnaires were given out to all
sixteen pupils and sixteen questionnaires were completed and returned. The questions
remained the same as the previous two questionnaires (see figures 7, 8 and 9 respectively.)
Figure 7. Feelings relating to no seating arrangement
Figure 8. Changes in behaviour with no seating arrangement
Figure 9. Relating to aspects of behaviour when seated according to ability
0
2
4
6
8
10
No seating
arrangement
Rating 1 - Like it
Rating 5 - Don't care
Rating 10 - Hate it
0
5
10
15
No seating
arrangement
Same as usual
Better than usual
Worse than usual
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
No seating
arrangement
More talkative
Less talkative
Able to concentrate more

14. P a g e | 14
1327405
After the final four-lesson session, the same six pupils were asked to attend an informal focus
group. Same rules applied and pupils were reminded that these questions related to the
previous four lessons only, when pupils were allowed to sit where they wanted. Examples of
the questions asked are in appendix 7. The Learning Mentor was present to help facilitate the
group and again as the session was small and short, there was no need to record the session.
The session started off with the question ‘How did you feel when you were told you could sit
where you wanted?’ All pupils agreed they were surprised, but pleased they were given the
option to sit where they wanted. All ability pupils enjoyed being able to choose who they sat
by. However, three of the four pupils felt the start of the lesson was confused and noisy as
some pupils were getting very excited and over-enthusiastic. They also felt they were unable
to concentrate as much with the noise level so high. One high ability pupil actually decided
to move himself during the lesson as he was unable to concentrate with so much noise and
distractions around him. He felt he had talked more and not learned as much because of ‘the
behaviour of the pupils around him.’ When the other members of the focus group were asked
whether they had managed to work well in the lessons, achieve all the lesson objectives, they
all said that although they had talked more, they had been able to get more work done,
because they were happy with where they were sitting. With the exception of one pupil, they
all expressed the desire to remain in these seats rather than reverting to the original seating
plan.
The final method used for this intervention was teacher observations. Over the twelve
lessons, three adults were in the room to observe changes in behaviour as a result of where
the pupils sat. Each adult was told to intervene as usual in any behaviour issues, but not to
intervene if pupils were not working or learning as a result of behaviour in the classroom.

15. P a g e | 15
1327405
This decision was made in order to get as true a picture as possible of behaviour changes
during the intervention.
After the first four-lesson session, where pupils sat in the original seating arrangement, we sat
down to discuss behaviour in the classroom. Without exception, all agreed behaviour was
excellent, with pupils focussed on learning and the lesson objectives. Low level disruption,
such as talking, was at a minimum and the lesson was able to start immediately. Marking of
the pupil’s written and eBook, corroborated our observations (see appendix 8.)
After the second four-lesson session, where pupils were seatedaccording to their ability, we
agreed there had been a significant change in behaviour. With the exception of five pupils,
three boys and two girls, behaviour worsened. The lesson was disrupted several times with
pupils asking to be moved ‘because they did not like who they were sitting next to’ and
talking between pupils increased. One male pupil walked out of the lesson, only to return five
minutes later to continue to disrupt the lesson with silly behaviour and mild verbal abuse to
those around him. The five pupils, whose behaviour remained constant, were higher ability
pupils, who were able to ignore distractions around them. It was agreed by all three observers
that learning had been stilted, due to the poor behaviour of others in the classroom. The
changes in seating arrangements and marking of the pupil’s written and eBook corroborated
these observations (see appendix 9.)
Finally, after the four-lesson session where pupils sat wherever they chose, the behaviour and
subsequent learning of every pupil worsened. Even the higher ability pupils struggled with
the informal approach to seating arrangements and they struggled to keep focussed in the
lesson and were drawn into poor behaviour and general disruption. All observers noted that

16. P a g e | 16
1327405
talking became a huge problem within the lessons, as did silly behaviour, such as throwing
pens and inappropriate verbal dialogue. Not one pupil achieved the lesson objectives after the
hour lesson and subsequent marking of written and online work showed a huge decrease in
output (see appendix 10.)
From the data and evidence produced during the intervention, it was clear to see that seating
arrangements within a classroom did impact not only on the behaviour of pupils but also on
their learning outcomes. Of the twelve lessons during the intervention, only four produced the
right classroom environment for learning to take place and where behaviour was not an issue.
These were the four lessons where the Academy’s policy of boy/girl seating were followed
and where the pupils were used to sitting. The data from the questionnaires also showed that
56% of pupils were quite happy being told where to sit and 88% of pupils felt they could
concentrate more. 75% of pupils felt their behaviour was the same as usual and 88% felt they
were less talkative. 19% of pupils hated sitting in the original seating arrangement, with 6%
of pupils saying their behaviour was worse than usual and 12% of pupils saying they were
more talkative.
After the four-lesson session where pupils were sat according to ability, behaviour patterns
altered and work output decreased. Results from the questionnaires showed that 44% of
pupils were quite happy being moved to sit according to ability and 50% of pupils felt they
could concentrate more. 6% of pupils felt their behaviour was the same as usual and 62% felt
they were less talkative. 25% of pupils hated sitting in the new seating arrangement, with
69% of pupils saying their behaviour was worse than usual and 38% of pupils saying they
were more talkative.

17. P a g e | 17
1327405
After the four-lesson session where pupils were allowed to sit wherever they chose,
behaviour patterns and work output decreased significantly. However, results from the
questionnaires showed that 62% of pupils were very happy being allowed to sit where they
wanted and 75% of pupils felt they could concentrate more. 0% of pupils felt their behaviour
was the same as usual and 25% felt they were less talkative. 25% of pupils hated sitting in the
new seating arrangement, with 25% of pupils saying their behaviour was worse than usual
and 75% of pupils saying they were more talkative.
The outcome from the focus groups, along with the data from the questionnaires did not truly
reflect what actually occurred within the classroom during the study. Although 75% of
pupils felt they concentrate more when being allowed to sit wherever they chose, 75% also
said they were more talkative. I struggled to get to the end of the lesson and was unable to
show pupil progress. Some books showed less than one line of text being written in a whole
hour (see appendix 11), computers were unplugged, noise levels were too loud and silly
behaviour increased. Pupils had forgotten the classroom rules and felt it was acceptable to
behave in an immature manner.
When seated according to ability, pupil’s behaviour also worsened. However, there was a
definite split regarding whose behaviour changed. From observations, we could see which
pupils were disrupting the class. The higher ability pupils were able to stay focussed, and
although a few became distracted with talking, it was the lower ability pupils who struggled
with this new arrangement. They were easily distracted by those they were seated next to.
Although the questionnaires were anonymous, 69% of pupils agreed their behaviour was
worse and 38% of pupils said they were more talkative.

18. P a g e | 18
1327405
In light of the classroom intervention which took place over twelve lessons looking at seating
arrangements, the qualitative and quantitative data corroborates the findings of Fernandes et
al., 2011, who cited Hastings & Schwieso, 1995 and Wannarka & Ruhl, 2008 in showing
that ‘good seating arrangements can help control disruptive and easily distracted students’
(p.70.) Not only that, but it also supports the view of Foucault, 1972, cited by Fernandes et
al., 2011, p. 70, that seating plans are put in place in order to ‘control and manipulate
behaviour.’ The eight lessons which changed seating arrangements from the standard boy/girl
seating pattern saw easily distracted pupils become disengaged with learning and,
subsequently, their behaviour deteriorated.
Interestingly the findings from the questionnaires and the focus groups see contrasting
opinions from both the adults and the pupils within the classroom. Pupils felt they
concentrated more when given the opportunity to select their own seat. They agreed they
talked more, but did not associate this with low-level disruption or indeed the lack of work
during the lesson. The adults saw the benefit of instructing pupils where to sit, knowing that
children of all ages are unlikely to disassociate themselves from poor behaviour going on
around them. The seating arrangements do not just serve to control behaviour, but also to
ensure optimum learning conditions for each pupil. Some pupils however, see where they sit
as a type of punishment and object because they are intent on disrupting lessons regardless of
where they sit.
During my six-week complementary school placement, I was able to look at the seating
arrangements of the classes I was teaching, look at their MELPs and experiment using the
same methodology strategy as my base placement school. The Academy, situated in
Handsworth, is in a deprived area of Birmingham, with a high proportion of children living in

19. P a g e | 19
1327405
poverty. The World Bank Organisation defines poverty as ‘a person is considered poor if his
or her income level falls below some minimum level necessary to meet basic needs. This
minimum level is usually called the "poverty line". What is necessary to satisfy basic needs
varies across time and societies. Therefore, poverty lines vary in time and place, and each
country uses lines which are appropriate to its level of development, societal norms and
values.’(BBC Online, 2014.) The minority ethnic population is made up 89.2% (27,726) of
the ward population, compared with 42.1% for Birmingham. These numbers exclude people
with a White Irish background (Lozells and East Handsworth Census of Population, 2011)
therefore the proportion of students from minority ethnic backgrounds is well above the
national average, as is those who speak English as an additional language.
At this Academy, there was no standard policy for seating arrangements however the teacher
I exchanged places with had introduced a seating plan based on ability. I taught five different
year groups in eight different classrooms and introduced new seating arrangements. The
layouts of the classrooms varied with some desks in groups of four or six, some on hexagonal
desks and then one classroom with rows of desks. The students here were less tolerant of
change and very suspicious as to the reasons for change. They objected to the boy/girl seating
plan, stating ‘our other teacher lets us sit where we want’ and ‘we don’t sit next to girls.’ The
seating arrangements were explained as temporary and all pupils were told it was in order for
me to get to know them and their names.
The boy/girl seating arrangement did not work as well in this community. A number of pupils
became belligerent, with the senior leadership team being called to remove pupils from the
class. After two weeks, the Head of English asked for me to revert to the seating plan left by
the original teacher in order to get behaviour and learning back on track. When my findings

20. P a g e | 20
1327405
from my primary placement were presented, showing how behaviour could be controlled
using the boy/girl policy, I was told that this had been tried at this Academy before and had
been unsuccessful. Unfortunately without this prior knowledge and without the backing of
the senior leadership team or the Head of English, I was unable to go further with the study.
With this in mind, it showed seating arrangements to be more than just teacher prerogative.
What might work in one school might be inappropriate in another. Seating arrangements can
have a detrimental effect on behaviour because every pupil is different, as are teaching styles,
classroom environments and attitudes to learning which supports Weinstein’s, 1985, research
(in Marx et al., 1999, p. 251.) However, as the results from the study showed, to not have a
seating arrangement in place, however informal, can impact upon the behaviour and learning
of not just one pupil, but all the pupils in the class.
To re-iterate, this was a small-scale study focussing on only one low ability year group over a
short period of time. The methodology chosen was for ease of analysis and for the fact it was
less intrusive than other methods: the questionnaires were easy to create and to glean
statistical results from; focus groups were used as a more informal approach to one-to-one
interviews; and observations by staff in the classroom were used as pupils were already used
to the adults being in the classroom and it was a good way to get unbiased results. The
limitations of this study in particular were numerous: a non-standard classroom with fixed
desks; small sample to work with; pupils not reading the questions properly or understanding
the Likert scale; questionnaires given out at end of lesson resulting in answers being rushed;
focus group contained leading questions; and once part of a focus group, pupils may answer
in a certain manner because they ‘may be influenced by the social nature of the exercise’
(Taylor et al, 2006, p. 38.) For the study to have more impact on the Academy’s policy of

21. P a g e | 21
1327405
boy/girl seating, then the intervention needs to be all encompassing and look at the effects of
seating arrangements on behaviour in all year groups and with all ability classes. Using only a
Year 7 group, where behaviour is more easily controlled due to patterns of behaviour not
being formed at such an early phase, can give skewed results. For behaviour patterns to be
studied fully, then all year and ability groups should be included in the study as well as
interventions taking place in alternative classrooms and during other subject lessons.
Moving forward, although restricted by the physical layout of my classroom, it has become
clear from this small-scale study, that following the Academy’s policy of boy/girl seating is
the best approach to control behaviour with this particular class, in this particular classroom.
However, this will not be strictly adhered to as I will need to tailor the seating arrangements
within each class and year group in order to get the best behaviour and learning outcomes
from the pupils. This may result in boys sitting next to girls and vice versa. This will be an
evolving piece of work, depending on the nature of the class and the individuals involved.
What works from one class will not necessarily work for another and therefore there may be a
period of transition where the seating arrangements change until the best solution is found.
What is clear from this study and which supports the findings of Weinstein, 1985, cited in
Marx et al., 1999, p. 251, that when pupils select their own classroom positions, then
behaviour and learning outcomes are subject to that individual’s ‘motivation, personality
variables, and participation.’ Therefore teachers have to rely on their knowledge of the
individual and how they learn, in order to seat the pupil in the best possible position in the
classroom in order to control behaviour and achieve the best learning outcomes for every
pupil in the class. The boy/girl seating policy is a good place to start, but teachers need to
adapt this policy in order to control behaviour within the classroom and how this will impact
on positive learning outcomes for all pupils. What my complementary placement taught me

22. P a g e | 22
1327405
was that varied approaches to seating arrangements need to be managed in order to control
behaviour and not to assume a universal approach is necessarily the right one. It is hoped that
this study can begin again in the autumn term with a larger number of interventions with
other year groups and with pupils of all abilities to support or disprove the original data from
this study. Above all I hope to present my findings, regardless of outcomes, showing there is
a relationship between seating arrangements and the behaviour of pupils to the senior
leadership team and in turn help to improve learning outcomes within the Academy.
5795 Words

23. P a g e | 23
1327405
Appendices
Appendix 1
Original Seating Plan Following Academy’s Policy of Boy/Girl Seating

24. P a g e | 24
1327405
Appendix 2
Questionnaire Used Following Each Four-Lesson Session

25. P a g e | 25
1327405
Questionnaire
Look at this scale
1 5 10
I Like it a lot I don’t care I hate it
Use the above scale to answer the following questions. Put the number you think
answers the question best in the box. You may need to write an answer for some
of the questions. If you get stuck, raise your hand and I will help you interpret
the question.
1. What do you think of the seating arrangement?
2. What effect does the seating arrangement have on class discussions?
3. What do you think about sitting next to a boy or girl?
4. How would you rate your behaviour in today’s lesson? (tick the box)
a) The same as usual
b) Better than usual
c) Worse than usual
d) I was more talkative
e) I was less talkative
f) I was able to concentrate more
Appendix 3

26. P a g e | 26
1327405
Example of Questions Asked During Focus Group Following Original Academy Seating
Plan of Boy/Girl
 How do you feel about sitting next to a boy or girl?
 How do you think you work when sitting next to a boy or girl?
 Do you talk more or less when sitting next to a boy or girl?
 Do you like where you normally sit? If yes – why? If no – why?
 What is expected of you when you enter the classroom?
 Does the behaviour of others spoil the classroom environment?
 What happens to your work when others misbehave around you?
Appendix 4

27. P a g e | 27
1327405
Seating Plan based on Pupil’s Ability
Appendix 5

28. P a g e | 28
1327405
Example of Questions Asked During Focus Group Following Seating Arrangement
Based on Ability
 How did you feel when you were told to move to a different seat?
 Were you able to get as much work done in the new seating arrangement?
 Did you talk more or less in this new arrangement?
 Did you like where yousat during these four lessons? If yes – why? If no – why?
 What is expected of you when you enter the classroom?
 Did the behaviour of others spoil the classroom environment?
 Did you misbehave because of the new seating arrangement? If yes – why?
Appendix 6

29. P a g e | 29
1327405
No Seating Plan – Pupils Choose Where They Sit
Appendix 7

30. P a g e | 30
1327405
Example of Questions Asked During Focus Group Following Pupils Being Allowed to
Select Where They Sit
 How did you feel when you were told you could sit where you wanted to?
 How do you think you worked when sitting next to your friend ?
 Do you talk more or less when sitting next to your friend?
 Did you like being able to sit where you wanted to? If yes – why? If no – why?
 What is expected of you when you enter the classroom?
 Did the behaviour of others spoil the classroom environment?
 What happened to your work when the noise levels within the classroom were so
high?
Appendix 8

31. P a g e | 31
1327405
Example of Pupil’s Work When Seated Following The Academy’s Policy of Boy/Girl
Seating
Appendix 9

32. P a g e | 32
1327405
Example of Pupil’s Work When Seated Based on Pupil’s Ability
Appendix 10

33. P a g e | 33
1327405
Example of Pupil’s Work When Allowed To Choose Where They Sit
Appendix 11

34. P a g e | 34
1327405
Example of Pupil’s Work When Allowed To Choose Where They Sit – One Line of Text
Appendix 12

35. P a g e | 35
1327405
Example Lesson from Gothic Scheme of Work
Bibliography

36. P a g e | 36
1327405
Fernandes, A, Jinyan, H, & Rinaldo, V 2011, 'Does Where A Student Sits Really Matter? -
The Impact of Seating Locations on Student Classroom Learning', International Journal Of
Applied Educational Studies, 10, 1, pp. 66-77, Education Research Complete, EBSCOhost,
[Accessed 9 December 2013].
Marx, A, Fuhrer, U, & Hartig, T 1999, 'Effects of Classroom Seating Arrangements on
Children's question-asking', Learning Environments Research, 2, 3, pp. 249-263, E-Journals,
EBSCOhost, [Accessed 9 December 2013].
McCorskey, J.C, & McVetta, R.W, Classroom Seating Arrangements: Instructional
Communication Theory versus Student Preferences, Communication Education, Volume 27,
1978, Pages 99-111, [Accessed 9 December 2013].
Mohammad Moslemi Haghighi, Mahmud Mohd Jusan, ‘Exploring Students Behavior on
Seating Arrangements in Learning Environment: A Review’, Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, Volume 36, 2012, Pages 287-294, [Accessed 9 December 2013].
Parker, T, Hoopes, O, & Eggett, D 2011, 'The Effect of Seat Location and Movement or Permanence
on Student-Initiated Participation', College Teaching, 59, 2, pp. 79-84, Education Research Complete,
EBSCOhost, [Accessed 9 December 2013].
Taylor, C, Wilkie, M, & Baser, J 2006, ‘Doing Action Research: a guide for school support
staff’ [Accessed 29 January 2014].
Academy Curriculum Policy [Accessed 18 October 2013].

37. P a g e | 37
1327405
Academy SEN Policy (January 2012) [Accessed 18 October 2013].
Academy OFSTED Section 8 Report - 2012
http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/files/2010649/urn/136347.pdf
[Accessed 18 October 2013].
Academy OFSTED School Inspection Report - 2013
http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/files/2227553/urn/136347.pdf
[Accessed 18 October 2013].
For data on the school, see the DfE EduBase:
http://www.education.gov.uk/edubase/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=136347
[Accessed 18 October 2013].
Chelmsley Wood crime stats:
http://www.ukcrimestats.com/Neighbourhood/West_Midlands_Police/Chelmsley_Wood#Lea
gue [Accessed 18 October 2013].
2011 Census of Population: Key Statistics
http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/handsworth [Accessed 27 February 2014].
BBC Online [Higher Still] Modern Studies: Definitions of Poverty
http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/education/int/ms/health/wealth/def_of_poverty/definitions.sht
ml [Accessed 27 February 2014].

38. P a g e | 38
1327405
2013 Ward Profile: Chelmsley Wood (Solihull Council):
http://www.solihull.gov.uk/Attachments/Chelmsley_Wood_WP.pdf
[Accessed 18 October 2013].
A4 MA Intervention Planning Annex

39. P a g e | 39
1327405
Name: Julie Robinson Subject: English Date: 8th
December 2013
Selected area of focus: In the table below, indicate in more detail the method(s) you will be using
in your intervention:
 Title or research question: The Impact of Seating Arrangements on Behaviour for Low
Attaining Students
Pre-intervention observations of the target group
Ability level of the
class
Organisation:
(ie seating
plan/group
work/practical etc)
Topic: (the
programme of study
for the duration of
the intervention)
Assessment: ( how
will progress be
assessed at the end of
the PoS)
Year 7 set 4. Low
level literacy and
understanding.
Three variations of
seating plan.
Individual work
creating eBook
The Gothic genre Quality and quantity
of work completed.
Teacher assessment
What method(s) of investigation will you use in your study? (Please tick)
Questionnaires Interviews Observations Learning outcomes
(i.e. tests)
What is your justification for using this/these method(s)?
For the pupils To ensure those who are uncomfortable with one method, are able to
participate in another to get a fuller study
For the school To show quantative data rather than just qualitative when presenting
results
For the study To show quantative data rather than just qualitative when presenting
results
What are the benefits of this method?
For the pupils Closed questions within the questionnaire will help reduce the
possibility of not understanding or even the inability to understand
what is being asked of them
For the study Questionnaires – by using questionnaires it is ‘easier to create
statistical results’ (Cohen et al 2007, p 321)
For the data By obtaining statistical results, the data becomes more reliable
What are the potential risks when using this method?
For the pupils For the questionnaires and interviews they give the answers they
think you want and do not act naturally when being observed.
For the data May become skewed if answers are not given openly and honestly
For reliability For the reasons stated above, if the pupils do not respond openly and
honestly, then the data will be unreliable
How have you addressed these risks?
The questionnaires will be confidential. No name or gender indication will be on the
questionnaire. This may assist the pupils in giving more honest and open feedback. Only

40. P a g e | 40
1327405
those who are comfortable with the interview process and who understand the need to be open
and honest will be invited to interview within the focus group. The neutral observer will only
indicate gender when filling in the observation criteria.
What, if any, are the ethical considerations with this intervention?
There are no ethical considerations with this intervention. The pupils will be given an honest
explanation of the intervention in order for them to understand what is happening. There are
no conflicts of interest between the researcher (myself) and the researched (pupils). Using a
neutral observer will ensure the researched are protected. All researched pupils will be made
aware that they can withdraw from the intervention at any point should they feel
uncomfortable.