Intellectual Property Crash Course for Entrepreneurs (February 22, 2011) presentation at the Wolf Law Building at the University of Colorado (Boulder, CO)
Legal Issues in Cloud Computing (J. Haislmaier - IP Institute 2010)
2011 Silicon Flatirons IP (Crash Course) For Entrepreneurers
1. February 22, 2011 Jason Haislmaier [email_address] @haislmaier Denver Boulder Colorado Springs Dublin London Los Angeles Phoenix Salt Lake City San Francisco
2. This presentation is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, nor is it intended to address specific legal compliance issues that may arise in particular circumstances. Please consult counsel concerning your own situation and any specific legal questions you may have. The thoughts and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenters and do not necessarily reflect the official or unofficial thoughts or opinions of their employers. For further information regarding this presentation, please contact the presenter(s) listed in the presentation. Unless otherwise noted, all original content in this presentation is licensed under the Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us .
6. Conscious choices In support of your business goals To tell your story
7. Angel funding Alpha Beta/Evaluation Gen 1 Product definition Product development Product refinement/ new versions Series A Friends & Family funding Founders Product development and support Sales and marketing Direct sales Partner/Channel sales NDAs Employee and Contractor Agreements Initial invention disclosures Follow-on disclosures Patent filings Patent filings Patent filings US TM filing Foreign TM filing DMCA Registration US TM filing DMCA Registration Employee and Contractor Agreements Gen 2 Initial invention disclosures
8. Ownership is key Centralize ownership Capture value
26. Key Concern U.S. patent system is “first-to-invent” Most all others are “first-to-file” Patents
27. U.S. Patent Filing “Bar date” One-year following first publication or One-year following first attempt to commercialize Patents
28. Non-U.S. Patent Filing “Bar date” Following first publication or Following first attempt to commercialize Patents
29. First Public Use, Disclosure, Sale, or Offer for Sale Statutory “Bar Date” (Filing Deadline for U.S. Application) One-year grace period from public use/disclosure of invention to file U.S. application U.S. Filing “Bar Date” Patents 12/7/10 12/7/11
30. Non-U.S. Filing “Bar Date” Non-U.S. Application Filing Deadline One-year grace period from U.S. application filing to file foreign patent application U.S. Application Filed (Includes provisional applications) Patents 12/7/10 12/7/11 First Public Use, Disclosure, Sale, or Offer for Sale
31. Non-U.S. Filing “Bar Date” Non-U.S. Application Filing Non-U.S. application filed within one-year of U.S. application but not within grace period First Public Use, Disclosure, Sale, or Offer for Sale 12/7/10 12/7/11 Patents U.S. application filed within grace period U.S. Application Filed (Includes provisional applications)
37. Are business methods and software still patentable? Patents
38. Yes, but. . . Patents Bilski Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ___ (2010) June 28, 2010
39. The “Bilski” Issue Still Protectable? Definitely Protectable Likely Not Protectable Patents Method for producing machine tools Abstract business methods Software-implemented business methods Software
61. All Marks Are Not Created Equal Stronger Protection Weaker Protection No Protection facial tissue computer software Cellophane Margarine Escalator Aspirin Trademarks Descriptive Generic Fanciful Suggestive Arbitrary
62.
63. IP is everywhere Not if IP is valuable to your business How valuable IP is to your business
64. Make each choice an informed and conscious choice