"Fly with Ease: Booking Your Flights with Air Europa"
Tourism Reputation in the Age of Social Media
1. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Tourism Reputation
in the Age of Social Media
Dr. Alessandro Inversini
Prof. Dimitrios Buhalis
School of Tourism
Bourbemouth University
Dr. Alessandro Inversini
linkedin.com/in/inversini
@beanbol
beanbol.com
ainversini@bournemouth.ac.uk
May 22nd 2013
6. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The aggregation of online feedback
mechanisms that use internet bidirectional
communication to share opinions about a
wide range of topics such as: products,
services and events
Dellarocas, 2003
The aggregation of all these online
feedbacks creates the web reputation of
the products service or event (and of the
destination)
Dellarocas, 2001 and 2005;
Bolton et al, 2004
13. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The social web perspective
i) the web is conceived more as a public square where to connect and exchange
opinions instead of a library;
ii) the possibility of publishing contents has been widespread thanks to easy-to-use
websites and applications;
iii) the availability of large bandwidth connections makes possible a wider use of
multimedia, leading to good quality, interactive content provided by the users
themselves. (Cantoni and Tardini, 2009).
14. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The social web perspective
Social Media are: “media impressions created by consumers, typically informed by
relevant experience, and archived or shared online for easy access by other
impressionable consumers” (Blackshaw, 2006)
They represent “a mixture of fact and opinion, impression and sentiment, founded
and unfounded tidbits, experiences, and even rumor” (Blackshaw & Nazarro, 2006)
Social media are important as they help spread within the web the electronic Word
of Mouth. (Litvin, Goldsmith, & Pan, 2008)
15. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The web search perspective
The issue of online information search (Jang, 2004) has attracted the interest of
academics and practitioners in the last decades.
Ramsey (2007) estimated that 61% of adult internet users conduct travel search
on the web.
Recent developments in the online information search research (Xiang et al., 2008)
demonstrated that travellers spend time to locate correct information on the
internet, checking different information providers (Inversini and Buhalis, 2009)
before making online reservations (Vermeulen and Seegers, 2009).
Most of the research has focused on the technical aspects
and on users’ behaviour aspects of online information
search (Brin & Page 1998; Jansen & Molina 2006).
16. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The web search perspective
• Social Media are SEARCH ENGINE FRIENDLY
• Intrinsic Characteristic (Gretzel, 2006)
• Social Media are popultating Search Engines
• 11% in 2010 (Xiang and Gretzel, 2010)
XiangandGretzel,2010
17. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Firms & brand management
• Two concepts are crucial for understanding a brand:
• Brand identity, that is the collection of all the brand attributes;
• Brand image, that is how relevant stakeholders perceive the brand.
Reputation can be understood as a
collective representation of multiple
stakeholders' image of the brand built
over time.
…but… different stakeholders can have
different perceptions of the same brand,
therefore different images may exists. (e.g.
Argenti & Druckenmiller, 2004).
19. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Firms & brand management
• Before Social Media
– Reputation was assessed thanks to structured
surveys (Fombrun et al. 1999) and models
such as the Reputation Quotinet and the
RepTrack (reputationinstitute.com)
• What about now???
– eWord of Mouth
– …
www.reputationinstitute.com
20. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Reputation can be considered as the aggregation
of feedbacks and feelings (Mandelli and Cantoni,
2010) of stakeholders about a given
organization, product and/or brand.
Experiences such as Destination Online
Reputation Model (DORM)
- Web search
- Content analysis
- Sentiment detection
Inversinietal.,2010
36. www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Tourism Reputation
in the Age of Social Media
Dr. Alessandro Inversini
Prof. Dimitrios Buhalis
School of Tourism
Bourbemouth University
Dr. Alessandro Inversini
linkedin.com/in/inversini
@beanbol
beanbol.com
ainversini@bournemouth.ac.uk
May 22nd 2013
Hinweis der Redaktion
we focus on fulfilling the promises
They review our facilitiesThey give feedback about our servicesDellarocas
Virtual:We do not know himIs maybe not buying our product/experience We do not feel her/him as real
Conceptualizing online reputation is not an easy task, because as Marchiori and Cantoni (2012) noted in their review of the literature, over the years different disciplines approached the issues such as (i) psychology (e.g. Bergler, 1948) which considers reputation as cognitive association related to an object that drives stakeholder behaviour; (ii) sociology which sees reputation as a social construct (e.g. Camic, 1992; Lang and Lang, 1988); (iii) economics which considers reputation as a cognitive interpretation of an organization’s performance gathered by stakeholders (e.g. Allen, 1984; Weigelt and Camerer, 1988); (iv) marketing which considers reputation as perceptual representation of a company’s past actions and future prospects that describes the firms overall appeal to all of its key constituents when compared with other competitors (Dowling, 2008; Fombrun, 1996; Fombrun et al., 1999). Finally, they add a linguistic/ethimological perspective defining, analysing the prefix “re” – which means iteration of something and “puto” - which implies a evaluative dimension. Reputation is in other words a sociological construct (i.e. sociology) based on cognitive interpretations and association of a brand or an organization performance gathered by stakeholders (i.e. psychology and economics), past actions and future prospects that describe the firm/brand/organization overall appeal when compared to other competitors (i.e. marketing) and that drive stakeholder behaviour (i.e. psychology). Reputation implies an iterative and long lasting evaluation (i.e. opinion) of relevant stakeholders part of a given social group (i.e. linguistic).
As travel and tourism are experience-based activities (e.g. Tussyadiah & Fesenmaier, 2008) such experiences need to be communicated. Communities, blogs, travel review websites and social media in general offer publication outlets to help information sharing among users (Arsal et al., 2008). These websites increasingly gain substantial popularity in online travellers’ use of the internet (Gretzel, 2006; Pan et al., 2007).web2.0 does not provide any new protocol or completely new technologies (although a range of related technologies has been developed around it, like Ajax). It represents mainly a different use of the web itself, characterized by different expectations, goals and practices (Kolbitsch and Maurer, 2006): (i) the web is conceived more as a public square where to connect and exchange opinions instead of a library, (ii) the possibility of publishing contents has been widespread thanks to easy-to-use websites and applications and (iii) the availability of large bandwidth connections makes possible a wider use of multimedia, leading to good quality, interactive content provided by the users themselves (Cantoni and Tardini, 2009).
Social media, are playing an increasingly important role as information sources for travelers as they increasingly appear in search engine results in the context of travel-related searches (Hays, Page, Buhalis, 2012). Social media constitute a substantial part of the search results and therefore traditional providers of travel-related information will have to ensure that they include social media in their online marketing (Xiang and Gretzel, 2010). Looking forward, successful tourism organisations will increasingly need to rapidly identify consumer needs and to interact with prospective clients by using online, comprehensive, personalised and up-to-date communication media for the design of products that satisfy tourism demand.
Xiang and Gretzel (2010) shows that social media constitute a substantial part of the search results in search engines. Their results clearly indicates that search engines can likely direct travellers to social media sites. The study describes the results of ten different searches performed with the popular search engine Google in nine US cities. The relevant results for each query were the ones contained in the first ten pages (10,383 results). The findings demonstrated that there is a great amount of User Generated Content populating the organic results of the popular search engine Google (11%) distributed in the following categories: virtual communities 40% (e.g. travel.yahoo.com), review sites 27% (e.g. tripadvisor.com and holidaycheck.com), blogs 15% (e.g. blogs.marriott.com and hotel-blogs.com), networking site 9% (e.g. facebook.com and wayn.com), media sharing 7% (e.g. youtube.com, flickr.com), others 2% (e.g. wikitravel.org and twitter.com). One other interesting finding regards the fact that different keywords generate different social media (e.g. nightlife is very social media friendly - Xiang and Gretzel, 2009). This study also demonstrated that social media are gaining substantial popularity within the online tourism domain (Gretzel, 2006; Pan et al., 2007). The importance of social media in online tourism lies in the fact that they are populating the search engine listing and apparently tourism businesses have little control.
Among the brand definitions ( I can quote few other s and the use this one) here this seems to be suited for our purposes: " a brand is a cluster of rational and emotional values that enable stakeholders to recognise a promise about a unique experience" (Christodoulies and Chernatony, 2002) + intangible setting - Therefore a brand has (i) emotional and (ii) functional values leading to a promise experience (Chernatony and Christodoulies 2004) - Two concepts are crucial for understanding a brand (i) identity, that is the collection of all the brand attributes and (ii) image, that is how relevant stakeholders perceive the brand --> different stakeholders (industry related, customers…) can have different perceptions of the same brand, therefore different images may exists. (e.g. Argenti & Druckenmiller, 2004).- Reputation is a collective representation of multiple stakeholders' image of the brand built over time. - Brand Management is a Marketing issue, while Reputation Management is a communication issue.- Reputation was assessed thanks to survey to relevant stakeholder (already in the chapter) before the web2.0