SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Sandra Cash


Mailbox 108


This document was written by Saint-Simon. In it he tries to evaluate King Louis XIV. He describes King Louis XIV as

being good and just. He expressed that he could have been a great king, except that he had flaws that he let

control him. Saint-Simon’s presence in Louis’ court complicated his assessment of King Louis XIV, since Louis is a

person who you have to compliment, and yet Saint-Simon also saw the bad side of Louis. This document implies

that absolutist rule can turn a good king slowly into a vain, jealous, who had to be superior.


Saint-Simon describes Louis XIV as being courageous, handsome, and gracious, having a natural charm about him.

He liked to have order, liked regularity and had a grand mien. He goes on to say that he could have been a good

king, maybe even a great king, but a he had a few flaws that kept him from this. These flaws were his vanity,

jealousy, his love of glory, and his need to be superior.


Saint-Simon’s own presence in Louis’ court complicates his assessment of Louis because Louis is a person that you

have to flatter. In order to do this he must also flatter Louis in his writing. Another problem is he sees how Louis

belittles everyone and Saint-Simon must also Due to this it could be easy for him to only notice all Louis’s faults

and hard to see Louis’s strengths.


This document implies that the nature of absolutist rule that even if you start out with a good King, he can turn out

bad later on. There is potential that all the glory given to a good king, goes to their head, making them vain, and

jealous if anyone else gets glory.


Saint-Simon describes Louis XIV as a good king whose evil came from other places. Saint-Simon being in Louis’

court complicates how he describes Louis XIV because one he has to praise the king and on the other hand he sees

all this evil, which would make it hard to see the king’s strengths. This document implies that even a good king, if

ruling too long, can become evil. This is due to the fact he gets too used to being in control, and can become way

too vain.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chong
Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chongCach hen ho voi phu nu da co chong
Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chongpiloca199
 
Gila 1
Gila 1Gila 1
Gila 1gkurtz
 
econf_twitter_veillesante
econf_twitter_veillesanteeconf_twitter_veillesante
econf_twitter_veillesantepressepapiers
 
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-Acebo
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-AceboBNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-Acebo
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-AceboBiblioteca Nacional de España
 
Theories of the universe 2
Theories of the universe 2Theories of the universe 2
Theories of the universe 2geislau15
 
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8markcancook.com.
 
Evaluation Catherine Thompson
Evaluation Catherine Thompson Evaluation Catherine Thompson
Evaluation Catherine Thompson Catherine10
 

Andere mochten auch (13)

Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chong
Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chongCach hen ho voi phu nu da co chong
Cach hen ho voi phu nu da co chong
 
Ice cream menu
Ice cream menuIce cream menu
Ice cream menu
 
Gila 1
Gila 1Gila 1
Gila 1
 
Bài giảng
Bài giảngBài giảng
Bài giảng
 
I am an artist
I am an artistI am an artist
I am an artist
 
Prepare!
Prepare!Prepare!
Prepare!
 
Chuong1
Chuong1Chuong1
Chuong1
 
econf_twitter_veillesante
econf_twitter_veillesanteeconf_twitter_veillesante
econf_twitter_veillesante
 
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-Acebo
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-AceboBNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-Acebo
BNE-Telefónica: Strategic Partner Agreement. José Luis Bueren Gómez-Acebo
 
Theories of the universe 2
Theories of the universe 2Theories of the universe 2
Theories of the universe 2
 
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8
Rangali bar menu sept 2011 v8
 
Evaluation Catherine Thompson
Evaluation Catherine Thompson Evaluation Catherine Thompson
Evaluation Catherine Thompson
 
Privacy Controversy
Privacy ControversyPrivacy Controversy
Privacy Controversy
 

Mehr von Random Sandi

Works cited for dracula paper
Works cited for dracula paperWorks cited for dracula paper
Works cited for dracula paperRandom Sandi
 
Poetic response to art
Poetic response to artPoetic response to art
Poetic response to artRandom Sandi
 
Paper two the rocking horse winner
Paper two the rocking horse winnerPaper two the rocking horse winner
Paper two the rocking horse winnerRandom Sandi
 
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summary
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summaryPaper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summary
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summaryRandom Sandi
 
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venice
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venicePaper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venice
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of veniceRandom Sandi
 
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rex
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rexPaper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rex
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rexRandom Sandi
 
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writings
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writingsPaper # 3 insights into poe’s writings
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writingsRandom Sandi
 
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dream
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dreamPaper #8 langston hughes’s dream
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dreamRandom Sandi
 
Paper #7 thoughts on poems
Paper #7 thoughts on poemsPaper #7 thoughts on poems
Paper #7 thoughts on poemsRandom Sandi
 
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connor
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connorPaper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connor
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connorRandom Sandi
 
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”Random Sandi
 
Notes for dracula paper
Notes for dracula paperNotes for dracula paper
Notes for dracula paperRandom Sandi
 
Literary analysis on dracula
Literary analysis on draculaLiterary analysis on dracula
Literary analysis on draculaRandom Sandi
 
Devotional response to scripture
Devotional response to scriptureDevotional response to scripture
Devotional response to scriptureRandom Sandi
 
World civ assignment 3.30.12
World civ assignment 3.30.12World civ assignment 3.30.12
World civ assignment 3.30.12Random Sandi
 
World c iv assignment 1.20.12
World c iv assignment 1.20.12World c iv assignment 1.20.12
World c iv assignment 1.20.12Random Sandi
 

Mehr von Random Sandi (20)

Works cited for dracula paper
Works cited for dracula paperWorks cited for dracula paper
Works cited for dracula paper
 
Poetic response to art
Poetic response to artPoetic response to art
Poetic response to art
 
Paper two the rocking horse winner
Paper two the rocking horse winnerPaper two the rocking horse winner
Paper two the rocking horse winner
 
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summary
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summaryPaper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summary
Paper # 6 thoughts on the merchant of venice withouth the plot summary
 
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venice
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venicePaper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venice
Paper # 6 thoughts on merchant of venice
 
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rex
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rexPaper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rex
Paper # 5 thoughts on oedipus rex
 
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writings
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writingsPaper # 3 insights into poe’s writings
Paper # 3 insights into poe’s writings
 
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dream
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dreamPaper #8 langston hughes’s dream
Paper #8 langston hughes’s dream
 
Paper #7 thoughts on poems
Paper #7 thoughts on poemsPaper #7 thoughts on poems
Paper #7 thoughts on poems
 
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connor
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connorPaper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connor
Paper #4 thoughts on flannery o'connor
 
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”
Paper 1 # “a rose for emily”
 
Notes for dracula paper
Notes for dracula paperNotes for dracula paper
Notes for dracula paper
 
Literary analysis on dracula
Literary analysis on draculaLiterary analysis on dracula
Literary analysis on dracula
 
Final part 2
Final part 2Final part 2
Final part 2
 
Final part 1
Final part 1Final part 1
Final part 1
 
Devotional response to scripture
Devotional response to scriptureDevotional response to scripture
Devotional response to scripture
 
Summary of act ii
Summary of act iiSummary of act ii
Summary of act ii
 
World civ assignment 3.30.12
World civ assignment 3.30.12World civ assignment 3.30.12
World civ assignment 3.30.12
 
World c iv assignment 1.20.12
World c iv assignment 1.20.12World c iv assignment 1.20.12
World c iv assignment 1.20.12
 
World civ 4.16.12
World civ 4.16.12World civ 4.16.12
World civ 4.16.12
 

World civ assignment 1.13.12

  • 1. Sandra Cash Mailbox 108 This document was written by Saint-Simon. In it he tries to evaluate King Louis XIV. He describes King Louis XIV as being good and just. He expressed that he could have been a great king, except that he had flaws that he let control him. Saint-Simon’s presence in Louis’ court complicated his assessment of King Louis XIV, since Louis is a person who you have to compliment, and yet Saint-Simon also saw the bad side of Louis. This document implies that absolutist rule can turn a good king slowly into a vain, jealous, who had to be superior. Saint-Simon describes Louis XIV as being courageous, handsome, and gracious, having a natural charm about him. He liked to have order, liked regularity and had a grand mien. He goes on to say that he could have been a good king, maybe even a great king, but a he had a few flaws that kept him from this. These flaws were his vanity, jealousy, his love of glory, and his need to be superior. Saint-Simon’s own presence in Louis’ court complicates his assessment of Louis because Louis is a person that you have to flatter. In order to do this he must also flatter Louis in his writing. Another problem is he sees how Louis belittles everyone and Saint-Simon must also Due to this it could be easy for him to only notice all Louis’s faults and hard to see Louis’s strengths. This document implies that the nature of absolutist rule that even if you start out with a good King, he can turn out bad later on. There is potential that all the glory given to a good king, goes to their head, making them vain, and jealous if anyone else gets glory. Saint-Simon describes Louis XIV as a good king whose evil came from other places. Saint-Simon being in Louis’ court complicates how he describes Louis XIV because one he has to praise the king and on the other hand he sees all this evil, which would make it hard to see the king’s strengths. This document implies that even a good king, if ruling too long, can become evil. This is due to the fact he gets too used to being in control, and can become way too vain.