Investigating the Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies on Situationally Impaired Users
•
0 gefällt mir•487 views
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Mehr von Hugo Nicolau
Mehr von Hugo Nicolau (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Investigating the Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies on Situationally Impaired Users
- 1. Investigating the Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies on Situationally Impaired Users David Lucas Hugo Nicolau Tiago Guerreiro Joaquim Jorge
- 2. Evolution …
- 3. On the move
- 5. @ Home
- 6. @ Work
- 7. Outdoors
- 8. In car
- 10. @ Subway
- 11. Many contexts CONTEXT
- 12. Leading to … SIID Situationally-Induced Impairments and Disabilities
- 13. Visual Attention
- 16. Not quite the same
- 18. Text-entry
- 19. Screen Readers
- 20. VoiceOver
- 21. NavTouch [Guerreiro, 2008]
- 22. User Evaluation
- 23. 23 Participants
- 24. 18 ~ 37 years old
- 27. Apparatus
- 28. Text-entry Methods QWERTY VoiceOver NavTouch
- 29. Visual Feedback NavTouch QWERTY
- 30. Mobility conditions seated corridor navigation
- 31. Five word sentences 97% correlation
- 32. Measurements and Design Words per Minute Error rate Minimum String Distance (MSD) Error Rate Preferred Walking speed
- 33. Text-entry speed 25 20 15 10 5 0 seated corridor navigation Qwerty VoiceOver NavTouch
- 34. Text-entry speed Text-entry sensitive to visually demanding conditions AT were inefficient regarding speed QWERTY the most sensitive (3.4 wpm)
- 35. Error Rate 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% seated corridor navigation Qwerty VoiceOver NavTouch
- 36. Error Rate More deletions with QWERTY Fewer errors with Assistive Technologies?
- 37. Quality of Text 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% seated corridor navigation Qwerty VoiceOver NavTouch
- 38. Quality of Text NavTouch the most erroneous Audio feedback improves quality of text QWERTY the most sensitive
- 39. Walking Speed 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% corridor navigation Qwerty VoiceOver NavTouch
- 40. Walking Speed Navigation course was more demanding Users decreased walking speed ATs were ineffective, possibly due to cognitive load
- 41. Conclusion Users reduce walking speed due to visual demand QWERTY outperformed ATs ATs are cognitively demanding Audio is overlooked when visual feedback is available
- 42. Future work More visually demanding conditions 1-step selection methods No visual feedback Play with visual attributes