SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Breaking
News:
Direct
Mail
is
NOT
the
Triceratops
of
Marketing



         That’s
right,
we’re
saying
it:
Don’t
believe
the
hype.
While
the
world
has
gone
online,

using
“the
Googles”
and
“the
Internets”
for
everything
from
shopping
to
socializing,
recent

studies
prove
that
good
old‐fashioned
direct
mail
is
still
an
effective
and
essential
marketing

channel.

         A
2008
DMNews/Pitney
Bowes
Direct
Mail
Survey
revealed
that
nearly
70%
of

respondents
renewed
a
relationship
with
a
business
because
they
received
a
marketing

piece
or
promotional
item
on
the
mail.
Nearly
40%
of
respondents
reported
trying
a
new

business
for
the
first
time
thanks
to
direct
mail.
Most
importantly,
respondents
stated
that

information
they
received
via
direct
mail
most
often
led
to
a
first‐time
contribution
to
a

non‐profit
organization.
The
surveyors
concluded
that
“direct
mail
induces
the
customer
to

touch
the
offer—recipients
of
direct
mail
are
receiving,
sorting,
reading,
and
using
direct

mail
to
make
purchasing
decisions.”

         The
Index
of
National
Fundraising
Performance,
published
by
Target
Analytics
in

2009,
analyzed
donation
channels
for
79
of
the
largest
non‐profits
in
the
United
States
and

found
that
78%
of
contributions
were
generated
by
direct
mail,
making
it
the
top
source
of

fundraising,
well
ahead
of
both
Internet
(9%)
and
telemarketing
(3%).
Most
interesting,

direct
mail
was
responsible
for
89%
of
all
new
donors,
while
only
12%
were
acquired

online.

         Of
course,
when
non‐profits
compare
direct
mail
and
email,
cost
is
a
factor.
Make

sure
your
organization
is
not
just
weighing
the
difference
in
cost
of
distribution,
but
also
the

difference
in
cost‐per‐response.
Although
there
is
currently
insufficient
data
available
on

email
response
rates,
the
2009
Global
Email
Deliverability
Benchmark
Report,
done
by

Return
Path,
found
that
20%
of
emails
were
undelivered
(sent
to
“junk”
or
“bulk”
folders)

while
the
deliverability
rate
for
traditional
mail
is
around
88%
or
higher.

         The
latest
facts
show
that
a
well‐planned
direct
mail
campaign
can
still
produce
the

most
reliable
and
predictable
method
of
results
generation
for
fundraising.
Obviously
we

don’t
suggest
that
you
rule
out
email,
which
can
be
extremely
effective
especially
once

you’ve
established
a
true
dialogue
and
trusting
relationship
with
your
donors
and

prospects.
The
best
marketing
mix
is
an
integrated
approach
that
maximizes
your
message

and
your
budget
across
various
mediums.


Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZA
CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZACARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZA
CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZAGuillermo15w
 
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der Niederlande
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der NiederlandeWikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der Niederlande
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der NiederlandeRobert Schuwer
 
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnp
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnpBengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnp
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnpWir sind das Kapital
 
Developing a new policy for social (care)
Developing a new policy for social (care)Developing a new policy for social (care)
Developing a new policy for social (care)Citizen Network
 
Vectores angulo entre vectores
Vectores angulo entre vectoresVectores angulo entre vectores
Vectores angulo entre vectoresEmmanuel Moreno
 
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖文化大學
 
Sofia de melo breyner
Sofia de melo breynerSofia de melo breyner
Sofia de melo breynermarialoucao
 

Andere mochten auch (11)

CV Adhitya 2016
CV Adhitya 2016CV Adhitya 2016
CV Adhitya 2016
 
CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZA
CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZACARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZA
CARTEL: WOODSTOCK PLAZA
 
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der Niederlande
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der NiederlandeWikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der Niederlande
Wikiwijs: der Ansatz bei OER in der Niederlande
 
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnp
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnpBengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnp
Bengs biotech region und cluster nch 05-2011_bcnp
 
Developing a new policy for social (care)
Developing a new policy for social (care)Developing a new policy for social (care)
Developing a new policy for social (care)
 
J Med 4 05 Eisen
J Med 4 05 EisenJ Med 4 05 Eisen
J Med 4 05 Eisen
 
Vectores angulo entre vectores
Vectores angulo entre vectoresVectores angulo entre vectores
Vectores angulo entre vectores
 
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖
外勞制度監理如國王新衣 聯合晚報 好社論-詹翔霖
 
Chem
ChemChem
Chem
 
Sofia de melo breyner
Sofia de melo breynerSofia de melo breyner
Sofia de melo breyner
 
Caravias ee-vc-5
Caravias ee-vc-5Caravias ee-vc-5
Caravias ee-vc-5
 

Writing Sample 1 - Direct Mail

  • 1. Breaking
News:
Direct
Mail
is
NOT
the
Triceratops
of
Marketing
 
 That’s
right,
we’re
saying
it:
Don’t
believe
the
hype.
While
the
world
has
gone
online,
 using
“the
Googles”
and
“the
Internets”
for
everything
from
shopping
to
socializing,
recent
 studies
prove
that
good
old‐fashioned
direct
mail
is
still
an
effective
and
essential
marketing
 channel.
 A
2008
DMNews/Pitney
Bowes
Direct
Mail
Survey
revealed
that
nearly
70%
of
 respondents
renewed
a
relationship
with
a
business
because
they
received
a
marketing
 piece
or
promotional
item
on
the
mail.
Nearly
40%
of
respondents
reported
trying
a
new
 business
for
the
first
time
thanks
to
direct
mail.
Most
importantly,
respondents
stated
that
 information
they
received
via
direct
mail
most
often
led
to
a
first‐time
contribution
to
a
 non‐profit
organization.
The
surveyors
concluded
that
“direct
mail
induces
the
customer
to
 touch
the
offer—recipients
of
direct
mail
are
receiving,
sorting,
reading,
and
using
direct
 mail
to
make
purchasing
decisions.”
 The
Index
of
National
Fundraising
Performance,
published
by
Target
Analytics
in
 2009,
analyzed
donation
channels
for
79
of
the
largest
non‐profits
in
the
United
States
and
 found
that
78%
of
contributions
were
generated
by
direct
mail,
making
it
the
top
source
of
 fundraising,
well
ahead
of
both
Internet
(9%)
and
telemarketing
(3%).
Most
interesting,
 direct
mail
was
responsible
for
89%
of
all
new
donors,
while
only
12%
were
acquired
 online.
 Of
course,
when
non‐profits
compare
direct
mail
and
email,
cost
is
a
factor.
Make
 sure
your
organization
is
not
just
weighing
the
difference
in
cost
of
distribution,
but
also
the
 difference
in
cost‐per‐response.
Although
there
is
currently
insufficient
data
available
on
 email
response
rates,
the
2009
Global
Email
Deliverability
Benchmark
Report,
done
by
 Return
Path,
found
that
20%
of
emails
were
undelivered
(sent
to
“junk”
or
“bulk”
folders)
 while
the
deliverability
rate
for
traditional
mail
is
around
88%
or
higher.
 The
latest
facts
show
that
a
well‐planned
direct
mail
campaign
can
still
produce
the
 most
reliable
and
predictable
method
of
results
generation
for
fundraising.
Obviously
we
 don’t
suggest
that
you
rule
out
email,
which
can
be
extremely
effective
especially
once
 you’ve
established
a
true
dialogue
and
trusting
relationship
with
your
donors
and
 prospects.
The
best
marketing
mix
is
an
integrated
approach
that
maximizes
your
message
 and
your
budget
across
various
mediums.