I gave this presentation to an undergraduate Design Research class at the University of Kansas, taught by Julia Eschman and Tamara Christensen, in March 2011. It focuses on the importance of finding the right people to drive insights for ethnographic/design research, and addresses tactics for doing so.
Recruiting is a key part of the design research process that often does not get the attention it deserves, to the detriment of project outcomes. I invite you to share your experiences and questions, to build a dialogue about this topic!
14. Putting the customer back in customer insights Competing for your attention: Selling projects Justifying methodology Experimenting with methods Identifying business questions Identifying research questions Fieldwork Travel Analyzing data Client wrangling Turning data into insights Storytelling Socializing findings Inspiring diverse teams Brainstorming …Designing! You can’t have the insights without the customer We focus a lot on the insights part of customer insights, but the customer part is truly foundational Finding the very people you need for insights can become an afterthought on busy teams Strive to put thought and decisions about who to talk to on equal footing early in the process
19. It’s even harder when you can’t offer an incentiveMost people are curious, and eager to be a part of something that contributes to progress. It’s rare that anyone is asked to talk about any aspect of their lives in detail – it’s an opportunity that many are eager to have!
24. How to do it You need people who are going to provide useful data; people who will inspire you, and inspire your design team and clients They must have the right relationship with whatever it is you’re studying, and they need to be good to spend time with There are four key steps: Establish relevant criteria Write a screener Find a recruiting partner/establish a recruiting strategy Build rapport prior to interview
25. 1. Relevant criteria: How NOT to do it Athletic gear: The archetypal persona the client design towards (brand hero) exists very rarely in the real world, and is better at inspiring marketing than informing design Don’t simply take the client’s customer segmentation or personas and find those people Don’t try to comprehensively represent all users and types of users of a product. It’s not an audit – be selective for quality not quantity
43. Think about intersectionsConsidering and understanding this helps the team get a broader sense even prior to research who is affected by the product and who is being designed for
44.
45.
46. Number of segments of actual, expected or desired users the team wants to cover
64. 1. Relevant criteria: Create a briefing sheet Sketch it out on whiteboard or paper; iterate Visualizing it helps surface details and potential issues
65.
66. Not letting details slip through the cracks… a critical tool in avoiding the kinds of failures we discussed!
67. Preventing bias in the participant by not tipping your hand (which can affect the research)
97. Layer of ethical protection (identity, privacy)Our clients frequently lament the dated methods that recruiters employ, and we concur. There is room for innovation in recruiting. Try to find creative partners. But what if you can’t use a professional recruiter?
Doing qualitative research in search of customer insights that can drive design and innovation...well, it’s squishy. We spend a lot of time justifying it to internal/external clients, talking about what we want to learn (the business questions) and what we want to ask (the research questions), what we’ll do with the data once we get it, how we turn it into actionable insights, (analysis and synthesis) and then figuring out how we will talk about and use the insights and stories to inspire diverse, multi-disciplinary teams.
Doing qualitative research in search of customer insights that can drive design and innovation...well, it’s squishy. We spend a lot of time justifying it to internal/external clients, talking about what we want to learn (the business questions) and what we want to ask (the research questions), what we’ll do with the data once we get it, how we turn it into actionable insights, (analysis and synthesis) and then figuring out how we will talk about and use the insights and stories to inspire diverse, multi-disciplinary teams.
Look at the system - the chooser, the user, the waiter, the bartender, the dishwasher, the parent, the child, the husband, the wife - interesting things don’t exist in a vacuum and the beahviors we want to understand interact with, intersect with, interleave with those of others - we can look at the experience of our “non customer” in order to understand more deeply about the experience with our customer (I’m sure you have stories; I remember the smarthome research hearing the husband tell us how great it was, when we spke to the wife later on, she told us she was going to come home and rip the damn thing out because the lights didn’t work)