PISA-VET launch_El Iza Mohamedou_19 March 2024.pptx
A framework for international standard for CA: towards stewardship for sustainable production. S. J. Lin
1. Lin S.J, Friedrich T., Hansmann B, Kassam A.
Presenter: Shang-Jung, Lin
(MSc Organic Agriculture, Wageningen University)
Date: 29 Sep 2011
2. Outline
Introduction
Purpose
International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
General introduction
Structure
Example of content
Application
Challenges and further development
3. Introduction
FAO strategic objective A 2010-2019 :
sustainable intensification of crop production
Population Growth
Higher life expectancy, better nutrition demand
Pressures on nature resources
Demand on multiple agricultural outputs
Agricultural Production
Comes along with depletion of nature resources
4. Introduction
Goods
Food Feed Fiber Fuel
+ + + +
Environmental
- - - - Services
Climate
Flood and Biodiversity Ground Water
Change
Erosion Control Conservation Recharge
Mitigation
5. Introduction
Free or Public Services
Income
Environmental
Sources Services
Goods
balance
Conservation Agriculture
Sustainable Crop
Intensification via Agro-
ecological Approches
6. Purposes
Promote CA application by providing extended benefits
to farmers who practice this concept
Reward farmers with more tangible forms
Assure the integrity of CA practices by setting up Good
Agriculture Practices specifically for CA
Follow three pillars in order to receive the real effects of
CA farming
Mitigate the gap between different initiatives regarding
certification schemes
Definition of level of tillage and soil cover etc.
7. International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
Scope
Any crop including annual crops and perennial crops grown
worldwide
Potential Users
Farmers
CA Communities of Practices (CoPs)
Stewardship owners
Governments
Growth Potential
124 M ha of no-tillage area worldwide currently
Expanding at the rate of 6 M ha per annum
8. International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
Structure of the Standard:
Fodder Production
Major practices
Forward Planning Precise Operation
Economically Feasible Reduce Usage of Pesticide
and Herbicide
9. International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
Structure of the Standard:
1. Soil Management 2. Water Management
- Avoid mechanical soil - Build up soil organic matter and
disturbance implement soil restoration
- Avoid soil compaction - Maximum water infiltration and
- Maintain soil cover reduce evaporation losses
- Avoid soil from contamination - Impact assessment of water
with agrochemicals management
3. Crop and Fodder 4. Inputs Management
Production - Seeds
- Implement crop rotation - Agrochemicals
- Conduct crop protection - Fertilizer and nutrient management
- Close Nutrient cycle by - Energy management
integrating system
11. International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
Application of Standard
To be certified for To be operated as a
Stewardship policy incentives
Agricultura Certificada (AC) National CA Program (India)
12. - Stewardship for Sustainable Agriculture
• To Create a Module as “CA Module” following the Standard
• Farms comply with CA module are equally qualified for getting
certification
Certification Target Mentioning about CA practice
Proliferations
Round Table on All kinds of Three pillars of CA are mentioned as methods
Responsible Soy Soy of soil erosion control and prevention
Association production practices in RTRS standard.
Rain Forest Alliance Agricultural Three pillars of CA are described as criteria in
products, climate module comprised in Sustainable
forest Agriculture Standard.
Unilever Sustainable Agricultural The principles of CA are covered through the
agriculture products content in Crop Growing Guidelines ex: to
keep soil covered, economical viably crop
rotation, minimum tillage
13. - Payment for Environmental Services
How CA standard fit in PES scheme?
Conservation effects of CA should be recognized by PES projects
Farmers comply with CA standard are rewarded with PES benefits.
Steps
Map depiction (Soil, Watershed, Biodiversity, tillage level)
Define Baseline
Incorporate with point system or scoring system
Examples for PES
Carbon Offsets
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)
Alberta Offset System (AOS)
Water Management
RUPES Project: Eco-friendly land use management
Itaipu with FEBRAPDP: Eco-friendly farming
14. - Policy Incentives
How CA standard fit in policy support scheme
Governments recognize CA as one of the agri-environmental
measures
Point CA faming as one of the desired conditions in rural
area
Steps
Mapping
Describe desired conditions
Identify indicators
Potential for Policy Support
Low Carbon Emission Agricultural Program (Brazil)
ECAF
15. International Standard for Conservation Agriculture
Challenges
How the standard be adopted in various local
condition?
How the standard well applies to smallholders?
How to distinguish the level of performance?
Further Development
Waste management
Define Mandatory practices and adjustable practices
Identify sustainability indicators
Combine with measurement tools
Develop scoring system
16. Acknowledgement
Delta Foundation (Taiwan )
Dr. Theodore Freidrich (FAO)
Dr. Amir Kassam (Reading University)
Dr. Berthold Hansmann (GIZ)
Dr. Tom Goddard (Alberta)
Dr. Ivo Mello (CAAPAS)
Agronomist Juliana Albertengo (Aapreid)
Hinweis der Redaktion
I am going to present : A Framework for International Standard for Conservation Agriculture: Towards Stewardship for Sustainable Production. This work is one of the outputs of my internship in FAO, together with Dr. Theodore Friedrich and Dr. Amir Kassam, we composed a report of good agriculture practices for conservation agriculture. It is meant to serve two different purposes which will be mentioned in following presentation.
The outline of the presentation are shown in this slide: First, I go for introduction, talking about the background and incentives for the standard, following by the purpose of building up standard. And the big portion of the presentation will be used for international standard for conservation agriculture itself, including introduction, structure, example of the content, application
Sustainable intensification of crop production is the strategic objective of FAO for 2010-2019, because we have to deal with the population growth, higher life expectancy, better nutrition demand, pressures on nature resources, and demand on multiple agriculture outputs. As what happening now, agricultural production comes along with depletion of nature resources. Such as
The capability of mitigating climate change, flood and erosion control. Biodiversity conservation and ground water recharge. The upper boxed are the goods coming out of agriculture production, lower boxes represent the environmental services that get depleted in an unsustainable system.
The reason why we see this unbalanced situation is that agricultural goods are main income source of the farmers, on the other hand, environmental services are often regarded as free or public services. Farmers don’t have much motivation to preserve it while production. If we want to make the situation more balanced, we should pursue agro-ecological approach meaning that deliver biological outputs and environmental services at the same time.
The purpose of building up this standard are : promoting CA , so we hope the application of this standard can provide farmers with more tangible
According to Theo’s presentation the other day, the statistic of worldwide CA land reaches 124 M ha.
The arrangementstructure
In terms of certification system, there is only one in the world exclusively for no-till farmers, called AC. It’s already implemented in Argentina, the updated news is that there r already 70 farms certified. Nevertheless, in policy incentives, we didn’t find any good examples, Indian national (professor?)
RTRS: Though these practices are regarded as voluntary adoption. Unilever: . Not all of them are listed as Must or Mandatory requirement in Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Code