Pondicherry Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Pondicherry Escort Servi...
Treatment as prevention wong
1. Treatment as Prevention
Michael Wong, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center
Harvard Medical School
Massachusetts Department of
Public Health
2. Accumulating Data that ART
Reduces HIV transmission
• Sullivan et al, CROI 2009
– Evaluated the effect of ART on HIV transmission rates in 2993
serodiscordant, monogamous heterosexual couples
– ART was prescribed to the HIV+ partner only if clinically indicated by
contemporaneous HHS guidelines
– Seronegative partner at time of study entry underwent q 3 month HIV
testing
• Risk for HIV seroconversion:
– Partner not on ART: 171 linked events, 3.4/100 CY
– Partner on ART: 4 linked events, 0.7/100 CY
– This difference is statistically significant
3. HIV Transmission Risk in
Heterosexual Serodiscordant
Couples Initiating ARV
92% lower HIV transmission risk in African serodiscordant
couples with HIV-infected partner receiving ARV therapy
vs couples with infected partner not receiving ARVs
• 102 of 103 cases of confirmed HIV transmission
occurred in couples with HIV-infected partner not
receiving ARV therapy
– ARV use in seropositive partner, adjusted for visit
and CD4+ cell count at initiation:
• Unadjusted relative risk: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.004-0.94; P = .037)
• Adjusted relative risk: 0.08 (95% CI: 0.002-0.57; P = .004)
Donnell D, et al. CROI 2010. Abstract 136.
4. Community Viral Load Mirrors Reduced
Rate of New HIV Cases in San Francisco
• Retrospective analysis of relationship between community viral load
(mean of summed individual HIV-1 RNA results per yr) and new HIV
diagnoses
30,000 P = .005 for Mean CVL
Mean Community Viral Load
association* 1200
25,000 Newly diagnosed and
Diagnosed HIV Cases
reported HIV cases 1000
Number of Newly
(copies/mL)
20,000
800
15,000 798
600
642
10,000 523 518 400
434
5000 200
0 0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Yr
*Data insufficient to prove significant association with reduced HIV incidence.
Das-Douglas M, et al. CROI 2010. Abstract 33.
5. Reduction in New HIV Diagnoses
in BC: Testing, HAART, and
Community VL
• Period of declining new HIV diagnoses in BC coincident with increased HIV
testing rates, increased uptake of antiretroviral therapy, and decrease in
community viral load (1996-2008)
– Decline in new HIV diagnoses despite increases in syphilis, gonorrhea,
12,000
chlamydia 1400
HIV-1 RNA,
New HIV+ Diagnoses (n)
10,000 Censored at the time of death or move
1200 copies/mL
8000 1000 < 500
Patients (n)
New HIV+ 500-3499
6000 diagnoses (all) 800
3500-9999
600
4000 10,000-49,999
400 ≥ 50,000
2000 200
0 0
6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 99 199 199 199 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Montaner J, et al. CROI 2010. Abstract 88LB..
7. • What we say to
patients: I have some
news for you; your HIV
test is positive. Now
that doesn’t mean you
have AIDS, but we
should…
• What patients hear:
Blah, blah, blah, HIV,
blah, blah, blah, AIDS…
8. Why does ART fail?
• Adherence
• Baseline resistance
• Prior ART not disclosed or not recorded
• Drug levels and drug-drug interactions
• Tissue reservoir penetration
• Provider inexperience
• Other unknown or yet to be identified
causes
9. Adherence Considerations
• Patient lifestyle (shift work, full time new
parent, travel, existing responsibilities)
• Concurrent medical history (drug-drug
interactions; DM; dual or triple diagnosis)
• Patient acceptance (“I feel fine; why should I
take medications?” “I heard these
medications can make you …..”)
• Patient life chaos (Is the patient’s medical
care their top priority, or are they worried
about housing, heating, food, running water?)
• Can the patient take medications reliably?
10. Dual and Triple diagnoses
• Dual diagnosis: active mental health disorder
and substance abuse (injection, prescription,
nonprescription)
• Triple diagnosis: includes dual diagnosis and
HIV diagnosis.
The impact of dual or triple diagnosis cannot be
overemphasized in this population.
11. Other medical considerations
• Concurrent active/chronic HBV infection
• Undiagnosed HCV infection
• Undiagnosed or untreated STD
including syphilis
• Undiagnosed/untreated LTBI; active
MTB infection
• HTN, DM, CAD, tobacco/ETOH use,
12. Pt Gender Age Presenting Conditions Outcome Time to Dx
1 M 34 KS, PCP, CMV and diffuse Died 4 months
large B cell lymphoma
(DLBCL)
2 M 45 KS, PCP, multicentric Doing well, KS 8 months
Castleman’s Dz, DLBCL and lymphoma
in remission
3 M 30 PCP, CMV, CNS Died 6 weeks
Lymphoma
4 M 32 PCP, CMV, KS Doing well; KS 6 months
in remission
5 M 65 PCP, MAI Doing well 3 months
6 M 51 PCP, Burkitt’s Lymphoma Doing well, 6 months
Burkitts in
remission
7 M 48 PCP, Hodgkins Doing well, 3 months
Hodgkins in
remission
8 M 49 KS, Hodgkins Starting chemo 9 months
13. Always work with your patient where they
are and remember this is dynamic.
For many patients, HIV therapy is
up here, not a basic need.
To Providers,
HIV therapy is
here
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
14. Conventional wisdom is that adherence
must be 95% to reduce risk of mutation
This means:
• If you are on a bid regimen and you miss 1
dose out of 14 your adherence is 93%
• If you are on a bid regimen and you miss 2
doses out of 14, your adherence is 86%
• If you are on a qd regimen and you miss 1
dose out of 7 your adherence is 86%
19. Transmission of Resistant Virus:
2006, pooled data from 8 US city
assessment, and Vancouver
• 0-14% of new infections are ZDV resistant
• 0-10% of new infections have PI
resistance mutations
• 2-14% of new infections have a significant
NNRTI mutation
• Reports of transmission of HIV resistance
to all ARVs exist
20. Conclusion
• HIV Treatment is an effective
prevention and public health strategy
– Requires infrastructure and funding to
sustain medications for existing and newly
diagnosed HIV+ patients especially with
universalized testing
21. Conclusion
• Treatment is not merely writing a prescription
for 1 of 4 first line regimens. Must consider:
– Baseline resistance genotype with reliable
interpretation*
– Assess the patient for support, life chaos, life style,
and readiness to take HAART
• I always hope to get them to be an HIV expert before we
start ARVs.
– Assess the patient for concurrent medical and
mental health conditions, and carefully assess for
drug-drug interactions
22. Conclusion
• Have an established team working with
you:
– Mental health expert
– Social worker/case manager
– HIV expert who can help comanage the
patient with you and assist with other
medical conditions
Hinweis der Redaktion
These data show that in serodiscordant couples in monogamous relationships, the HIV+ partner if on ARVs has a much lower risk of transmitting HIV to his or her partner than those who are not on ARVs. Extrapolated, tells us if we find HIV infected persons earlier as they have in DC, SF and BC, and effectively get them on effective HIV meds, we can decrease transmission rates in a very measurable manner.
These are data from San Francisco DPH demonstrating what’s being referred to as “community viral load” in log copies/mL on the X axis and new HIV diagnoses on the Z axis. Unfrotunately, no denominator data. Period was from 2004 to 2008. SF was a demonstration site in 2004-5 for verbal consent, and in 2006, went to opt-out testing. The take homes here are: 1) verbal consent was effective; 2) the community viral loads early in the demonstration were high– around 100,000 copies/mL at time of diagnosis– by 2008, the viral loads were around 15,000 copies/mL. The biologic impact of this is lower transmission rates (transmission is directly tied to types of risk behaviors and viral load). I can’t say more about this– the SF DPH is very careful to say the data are not robust enough to say they’re affecting HIV incidence yet, though the trend would suggest this.
These are data from British Columbia, Canada (includes Vancouver– very high HIV rates). The Canadians use an opt-out, verbal discussion testing format that started I believe in the mid 2000s. They’re finding trends similar to the SF DPH– community viral load down, getting more and more people on ARVs earlier, and the public health impact has been a persistently falling new case rate– in spite of continued high-risk behavior as indicated by the other STD rates (increasing syphilis, GC and chlamydia rates– generally used as surrogates for unprotected sex exposures).