SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 13
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
  Un-learning to Re-learn for Understanding




                                     © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
When a new idea is introduced to a learner, it doesn’t just get
poured into their mind like water into a bucket. e new idea
is faced with integrating itself into the learner’s personal
cognitive landscape.
Each person has their own, unique Cognitive Ecology—
knowledge, concepts, experiences, schemas, and beliefs that
makeup what Kenneth Strike and George Posner call a
“Semantic Syntactical Network of Concepts.” [Hang onto that
notion—we’ll come back to it later]. Generally speaking,
people don’t let go of aspects of their Cognitive Ecology easily
—if a new idea introduced doesn’t fit into their network of
concepts easily (known as ‘assimilation’), then the individual
must alter their network of concepts in order to fit this new
idea into it (or ‘accommodate’ it). It’s kinda like having a
typical two-story home and saying you want to put an indoor
pool in the middle of it—successfully doing so isn’t like just
adding a wing onto the house, instead you’d have to take
apart the whole thing and rebuild it in a new way.
As a result, a person’s current Cognitive Ecology will influence
their production of a new conception.
For all these reasons, it’s critical to identify the
                                                           learner’s current Cognitive Ecology before
                                                           introducing a new conceptual model. Doing so will
                                                           allow the instructional designer to strategically
                                                           create an instructional experience (or cognitive
                                                           journey) for the learner, which increases its chances
                                                           exponentially of producing a conceptual change.
                                                           How can you unearth a learner’s Cognitive Ecology?
                                                           ere’s numerous things you can look to elicit
                                                           which will give you a sense of the individuals beliefs
                                                           and conceptions:

    • Exemplars & Images - can they explain for you an example of what they think, or draw an image of their ideas?
    • Analogies & Metaphors - can they come up with a metaphor or analogy that demonstrates what they believe?
    • Past Experiences - can they talk about their past experiences that have led to their current conceptions?
    • Anomalies - Are there parts of their conception that they can tell don’t quite “add up” in their head?
    • Other Knowledge - Do they hold other conceptions, that relate to or interact with the one you are concerned
     with, that might inhibit the acceptance of a new conception?

ese are just some of the things to look for and expose in the learner’s current Cognitive Ecology.


                                                                                        © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
To leverage a Conceptual Change, you must create in the learner
dissatisfaction with their current conception, by presenting them
conflicting and/or alternative ideas. A good instructional hook will
get them to engage in your cognitive journey.




                                        © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
As the instructional designer, your job is to shake
that foundation by creating an experience for them
that generates internal dissatisfaction with their
current conception.
e neat thing about these instructional experiences
is that they can often expose current conceptions, if
you weren’t able to decipher them easily before this.
What does these instructional experiences need to
look like? e general answer is they need to make
the learner unhappy with their previous conception
—which of course will likely be specific to the concept
you are driving at. However, there are certain things
you can strive for.




                         © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
• EXPOSE current weaknesses in their current conception
• create an outright ANOMALY in the mind of the learner—one
   of the most powerful ways of leveraging dissatisfaction. Is
   there an experience you can create for the learner that will
   leave their current conception coming up short?

• a NEW EXPERIENCE that is unlike anything they’ve had
   before can open new cognitive channels for the learner,
   thereby fitting better into their overall ‘Semantic Syntactical
   Network of Concepts”.




                                     © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
NOTE:   Although ANOMALIES are one of the most powerful mechanisms
        for leveraging cognitive dissonance, they don’t come easily.
        Providing the learner with an anomaly leaves their conceptual
        ecology on very shaky ground. Changing their cognitive ecology to
        accommodate the anomaly is the most difficult of the learner’s
        options—it’s much easier for the learner to just reject what they
        experienced, disregard the experience as irrelevant, or just try to
        compartmentalize their knowledge so that the new beliefs they are
        forming do not interact with their prior conceptions.

        In order for the anomaly to successfully do its job, the learner must:
         1. understand why the experience produced an anomaly
         2. believe they must reconcile this experience with their previous
               conceptions
         3. have the desire to put the cognitive work into doing this
         4. fail at attempts to assimilate the new knowledge

        It may seem daunting, but the good news is that there is extensive
        research showing the cognitive dissonance is a powerful
        mechanism, and many learners will seek to reconcile disconnects in
        conceptions in order to relieve this dissonance.


                                                  © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
Now that the learner’s conceptual foundation is on shaky ground
and they seek to re-concretize their conceptual ecology, you can
help them build the bridge to new conceptions. Presenting the new
conception will be successful if that bridge consists of 2 parts:
  • Minimal Understanding of the new conception, and
  • Initial Plausibility of the new conception




                                           © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
For minimal understanding, the learner must be given a framework
they can digest, or can construct this framework on their own.
Metaphors and analogies are useful tools in this area, as they
provide a familiar onramp for an unfamiliar concept.




                                         © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
For Initial Plausibility, the new concept must at least appear to
integrate with their overall semantic network and consistent with
other theories, knowledge, and prior experiences they hold.
Additionally, the new concept must appear to resolve the anomaly.
It also helps if the new conceptions appears analogous to another
conception to which the learner is already familiar.




                                                                    © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
If the learner is willing and able to go this far on the
cognitive journey, they are in good position to begin
to build a new foundation for their conception.
Continued instructional experiences and learning
opportunities designed for the new conceptual model
will result in the building, assimilation, and
concretization of the new conceptual model. By being
able to fit this new conceptual model into their
Semantic Syntactical Network of Concepts, the
learner is likely to have a strong and enduring
Conceptual Ecology.




                                                           © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
REVIEW




         © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
REVIEW




         © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Conceptual Change - Unlearn to Relearn

ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAM
ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAMED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAM
ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAMED IN
 
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdf
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdfLearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdf
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdfNoraima2
 
Learner centered principles
Learner centered principlesLearner centered principles
Learner centered principlesHa Ninh
 
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docx
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docxLearning Theory Job Aid Paper.docx
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docxBethanyClatt
 
what is reflective practice
what is reflective practicewhat is reflective practice
what is reflective practiceJoy Amulya
 
Intelligent Behaviors presentation
Intelligent Behaviors presentationIntelligent Behaviors presentation
Intelligent Behaviors presentationlynngall811
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryStephanie Conway
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryStephanie Conway
 
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large Classes
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large ClassesRemedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large Classes
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large ClassesDilip Barad
 
IT enters a new Learning Environment
IT enters a new Learning EnvironmentIT enters a new Learning Environment
IT enters a new Learning EnvironmentJay Cee
 
A Journey of Continuous Growth With Habits of MindDR AR.docx
A Journey of Continuous Growth  With Habits of MindDR AR.docxA Journey of Continuous Growth  With Habits of MindDR AR.docx
A Journey of Continuous Growth With Habits of MindDR AR.docxstandfordabbot
 
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph d
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph dEngaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph d
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph dcidanegeri
 
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide c
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide cEdutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide c
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide cDean Hanson
 
SW4085 Session 1
SW4085 Session 1SW4085 Session 1
SW4085 Session 1ZoeORiordan
 

Ähnlich wie Conceptual Change - Unlearn to Relearn (20)

AcaciAa 2011
AcaciAa 2011AcaciAa 2011
AcaciAa 2011
 
ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAM
ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAMED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAM
ED.IN 360 MASTER PILOT PROGRAM
 
Learning Center Model
Learning Center ModelLearning Center Model
Learning Center Model
 
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdf
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdfLearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdf
LearningTheories-PLT_studyguide-www.astate.edu-dotAsset-192246.pdf
 
Learner centered principles
Learner centered principlesLearner centered principles
Learner centered principles
 
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docx
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docxLearning Theory Job Aid Paper.docx
Learning Theory Job Aid Paper.docx
 
Constructivism
ConstructivismConstructivism
Constructivism
 
what is reflective practice
what is reflective practicewhat is reflective practice
what is reflective practice
 
Grits conference
Grits conference Grits conference
Grits conference
 
Intelligent Behaviors presentation
Intelligent Behaviors presentationIntelligent Behaviors presentation
Intelligent Behaviors presentation
 
CONCEPT-BASED LEARNING.pptx
CONCEPT-BASED LEARNING.pptxCONCEPT-BASED LEARNING.pptx
CONCEPT-BASED LEARNING.pptx
 
Edmonton catholic 2010
Edmonton catholic 2010Edmonton catholic 2010
Edmonton catholic 2010
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
 
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large Classes
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large ClassesRemedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large Classes
Remedy for the Challenge of Continuous Assessment in Large Classes
 
IT enters a new Learning Environment
IT enters a new Learning EnvironmentIT enters a new Learning Environment
IT enters a new Learning Environment
 
A Journey of Continuous Growth With Habits of MindDR AR.docx
A Journey of Continuous Growth  With Habits of MindDR AR.docxA Journey of Continuous Growth  With Habits of MindDR AR.docx
A Journey of Continuous Growth With Habits of MindDR AR.docx
 
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph d
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph dEngaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph d
Engaging all partners in reflection by kathleen rice ph d
 
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide c
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide cEdutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide c
Edutopia 6-tips-brain-based-learning-guide c
 
SW4085 Session 1
SW4085 Session 1SW4085 Session 1
SW4085 Session 1
 

Mehr von Jennifer S. Groff (19)

GBL-Basics_workshop
GBL-Basics_workshopGBL-Basics_workshop
GBL-Basics_workshop
 
Teach forchange
Teach forchangeTeach forchange
Teach forchange
 
Style Manual for the Computer
Style Manual for the ComputerStyle Manual for the Computer
Style Manual for the Computer
 
MIT-Ubiq-Games_HHL2009
MIT-Ubiq-Games_HHL2009MIT-Ubiq-Games_HHL2009
MIT-Ubiq-Games_HHL2009
 
Beyond Current Horizons - Futurelab
Beyond Current Horizons - FuturelabBeyond Current Horizons - Futurelab
Beyond Current Horizons - Futurelab
 
Open Assessment
Open AssessmentOpen Assessment
Open Assessment
 
Futurelab - Consolarium - Console Games Research
Futurelab - Consolarium - Console Games ResearchFuturelab - Consolarium - Console Games Research
Futurelab - Consolarium - Console Games Research
 
MIT-STEP
MIT-STEPMIT-STEP
MIT-STEP
 
LGN - Education Market Overview
LGN - Education Market OverviewLGN - Education Market Overview
LGN - Education Market Overview
 
Global Citizen
Global CitizenGlobal Citizen
Global Citizen
 
Ed arcade mobilegames2011-groff
Ed arcade mobilegames2011-groffEd arcade mobilegames2011-groff
Ed arcade mobilegames2011-groff
 
Dynamic Complex Systems
Dynamic Complex SystemsDynamic Complex Systems
Dynamic Complex Systems
 
CCR
CCRCCR
CCR
 
Assessment Primer
Assessment PrimerAssessment Primer
Assessment Primer
 
AugmentedRealityGames
AugmentedRealityGamesAugmentedRealityGames
AugmentedRealityGames
 
Learning Genome Project
Learning Genome ProjectLearning Genome Project
Learning Genome Project
 
GDTK
GDTKGDTK
GDTK
 
Barriers to Game Play in the Classroom
Barriers to Game Play in the ClassroomBarriers to Game Play in the Classroom
Barriers to Game Play in the Classroom
 
Xenos - LGN OER2011
Xenos - LGN OER2011Xenos - LGN OER2011
Xenos - LGN OER2011
 

Conceptual Change - Unlearn to Relearn

  • 1. CONCEPTUAL CHANGE Un-learning to Re-learn for Understanding © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 2. When a new idea is introduced to a learner, it doesn’t just get poured into their mind like water into a bucket. e new idea is faced with integrating itself into the learner’s personal cognitive landscape. Each person has their own, unique Cognitive Ecology— knowledge, concepts, experiences, schemas, and beliefs that makeup what Kenneth Strike and George Posner call a “Semantic Syntactical Network of Concepts.” [Hang onto that notion—we’ll come back to it later]. Generally speaking, people don’t let go of aspects of their Cognitive Ecology easily —if a new idea introduced doesn’t fit into their network of concepts easily (known as ‘assimilation’), then the individual must alter their network of concepts in order to fit this new idea into it (or ‘accommodate’ it). It’s kinda like having a typical two-story home and saying you want to put an indoor pool in the middle of it—successfully doing so isn’t like just adding a wing onto the house, instead you’d have to take apart the whole thing and rebuild it in a new way. As a result, a person’s current Cognitive Ecology will influence their production of a new conception.
  • 3. For all these reasons, it’s critical to identify the learner’s current Cognitive Ecology before introducing a new conceptual model. Doing so will allow the instructional designer to strategically create an instructional experience (or cognitive journey) for the learner, which increases its chances exponentially of producing a conceptual change. How can you unearth a learner’s Cognitive Ecology? ere’s numerous things you can look to elicit which will give you a sense of the individuals beliefs and conceptions: • Exemplars & Images - can they explain for you an example of what they think, or draw an image of their ideas? • Analogies & Metaphors - can they come up with a metaphor or analogy that demonstrates what they believe? • Past Experiences - can they talk about their past experiences that have led to their current conceptions? • Anomalies - Are there parts of their conception that they can tell don’t quite “add up” in their head? • Other Knowledge - Do they hold other conceptions, that relate to or interact with the one you are concerned with, that might inhibit the acceptance of a new conception? ese are just some of the things to look for and expose in the learner’s current Cognitive Ecology. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 4. To leverage a Conceptual Change, you must create in the learner dissatisfaction with their current conception, by presenting them conflicting and/or alternative ideas. A good instructional hook will get them to engage in your cognitive journey. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 5. As the instructional designer, your job is to shake that foundation by creating an experience for them that generates internal dissatisfaction with their current conception. e neat thing about these instructional experiences is that they can often expose current conceptions, if you weren’t able to decipher them easily before this. What does these instructional experiences need to look like? e general answer is they need to make the learner unhappy with their previous conception —which of course will likely be specific to the concept you are driving at. However, there are certain things you can strive for. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 6. • EXPOSE current weaknesses in their current conception • create an outright ANOMALY in the mind of the learner—one of the most powerful ways of leveraging dissatisfaction. Is there an experience you can create for the learner that will leave their current conception coming up short? • a NEW EXPERIENCE that is unlike anything they’ve had before can open new cognitive channels for the learner, thereby fitting better into their overall ‘Semantic Syntactical Network of Concepts”. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 7. NOTE: Although ANOMALIES are one of the most powerful mechanisms for leveraging cognitive dissonance, they don’t come easily. Providing the learner with an anomaly leaves their conceptual ecology on very shaky ground. Changing their cognitive ecology to accommodate the anomaly is the most difficult of the learner’s options—it’s much easier for the learner to just reject what they experienced, disregard the experience as irrelevant, or just try to compartmentalize their knowledge so that the new beliefs they are forming do not interact with their prior conceptions. In order for the anomaly to successfully do its job, the learner must: 1. understand why the experience produced an anomaly 2. believe they must reconcile this experience with their previous conceptions 3. have the desire to put the cognitive work into doing this 4. fail at attempts to assimilate the new knowledge It may seem daunting, but the good news is that there is extensive research showing the cognitive dissonance is a powerful mechanism, and many learners will seek to reconcile disconnects in conceptions in order to relieve this dissonance. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 8. Now that the learner’s conceptual foundation is on shaky ground and they seek to re-concretize their conceptual ecology, you can help them build the bridge to new conceptions. Presenting the new conception will be successful if that bridge consists of 2 parts: • Minimal Understanding of the new conception, and • Initial Plausibility of the new conception © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 9. For minimal understanding, the learner must be given a framework they can digest, or can construct this framework on their own. Metaphors and analogies are useful tools in this area, as they provide a familiar onramp for an unfamiliar concept. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 10. For Initial Plausibility, the new concept must at least appear to integrate with their overall semantic network and consistent with other theories, knowledge, and prior experiences they hold. Additionally, the new concept must appear to resolve the anomaly. It also helps if the new conceptions appears analogous to another conception to which the learner is already familiar. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 11. If the learner is willing and able to go this far on the cognitive journey, they are in good position to begin to build a new foundation for their conception. Continued instructional experiences and learning opportunities designed for the new conceptual model will result in the building, assimilation, and concretization of the new conceptual model. By being able to fit this new conceptual model into their Semantic Syntactical Network of Concepts, the learner is likely to have a strong and enduring Conceptual Ecology. © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 12. REVIEW © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu
  • 13. REVIEW © 2012 Jennifer Groff jennifer_groff@mail.harvard.edu